Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3164 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I saw this in another post. I play different courses through out the year. Some are even brand new to me.

I can't remember the last time I thought about the slope and rating of the course. I don't even think that much about the total yardage of the course. I do pay attention to the where the 150 marker might be on longer holes, but that's about it. 

I just show up and play the course. Long, short, hard, or easy, I just go with what I see in front of me. 

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

What are you asking? 

What's in Paul's Bag:
- Callaway Big Bertha Alpha Driver
- Big Bertha Alpha 815 3-wood
- Callaway Razr Fit 5-wood
- Callaway Big Bertha 4-5 Rescue Clubs
-- Mizuno Mx-25 six iron-gap wedge
- Mizuno Mp-T4 56degree SW
- Mizuno Mp-T11 60degree SW
- Putter- Ping Cadence Ketsch


Posted (edited)

I think he is asking what is the dealio with the slope and rating. 

I had not clue either until I got my ass kicked on a very difficult course. I went home and started to read about how they rate the difficulty of the course. 

Now I absolutely pay attention before I make a tee time..It reminds me that not all courses give you a second chance if you hit them off line. 

A 120 slope for my handicap is fun, 117 is easier, 127 more difficult. 

Edited by Hategolf
forgot to mention

Posted
19 hours ago, Patch said:

 

I just show up and play the course. Long, short, hard, or easy, I just go with what I see in front of me. 

Yea I normally just show up and play don't pay much attention to slope either. 

If the place has multipule courses I will always play the easier one. I just ask when making the tee time which one is easier. For example when I play up at Penn State I always play the white course because the blue course is harder. 


Posted (edited)

In my area the white tees suit my ability best.  6200 yards or so 127 slope or so.

Tee choice is very important and I always make sure not to bite off more than I can chew when playing different courses.

The tips on these courses are best suited to the real serious golfers.  

When I see a few guys tee off from the tips they are almost always bombers.

Edited by Jack Watson

Posted

Our Michigan delegation of TST is playing College Fields in East Lansing Friday May 19th.   From the looks of the score card, the course is difficult for mere mortals; 69.9 / 130 from the white tees.  The blue tees are 72.6 / 134.     This is out of my ball park.    My home course is 67.4 / 118.    

The higher the slope number, the harder the course is for the bogey golfer relative to the difficulty of the course for the scratch golfer.

  • Upvote 1

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
On 5/12/2017 at 4:38 PM, BuckeyeNut said:

What are you asking? 

I'm not asking anything. I just don't pay attention to the "S & R" info. I just show up and play the course. 

Now if a hdcp  is involved, I will use the info, but these days, it's not a big deal. 

Edited by Patch

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I pay more attention to the distance if playing a course other than my own.  My home course from the middle tees is a par 71 with a 67.6/130 rating and slope, and only 5611 yards.  I can handle the difficulty but I could not come close to scoring well (mid-high 80's for me) on a 6700+ yard course.  I have selected tee boxes using distance but not the rating and slope.  

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

My home course from the white tees (middle) is 69.8 / 129 and just about 6200 yards.  I'll typically score 82 - 86 there.  

This past Saturday, we played a course from a set of mixed tees that was 71.1 / 141 and played about just shy of 6500 yards.  In the middle part of my round, I completely lost my driver swing.  For 6 holes (not including a par 3)... I was in the woods or in trouble and punching out after my tee shot.  

This is the 4th time I've played this course from varying sets of tees (69.6 / 135 or 71.1 / 141).  I've shot 102, 94, 93 and 95 there.  

I don't typically pay too much attention to the rating and slope of a course until after I've struggled, but I can tell you that once the slope gets above about 132... I really begin to struggle and my scores will go from the 82 - 86 range to the 92 - 97 range.  

CY

Career Bests
- 18 Holes - 72 (+1) - Par 71 - Pine Island Country Club - 6/25/2022
- 9 Holes - 36 (E) - Par 36 - Pine Island Country Club - 6/25/2022

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 5/12/2017 at 7:31 PM, Patch said:

 

I can't remember the last time I thought about the slope and rating of the course. I don't even think that much about the total yardage of the course. ...

I just show up and play the course....

You just arrive at a course, walk to the back tees and go. It works for you, how about the rest of your group?  

If I ignored the yardage, slope and rating of each course I play, I am afraid I would be in for some long days.

  • Upvote 1

Brian Kuehn

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, bkuehn1952 said:

You just arrive at a course, walk to the back tees and go. It works for you, how about the rest of your group?  

If I ignored the yardage, slope and rating of each course I play, I am afraid I would be in for some long days.

Same here.  I only drive about 260 max anymore on fairways that are soft.  I need to pay attention.  240-245 is about what I can expect anymore with some control.  200 plus yard approaches for me I need to think about playing two wedges versus attacking the trouble near the green.  I'm not what I used to be on swinging fast.  I need to think what that means for my strategy.

If the fairways are hard and rolling out I can be a little more aggressive but the courses I play are not like that.

Edited by Jack Watson

Posted

Back in the day, here in NE Ohio there used to be a course called Thunder Hill. From the tips it was 7,504 yards with a course rating of 78.5 and a slope of 152! Even when I could play a little bit, to go from there would have been suicide.

Unfortunately, the course no longer exists. That's a shame. It's the single most difficult and spectacular course I have ever played.

These days any course over 6,300 with a slope of 125-130 will be a test for me.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
6 hours ago, bkuehn1952 said:

You just arrive at a course, walk to the back tees and go. It works for you, how about the rest of your group?  

If I ignored the yardage, slope and rating of each course I play, I am afraid I would be in for some long days.

 When I show up as a single, I will play from which ever set of tees the group I am with that day wants to play. Most of the time the different tee boxes are not that far apart as it is. Usually maybe only a half of club........or even less.

If I am with my golfing buddies that I have spent the last 30+ years with, we usually play from the middle tees.

When we go out, we are out there to have a good time. We just want to hit some good shots, and make a few putts. Talk a little smack to each other. Drink a few beverages. Maybe smoke a gawd awful cigar, or two. Slope & Rating usually never enters into our thoughts when playing. We just play what's in front of us. 

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
4 hours ago, Patch said:

 When I show up as a single, I will play from which ever set of tees the group I am with that day wants to play. Most of the time the different tee boxes are not that far apart as it is. Usually maybe only a half of club........or even less.

If I am with my golfing buddies that I have spent the last 30+ years with, we usually play from the middle tees.

When we go out, we are out there to have a good time. We just want to hit some good shots, and make a few putts. Talk a little smack to each other. Drink a few beverages. Maybe smoke a gawd awful cigar, or two. Slope & Rating usually never enters into our thoughts when playing. We just play what's in front of us. 

This...

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3164 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
    • Day 23 - 2026-01-12 Finally outdoors again with 10 minutes of 7 iron work in the net. Also mirror work. Excited to get back on the range tomorrow and maybe do some film.
    • Day 10: 2026.01.12 Hit 25 balls at the range, working on rotating right hip during backswing.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.