Jump to content
Note: This thread is 3146 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

58 minutes ago, newtogolf said:

Shouldn't be a long tedious battle, she admitted to knowing what the proper procedure was for handling her SOS e-mail and willfully decided to manage it using a private e-mail server, that's what willful negligence is.  

While I know you're celebrating the victory, I doubt you'd be as elated if this were a republican or Trump or was guilty of the same offenses and was just given a get out of jail free card by a republican POTUS and DOJ.  

HRC being given this pass doesn't mean she's not guilty, it just means DOJ and the FBI don't want to pursue it.  If you're okay with someone who doesn't take national security seriously becoming POTUS then Clinton is your girl.  

DOJ has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that her intent was to break the law, or she was willingly negligent.

If you red the report the defense would just point to the find of facts as it relates to other cases.
If you have ever gone to trial you know this will take at least a year to prepare the case and witnesses, subpoenas, deliberations and jury selection. Than you have an appeal process.


 "In looking back at our investigations into mishandling of removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts," Comey said.

Furthermore the Defense would simply quote Comey: " "Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information..."

based on that quote no prosecutor would take this to trail!

In my Grom:

Driver-Taylormade 10.5 Woods- Taylomade 3 wood, taylormade 4 Hybrid
Irons- Callaway Big Berthas 5i - GW Wedges- Titles Volkey  Putter- Odyssey protype #9
Ball- Bridgestone E6
All grips Golf Pride

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

45 minutes ago, Elmer said:

There are also Trump supporters who feel Hillary should be in jail for "gross negligence", but have no issue with Trumps "deliberate fraud" with Trump U.

And is Trump is a Hillary plant, he deserves an EGOT, because he will be the best actor in the world!!!
 

But seriously, politics aside what is/should be fair consequence?

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

(edited)
2 hours ago, GolfLug said:

In the least I would think if nothing happens (that would not be right) AND she goes on to be the POTUS (that would be okay-ish compared to the option I guess), this whole episode will serve as a major deterrent in her acting entitled or high handed in the future. Well, one can hope.    

(emphasis added)

LOL....no way this will be a deterrent, the Clintons have an entitled disdain for the law or rules when it comes to them.  Whitewater, Travelgate, Monica Lewinski, Clinton foundation money from Saudi Arabia etal, the private server, KNOWING that it was against the rules.....

Now, that being said, what a sad state our Political System is in when our only two choices for President that have a chance of being elected are Hillary and The Donald.

Edited by metbid

In my bag: Cobra Bio Cell 10.5º driver ;  Cobra Bio Cell 3w;  Mizuno MP H4 3 - PW;  Mizuno MP T4 52º GW, 56º SW, 60º LW
Favorite ball Titleist Pro-V
One HIO....LUCK.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

19 minutes ago, Elmer said:

DOJ has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that her intent was to break the law, or she was willingly negligent.

If you red the report the defense would just point to the find of facts as it relates to other cases.
If you have ever gone to trial you know this will take at least a year to prepare the case and witnesses, subpoenas, deliberations and jury selection. Than you have an appeal process.


 "In looking back at our investigations into mishandling of removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts," Comey said.

Furthermore the Defense would simply quote Comey: " "Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information..."

based on that quote no prosecutor would take this to trail!

The case against Patraeus wasn't much different, yet they found a way to indict him.  Guilt does not relate to willingness to prosecute.  

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 minute ago, newtogolf said:

The case against Patraeus wasn't much different, yet they found a way to indict him.  

"a grand jury would 'indict a ham sandwich,' if that's what you wanted."-Sol Wachtler

But an indictment is not the same as conviction.
Once again Federal Prosecutors only like to take cases that they are sure will end in conviction.

In my Grom:

Driver-Taylormade 10.5 Woods- Taylomade 3 wood, taylormade 4 Hybrid
Irons- Callaway Big Berthas 5i - GW Wedges- Titles Volkey  Putter- Odyssey protype #9
Ball- Bridgestone E6
All grips Golf Pride

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm less upset about not indicting (if intent really is key), but I am upset that there is no administrative reaction.  Upset that people are treated differently in this situation.  Upset that the lefty advocates won't even acknowledge the seriousness of this, even if they still want to support her, the total lack of objectivity on a subject by subject basis is scary.

Not going to jail, but restricted from having any position that requires a security clearance would be very normal in any other case.

This did border on willful disregard.  So we have to decide (since it's now considered unintentional), was she negligent, or stupid, or careless.  I don't think there is any other options.

Bill - 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

20 minutes ago, metbid said:

Now, that being said, what a sad state our Political System is in when our only two choices for President that have a chance of being elected are Hillary and The Donald.

Perhaps Biden or Romney running as an independent would win the election.  I'd vote for either one of them before I'd vote for Hillary or Trump.

Crazier things have happened... For example, Hillary and Trump being the candidates for president is pretty crazy.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

 

5 minutes ago, Elmer said:

"a grand jury would 'indict a ham sandwich,' if that's what you wanted."-Sol Wachtler

But an indictment is not the same as conviction.
Once again Federal Prosecutors only like to take cases that they are sure will end in conviction.

Somehow I think the DOJ would take the case if it was Trump and not Hillary but I don't expect you to admit that.  

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

5 minutes ago, newtogolf said:

Somehow I think the DOJ would take the case if it was Trump and not Hillary but I don't expect you to admit that.  

You just can't plug Trump into this equation and assume all is the same. If you do then you must assume a lot other things like Trump would probably be a Politician instead of a Businessman. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 minute ago, newtogolf said:

 

Somehow I think the DOJ would take the case if it was Trump and not Hillary but I don't expect you to admit that.  

If the situation was reversed I don't think they would charge him either, 
Most prosecutors will drop or not charge cases they don't think they will win!

I read the directors statement, the FBI indicates that 32 of the 30,000 emails were considered classified and should not have been on an open server. That is less than 1%.

Furthermore the " the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent" and how similar cases were handled.

"Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent. Responsible decisions also consider the context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the past.

In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here."


https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b.-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clintons-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system

I knock Trump for a lot of things, but even charging him on these same facts is not efficient use of the Federal court system!

In my Grom:

Driver-Taylormade 10.5 Woods- Taylomade 3 wood, taylormade 4 Hybrid
Irons- Callaway Big Berthas 5i - GW Wedges- Titles Volkey  Putter- Odyssey protype #9
Ball- Bridgestone E6
All grips Golf Pride

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Now, as I turn on the tv, I see that Hillary has flown to a rally with the President on Air Force One....campaigning on our tax dime.

 

In my bag: Cobra Bio Cell 10.5º driver ;  Cobra Bio Cell 3w;  Mizuno MP H4 3 - PW;  Mizuno MP T4 52º GW, 56º SW, 60º LW
Favorite ball Titleist Pro-V
One HIO....LUCK.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

23 minutes ago, rehmwa said:

I'm less upset about not indicting (if intent really is key), but I am upset that there is no administrative reaction.  Upset that people are treated differently in this situation.  Upset that the lefty advocates won't even acknowledge the seriousness of this, even if they still want to support her, the total lack of objectivity on a subject by subject basis is scary.

Not going to jail, but restricted from having any position that requires a security clearance would be very normal in any other case.

This did border on willful disregard.  So we have to decide (since it's now considered unintentional), was she negligent, or stupid, or careless.  I don't think there is any other options.

Democrats quickly made this a political issue not one of National Security.  In fairness if it was reverse the Republicans would have done the same.  It's not a certain race or religion that is entitled in this country it's the elected officials who believe they are above the law and this is an example of it.  

I had a clearance.  We were taught above all to protect any information we came in contact with that was considered, sensitive or higher.  If an appointed staff member or elected official doesn't understand the importance of document classification and proper handling of such documents they have no business being in that position regardless of what political party they work for.  

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

10 minutes ago, metbid said:

Now, as I turn on the tv, I see that Hillary has flown to a rally with the President on Air Force One....campaigning on our tax dime.

 

Name me an incumbent president who did not use Air-Force one to campaign, either for their re-election or campaign for others?

In my Grom:

Driver-Taylormade 10.5 Woods- Taylomade 3 wood, taylormade 4 Hybrid
Irons- Callaway Big Berthas 5i - GW Wedges- Titles Volkey  Putter- Odyssey protype #9
Ball- Bridgestone E6
All grips Golf Pride

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

27 minutes ago, metbid said:

Now, as I turn on the tv, I see that Hillary has flown to a rally with the President on Air Force One....campaigning on our tax dime.

 

Which means Obama knew HRC wasn't going to be indicted before the plane ever left the ground.  

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

12 minutes ago, newtogolf said:

Which means Obama knew HRC wasn't going to be indicted before the plane ever left the ground.  

The FBI probably knew the decision they were going to make days ago. I would bet they let the President know about it then. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

35 minutes ago, metbid said:

Now, as I turn on the tv, I see that Hillary has flown to a rally with the President on Air Force One....campaigning on our tax dime.

That's ok, I'm sure he'll do the same for all the other candidates as well.

Bill - 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

9 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

The FBI probably knew the decisions days ago. I would bet they let the President know as soon as they made their decision. 

Probably knew as soon as Bill Clinton got off Lynch's plane last week after their secret meeting.  

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

5 minutes ago, newtogolf said:

Probably knew as soon as Bill Clinton got off Lynch's plane last week after their secret meeting.  

Every private meeting is a secret meeting. Saying it's secret gives it some unwanted connotation. 

It depends on when she got word from the FBI. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3146 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 140 - 2025-02-17 Got to GE pretty early. Few lessons and then a GEARS visit with a guy. Pelvis work, go figure. Put down two mats later with a carpet stay thing, and hit some balls before heading home.
    • If you own a Stack radar…
    • If you own a Stack radar (for now, it's limited to Stack radar only), and want to work on your wedge game… it turns out that wedge distances are 99% correlated to ball speed. So, with a small radar, you can practice your wedge game easily in a gamified way.
    • Day 11: 2/16/2025 Rince and Repeat: Just like yesterday I spent several 5-10 minute sessions working on what I learned on Friday.   
    • Quick update. So, I got the PXG Secret Weapon and I have to say I like it... mostly. (see below) I spent some time with it on the range and I even gathered some data in doors. I'm not going to post data yet, as my swing is still a bit of a work in progress and I'd like to gather some more data after I settle down a little bit more. But here's my review.  First as a driver replacement. ... IMO it is not a replacement, it's clearly more of a supplement... for me anyway. Not long enough to really replace the driver. For me it's about 20 yards short of my driver. It is longer than my 30-wood off the tee. (15 yards-ish) I will say it is easier to hit off the tee than my 3-wood. I get some of my best shots teeing it low, but I also get some of my worst. If I tee it about a full inch off the ground I get very consistent shots. Super repeatable. Amazingly repeatable even with my messy swing. Off the tee, I find it draw biased just a bit. You can tinker with the set up if that isn't your personal cup of tea.  As a 3-wood replacement. For me it's about perfect. It's longer than my 3-wood off the deck (my data showed 10 yards longer) and it has a gentle fade to it, which I love. You do need a clean lie, but I never hit my 3-wood off anything but a clean lie anyway. I found it interesting that I hit a gentle fade off the deck and a slight draw off a tee. I'm sure that's not uncommon. Again, you can tinker with the set up to optimize that if you wanted to... I don't want to.  It's clearly a lot longer than my 3-wood off the tee. Easier to hit off the tee than my 3 wood, and off the deck it's also longer. So, it's a no-brainer 3-wood replacement for me. I will say that over the years I've learned to use my 3-wood for this low-flying-100-yard-punch-out-from-under-a-tree shot.  I'll have to see if the Secret Weapon can handle that duty. But it's going in the bag to replace the 3-wood.  I also turned my 5-wood down from 19 degrees to 17 degrees. ... Incidentally my 3-wood had been 16 degrees. I used to always hit my 5 wood and my hybrid about the same distance. This adjustment helps my gapping a bit at the top of the bag. I can clearly hit my 5-wood farther than my hybrid now.  Overall on the PXG Secret Weapon. The good: It's clearly longer and easier to hit off the tee than my 3-wood. It's a bit longer off the deck than my 3-wood.  It's super forgiving... surprisingly so.  It's uber adjustable. ... Although I do suggest getting fit for it. That will save you having to (or wanting to) buy a weight kit just to try out the infinite number of set ups. The headcover is super cool.  The maybe not so good: Shots out of the middle sound great. Shots off the heal sound great. Shots off the toe sound ... what's the work... clangy? It's very forgiving off the toe and the heal. The flight and the distance are incredibly consistent. But the sound off the toe isn't great.  For me I tend to draw it off the tee and fade it off the deck. You can set it up to be biased either way, but in my hands I think if I set up a draw off the deck, that might induce a duck hook off the tee. ... In fairness that could also be where my swing is at right now.  It's pretty spendy. ... If I really stop and think about it, I paid $450 for a new 3-wood. Granted it's a better performing 3-wood. But for me it's really a 3-wood replacement.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...