Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3548 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 minutes ago, drmevo said:

Congressional Republicans could do a lot to avert that risk by simply moving forward with hearings for Merrick Garland.  He is widely regarded as a centrist and there are many Republicans who thought he would make a great SCOTUS pick before Obama nominated him. I would bet, if Clinton wins, Republicans will move forward with the nominating process during the lame duck session to try to prevent a more liberal pick from Clinton.

The President just vetoed that 9/11 bill with strong reservations; the Senate overrode the veto, then immediately chastised the president for not telling them how bad the bill they just passed was.

Garland's not getting a vote. The dysfunction in Congress runs too strong.

In my UnderArmour Links stand bag...

Driver: '07 Burner 9.5° (stiff graphite shaft)
Woods: SasQuatch 17° 4-Wood (stiff graphite shaft)
Hybrid: 4DX Ironwood 20° (stiff graphite shaft)Irons/Wedges: Apex Edge 3-PW, GW, SW (stiff shaft); Carnoustie 60° LWPutter: Rossa AGSI+ Corzina...


  • Replies 322
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
2 minutes ago, newtogolf said:

Accepting Garland is like eating something you don't like because you fear the next course could be even worse.  

Garland is still left of center and not the person we want to see sitting on the court for many years to come.  

Perhaps, but the chances of Donald Trump winning are not great. If he loses, they're going to get what they get, and there's a good chance the Senate will be turned over to the Democrats.

2 minutes ago, Chilli Dipper said:

The President just vetoed that 9/11 bill with strong reservations; the Senate overrode the veto, then immediately chastised the president for not telling them how bad the bill they just passed was.

Garland's not getting a vote. The dysfunction in Congress runs too strong.

Truer words have never been spoken. They're pretty much a joke at this point.


  • Administrator
Posted
4 hours ago, David in FL said:

The fact of the matter remains.  In the general election, a vote for anyone other than either of the 2 main candidates has the same impact as not voting at all.  

Not true.

A record-setting vote for a third-party candidate would not have the same effect as low voter turnout.

Plus, at an even more basic level than "sending a message," voters choosing a third-party candidate are still voters who might have, without a third-party candidate they supported at all, might have voted for one of the first two. The math doesn't work. I'm sure you can Google it, too, but… here's one example: http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2016/03/16/vote-third-party-candidate-vote-hillary/ .

You're wrong, and acting superior about it.

2 hours ago, drmevo said:

Perhaps, but the chances of Donald Trump winning are not great.

He's a few percentage points behind Hillary right now, I thought I saw.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I think it's Hillary at +3-4. 

Her odds are increasing again. She definitely got a post debate bump. 

IMG_0702.PNG

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
5 minutes ago, iacas said:

Not true.

A record-setting vote for a third-party candidate would not have the same effect as low voter turnout.

Plus, at an even more basic level than "sending a message," voters choosing a third-party candidate are still voters who might have, without a third-party candidate they supported at all, might have voted for one of the first two. The math doesn't work. I'm sure you can Google it, too, but… here's one example: http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2016/03/16/vote-third-party-candidate-vote-hillary/ .

I was mulling this over since this morning and here's what I think.  David is correct that the primary has the most impact because veering towards one candidate as an alternative vs. another is the most effective way to get a better candidate.  Or at least the one you want.

However for effective third parties to rise, you need to have them outside the political parties that exist.  They either need to get on the ballot as a member of one of the two parties or run a primary of their own and be on the ballet next to the existing 2.

What third parties have tried to do is get 5% of the popular vote in the general to get access to a lot of matching federal funds.  So their impact is best achieved at the general election level.

Since Perot I don't think we've seen anyone get near 5%.  Nader was under 3%.   Nader probably swung Florida to Bush, so that's a direct impact.   Perot got 19% and potentially knocked Bush out.  So there is a measurable impact in a tighter election (I consider Perot an outlier).   Voting for a third-party candidate is probably a net "the same as not voting" in this election because I suspect it's such a wonky year that third parties will drain from both.

2000 is an example where there was a direct impact.   Over 2000 people voted for Nader and Gore lost by 537 (officially).   Those 2000 people were motivated enough to vote for someone who wasn't going to win.  If a majority of them go and pull the lever for Gore, the election goes the other way (demographics strongly supported Nader voters leaning to Gore).  However what we don't know (and makes this speculation) is how many of them would have been motivated to show up for Gore and would that been enough?

David's statement only holds true if those voters would have not pulled the lever for someone else.   Or in other words they only thing that motivated them was voting for the third party.  It doesn't take into account a voter who is going to vote no matter what, and if the two main parties are on the ballot then that is who they have to choose from.   Where David is correct (IMO) is that it's not a vote for one of the people who have a shot at winning.

 

—Adam

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Guys, Donald Trump is going to lose in the biggest landslide since Ronald Reagan defeated Walter Mondale. I don't believe the polls at all.

I watched the first debate but I will not be watching the others. I'm going to play twilight instead.

It's Washington. Always expect more of the same. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
5 minutes ago, imsys0042 said:

Where David is correct (IMO) is that it's not a vote for one of the people who have a shot at winning.

That's implicit.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
3 minutes ago, Kalnoky said:

Guys, Donald Trump is going to lose in the biggest landslide since Ronald Reagan defeated Walter Mondale. I don't believe the polls at all.

I watched the first debate but I will not be watching the others. I'm going to play twilight instead.

It's Washington. Always expect more of the same. 

I think what has changed since then is that barring a candidate shooting someone on live TV, certain states have enough inbuilt support for one party that at least 15 states will go for one side.

I think Hilary has a chance to get states that otherwise would not go blue into her column this election, but Trump as bad of a candidate as he is*** will get double digit states.

*** Not talking about issues, policies or anything other than he is unpredictable, unconventional and has issues that historically would not win him anything in a "normal" year.   His unfavorables are extremely high but not high enough to still poll well in areas of the country.

—Adam

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

I saw mention of this, but I don't think it was ever actually posted here.

4Chan and Reddit Manipulated Online Polls to Declare Trump the Winner - The Daily Dot

You may be getting trolled right now without even knowing it.

Donald Trump supporters artificially manipulated the results of online polls to create a false narrative that the Republican nominee won the first presidential debate on Monday night.

The efforts originated from users of the pro-Trump Reddit community r/The_Donald and 4chan messaged boards, which bombarded around 70 polls, including those launched by Time, Fortune, and CNBC.

Edited by baller7345

Driver - Cleveland CG Black 265
Fairway Wood - Adams Tight Lies 16 Degrees
Hybrids - 18 and 20 Degrees Adams Pro
Irons - 4-PW Adams XTD
Wedges - 52 and 56 degree Cleavland CG16

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
6 minutes ago, baller7345 said:

I saw mention of this, but I don't think it was ever actually posted here.

4Chan and Reddit Manipulated Online Polls to Declare Trump the Winner - The Daily Dot

 

 

@Gunther was parroting those "polls" a while back.

On 9/27/2016 at 1:51 PM, Gunther said:

The pundits perhaps but most snap polling gave Trump the W.  

Screenshot_2016-09-27-12-43-50.png

 

On 9/27/2016 at 2:05 PM, Chilli Dipper said:

I'll take a wild guess: those were open online polls that were invaded by trolls.

 

In my UnderArmour Links stand bag...

Driver: '07 Burner 9.5° (stiff graphite shaft)
Woods: SasQuatch 17° 4-Wood (stiff graphite shaft)
Hybrid: 4DX Ironwood 20° (stiff graphite shaft)Irons/Wedges: Apex Edge 3-PW, GW, SW (stiff shaft); Carnoustie 60° LWPutter: Rossa AGSI+ Corzina...


Posted

Lol. Regardless of party or candidate affiliation, anyone who is serious about giving Trump the win in that debate is not to be taken seriously. I mean c'mon, even if he's your guy, you gotta be lamenting that piss poor performance. 

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, Ernest Jones said:

Lol. Regardless of party or candidate affiliation, anyone who is serious about giving Trump the win in that debate is not to be taken seriously. I mean c'mon, even if he's your guy, you gotta be lamenting that piss poor performance. 

All the "legit" polls say that Clinton beat Trump by a huge margin.  On average, about 20% poll responders thought Trump won.  I bet those 20% are the die hard Trump supporters.   In their eyes, Trump can't do no wrong.

The aftermath of the debate isn't looking good for Trump.   All the post debate polls suggest that Clinton picked up about 5 point.   Trump's latest tweet at 3:00 am today has made things even worse for Trump.   Clinton will pick up even more points in the next week's poll results.

What happened since Monday will sway enough independents and people on the fence to vote for Clinton or for a 3rd party candidate.

 

RiCK

(Play it again, Sam)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
10 hours ago, iacas said:

He's a few percentage points behind Hillary right now, I thought I saw.

Right, it's about 4, as @saevel25 pointed out.  That's actually kind of a lot at this stage in the game, especially with the trend expected to continue.  Gary Johnson's latest stumbles can only help as well.


Posted
44 minutes ago, drmevo said:

Right, it's about 4, as @saevel25 pointed out.  That's actually kind of a lot at this stage in the game, especially with the trend expected to continue.  Gary Johnson's latest stumbles can only help as well.

Clinton's lead is going to widen next week.   I wonder if Trump is up for another debate given how disastrous the 1st one was.  

RiCK

(Play it again, Sam)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
10 hours ago, rkim291968 said:

Clinton's lead is going to widen next week.   I wonder if Trump is up for another debate given how disastrous the 1st one was.  

You're forgetting how poorly Obama did in his first debate.  Trump will prepare better and not try to be nice in future debates.  Hillary drew first blood now it's all fair game.  

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
17 minutes ago, newtogolf said:

You're forgetting how poorly Obama did in his first debate.  Trump will prepare better and not try to be nice in future debates.  Hillary drew first blood now it's all fair game.  

I think you're vastly over estimating Trump's ability to act like an adult. 

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
26 minutes ago, Ernest Jones said:

I think you're vastly over estimating Trump's ability to act like an adult. 

Let's be honest EJ, Trump didn't win the Primary acting like an adult and for him to have a chance to beat Hillary he needs to pull out all the stops including a few cigar jokes.  

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
5 minutes ago, newtogolf said:

Let's be honest EJ, Trump didn't win the Primary acting like an adult and for him to have a chance to beat Hillary he needs to pull out all the stops including a few cigar jokes.  

Those are very different target audiences, though.

I want so badly to believe that cigar jokes or references to Bill's infidelity would only hurt Trump, but sadly I'm not sure it would.

- John

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3548 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I have been debating getting a launch monitor of some sort, if only so I can re-figure my shot zones (I haven't actually mapped them in years) and also to practice distance wedges at home.  I have to see if this works with either my current setup, or what my setup would be if I move it to the garage.  
    • Day 48, June 23.  After work today, I took 25 minutes in my practice room;  6-iron, same everything as yesterday except the time and count. 
    • Well, this is interesting.  I think we discovered a few months ago that I haven't been following professional golf in a while (my confusion about Scotty's footwork confirmed that), so at least as I aim to follow a bit more I'll get something new to learn with all of you.  My very quick read of Erik's summary makes me think this new Challenger series fits somewhere between Korn Ferry and the Championship (not Champions, but I know I'm going to make that mistake a few times if I'm not careful!).   My recollection is that there were already second-tier events among the PGA Tour;  the Bob Hope didn't have the same quality of field as the event at Riviera (whose current name I forget, although now that I say that, I realize the Palm Springs event hasn't been called the Bob Hope in a few years either).   With the absence of the FedEx (if I'm reading that correctly), does that mean no more FedEx Cup at all? Hopefully I'll have time later in 2026 to sit down and see what we're in for in 2027, where one of my goals already is to follow more professional golf.
    • The highlights as I see them: Championship and Challenger Series The creation of the PGA Tour and the PGB Tour, in the words of Joel Dahmen a few years ago. They're calling them the Championship Series (23-24 events) and the Challenger Series (20+ events). Both run February to August. They feel this will achieve three things: increasing the consistency and quality of fields across the season creating a clear system for players to earn and retain status and delivering a more structured and competitive experience for fans and partners—all in an effort to strengthen meritocracy. Championship Series Structure and Eligibility The 23-24 events includes the Players, majors, season-ending events, and the Presidents Cup and Ryder Cup. These will be 72-hole events with a 36-hole cut to the top 65 and ties and purses of $20M+. 120 players without an alternate list. 90 players (roughly) from the previous year and 20 players promoted from the Challenger Series. Full eligibility will be finalized later this year. Sites (cities) to be finalized soon, but 10 of the 15 courses have already been determined. Postseason: includes retention and relegation and concludes with match play. The Tour Championship will also be played across a rotation of prestigious courses. Challenger Series Structure and Eligibility 20+ events. Running concurrently. Will feature players fighting their way back to the Championship Series or players graduating and on the upswing from the Korn Ferry Tour. Many of these events will be current PGA Tour courses. About 7 of the Challenger Series events will be during off weeks for the Championship Series with elevated purses and visibility. Purses of at least $4M, with cuts similar to the Champ series. 144 player fields. Competitive Fields for Both Series Players will be eligible for only one series at a time: Championship Series Players are not eligible for Challenger Series events. Championship Series members will have a known schedule with all events having the same eligibility. Players and Majors will have their own eligibility criteria. Championship Series players don't have to play all events. This begs the question about, say, the Canadian Open, and other "home-town" events that players might want to play, even if they're Challenger Series events. Will releases be granted? Promotion and Relegation At least 90 players will be retained in the Championship Series, and 20 players will be promoted from the Challenger Series each year. Battlefield promotion for two-time winners from the Challenger Series. Players relegated from the Championship Series will have a "last chance" opportunity to retain status, or will go to the Challenger Series. Criteria will be finalized before the start of the 2027 season. Points System New points system (not FedExCup points). Separate points systems for the Championship and Challenger Series. Elevated points in the Challenger Series for off-weeks on the Championship Series. More details tk. Elevated International Events in the Fall The fall schedule will include a limited series of elevated international events with top players from the Championship Series, with the intent to deliver in partnership with the DP World Tour as part of the Strategic Alliance. Last Chance Series The Tour will develop a “last chance” series of 4-6 events in the fall, with a limited number of spots on the Championship Series available for top finishers. Eligibility will include players relegated from the Championship Series, Challenger Series players, and other categories to be determined. Q-School continues, as do the Korn Ferry Tour and PGA Tour Latinoamerica. Also, Brian Rolapp is the new commissioner as of January 1, 2027.
    • You can download the PDF at this link or see the first page of it above.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.