Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2106 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
18 minutes ago, HybridTurkey said:

I would like to know whether or not i should play them or sell them to buy a new set. And how much i could sell them for.xymZk

http://imgur.com/a/xymZk The clubs 3-9 incase the post didnt show them.

Not really worth playing because the grips look shot and re-gripping them would cost more than the set itself. Not really worth selling either, I'd say you overpaid at $19. You could use them as a display piece if you have yourself a man cave but that's about it.

:callaway: Big Bertha Alpha 815 DBD  :bridgestone: TD-03 Putter   
:tmade: 300 Tour 3W                 :true_linkswear: Motion Shoes
:titleist: 585H Hybrid                       
:tmade: TP MC irons                 
:ping: Glide 54             
:ping: Glide 58
:cleveland: 588 RTX 62

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Just now, SavvySwede said:

Not really worth playing because the grips look shot and re-gripping them would cost more than the set itself. Not really worth selling either I'd say you overpaid at $19, you could use them as a display piece if you have yourself a man cave but that's about it.

Thanks bud


Posted

Googled this because I really don't know much about it. But, it didn't seem to me that I saw much Wilson Staff equipment being sold in the "cheapo" outfits back then. Hit on a thread from Wishon Golf Technologies, which is authored by Tom Wishon, a club designer and engineer who knows his stuff. I respect his opinion immensely. He said the Dynapower was designed for better players, but because of some design quirks, were not easily reshafted. Regripping, however, should not be a problem.

I'd suggest regripping a mid iron, maybe a 5 or 6, whichever is your preference, and see if you can hit it. Long story short, you're not going to get very far, financially, toward a new set of clubs by trying to sell old sets of clubs! Even though many people have lost sight of how good those clubs were!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 minute ago, Buckeyebowman said:

Googled this because I really don't know much about it. But, it didn't seem to me that I saw much Wilson Staff equipment being sold in the "cheapo" outfits back then. Hit on a thread from Wishon Golf Technologies, which is authored by Tom Wishon, a club designer and engineer who knows his stuff. I respect his opinion immensely. He said the Dynapower was designed for better players, but because of some design quirks, were not easily reshafted. Regripping, however, should not be a problem.

I'd suggest regripping a mid iron, maybe a 5 or 6, whichever is your preference, and see if you can hit it. Long story short, you're not going to get very far, financially, toward a new set of clubs by trying to sell old sets of clubs! Even though many people have lost sight of how good those clubs were!

Thanks man. This answer helps haha. Ill buy a cheapo reshaft set and give it a go


  • 2 years later...
Posted

I have recently developed a bit of an obsession with the old-school Wilson Staff blades. For years I’ve been playing a mix and match set of irons that’s part Wilson bulletbacks, and part Titleist tour model blades. I finally decided I wanted a complete iron set, and snagged a set of what I believe to be ‘66 Dynapowers. And then I bought a set of ‘73s with the screw-in weights. I couldn’t resist.

 

Anyway, there’s something odd about the ‘73s and I’m hoping someone here can explain it. The bulk of the set is shorter than the older set. The short irons are the same length in both sets. The ‘73 6-iron is a tad shorter than the ‘66, and the 3-5 are a full club shorter. In other words, the ‘73 4-iron has the same overall length as my ‘66 5-iron. But from everything I’ve read, irons have tended to get longer through the years, so it seems odd that my newer set is shorter than the older one.

 

Both sets seem to have their original Ultralite shafts. The screw-ins have an extra sticker on the shafts with some sort of alpha-numeric serial number that matches across the set. The ‘66s don’t have this. I wonder if the screw-ins could possibly be a custom job?

 

I’ll try to update with some pics soon

As an unrelated aside, the leading edge on the screw-ins is the sharpest I’ve ever seen on a golf club. Wilson really took the blade thing seriously. I could almost shave my face with these clubs


Posted

Got some pics. First is one of the clubs I think is from ‘66. They don’t have the two diagonal hash marks though, so I’m not entirely certain of the model. If someone can confirm or identify.

 

Then a couple showing that extra sticker I mentioned on the screw-ins. Number appears to be O5J 22872

85E1A4F5-36E3-4FF4-88B2-12E6981BD803.jpeg

19265893-06AF-4B98-BBE4-4EF07355C00C.jpeg

15755E1D-303D-480A-86A9-A5958F9E94D9.jpeg


  • Moderator
Posted

I don't know much about Wilson clubs, but any possibility that the long iron shafts on your newer set were simply trimmed?

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
7 minutes ago, billchao said:

I don't know much about Wilson clubs, but any possibility that the long iron shafts on your newer set were simply trimmed?

That’s certainly possible, i think. But wouldn’t most people want to shorten their whole set by a uniform amount? Aside from my crude cut-offs I played as a child, altering club lengths isn’t something I know much about


  • Moderator
Posted
20 minutes ago, FrivolouslyWasted said:

That’s certainly possible, i think. But wouldn’t most people want to shorten their whole set by a uniform amount?

Not necessarily. Maybe someone wanted shorter long irons for better control. 

Another explanation could be hard stepping shafts that were already trimmed to playing length. Then your 3i will be the same length as the old 4i, 4i and 5i, etc., because you'd be taking the shaft out of the 4i and installing it into the 3i and so on.

I'm really just spitballing here. Maybe they're factory spec. I have no idea.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 year later...
Posted

On this topic with Wilson dynapower, I have a set of fluid feel 2-P with original grips. Clubs look great, a couple of the shafts rattle now and I was looking to reshaft. 
I have a set of .355 taper irons but they fit through the immediate hole but not quite all the way. 
 

does anyone have any knowledge on if it is possible to reshaft the 1965 “fluid feel back” version? 


Posted

Did you have any luck with the reshafting?  
I am having difficulty with a set of .355 I have but it appears the head tapers in to approx .317 at tip

 

any local knowledge out there?


Posted
1 hour ago, Mhp2020 said:

Did you have any luck with the reshafting?  
I am having difficulty with a set of .355 I have but it appears the head tapers in to approx .317 at tip

 

any local knowledge out there?

@Adam C may know...

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
14 hours ago, Mhp2020 said:

Did you have any luck with the reshafting?  
I am having difficulty with a set of .355 I have but it appears the head tapers in to approx .317 at tip

 

any local knowledge out there?

Contact Golfworks. They have adapters that may work.


Assembly Supplies at The GolfWorks

 

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
17 hours ago, Mhp2020 said:

Did you have any luck with the reshafting?  
I am having difficulty with a set of .355 I have but it appears the head tapers in to approx .317 at tip

 

any local knowledge out there?

You would have to bore out those hosels to get back to a .355 if they are in fact smaller than that. Just make sure it's not just a case of leftover debris in there. Adapters won't help. 

  • Thumbs Up 1

Posted

The ones from the early to mid fifties have a "DynaPowered" rather than "DynaPower" stamping on the back.

I still have the ones that my uncle handed down to me when I was a kid.  Also the MacGregor Tommy Armour woods and Spalding Cash In putter that came with them..

There's a long row of golf bags in my finished basement that almost make up a history lesson of my life.

The set handed down to me.

The set that was a graduation gift.

The set that was a retirement gift.

And the sets that I bought myself; considering my age, there's only a few of them.

 

 

 

Ping G430 Max....3, 5, 7, 9-woods (Alta CB Black 65);  Callaway Apex UT...driving iron (Aerotech i95);
Titleist T-100...5-9 (Aerotech i95);  Edel C Grind...48, 54° (Aerotech i95};
Edel P Grind...60° (Aerotech i95);  Ping DS-72...putter; Titleist Pro V1x...ball


Note: This thread is 2106 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.