Jump to content
IGNORED

Best WR in the NFL?


bostonboy9416
Note: This thread is 2707 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, boogielicious said:

Exactly. Good/great QBs can make even average receivers look good. BR has a knack for finding receivers down field even when a play looks broken.

The O-Line has a lot to do with it as well. The best QB in the world will have issues if the D is always in his face. There are a few that seem to thrive under pressure, but they are freaks. 

- Shane

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
12 minutes ago, CarlSpackler said:

The O-Line has a lot to do with it as well. The best QB in the world will have issues if the D is always in his face. There are a few that seem to thrive under pressure, but they are freaks. 

Agreed, but the Steelers o-line hasn't always been good. BR seems to make something out of nothing. Rogers is similar in that manner. Brady just gets rid of the ball so fast it doesn't matter.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Just now, boogielicious said:

Agreed, but the Steelers o-line hasn't always been good. BR seems to make something out of nothing. Rogers is similar in that manner. Brady just gets rid of the ball so fast it doesn't matter.

They still aren't good. They just get away with a lot of holding. They were getting called for it when they played Philly. Just sayin.

- Shane

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 10/11/2016 at 11:17 AM, boogielicious said:

Exactly. Good/great QBs can make even average receivers look good. BR has a knack for finding receivers down field even when a play looks broken.

On the other hand, A great WR can make an average QB look good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Julio Jones needs some more love in this thread. I'd take him over Brown because he's physically more dominant.

It's really hard to choose between the two, they're really on a tier by themselves, with AJ Green and Odell in the next tier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 2 weeks later...

Beckham is overrated imo.  He makes 1 ridiculous catch and suddenly people think he is a god.  If he didn't get thrown off his game so easily by simple school yard taunting maybe I'd rank him higher but for now I think he belongs in the "still needs to prove himself" pile.

Anyway, with Calvin Johnson gone I think the best is probably Dez Bryant, or yes even old man Larry Fitzgerald.

Edited by Strandly
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 2 weeks later...

I think in terms of spotlight, Beckham is the go-to favorite because he's got freakish hands and is quite the personality which really draws a lot of attention to himself. But if I were to be starting a franchise and were able to pick a WR to be my #1, I would absolutely choose Julio Jones. He is more of an athlete than Beckham or Brown. He is more physical than the others as well and still puts up higher numbers despite being the only passing threat on his team which teams can key in on. Beckham is incredibly explosive but less consistent and not as much of a physical player as Julio while Antonio Brown is very reliant on his QB play or else he simply is not a Top5 receiver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 2707 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Welcome to TST @Camjr.   We're glad you've joined.  
    • Angle is not a factor. I hit the ball 100’ high. Par is net birdie. My CH is 16. The rough between the bunkers is like 10’ wide though. That’s not something you’re going to try to hit on purpose. Most of the area to the left of that is fescue/native vegetation and I’m pretty sure there isn’t a flat lie in any of it. It’s the second hole.
    • Hello all.  I'm about to be 57 yrs old, started playing when I was 16, and have quit and restarted the game more times than I can count.  I had started playing a weekly round with a friend, and finally made the jump to Senior A shafted Tour Edge clubs.  Instantly gained 10 yds with an easier swing (why didn't I make that jump sooner???).  Glad to be a part of the group. Cheers all,
    • I think I like this hole.  It is a clear "Risk-Reward" choice.  Since most of the shots in your cone cleared the bunkers I would say they are a minor risk and not a big issue.  Playing the aggressive line may give you 70ish yards in from what looks to be playable rough while conservative play is 120ish from fairway.  I know you said 70 vs 120 is minor for you but how does the approach angle in impact your results?  I figure both strategies are playing for Birdie since holing out from either is mostly luck. Looking at your proximity hole I think it says @ 50 feet when hitting from the fairway from 100-150 and 40 feet if hitting 50-100 from the rough.  Neither of those is an easy birdie putt.   I like the approach angle from the rough between the bunkers & the adjacent tees over the angle from @ 120 in the fairway but I really do not like the idea of hitting onto the adjacent tee boxes and that may impact my confidence with making the shot.  Also, too far left may be a worse approach angle then from the fairway short of the bunkers. For me this may come down to how confident do I feel when I reach that tee box.  If I am stroking it well off the tee leading up to the hole I would try for over the bunkers and the better angle in but if I am struggling that day I would likely opt for the fairway to take more bad stuff out of play.
    • Wordle 1,035 2/6 🟨🟨🟨⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...