• entries
50
767
• views
26,433

# Switcheroo

3,933 views

Game 1: PGA Tour Player Switcheroo
Imagine a game in which you pair two average PGA Tour players with two average 80s golfers.

• Team A: the pro hits every shot that requires a Full Swing Motion (roughly every shot from 65+ yards), and the 80s golfer will play every short game shot and hit every putt.
• Team B: the 80s golfer hits every Full Swing Motion shot, and the pro plays every short game shot and hits every putt.

On a typical 7000-yard golf course, what might you expect these teams to score? Which team would win?

Game 2: Personal Switcheroo
Imagine a game in which you play two golf balls.

• Ball 1: You hit every full swing shot the way you normally hit them (righty if you're right-handed), and every short game shot/putt opposite handed (lefty if you're a righty).
• Ball 2: You hit every full swing shot opposite handed, and every short game shot and putt normally.

With which ball will you end up shooting the lower score?

I got tired of finding this from LSW and quoting it (often to have it completely ignored), so I made it a blog post, and now can just refer to this.

##### Link to comment

Yep. Such a beautiful explanation that anyone should be able to get. I've used this many times and it seems to drive the point home pretty well.

##### Link to comment

I believe I've finally convinced my golfing 4 some of the importance of the long game.  in the past, it has always been "Drive for show, putt for dough".      They have finally realized that the longer drive, the better approach shot leaves a shorter putt and leads to better scores.

##### Link to comment
Quote

On a typical 7000-yard golf course, what might you expect these teams to score? Which team would win?

I think Team A wins on any length course. If you took their additional length out of the equation, their precision with the full swing would still be a huge advantage. Even I can two-putt from 15' most of the time.

My interpretation of this may be wrong, but improving one's full swing does not necessarily mean trying to squeeze more distance. To me, it means learning to hit a 3 wood as accurately as I currently hit a 4 iron. That's not to say I'd hope to be hitting greens regularly with those clubs, only that I need to be able to keep it in play.

Right now, the knowledge that I'm likely going to lose a ball by pulling a longer club prevents me from getting closer to the green with too many shots.

##### Link to comment
5 hours ago, JonMA1 said:

I think Team A wins on any length course. If you took their additional length out of the equation, their precision with the full swing would still be a huge advantage. Even I can two-putt from 15' most of the time.

I think team A could even do better on a shorter course.  After all, how many short game shots will you have to hit if the pro is playing from 6200 yards?

5 hours ago, JonMA1 said:

My interpretation of this may be wrong, but improving one's full swing does not necessarily mean trying to squeeze more distance. To me, it means learning to hit a 3 wood as accurately as I currently hit a 4 iron. That's not to say I'd hope to be hitting greens regularly with those clubs, only that I need to be able to keep it in play.

Right.  And as you improve you will certainly have more average distance even if your swing speed and max distance stays the same.  Perhaps you currently hit good drives 240, mediocre ones 210, and poor ones 180.  Improve your swing and those numbers may change to 240, 230, and 220.  You'll have the same results in a long drive contest, but your golf game will improve a lot.

##### Link to comment

Or, instead of the full switcheroo, try only one half of the experiment and end up with a stupid conclusion:

What a dumbass.

##### Link to comment
• Moderator
1 hour ago, Hardspoon said:

Or, instead of the full switcheroo, try only one half of the experiment and end up with a stupid conclusion:

What a dumbass.

Experiment design matters.

##### Link to comment
• Moderator

Maybe people are in denial of how not good their long game actually is.

##### Link to comment
3 hours ago, Hardspoon said:

Or, instead of the full switcheroo, try only one half of the experiment and end up with a stupid conclusion:

What a dumbass.

It will be a lower score. It's also a bit contrived because by hitting the third shot on par fours… the guy may be dropping near a hazard and playing in from 168 yards or something.

More immediate gains can definitely be made in the short game. But the full swing has much larger gains to be made.

##### Link to comment

I want to see a golf pro salvage a par 5 after I've hit two tee shots in a row into the woods.

For the last few years I thought my poor putting was a glaring weakness (it was), but as I found out this year, the damage caused by poor putting is nothing compared to losing control of your driver.

• 1
• 1
##### Link to comment
8 hours ago, Hardspoon said:

Or, instead of the full switcheroo, try only one half of the experiment and end up with a stupid conclusion:

What a dumbass.

Fortunately, some of the commenters at the end of the article saw the problem. One even proposed the setup of "game 1" of this thread.

##### Link to comment
19 minutes ago, JonMA1 said:

I want to see a golf pro salvage a par 5 after I've hit two tee shots in a row into the woods.

This made me laugh.  I'm picturing you firing two tee shots into the woods, and doing a club/mic drop.  "Try to make par now, DJ!!!"

##### Link to comment
19 hours ago, Hardspoon said:

This made me laugh.  I'm picturing you firing two tee shots into the woods, and doing a club/mic drop.  "Try to make par now, DJ!!!"

Ha ha.

After losing 2 in a row off the tee I'd be dropping something... probably a few F-bombs.

##### Link to comment
20 hours ago, JonMA1 said:

I want to see a golf pro salvage a par 5 after I've hit two tee shots in a row into the woods.

For the last few years I thought my poor putting was a glaring weakness (it was), but as I found out this year, the damage caused by poor putting is nothing compared to losing control of your driver.

Or as paralyzing.  I've been pulling my driver the past ... month or so.  There are three tee shots on my home course where this is deadly as it significantly risks O.B..  I've debated hitting as low as hybrid off those tees (I haven't yet gone to that level).  A missed 3' putt probably doesn't cost you two strokes, or make you lose a partial in fear of it, and it almost definitely won't hit a passing car.

##### Link to comment
57 minutes ago, Shindig said:

A missed 3' putt probably doesn't cost you two strokes

Exactly.

##### Link to comment

I know this is basically rhetorical at this point and the point is proven, but just for some partial experimental evidence -- I did putt righty (I'm lefty) for a full round because I forgot my putter and it had little to no impact on my score. I did a claw/hockey-style stroke and it was just fine -- with zero practice ever.   I actually throw a righty putter in my bag once in a while just to mix things up now.

##### Link to comment

I would definitely have the pro laying up to 70 yards in almost all circumstances. All my money on team A all of the time. And short game is identified as a glaring weakness in my game.

##### Link to comment
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×

• Want to join this community?

We'd love to have you!

• ### Posts

• Day 164 (22 May 22) - worked on getting weight on lead foot - used the reverse stork drill and 3w.  Key was to stay as balanced as possible, did okay.  Followed with some lefty swings with the Dunlop lefty 7i, focused on the pressure of my weight on my lead “right” foot.  Then turned it back around and completed the drill session with full swings with my SLDR 7i and the hard foam balls.
• Correct. The R10 is much closer to the Mevo, not the Mevo+. Yeah. 😄
• At \$300 and requiring only 3’ for a radar unit, I don’t think it’s going to be very accurate. So no, it’s not going be dominating the Mevo market anytime soon. There are those of us who didn’t get the Garmin R10 at a fraction of the price of a Mevo+ (and Pro package) because of questionable accuracy. Hell, the gifs on their site show people “playing” the simulator without even hitting a ball. It’s basically a video game at that point.
• Yet another question about the technology for filming a swing. I read Erik's updated "Filming your Swing" blog post as part of researching my next phone purchase. My current phone, which is on its last legs, was able to record video up to 1080p at up to 120 fps (Pixel 3XL).  However, that camera isn't great at the moment (various reasons unrelated to its specifications) and I'm going to get a new device soon, too.  Its likely successor for me is only able to do 30fps at 1080p, so that won't work for filming a golf swing.  It can do 720p @ 480 fps though (device I'm likely to get is a Galaxy A42).  Will that work for this?  I realize the post says "at least 720p video," but I don't know if I should shoot for better than that (such as if it is expected to be outdated soon).  It also seems odd to me that a camera could do only 30fps at 1080p but 480 fps at 720p, but I know almost nothing about these things. I am also debating getting a separate camera for golf swings if this won't work;  my prior separate-camera is a Canon PowerShot ELPH 110.  I believe it tops out at 720p / 30 fps;  if there's a reasonably priced camera that works for my golf swing filming, I'd be happy to get that and not sweat the camera on the phone. Other than filming my golf swing, my phone is pretty much a communication device and podcast player, so I'm not going higher end except if doing so is the most effective way to get a good camera for my golf swing. (Apologies if this should have been a separate thread, but I figured it was on-topic here and I didn't think there was another forum than Member Swings where this would be an appropriate top-level post)
• Day 127: Played 18 this morning. Tried to simplify the mechanics of my priority piece (which is two things) into a feel but didn’t work great, so just settled on on of them after a few holes. Played okay except for a dumb triple bogey on #12.
• ### Today's Birthdays

1. DocP
(61 years old)
2. Isaac03
(38 years old)
3. phillyk
(32 years old)
×
×
• Create New...

## Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...