Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Is Phil the 3rd Best Player of All Time?


Note: This thread is 1641 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Posted
2 hours ago, Big Lex said:

I think it helps everyone.

That’s like saying auto-tune helps the great singers as much as it helps the bad singers.

It’s just not true.

  • Like 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
28 minutes ago, Vinsk said:

Tour level players don’t mess with their swings like we do. At least not ‘carelessly.’ They can bring the face to the ball pretty damn accurately almost every time. I think the small margin of mis-hits corrected with technology are helping the lesser talented.

I read somewhere that many tour players can swing harder than they do during competitions because the loss in accuracy is not worth it. If that is not true then it does change things.


Posted
2 hours ago, saevel25 said:

In the end, tech has helped people who don't strike the ball as good as other golfers. 

this ^^.    Very few hit the ball 300 yds when Tiger started.   Most do now with newer tech and fitting.   When Tiger started, he was hitting driver 8 iron into greens where other good pros were hitting driver 4 iron.   Distance is a skill and newer tech has narrowed the gap.

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Let's not forget about the modern ball. My buddy on the tour went from Taylor Made first gen metal with balata Titleist 90 and gained 15 yards in a few years with 2nd Gen metal and newer ball. I want to say @1996 to 2001 we saw some big jumps. 

Callaway AI Smoke TD Max 10.5* | Cobra Big Tour 15.5* | Rad Tour 18.5* | Titleist U500 4i | T100 5-P | Vokey 50/8* F, 54/10* S,  58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback 1


Posted
1 hour ago, dennyjones said:

this ^^.    Very few hit the ball 300 yds when Tiger started.   Most do now with newer tech and fitting.   When Tiger started, he was hitting driver 8 iron into greens where other good pros were hitting driver 4 iron.   Distance is a skill and newer tech has narrowed the gap.

Tiger was always renowned for working out a lot relative to others and that gap has definitely narrowed.


Posted
3 hours ago, Big Lex said:

Can we all agree that if Phil wins at Torrey, he is without question #3 all time? 

Yes! 

Callaway AI Smoke TD Max 10.5* | Cobra Big Tour 15.5* | Rad Tour 18.5* | Titleist U500 4i | T100 5-P | Vokey 50/8* F, 54/10* S,  58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback 1


  • Administrator
Posted
4 hours ago, Big Lex said:

If we take a really broad view, it's almost certain that technology helps better players more than poor players.

The opposite.

4 hours ago, Big Lex said:

yet the average club golfer is no better than he's been in 50 years, probably

Also wrong.

4 hours ago, Big Lex said:

I think if we could reverse Jack and all his competition with Tiger and all his - reverse the eras - Jack might dominate more than he did in his day, because of the equipment and how it would reward his superior technique. 

No. He would not. He would win less often.

4 hours ago, saevel25 said:

If comparing PGA Tour players to 30 handicap golfers, maybe. 

If comparing Elite PGA Tour players to the bottom half of the PGA Tour, then no.

QFT.

Many other good points, @saevel25.

4 hours ago, Big Lex said:

True, but I would be shocked if he wasn't a top 50 player today.

Oh my, a top 50 versus what he was in his time?

He would have won less frequently, less often, less in total. Likely significantly so.

3 hours ago, Big Lex said:

Let's say Deane Beaman's average error is 6% off perfect. Let's say Jack's was 2% off perfect. Now imagine a club which gives you a 2% correction. Now, Jack's errors have all been converted to perfect shots, while Beaman is still averaging a 4% error.  Who's score will benefit more?

That's not how that works.

3 hours ago, Big Lex said:

There are just too many variables to deceive ourselves into thinking we can properly account for them all.

It's not complicated. You look at the players and who they played against and their records. And then you adjust them as you see fit to determine what you think.

Players can only beat the people they played against, but if they only managed to do it 8 times in majors and 39 times in all PGA Tour events 50 years ago, you can value those numbers differently than 6 and 45 today (or whatever the numbers are).

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, TourSpoon said:

Yes! 

Personally, I don't think he has to win another major to be considered #3. It would be icing on the cake so to speak, but I don't think he needs it to be #3.

Thomas Gralinski, 2458080

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, Billy Z said:

Personally, I don't think he has to win another major to be considered #3. It would be icing on the cake so to speak, but I don't think he needs it to be #3.

Think you would say it is what removes any question about it.


Posted
7 hours ago, Vinsk said:

But the advantage of hitting the sweet spot is less than the advantage that lesser ball strikers gain with the more forgiving miss. They’re ‘poor ball striking’ is less a disadvantage due to the technology.

Exactly.

Anyone who played in the 70s knows that drives they sometimes hit these days high on the toe that go a good distance but right (for a RH player)  would have just been disastrous with a laminated or persimmon or maple driver. When the new drivers came in, the huge advantage players like Norman had off the tee evaporated because everyone suddenly had a larger margin of error off the tee. Being able to consistently hit it dead centre wasn't the advantage it once was.

  • Like 1

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


Posted
9 hours ago, Shorty said:

Exactly.

Anyone who played in the 70s knows that drives they sometimes hit these days high on the toe that go a good distance but right (for a RH player)  would have just been disastrous with a laminated or persimmon or maple driver. When the new drivers came in, the huge advantage players like Norman had off the tee evaporated because everyone suddenly had a larger margin of error off the tee. Being able to consistently hit it dead centre wasn't the advantage it once was.

Norman…great example since he was one of if not the best driver when this tech transition took off.

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I vote Hogan for 3rd best. More majors than Mickleson. More wins than Mickleson. Better win percentage, all interrupted by a World War and a near life ending car crash.

Stevie T

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
1 minute ago, Beastie said:

I vote Hogan for 3rd best. More majors than Mickleson. More wins than Mickleson. Better win percentage, all interrupted by a World War and a near life ending car crash.

🤦‍♂️

And 18x > 15y too, right? 🙂

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 minute ago, iacas said:

🤦‍♂️

And 18x > 15y too, right? 🙂

Nope. I did think that, but I’m prepared to change my views and I did, partly based on what I have read on here, in relation to comparative strength of fields etc. So I rate Tiger #1 and comfortably so then Jack. But Hogan has 50% more wins and 50 % more Majors than Phil. I don’t think the delta in field strength tilts enough to Phils favour

Stevie T

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
10 minutes ago, Beastie said:

Nope. I did think that, but I’m prepared to change my views and I did, partly based on what I have read on here, in relation to comparative strength of fields etc. So I rate Tiger #1 and comfortably so then Jack. But Hogan has 50% more wins and 50 % more Majors than Phil. I don’t think the delta in field strength tilts enough to Phils favour

45/64 = 70% of Hogans PGA Tour win total
6/9 = 66% of Hogans Major win total

You can probably throw out 3 of his majors just because the PGA Championship was match play, and no one from the US hardly ever played The Open during Hogan's time. 

I put Phil's majors as significantly more impressive major victories. 

If you look at some of his wins. He played in a four-ball tournament. I am almost to the point of saying that his 45 wins are significantly more impressive than Hogans 64 wins. 

  • Upvote 1

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
12 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

45/64 = 70% of Hogans PGA Tour win total
6/9 = 66% of Hogans Major win total

You can probably throw out 3 of his majors just because the PGA Championship was match play, and no one from the US hardly ever played The Open during Hogan's time. 

I put Phil's majors as significantly more impressive major victories. 

If you look at some of his wins. He played in a four-ball tournament. I am almost to the point of saying that his 45 wins are significantly more impressive than Hogans 64 wins. 

3/6 =50%
19/45=42%
 

It took Phil 13 years on tour to win his first major. He has never been world #1. 
Phil’s a great player and I really love the way he plays golf. But the 3rd best of all time is a stretch. If he is then who do you guys think is 4th? 
 

Never mind the Super Golf League we need a time travel league. I’d pay to watch that. 

Stevie T

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
2 minutes ago, Beastie said:

He has never been world #1.

Neither was Hogan. 😄

3 minutes ago, Beastie said:

If he is then who do you guys think is 4th? 

If it's not Hogan in third I think most people would put him fourth.

FWIW I think I'd barely put Hogan as third ahead of Phil, and some of my reluctance AND indulgence there is due to the stupid "Hogan Mystique."

He played against very weak fields. Much weaker than even Jack.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 minute ago, Beastie said:

3/6 =50%
19/45=42%

Where did you get these numbers? Unless you are manipulating the data for your argument? 

Screen Shot 2021-06-09 at 3.01.43 PM.png

2 minutes ago, Beastie said:

It took Phil 13 years on tour to win his first major. He has never been world #1. 

Doesn't matter. # of wins, # of majors, strength of competition. 

 

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1641 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.