Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1348 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
22 hours ago, saevel25 said:

I like the content these guys put out.

Their model has it... Alabama 33 versus Cincinnati 33. 

So, the reason why their model is 33 to 33. Alabama's run offense is average at best. Cincinnati has a very good pass defense. So, it is strength v strength. Alabama pass offense, versus Cincy pass defense. Cincy has a pretty decent passing attack, not elite. Alabama's pass defense is average at best this year. Passing travels better than running. 

Here is Michigan v Georgia... Michigan 25, Georgia 29. Yea, I kinda of thought this would be the scoring range. Two defensive teams. In my head, at that scoring range, who make its to 27 first wins? 

The only issue with Georgia is, they better bring that elite rush defense to town. If Michigan averages 4-5 yards per carry, their offense really starts to get going. 


I do hope both games are close.

The worst case would be both Georgia and Alabama crushing their opponents and then Alabama stomping Georgia again. 

I like these guys too. Metrics are one thing but they don’t account for the unmeasurable.  It’s like when Mike Tyson said every fighter has a plan until they get hit. Cincinnati will face a team of which they are essentially unfamiliar with. The speed, the power, the talent. Beating up on much inferior teams isn’t much preparation for them to play Alabama. Making good completions and covering the passing game when they went minimally challenged isn’t the same as doing it against an elite team. 
 

If I played basketball against a bunch of talented 10 year olds it wouldn’t be remarkable that I had exceptional rebounding stats. And trying to measure how I’d perform against players my own size would be a pure guess. Cincinnati has a dismal SOS. Three months ago they beat a good team. Since then they’ve played mediocre teams, and those teams were only mediocre because they too had dismal SOS’s. 
 

Alabama will humiliate Cincinnati.

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, Vinsk said:

Alabama will humiliate Cincinnati.

On paper, yes they should.  In real life, eh.

I love an underdog, pulling for Cincinnati.

Edited by Double Mocha Man

Posted
1 hour ago, Double Mocha Man said:

On paper, yes they should.  In real life, eh.

I love an underdog, pulling for Cincinnati.

I think it’s the opposite. Silly numbers show it to be a great game. I just don’t agree. Oh I’d love to see Cincinnati put up a great game. It would justify their ranking towards the end when everyone but Cincy had to go to war to make the top four. And as has been questioned, who other than Cincy? I get that, yes. But it’s almost a certainty that Cincy wouldn’t be undefeated had they played any of the schedules Ala,OSU, OkSt, and OU. All this ‘they earned it’ I don’t completely agree with. They beat one ‘ranked’ team. 

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, Vinsk said:

I think it’s the opposite. Silly numbers show it to be a great game. I just don’t agree. Oh I’d love to see Cincinnati put up a great game. It would justify their ranking towards the end when everyone but Cincy had to go to war to make the top four. And as has been questioned, who other than Cincy? I get that, yes. But it’s almost a certainty that Cincy wouldn’t be undefeated had they played any of the schedules Ala,OSU, OkSt, and OU. All this ‘they earned it’ I don’t completely agree with. They beat one ‘ranked’ team. 

Looking at the schedules, it says they beat 2 ranked teams; ND and Houston.  That is the same number of ranked teams that Michigan beat. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, Golfingdad said:

Looking at the schedules, it says they beat 2 ranked teams; ND and Houston.  That is the same number of ranked teams that Michigan beat. 

That’s why I put ranked in quotes. Houston? Come on…Michigan best OSU ffs. But look, nobody is gonna get anywhere discussing Cincinnati’s SOS. There’s simply no argument. It sucked.

Edited by Vinsk

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Ohio State QB throwing shade at the California college football fans...

Quote

“I think that does play a big part,” Stroud said. “You got to these USC and UCLA games, and to be quite honest, it’s kind of boring. There’s not a lot of people. The fans aren’t really in tune. They’re just kind of there on vacation and whatnot. You got to these other schools out of state, and their fans are kind of like fanatics. They don’t really care what people think about them. They’re wearing all type of stuff. They’re yelling at the top of their lungs. With that comes great responsibility because you do get criticized as well. It’s a slippery slope. It’s a two-way street. If you want a lot of fans to be supporting you, they’ll be hating on you as well. I definitely do think it plays a big part in leaving home because you just want that type of support.”

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

image.jpeg.41508561874fb84bafe11071e0053a89.jpeg

  • Funny 4

Matt          My Swing

 

 :ping: G425 Max Driver

Sub 70 3 wood, 3 hybrid and 5-p 639CB

Edison wedges 51, 55, 59

Sub 70 004 Mallet

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Thoughts on Cincy loss to Alabama..

Cincy is the 2nd team other than Auburn to keep Alabama under 30 points in a game this season. Which, is impressive to me with how inept Cincy's offense was. When Alabama is on pace for 90+ plays after the 1st half, you think they should hang 50+ on a team. Especially with 300+ yards in the first half. 

Cincy was highly outmatched with their offense versus Alabama's defense. No way to take the top off, all passes were less than 15 yards down field. Alabama could just play downhill all night. 

Yea, Cincy defense, especially their passing defense. LEGIT! 

Cincy' offense, lack of playmakers. 

Hey, they performed better than some power 5 teams in playoff games. 

It's 27-3 Georgia v Michigan at the half!!! I might think Cincy is a better team than Michigan. 

Maybe schedule isn't everything, but it is something. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

I might think Cincy is a better team than Michigan. 

Oh, you are just asking for trouble...  😁

Edited by Double Mocha Man

Posted
5 minutes ago, Double Mocha Man said:

Oh, you are just asking for trouble...  😁

I hate to do direct single game opponent comparisons, BUT!!!

Alabama beats Georgia 41-24
Alabama beats Cindy 27-6
Michigan losing to Georgia 27-3 at half...

Umm... Cincy gave Alabama more trouble on defense than Georgia. Mostly because they decided to allow a light box all night and cover the deep ball the entire game. They gave Bryce Young the Patrick Mahomes treatment. Nothing deep, you got to pass underneath all night. Which, Georgia, might want to run Cover-2 Man under all night at the NC game. Nothing deep, keep Alabama under 30. Just saying. 

If Cincy played Georgia, they lose about the same to Alabama... 27-30 to what 10 points? 

So, yea... I am thinking Cincy is better than Michigan. 😛 

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 minute ago, saevel25 said:

So, yea... I am thinking Cincy is better than Michigan. 😛 

Not disagreeing.  Just don't tell my Michigan golfing buddy who is suffering deeply at this moment.  


Posted

Lol! @saevel25 that’s classic! Gotta love ya. Cincy loses a CFP game by 21pts and you wanna talk about how good they are. 😃

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 minutes ago, Vinsk said:

Lol! @saevel25 that’s classic! Gotta love ya. Cincy loses a CFP game by 21pts and you wanna talk about how good they are. 😃

So, If Alabama is 30 points better than an average football team. Cincy losing by 21 points, means they are 10 points better than an average team. Which puts them probably in the top 30 of all NCAA football teams. 

What is worse, losing by 12 strokes to Tiger Woods, or losing by 12 strokes to some unknown average PGA Tour player? Losing by 12 to Tiger Woods might give you no shame when Tiger is on his A+ game. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
16 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

So, If Alabama is 30 points better than an average football team. Cincy losing by 21 points, means they are 10 points better than an average team. Which puts them probably in the top 30 of all NCAA football teams. 

What is worse, losing by 12 strokes to Tiger Woods, or losing by 12 strokes to some unknown average PGA Tour player? Losing by 12 to Tiger Woods might give you no shame when Tiger is on his A+ game. 

Well That’s where the playoff just wasn’t gonna be a good game. An average PGA tour player shouldn’t be playing Tiger in the semifinals of the biggest match of the year. And according to the committee we had the #4 best player in the country play the #1 best player and he lost by 12 strokes.  
 

Everyone was hoping for a good game with all the hype Cincy got ( which I felt was overrated) and we didn’t get one. Cincy never had a chance. They generated metrics from far inferior opponents save one ( ND). I’m not sure if  a 12 team playoff would’ve produced a better game but I can’t help but believe several two loss teams would’ve played a better game than Cincy did.

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
28 minutes ago, Vinsk said:

They generated metrics from far inferior opponents save one ( ND).

Metrics account for that. They account for the quality of teams they played. Cincy was fairly analyzed, fairly placed, and fairly allowed to play in the playoff. 

 

29 minutes ago, Vinsk said:

I’m not sure if  a 12 team playoff would’ve produced a better game but I can’t help but believe several two loss teams would’ve played a better game than Cincy did.

It wouldn't. Not with how some of these teams are built. NCAA is not like the NFL were the talent gap is not huge. 

If there was a 12 team playoff this year...

Alabama (Bye), Michigan (Bye), Georgia (bye), Cincy (Bye)

ND v Pitt, OSU v Utah (umm....), Baylor v MSU, Miss. v OU State

Though, I am not sure Cincy is #4 in a 12 team playoff. They can validate them to a lower spot. I am not sure you can give the #4 spot to ND who lost to Cincy. I am not sure you can give the #4 spot to any of the 2-loss teams either. Yea, we would have better 1st round game because no one is facing Alabama or Georgia. Georgia obviously being the best team all year, and Alabama catching fire after losing. There is still a chance that the same 2 games happen in the 2nd round of a 12-team playoff. 

The disparity in talent in NCAA is too large. Even with NCAA Basketball. Heck, no team seeded outside the 11th seed has made it to the final four in NCAA basketball. You could cut that tournament down. 

There should be some major changes to NCAA football in general before we go to a 12-team playoff. 

1) Make a smaller super conference that only plays against itself. Like, have 4 conferences with 16 teams = 64 teams, or about half of current division 1 football. 

2) Get rid of divisions in conferences so that good teams just don't crush each other every year. 

3) Make it so the schedules are created by the entire 4 conferences, and each conference plays the same # of conference games. 

4) Conference should not be by region, break up the SEC. 

Something like this...

image.png

Top 64 teams, based on 5 years of FEI Rankings. I basically counted up the # of times a team was in the top 64 in FEI Rankings. Teams who tied with 3 times in the top 64, I ranked them by average FEI Rankings. Then, with the 64 teams, I ranked them by average FEI Rankings and did a snake draft to create the 4 conferences. The top 4 teams, over the past 5 fully played NCAA seasons, were in their own conference. 

Just have a 12 game regular season, with a 4 team playoff. So, that would be 14 games Total played. 

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, saevel25 said:

Metrics account for that. They account for the quality of teams they played. Cincy was fairly analyzed, fairly placed, and fairly allowed to play in the playoff. 

 

It wouldn't. Not with how some of these teams are built. NCAA is not like the NFL were the talent gap is not huge. 

If there was a 12 team playoff this year...

Alabama (Bye), Michigan (Bye), Georgia (bye), Cincy (Bye)

ND v Pitt, OSU v Utah (umm....), Baylor v MSU, Miss. v OU State

Though, I am not sure Cincy is #4 in a 12 team playoff. They can validate them to a lower spot. I am not sure you can give the #4 spot to ND who lost to Cincy. I am not sure you can give the #4 spot to any of the 2-loss teams either. Yea, we would have better 1st round game because no one is facing Alabama or Georgia. Georgia obviously being the best team all year, and Alabama catching fire after losing. There is still a chance that the same 2 games happen in the 2nd round of a 12-team playoff. 

The disparity in talent in NCAA is too large. Even with NCAA Basketball. Heck, no team seeded outside the 11th seed has made it to the final four in NCAA basketball. You could cut that tournament down. 

There should be some major changes to NCAA football in general before we go to a 12-team playoff. 

1) Make a smaller super conference that only plays against itself. Like, have 4 conferences with 16 teams = 64 teams, or about half of current division 1 football. 

2) Get rid of divisions in conferences so that good teams just don't crush each other every year. 

3) Make it so the schedules are created by the entire 4 conferences, and each conference plays the same # of conference games. 

4) Conference should not be by region, break up the SEC. 

Something like this...

image.png

Top 64 teams, based on 5 years of FEI Rankings. I basically counted up the # of times a team was in the top 64 in FEI Rankings. Teams who tied with 3 times in the top 64, I ranked them by average FEI Rankings. Then, with the 64 teams, I ranked them by average FEI Rankings and did a snake draft to create the 4 conferences. The top 4 teams, over the past 5 fully played NCAA seasons, were in their own conference. 

Just have a 12 game regular season, with a 4 team playoff. So, that would be 14 games Total played. 

 

Really like all of that and have to agree 100%. My beef is how it played out towards the end. I watched several Cincinnati games and all of the OSU, OkSt, OU, Ala and Georgia. Cincinnati just didn’t match up with my eye test. And I know it’s probably all we can do with the current system, but I don’t like the ‘well based on how Cincy played against SMU this is how they’d do against Alabama’ concept. Didn’t really pan out that way. And so often the unmeasurable factors seem to prevail. 
 

Cincinnati was deserving only before they were dealt an easy SOS that put them there. There’s no way in hell they would’ve been undefeated with any of the other  top 7 team’s schedules. Ohio State didn’t make it because Cincy was a better team. They didn’t make it because they were put through a much more difficult path. And I simply refuse to believe that routing a shitty team is more difficult or valuable than squeaking a win against a power house team.

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
4 hours ago, saevel25 said:

Metrics account for that. They account for the quality of teams they played. Cincy was fairly analyzed, fairly placed, and fairly allowed to play in the playoff. 

 

It wouldn't. Not with how some of these teams are built. NCAA is not like the NFL were the talent gap is not huge. 

If there was a 12 team playoff this year...

Alabama (Bye), Michigan (Bye), Georgia (bye), Cincy (Bye)

ND v Pitt, OSU v Utah (umm....), Baylor v MSU, Miss. v OU State

Though, I am not sure Cincy is #4 in a 12 team playoff. They can validate them to a lower spot. I am not sure you can give the #4 spot to ND who lost to Cincy. I am not sure you can give the #4 spot to any of the 2-loss teams either. Yea, we would have better 1st round game because no one is facing Alabama or Georgia. Georgia obviously being the best team all year, and Alabama catching fire after losing. There is still a chance that the same 2 games happen in the 2nd round of a 12-team playoff. 

The disparity in talent in NCAA is too large. Even with NCAA Basketball. Heck, no team seeded outside the 11th seed has made it to the final four in NCAA basketball. You could cut that tournament down. 

There should be some major changes to NCAA football in general before we go to a 12-team playoff. 

1) Make a smaller super conference that only plays against itself. Like, have 4 conferences with 16 teams = 64 teams, or about half of current division 1 football. 

2) Get rid of divisions in conferences so that good teams just don't crush each other every year. 

3) Make it so the schedules are created by the entire 4 conferences, and each conference plays the same # of conference games. 

4) Conference should not be by region, break up the SEC. 

Something like this...

image.png

Top 64 teams, based on 5 years of FEI Rankings. I basically counted up the # of times a team was in the top 64 in FEI Rankings. Teams who tied with 3 times in the top 64, I ranked them by average FEI Rankings. Then, with the 64 teams, I ranked them by average FEI Rankings and did a snake draft to create the 4 conferences. The top 4 teams, over the past 5 fully played NCAA seasons, were in their own conference. 

Just have a 12 game regular season, with a 4 team playoff. So, that would be 14 games Total played. 

 

This would never work.   The rivalries are all about the money.   It always is and always will be.   Alabama / Auburn, Michigan / Ohio will  play forever in our lifetime.   Tradition and money drives sports.   Ask your alums if they would give up the Michigan game.   I bet their first thought would be to ask what you've been smoking.  

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1348 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • The first post is here:   Do you have an overly long backswing that ruins sequencing and leads to poor shots? In nearly 20 years of teaching, I've found 5 common faults. You don't have to swing like Jon Rahm, but a shorter swing will probably help you #PlayBetter golf. Which is your fatal flaw? #1 - Trail Elbow Bend Average golfers ♥️ bending their trail elbows. It can feel powerful! Tour players bend their trail elbows MUCH less. A wider trail elbow creates a longer hand path and preserves structure. It also forces more chest turn; not everything longer is bad! Overly bending your trail elbow can wreak havoc on your swing. It pulls your arms across/beside your body. It requires more time to get the elbow bend "out," ruining your sequencing. The lead arm often bends and low point control is destroyed. The misconception is that it will create more speed, but that's often the opposite of what happens. Golfers often feel they swing "easier" but FASTER with wider trail elbows. Want to play better golf with a shorter backswing? Don't bend your elbow so much. #2 - Hip (Pelvis) Turn I see this all the time: a golfer's hips are only 5-10° open at impact, but he turns them back 60°+ in the backswing. Unless your father is The Flash, your hips are probably not getting 40° open at impact from there! That's more rotation than Rory! Golfers who over-rotate their pelvis often over-turn everything - trail thigh/knee, chest/shoulders, etc. They have more work to do in the same ~0.3 seconds as a Tour player who turns back ~40° and turns through to impact 40° or so. Want to shorten the pelvis turn a bit? Learn to internally rotate into the trail hip, externally rotate away from the lead hip, and do "less" with your knees (extending and flexing) in the backswing. Learn some separation between chest and pelvis. #3 - Rolled Inside and Lifted Up Amateurs love to send the club (and their arms) around them. You see the red golfer here all the time at your local range. The problem? Your arms mostly take the club UP, not around. Going around creates no height until you have to hoist the club up in the air because you're halfway through your backswing and the club is waist high and three feet behind your butt! 😄  Learn to use your arms properly. Arms = up/down, body = around. Most golfers learn how little their arms really have to do in the backswing. The picture here is all you've gotta do (but maybe with a properly sized club!). #4 - Wide Takeaway Width is good, no? Yes, if you're wide at the right time and in the right spots. Golfers seeking width often don't hinge the club much early in the backswing… forcing them to hinge it late. Hinging the club late puts a lot of momentum into the club, wrists, and elbow just before we need to make a hairpin turn in transition and go the other direction at the start of the downswing. When you're driving into a hairpin curve, you go into it slowly and accelerate out of it. Waiting to hinge is like coasting down the straightaway and accelerating into the hairpin. Your car ends up off the road, and your golf ball off the course. Give hinging at a faster rate (earlier) then coasting to the top a try. You'll be able to accelerate out of the hairpin without the momentum of the arms and club pulling in the wrong direction.   #5 - Sway and Tilt Some sway is good but sometimes I see a golfer who just… keeps… swaying… Their chest leans forward a bit for balance, resulting in a whole lotta lean. The green line below is the GEARS "virtual spine." Pros sway a bit, but stay ~90°. This sway often combines with the extra pelvis turn because this golfer is not putting ANY limits on what the "middle of them" (their pelvis) is doing in the backswing. These golfers spend a lot of energy just to get back to neutral! The best players begin pushing forward EARLY in the backswing. Often before the club gets much past their trail foot! Pushing forward (softly) first stops your backward sway and then begins to get your body moving toward the target. Push softly, but early!  
    • I  no longer spend the time and effort trying to sell something I no longer need. Instead, if the clubs are in good condition, I go to my local golf shop or even Dicks Sporting Goods. Trade the clubs in for store credit and pick up something I need, like a hat. Cause you always need another golf hat!
    • Day 205 3-10 Wider backswing, reconnecting arm in downswing/arching wrist through. Also worked on less pause at the top. Recorded and hit a few foam balls. 
    • I really enjoyed this episode with Nick from Callaway. I didn't know the problem with swing weight and female golfers, but it makes sense. I actually think swing weight might not matter that much. If everyone senses the club differently, then wouldn't it mean that people might feel swing weights differently? Swing weight is a way to classify how heavy a club feels during the swing. Yet for a 70-year-old golfer, a D0 might feel like a D4 for a 25-year-old golfer? I think stronger people would consider higher swing weights lighter. Maybe a C8 equals a D2 in terms of feel?   
    • Wordle 1,725 3/6 ⬜🟨⬜🟨⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.