Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

balls comes to rest against fallen OB stake


Note: This thread is 3709 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hit a drive that came to rest against an OB stake that was no longer standing up.  It was a small wooden OB stake and somehow had fallen over and my ball was now resting against it.  Do I get relief or play as it lies?  We also couldn't tell exactly where the stakes should go since we didn't see an obvious hole in the ground.

  • Upvote 1

Posted

thats a good question.

I would consider that the stake marks the OB where it lies even if it is fallen or misplaced un less the committee is available for questioning as to where the OB is supposed to be.

therefore if my ball is totally beyond the line from that stake to the next mark then my ball is out of bounds.

If the ball lies within the ground I would have it as it lies and play it someway or take a relief such as unplayable etC.


Posted

If an OB stake is displaced, it becomes an obstruction. you may move it. If your ball moves incidental to moving the stake, replace it with no penalty.

  • Upvote 1

Posted

33-2a/20

 

Displaced Boundary Stake

Q.A boundary stake has fallen down, or has been removed without authority of the Committee. The stake is lying several feet from the hole in which it had been situated. It is obvious that the stake had been displaced.

A player's ball comes to rest in bounds near the hole in which the boundary stake had been situated. The ball is in such a position that, if the boundary stake were reinstalled, it would interfere with the player's swing.

Is the player required to replace the stake before playing his next stroke?

A.No. If a boundary fence or stake is leaning towards the course and as a result interferes with a player's swing, the player is not allowed to straighten the fence or the stake - see Decision 13-2/18. It follows that, if the boundary fence or stake is leaning away from the course the player is not allowed to straighten it.

A displaced boundary stake is a movable obstruction. Therefore, the player may replace it but he is not required to do so.


Posted
32 minutes ago, Martyn W said:

If an OB stake is displaced, it becomes an obstruction. you may move it. If your ball moves incidental to moving the stake, replace it with no penalty.

The problem in ops case is that he doesn't know if he's in bounds or not.  What then?

my first instinct would be to play two balls, one assuming I can't move the stake and one assuming I can.  For the ball where I can't move the stake, I'd probably take an unplayable. Then take it to the committee afterward. The obvious problem with that, though, is that I'm not addressing the possibility that my ball is OB.  Is there a provision in 3-3 that would allow me to play out with three balls, lol? :)

good question op.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
16 minutes ago, Golfingdad said:

  Is there a provision in 3-3 that would allow me to play out with three balls, lol? :)

 

3-3/10

 

Competitor Plays Three Balls When Doubtful of Rights

Q.Are there any circumstances under which a competitor in stroke play, who is doubtful of his rights or procedure, may play a third ball under Rule 3-3?

A.No. If a competitor so proceeds, the score with the original ball or, if the original ball is not one of the balls being played, the first ball put into play shall count. If the Rules do not allow the procedure adopted for the original ball or the first ball put into play, the competitor incurs the penalty prescribed for the improper procedure.

  • Upvote 1

Posted

Boundary marker found on its side, possibly displaced further outside of its original position but unknown; original hole not obvious due to conditions. Ball lands inside of this marker. Procedure? Play as it lies?

Julia

:callaway:  :cobra:    :seemore:  :bushnell:  :clicgear:  :adidas:  :footjoy:

Spoiler

Driver: Callaway Big Bertha w/ Fubuki Z50 R 44.5"
FW: Cobra BiO CELL 14.5 degree; 
Hybrids: Cobra BiO CELL 22.5 degree Project X R-flex
Irons: Cobra BiO CELL 5 - GW Project X R-Flex
Wedges: Cobra BiO CELL SW, Fly-Z LW, 64* Callaway PM Grind.
Putter: 48" Odyssey Dart

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
5 hours ago, Martyn W said:

If an OB stake is displaced, it becomes an obstruction. you may move it. If your ball moves incidental to moving the stake, replace it with no penalty.

This how I had a similar situation ruled.  Probably the stake was in play a little more than in OP but wanted a ruling in a tournament.  BTW, a number of stakes were "moved" to clean up OB line and some not replaced.  It was easy to replace in the correct position after ruling for the following groups to have a cleared course. 

Darrell Butler

Coach (me) to player, "Hey, what percentage of putts left short never go in?"  Player, "Coach, 100% of putts left short never go in."  Coach (me), "Exactly."  Player, "Coach what percentage of putts that go long never go in."  LOL!


Posted

A pole in the ground may not be moved but one that is displaced and lying down is considered a movable obstruction, even more so in the event that you fear it may damage your club.  Move it

What's in the bag

  • Taylor Made r5 dual Draw 9.5* (stiff)
  • Cobra Baffler 4H (stiff)
  • Taylor Made RAC OS 6-9,P,S (regular)
  • Golden Bear LD5.0 60* (regular)
  • Aidia Z-009 Putter
  • Inesis Tour 900 golf ball
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
3 hours ago, pganapathy said:

A pole in the ground may not be moved but one that is displaced and lying down is considered a movable obstruction, even more so in the event that you fear it may damage your club.  Move it

Fear that it may damage one's club does not make it "more movable".  It is either movable or not under a rule.  If it is not movable, then the player may take relief by moving the ball under a rule.  That relief may involve a penalty (Rules 26 or 28), or may not involve a penalty (Rules 24 or 25), depending on the situation and the rule procedure that is being followed. 

You do not get more latitude for moving an object just because of a threat of club damage.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 11/15/2015, 11:26:53, Martyn W said:

33-2a/20

 

Displaced Boundary Stake

Q.A boundary stake has fallen down, or has been removed without authority of the Committee. The stake is lying several feet from the hole in which it had been situated. It is obvious that the stake had been displaced.

A player's ball comes to rest in bounds near the hole in which the boundary stake had been situated. The ball is in such a position that, if the boundary stake were reinstalled, it would interfere with the player's swing.

Is the player required to replace the stake before playing his next stroke?

A.No. If a boundary fence or stake is leaning towards the course and as a result interferes with a player's swing, the player is not allowed to straighten the fence or the stake - see Decision 13-2/18. It follows that, if the boundary fence or stake is leaning away from the course the player is not allowed to straighten it.

A displaced boundary stake is a movable obstruction. Therefore, the player may replace it but he is not required to do so.

 

On 11/15/2015, 11:44:29, Golfingdad said:

The problem in ops case is that he doesn't know if he's in bounds or not.  What then?

So it seems we have an answer to a question similar to the one posed in the OP, but not an answer to the actual question posed.  Martin's decision is clearly predicated on the idea that the correct location of the OB stake is known and that the ball is in bounds, but the OP stated that they did not know where the stake belonged since they couldn't find the hole it came out of.

What then?  Do they do their best to figure out the intent of the stakes (perhaps there is a curb or cart path that the rest of the stakes follow) or are they required to go by the nearest two OB stakes that haven't fallen over?  In that case, it's easy to see how a ball that is OB gets to be played and a ball that was in bounds must now be treated as OB.

Lots of potential messiness here with a course that is not well marked.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I am not as well versed in the rule citations but I thought that in the case you can't determine the OB line, you are to seek out the first two established makers between the ball and potential OB.  I know we play a course each year where there is an OB inside the course between two holes that golfers used to try to cheat on their drive to gain an advantage on one hole.  On that course, it is not uncommon for someone to lift an OB once in a while.  So, the guys I play with simply agree to draw that line before play every year.  We like the course but hate that local rule/hole layout. 

Darrell Butler

Coach (me) to player, "Hey, what percentage of putts left short never go in?"  Player, "Coach, 100% of putts left short never go in."  Coach (me), "Exactly."  Player, "Coach what percentage of putts that go long never go in."  LOL!


Posted
1 hour ago, CoachB25 said:

I am not as well versed in the rule citations but I thought that in the case you can't determine the OB line, you are to seek out the first two established makers between the ball and potential OB.  I know we play a course each year where there is an OB inside the course between two holes that golfers used to try to cheat on their drive to gain an advantage on one hole.  On that course, it is not uncommon for someone to lift an OB once in a while.  So, the guys I play with simply agree to draw that line before play every year.  We like the course but hate that local rule/hole layout. 

The simple solution is to 'dot' the stakes. A white dot sprayed at the base of the posts leaves players in no doubt as to where the OB line is. I officiated at an NCAA event a couple of years ago at a course which had OB on every hole -the day before the event I sprayed 1200 dots!


Posted

We paint the ground around the stake white, like a donut around the base of the stake.  Identifies where the stake is meant to be.  Not much different than a dot.  I have used dots on asphalt as posts to minimize painting anything that is permanent.


Posted
12 minutes ago, Martyn W said:

The simple solution is to 'dot' the stakes. A white dot sprayed at the base of the posts leaves players in no doubt as to where the OB line is. I officiated at an NCAA event a couple of years ago at a course which had OB on every hole -the day before the event I sprayed 1200 dots!

Yes, this is what is done when my HS plays a tournament on this course. 

Darrell Butler

Coach (me) to player, "Hey, what percentage of putts left short never go in?"  Player, "Coach, 100% of putts left short never go in."  Coach (me), "Exactly."  Player, "Coach what percentage of putts that go long never go in."  LOL!


Posted

"So it seems we have an answer to a question similar to the one posed in the OP, but not an answer to the actual question posed.  Martin's decision is clearly predicated on the idea that the correct location of the OB stake is known and that the ball is in bounds, but the OP stated that they did not know where the stake belonged since they couldn't find the hole it came out of.

What then?  Do they do their best to figure out the intent of the stakes (perhaps there is a curb or cart path that the rest of the stakes follow) or are they required to go by the nearest two OB stakes that haven't fallen over?  In that case, it's easy to see how a ball that is OB gets to be played and a ball that was in bounds must now be treated as OB.

Lots of potential messiness here with a course that is not well marked."

 

That from Golfingdad.  I'm the one that posted the original question and believe the ball was in bounds but felt you can never move an OP stake whether upright or laying down.  I ended up hitting it as it laid, advanced ball 20-30 yards, sent OB stake flying and didn't damage club or my wrists.  So all in all ok out come but it sounds like if you know you're in bounds then the stake could have been moved.


Posted

Provided the stake is displaced and lying on the ground, it can be treated as a movable obstruction.  However, you do need to determine, if possible, whether you are OB or not.  If it is not possible to determine, you need to play one ball continuing from there and another teeing off again (first ball is OB), mark the location and then ask the tournament rules committee to decide whether you were OB or not.

What's in the bag

  • Taylor Made r5 dual Draw 9.5* (stiff)
  • Cobra Baffler 4H (stiff)
  • Taylor Made RAC OS 6-9,P,S (regular)
  • Golden Bear LD5.0 60* (regular)
  • Aidia Z-009 Putter
  • Inesis Tour 900 golf ball
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3709 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • My next golf trip will probably be a short one, but I’m really looking forward to it. I’m thinking of staying relatively close, picking a spot with a few solid courses and making a long weekend out of it. For me, the best golf trips are about good courses, relaxed vibes, and time away with friends.
    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.