Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Spieth in Danger of Tour Violation


Note: This thread is 2677 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
13 hours ago, Chris223 said:

So you don’t think theres a lot of tournaments that a lot of people don’t care about because of strength of field?

There may be, but if the better players were spread out across more events, you'd probably see less appeal in some of the better events like the Arnold Palmer Invitational and the Memorial, and no doubt weaker fields in those events too. I think trying to make them all much the same would take away from that somewhat. 

With Fedex cup points on offer as well as handsome purses, there'll always be at least a handful of big names at every tournament, so I think it's fine as it is. 


Posted

I think he should be penaliced but not with a suspension, that´s against the spirit of the rule witch is to make him play more. He should be forced to add 2 new tournaments in his schedule and play a minimun of 27 tournaments next season.
Another harsh one it would be to give him negative points for the next fedex cup and ranking systems for 1 year.      
 

  • Upvote 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
16 minutes ago, p1n9183 said:

I think he should be penaliced but not with a suspension, that´s against the spirit of the rule witch is to make him play more. He should be forced to add 2 new tournaments in his schedule and play a minimun of 27 tournaments next season.
Another harsh one it would be to give him negative points for the next fedex cup and ranking systems for 1 year.      
 

Well instead of just taking away 3 tournaments (which could be 3 a player didn’t play in anyway) they could penalize by saying the player can’t play in 3 tournaments next year that he did play in. Maybe say his first three player of said year are now banned for him (unless one was a major). Maybe?

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, p1n9183 said:

I think he should be penaliced but not with a suspension, that´s against the spirit of the rule witch is to make him play more. He should be forced to add 2 new tournaments in his schedule and play a minimun of 27 tournaments next season.
Another harsh one it would be to give him negative points for the next fedex cup and ranking systems for 1 year.      
 

I like that idea!

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, David in FL said:

I like that idea!

Me too. Does seem rather odd to penalize a player for not playing enough by having him play less. 

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 9/10/2018 at 8:36 PM, billchao said:

Is it just me or are the options of a 'more than' 20,000 fine or a 3 tournament suspension grossly disproportional?

9 hours ago, Vinsk said:

Well instead of just taking away 3 tournaments (which could be 3 a player didn’t play in anyway) they could penalize by saying the player can’t play in 3 tournaments next year that he did play in. Maybe say his first three player of said year are now banned for him (unless one was a major). Maybe?

How about he forfeits the Fedex points he earned in the first 3 tournaments he plays?

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
8 hours ago, turtleback said:

How about he forfeits the Fedex points he earned in the first 3 tournaments he plays?

In general or just Spieth? What if the player didn’t earn any FedEx points?

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 9/10/2018 at 6:14 PM, Vinsk said:

Well I don’t care if I see Tiger in the Honda Classic or not...

You know you care.....😘

  • Like 1

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
16 minutes ago, colin007 said:

You know you care.....😘

100%. Wouldn’t miss a minute of it. Totally busted.

  • Like 1

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

Just curious.... Does anyone know if there any other players who did just qualify for East Lake to meet the minimum requirement?

Maybe somebody already answered this, but does this happen often?

Edited by SPJr

- Steve

Driver: titleist.png.44b235e3fc0459caf96200c226b82945.png 917D2 (9.5*), 3/4 Wood: titleist.png.44b235e3fc0459caf96200c226b82945.png 917F2 (16*),
Hybridstaylormade.png.b56433b17b721d4da3cda2f79f9e73a7.png Rescue Mid (19*) & :wilsonstaff: D100 (22*), 5i-PW, GWcobra.png.f5a0c3806c04153a74a3b11aaf4308b0.png F7 One Length
Wedges:wilsonstaff: PMP (54* & 58*), Puttertaylormade.png.b56433b17b721d4da3cda2f79f9e73a7.png Spider Mini

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2677 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
    • Day 23 - 2026-01-12 Finally outdoors again with 10 minutes of 7 iron work in the net. Also mirror work. Excited to get back on the range tomorrow and maybe do some film.
    • Day 10: 2026.01.12 Hit 25 balls at the range, working on rotating right hip during backswing.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.