Jump to content
IGNORED

Bryson DeChambeau's New Putting Stroke (Side-Saddle)


mvmac
Note: This thread is 2620 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, iacas said:

I don't think it actually has to do with the center-shafted nature.

I think it has to do with the rules re: the lie angle, as I previously noted.

From the article...

DeChambeau first used the sidesaddle method at the Franklin Templeton Shootout in December. He told reporters at that event: "I'm concerned if I start doing well with it, what will they do? It's within the rules. It's legal. Will they make a new rule? We'll fight it all the way."

Apparently he had some concerns himself that it might not be conforming before even submitting it.  He's very mechanically/technically oriented.  I'd think that the technical standards for conforming would be pretty easy for him to understand and ensure.  He had to know...

I like the "if I start doing well with it" remark.  So far he hasn't.  I'm wondering if he wouldn't be better off working a little harder on his game, and a little less on product development.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
26 minutes ago, David in FL said:

Apparently he had some concerns himself that it might not be conforming before even submitting it.  He's very mechanically/technically oriented.  I'd think that the technical standards for conforming would be pretty easy for him to understand and ensure.  He had to know...

From the USGA:

Quote

the projection of the straight part of the shaft on to the vertical plane through the toe and heel must diverge from the vertical by at least 10 degrees (see Fig. II). If the overall design of the club is such that the player can effectively use the club in a vertical or close-to-vertical position, the shaft may be required to diverge from the vertical in this plane by as much as 25 degrees;

I think that's the part of the rule that got him, not this:

Quote

Except for putters, all of the heel portion of the club must lie within 0.625 inches (15.88 mm) of the plane containing the axis of the straight part of the shaft and the intended (horizontal) line of play (see Fig. IV).

The shaft must be attached to the clubhead at the heel either directly or through a single plain neck and/or socket. The length from the top of the neck and/or socket to the sole of the club must not exceed 5 inches (127 mm), measured along the axis of, and following any bend in, the neck and/or socket (see Fig. VI).

(figure here)

Exception for Putters: The shaft or neck or socket of a putter may be fixed at any point in the head.

In other words, I still think the lie angle bit is what tripped him up, not the center-shaftedness. That makes no sense at all and feels like lazy journalism to say it is the reason.

Hell Paul Azinger putted with "The Thing".

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 minutes ago, iacas said:

From the USGA:

I think that's the part of the rule that got him, not this:

In other words, I still think the lie angle bit is what tripped him up, not the center-shaftedness. That makes no sense at all and feels like lazy journalism to say it is the reason.

Hell Paul Azinger putted with "The Thing".

Thanks, interesting.  Sounds like there's some subjectivity in that.  Still sounds like he knew he was probably on the ragged edge...

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
13 minutes ago, David in FL said:

Thanks, interesting.  Sounds like there's some subjectivity in that.  Still sounds like he knew he was probably on the ragged edge...

Virtually certain the lie angle thing is what got him:

That putter doesn't look like it's designed NOT to be used vertically. I'd previously said that maybe it could, but the USGA must have felt that the way he used it disproved that it wasn't designed to accommodate it.

For example, my putter I could putt vertically, but the heel would be WAY off the ground and I'd risk scuffing the toe on the putting surface all the time just to hit the ball. His putter didn't have those problems so it could be used nearly vertically.

On 12/15/2016 at 9:19 AM, nevets88 said:

Another view

 

 

On 1/9/2017 at 3:51 PM, natureboy said:

DeChambeau putter lie angle.JPG

Yeah, I'm not sure that cut it, especially since the back of the putter may look more angled than the front. Clearly he can use it nearly vertically, so I'd wager a lot of money it was the lie angle thing that got him.


Seriously… this does the opposite to reinforce that he's a smart guy.

  • Upvote 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 12/7/2016 at 7:02 PM, iacas said:

Wait… does Bryson's putter have an 80° lie angle or less?

Well, my my my ...

http://www.golfchannel.com/news/golf-central-blog/one-dechambeaus-side-saddle-putters-deemed-non-conforming/

Quote

The USGA declined to say why the putter was non-conforming, citing confidentiality standards when it comes to specific clubs and manufacturers.

 

Craig
What's in the :ogio: Silencer bag (on the :clicgear: cart)
Driver: :callaway: Razr Fit 10.5°  
5 Wood: :tmade: Burner  
Hybrid: :cobra: Baffler DWS 20°
Irons: :ping: G400 
Wedge: :ping: Glide 2.0 54° ES grind 
Putter: :heavyputter:  midweight CX2
:aimpoint:,  :bushnell: Tour V4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
1 minute ago, Missouri Swede said:

Well, my my my ...

What?  I feel like I'm missing something. :-)

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

13 hours ago, iacas said:

especially since the back of the putter may look more angled than the front. Clearly he can use it nearly vertically, so I'd wager a lot of money it was the lie angle thing that got him.

Even from this angle it looks to be well under 20 degrees. More in the vicinity of 9, though the camera angle may be distorting it slightly.

From the rule that was quoted, the rules imply that swinging vertically is not permitted, but only stipulates that such a swing creates a larger minimum lie angle on the club. Seems like the intent was to prevent vertical strokes, but I read 'as much as' as an upper limit to the required lie angle. Why didn't they just ban the vertical stroke?

It's possible a 25 degree change (shown in 2nd angle below) may effectively put the clubhead in an awkward spot for contact, but DeChambeau's model is pretty narrow.

hjfyt575.JPG

Kevin

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Does anyone know if he went back to a traditional stroke this week?

 

 

stats.png

"No man goes round boasting of his vices,” he said, “except golfers." 

-- Det. Elk in The Twister by Edgar Wallace

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
9 hours ago, natureboy said:

Even from this angle it looks to be well under 20 degrees.

The rule is 10 degrees. Or 80, if you want to measure it from horizontal.

9 hours ago, natureboy said:

From the rule that was quoted, the rules imply that swinging vertically is not permitted, but only stipulates that such a swing creates a larger minimum lie angle on the club. Seems like the intent was to prevent vertical strokes, but I read 'as much as' as an upper limit to the required lie angle. Why didn't they just ban the vertical stroke?

Because people would violate it on tap-ins, and you can't have people out there with protractors during a round checking to see whether someone's stroke was vertical. You've argued that the rules are turning people away from the game and that's what you come up with?

The rule says that if a putter can be used more vertically, it may be required to have an even flatter lie angle.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, krupa said:

Does anyone know if he went back to a traditional stroke this week?

 

 

stats.png

If he did, it ain't workin' either....

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

Next he will move on to this style of putting.

 

  • Upvote 1

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

I still think it might be the lie angle of the putter more than anything, but this is possible, too, perhaps:

Quote

(iii) Putters (see Fig. IX) 

When the clubhead is in its normal address position, the dimensions of the head must be such that: 

  • the distance from the heel to the toe is greater than the distance from the face to the back; 
  • the distance from the heel to the toe of the head is less than or equal to 7 inches (177.8 mm); 
  • the distance from the heel to the toe of the face is greater than or equal to two thirds of the distance from the face to the back of the head;

bryson_putter.jpgI bolded two things that may be questionable. I don't know if the putter conforms in those ways (depending on what they consider the "face" - are the far corners part of the "face"?).

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

He's such a tool. Seriously. The wife has never seen him before but saw his cover pic on a recent Golf Magazine and said something hilariously inappropriate about him. What a nonce.

Colin P.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

12 hours ago, iacas said:

The rule is 10 degrees. Or 80, if you want to measure it from horizontal.

Understood. From that photo his putter looks to have 10* or less from the horizontal as implemented for the stroke. The other yellow line in my posted pic represents what a 25* angle from the horizontal (red line relative to a vertical shaft) would be.

12 hours ago, iacas said:

Because people would violate it on tap-ins, and you can't have people out there with protractors during a round checking to see whether someone's stroke was vertical.

Good answer. I figured it was something like that.

Edited by natureboy

Kevin

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Well he missed cut Farmers so he have plenty time to practice side saddle, may be go over to England a get some tips from the crocket players, sure the old ladies give him some tips. :hmm:

Titleist 915 D2-10.5°, Titleist 915 F 15°, PING G25 16.5°, PING G30 Hybrid 19°
PING G25 4-W, Cleveland RTX 588 Rotex 2.0 48°/52°
Rife Bimini Island Series Putter, PING DLX Bag
Sureshot Rangefinder, PING Sensor Glove, Srixon Q star Balls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


18 hours ago, colin007 said:

He's such a tool. Seriously. The wife has never seen him before but saw his cover pic on a recent Golf Magazine and said something hilariously inappropriate about him. What a nonce.

I read somewhere recently where somebody called him golfs hipster.  Seems apropos at this point - quirky under the guise of being innovative but really just quirky for the sake of being quirky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, Golfingdad said:

I read somewhere recently where somebody called him golfs hipster.  Seems apropos at this point - quirky under the guise of being innovative but really just quirky for the sake of being quirky.

I can kinda see that...But hipsters are more annoying than anything else. Harmless. But Bryson just comes off as a douche nozzle. There's something smarmy about him. Like he really thinks he's better than everyone else.

Colin P.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2620 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • More actual thoughts on the articles: Oh boy. I taught 5SK, and before that, I was S&T certified. Those experiences, for many good instructors, are additive. They're not "all" that they are. If I were to go through Scott Cowx's certification, or Dr. Kwon's, or James Ridyard's, or whomever's… I wouldn't be a "method" teacher any more than I am now. I'd be adding tools to the toolbox. He says there are "system" teachers, "non-system" teachers, and method teachers. Which one am I? A "non-system teacher"? So, I don't have any systems or structure? Or am I a "system" teacher with a bunch of branches and if/then/else statements? I don't know. The physics thing as it relates to S&T… yeah, that's already been discussed. Huh? Brendan, sorry, that part is bogus AF. Of course the arms go "around" somewhat. It's back, up, and in. Down, out, and forward. Plus, again, "energy can either be created or destroyed" isn't even right, as many of you have said. It's "neither" and it can be transformed, too. Plus, as others noted, that's typically a closed system: in our bodies we transform sugars and other things to create movement, energy. I'm going to move off this before I get totally annoyed… "These are the pontifications of a method" — no, the specific example he cited is the way everyone who has ever played good golf moves their hands - back, up, and in. The clubhead moves that way, too. I've seen this happen. This part might be the most accurate part of the article (it's no longer clear whether he's talking about this fellow or just talking in general here.) "Now here’s the sinister thing: The overwhelming information is by design." — If the instructor is as incompetent as he says, he's likely not doing any of this "by design." He doesn't sound bright enough to do so. WTF does that have to do with anything? Probably happens to some extent sometimes, but is that the instructor's fault? Or the student for not recognizing it? Also, again, this instructor doesn't seem to be bright (not that this article even really talks about the instructor anymore), so… I doubt he's doing all of this intentionally. People are found out eventually. I'm at a point where I get a lot of referrals from people who have noticed their friends playing better golf, and ask. Or people want to brag about their improvements, and that sells their friends. "As a result, these players couldn’t play golf." — Huh? I think he just observed when he was there. Not that he went out of his way to watch. 😄 
    • I am dying..🤣 Can one of yall come and pick me up from the floor? 
    • If you can’t, attack it. That’s the new age ideology. 
    • Is it possible that he writer is full of shit himself? "After months of listening and watching...". Yeah right, cuz that's so normal for writers do that just to get a single article out of the massive endeavor. I mean unless you are angling for a Rant-Pulitzer (Yup, it is a thing.. like, totally). 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...