Jump to content
IGNORED

Poor Instruction Is Very Common. Why?


Jack Watson
 Share

Note: This thread is 1498 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator

I don't think the pivot has as much to do with it as it sounds like you think it does.

I've seen terrible pivots, but people who just have a knack for "finding the golf ball" and some good hands shoot in the low 70s.

I've seen complete arm-swingers get to scratch golf with little more than a 45° turn. They struggle from there, and have a few compensations, but it can happen.

I wouldn't limit it to just the pivot. Some people just have a knack for "finding the ball" with some good speed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Just now, Jack Watson said:

Yeah,  bottom line is certain individuals can and do improve really really quickly.  They do so much much faster than average joe.

I'd say some individuals shoot lower scores more quickly than others… some are setting themselves up for a ceiling (or a scoring floor), too, by the swings they "create" for themselves.

It's more about "finding the golf ball" for me, though, than "making a good pivot."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The original point was why is there so much bad instruction. I think there are basically two reasons, One, there's money in them there bad golf tips! Or two, "I'm the smartest guy I know, so I must be the smartest guy on the range!"

As for swing styles and pivot, I played a lot of golf with a buddy who was all upper body. Total arm swinger! Legs looked like they were rooted in the ground. But, he was a big guy, 6'3" - 220, and he could crush the ball!

Oddly, or maybe not, he could not hit his Driver to save his life! So, he teed off with a 3 wood. Sound familiar anybody? And he was doing this 30+ years ago. Go with the club you can hit!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 8/8/2017 at 9:26 PM, Jack Watson said:

To me a person who refers to the swing as simple physics is really only advertising their personal lack of understanding of physics.

Yeah, no. My masters in engineering would say otherwise. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

(edited)
5 hours ago, Apoc81 said:

Yeah, no. My masters in engineering would say otherwise. 

Engineers can be very good at what they do.  In terms of mechanical/electrical engineers that I have experience with often they are very poor at troubleshooting.  Sure,  calcs and design are one thing,  but troubleshooting existing systems is another.   

I agree with Iacas.  The human element in our game is very different from simply designing some iron Byron contraption to make tests.

In fact imo in golf everything is a trade off.  

I stand by my comment that simply reducing it to some inane comment that anyone can play around with their move and become good by simple physics is ludicrous.

There is NO data that supports such a preposterous assertion.

One thing I will say is that for an instructor to be one of quality they must possess a knack for it.

People with a knack get to the root causes not symptoms.

I will say I definitely would never assert being a good instructor is simple physics imo it would have to be so much more.  In a way I think it's no wonder there is a lack of good instruction available.

 

 

 

Edited by Jack Watson
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Although poor professional instruction is common,  I highly recommend people going to pros and getting lessons over buying clubs and so forth.

Taking matters into ones own hands isn't gonna work 99.5% of the time

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • iacas changed the title to Poor Instruction Is Very Common. Why?
Note: This thread is 1498 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    Whoop
    SuperSpeed
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo and the code "iacasjun21" for 10% off SuperSpeed.
  • Posts

    • Best 92 ever for me. 2nd time on this course that has many elevation changes and hidden hazards. 6 penalty strokes and never really put anything together. But also hit everything solid. I'll take it any day.
    • Day 13 Full swing iron practice with a 6i, 8i and GW.
    • Obviously, if a person made 100% of them on perfect greens, then on substandard greens they would miss putts. So, it would never benefit them.  Let's say a golfer makes 50% of putts on perfect greens, and on bad greens 50% of putts made were deflected away, and 50% of putts missed were deflected in, then their made % would not change.  I don't know we could assume that the green would cause 50% of the putts to miss for the golfer who made 100% on perfect greens, but it would cause a certain % of their putts to miss.  I would say that it hurts the better putters more and maybe doesn't effect bad putters as much. A horrible putter it may never help 😛. If you're not even close for a deflection. 
    • Day 204.  Several times during football Sunday, I took 5-10 minute breaks to hit a few practice balls.  As always, the focus was on the slow correct swings.  I think several small sessions might be better for me than one extended long session:  I don't always have good discipline as I go past the 15 minute mark, and sometimes I catch myself raking in a ball and hitting it right away;  by contrast, when I consciously start a short session, I'm going to at least set in with what I set to do. 
    • (Written without reading anyone else's replies) I voted the difference would increase.  Here's my line of thinking.  The good putter would have been in or close on the ideal surface;  so while the bumps can keep some out, it can also push some that were going to be close into the cup.  Luck at least has a chance to be at least as beneficial as it is hurtful.  By contrast, the poor putters can't really benefit much from luck -- sure, it might cause a ball to finish closer to the cup, but they aren't missing by two bumps instead of one.
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. AmirReza
      AmirReza
      (34 years old)
    2. BushwoodCC
      BushwoodCC
      (55 years old)
    3. cozelos
      cozelos
      (36 years old)
    4. RollingStoppie
      RollingStoppie
      (52 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...