Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 8/19/2022 at 12:41 PM, Bucki1968 said:

I have a mixed set of Mizuno's. Some JPX Hot metal pros and some forged 221's. I'm always surprised more guys don't go this route.

That seems like an odd mixed set.  Curious what the exact mix is, and what adjustments were necessary?  There would be lie adjustments to match the 225 and 221 (even 223), so I’d imagine JPX would require some as well.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
6 hours ago, Denny Bang Bang said:

That seems like an odd mixed set.  Curious what the exact mix is, and what adjustments were necessary?  There would be lie adjustments to match the 225 and 221 (even 223), so I’d imagine JPX would require some as well.

I wouldn't think you'd have to make any lie adjustments. ... I guess maybe a half degree. Perhaps slight loft adjustments. But maybe not. My guess is you may want to carry (2) eight-irons. Or something like that. 

Here's my guess:

  • PW, 9 iron, 8 iron in the Mizuno Pro 221's.
  • 8 iron, 7 iron, 6 iron, and 5 iron in the JPX Hot metals. 

Those would blend nicely. Two 7 irons or two 6 irons would also work. It just depends on where you start to feel you need the extra help. 

If it were me I'd most likely do two 8 irons. But I'd have to test them to know for sure. 

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, ChetlovesMer said:

I wouldn't think you'd have to make any lie adjustments. ... I guess maybe a half degree. Perhaps slight loft adjustments. But maybe not. My guess is you may want to carry (2) eight-irons. Or something like that. 

Here's my guess:

  • PW, 9 iron, 8 iron in the Mizuno Pro 221's.
  • 8 iron, 7 iron, 6 iron, and 5 iron in the JPX Hot metals. 

Those would blend nicely. Two 7 irons or two 6 irons would also work. It just depends on where you start to feel you need the extra help. 

If it were me I'd most likely do two 8 irons. But I'd have to test them to know for sure. 

4 and 5 iron are JPX. They are easier to hit (for me). I have 4-G in the 221's but just replaced the 4 and 5 irons. All are 1/2 degree flat. 

Edited by Bucki1968

My bag:

Taylor Made R7 (x-stiff).
Taylor Made Burner 2 irons (stiff)
Cleveland Wedges (gap and 60)
Odyssey two ball putter (white) 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
3 hours ago, ChetlovesMer said:

I wouldn't think you'd have to make any lie adjustments. ... I guess maybe a half degree. Perhaps slight loft adjustments. But maybe not. My guess is you may want to carry (2) eight-irons. Or something like that. 

Here's my guess:

  • PW, 9 iron, 8 iron in the Mizuno Pro 221's.
  • 8 iron, 7 iron, 6 iron, and 5 iron in the JPX Hot metals. 

Those would blend nicely. Two 7 irons or two 6 irons would also work. It just depends on where you start to feel you need the extra help. 

If it were me I'd most likely do two 8 irons. But I'd have to test them to know for sure. 

Chris Voshall does a pretty in depth discussion on the necessary adjustments to blend the different sets.  I believe I saw it on YouTube, if anyone wants to see it I can try to find it.

1 hour ago, Bucki1968 said:

4 and 5 iron are JPX. They are easier to hit (for me). I have 4-G in the 221's but just replaced the 4 and 5 irons. All are 1/2 degree flat. 

Interesting you you didn’t have to change anything, based on what I saw from the Voshall discussion.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 8 months later...
Posted
On 5/19/2020 at 6:51 PM, billchao said:

I remember that article, so Mark's results don't surprise me in the least bit ;-)

It's why I'm not getting rid of my blades now that I'm playing cavity backs again. One day...

Have to keep in mind though that this is a high skilled player performing this test. His definition of "very poor strike" is a good strike by my standards.

Blades are going to perform better around the sweetspot than cavity backs, because by design, cavity backs have less mass behind the sweetspot than blades do. There is going to be more variation in the result from the collision of the club and ball. Where you're going to see the design advantage of a cavity back is farther away from the sweet spot than 5mm.

You are correct.  A player with IACAS' skill could could very likely turn in a , what I would consider a "dream round " with about any set of irons you put in his hands. Further, because of his skill, he likely would have better scores with Players' Irons than Game Improvement Irons.  But I appreciate those data he posted which confirm that skilled players probably should be playing with Players' clubs.  

I looked for data that was taken using an "Iron Byron" comparing the cavity back irons to players Irons.  I am pretty sure those data exist, and just as sure it will be difficult to gain access to. So I didn't find such data  in my half hour search.  But, I'll keep trying because 5 mm is less than 0.2 inches and we 20 something handicap players call that part of the sweet spot.  

Butch


Posted
On 5/21/2023 at 2:09 PM, ghalfaire said:

I looked for data that was taken using an "Iron Byron" comparing the cavity back irons to players Irons.  I am pretty sure those data exist, and just as sure it will be difficult to gain access to. So I didn't find such data  in my half hour search.  But, I'll keep trying because 5 mm is less than 0.2 inches and we 20 something handicap players call that part of the sweet spot.  

There used to be a video that showed blade irons had a tighter dispersion. 

  • Thumbs Up 1

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 months later...
Posted

Irons really have come so far, like my irons aren't even anywhere near new anymore, they are Mizuno JPX 919 forged, but they are miles and miles better than my old mp57s or mp58s

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 24 (4 Dec 25) - Spent about an hour working with the new 55° wedge in the backyard.  Kept all shots to under 20yds.  Big focus - not decelerating thru downswing and keeping speed up with abbreviated backswing.  Nothing like hitting a low flighted chip with plenty of check spin and then purpose to float a pitch of similar distance.  
    • Day 114 12-4 Put some work in on backswing, moving the hips correctly, then feeling over to lead side. Didn't hit any balls was just focused on keeping flowy and moving better. I'll probably do another session tonight and add in some foam balls.
    • Didn't say anything about your understanding in my post.  Well, if you are not insisting on alignment with logic of the WHS, then no.  Try me/us. What do you want from us then?? You are not making sense. You come here and post in an open forum, question a system that is constructed with logic, without using any of your own and then give us a small window of your personal experience to support your narrative which at first sight does not makes sense.  I mean, if you are a point of swearing then I would suggest you cut your losses and humor a more gullible audience elsewhere. Good heavens.
    • I have access to far more data (including surveys and polls) than you do with your anecdotes. I mean this as plainly and literally as possible: you’ve demonstrated that you do not. They would, one way or the other.
    • Yes, but you don't live in the UK, so you have no idea what we think about it here. It's a very different mindset here, to demonstrate the fact you should consider 9 out of 10 games we play here are Stableford, whereas you you almost solely play medal. Neither is right or wrong, it's just different  I'm trying to avoid swearing here. Once again, and for the 1000th time, I understand the system, I just don't agree with it. Is there anything wrong with that? PS, I do not have the time or patience to post my results, especially as they prove nothing  That's because 99% of the posters are Yanks
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.