Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Most hated course design tricks


Note: This thread is 6167 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
What's your most hated piece of course design?

mine is the gimnick holes....and what I mean by that are the courses where you have a short Par4 with a huge dog leg to the left or right...but the tee shot (if your not going for the green) is roughly only 125yds landing area before the dog leg......and going for the green is almost impossible because of high grass and weeds etc..........making the shot invisible......it's not that you can't take a iron off the tee (that's not a issue), but just causing you temptation......

  • Replies 120
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
How about when the green is rock hard and its a 185 yard approach and the lay up/front fringe is soaking wet. So you cant land the ball on the green and stop it. And you cant run the ball up either. And I hit the ball quite high with a lot of spin and its not stopping until it hits the rough. This pisses me off. Give me an option, and make it the same for the course. I dont need the next hole the layup hard and the green soft. I like difficult, but I need options.

  • 8 months later...
Posted
Feel free to list your least favorite design elements

I like to play different courses all the time, so I rarely play the same course twice in 3 months. I am also very frugal, so I play very early in the day (read poor light) and cheap courses that often don't have caddies, GPS, or detailed hole maps.

1. Hazards in the middle of the fairway (a big tree, a waste area, whatever) Your goal off the tee should be to split the fairway (especially if pin positions aren't foretold)

2. Blind tee shots on courses that don't offer caddies, forcaddies, GPS, or detailed hole maps. This also goes for blind hazards, such as tiny creeks, bunkers, or ponds not seen from the tee or second shot on par 5s.

3. severely sloping fairways where if you don't hit the extreme uphill side of the fairway, you don't stay on the short grass.

4. I guess this is more course maintenance, but allowing tree limbs to overgrow so that they effect shots from the fairway.

I guess my unifying theme here is, if you hit the fairway, you should be rewarded, not punished.

HiBore XLS Tour 9.5*
Adams Fast10 15* 3W
A2OS 3H-7iron 60* LW
8iron Precept Tour Premium cb
9iron and 45* PW 50* GW 56* SW m565 and 455 VfoilPutter Anser Belly Putter Ball in order of preference TPblack e5 V2  AD333


Posted
Very narrow fairways with hazards on either side really get to me. This one hole at a course that I play frequently has a 400+ yard par 4. The distance calls for a driver. However, the fairway is only 10 yards wide where drives land. There is water on the right that goes for 70 yards and a bunker on the left. Oh and then there are trees if you carry the bunker. I have no problem with a narrow fairway, but 10 yards...COME ON!

I like most of the other course designs. I say most and not all because I'm sure there is another one that I don't like.

In my Ogio Ozone Bag:
TM Superquad 9.5* UST Proforce 77g Stiff
15* Sonartec SS-2.5 (Pershing stiff)
19* TM Burner (stock stiff)
4-U - PING i10 White dot, +1.25 inches, ZZ65 stiff shafts55*/11* Snake Eyes Form Forged (DGS300)60*/12* Snake Eyes Form Forged (DGS300)Ping i10 1/2 MoonTitleist ProV1


Posted
there's one particular hole on a local course here that i just utterly loathe. it's a par 4, it's about 450 yards long, and 230 yards off the tee is a canal cutting across the entire fairway, and this canal is a good 20 yards across. then you get about 125 yards worth of fairway before you're hit with ANOTHER canal, this one about 40 yards across, that's right in front of the green. and this course is totally flat with no trees, too, so the wind really can get ahold of your ball.

basically, you have two options: carry a drive 260 yards (minimum) into the wind to leave yourself a 190 approach - and if you leave that approach more than 20 yards short, you're in the drink. or you can hit something like a 5-iron off the tee, layup in front of the first canal, then hit the 5-iron again to lay-up in front of the second canal, and just hope like hell you can get the ball close to the pin on your third shot and save par.

Posted
1. Blind shots
2. Bunkers with no visible lip of sand, so they are hidden
3. Tee shots on par fives that eliminate the Driver as an option
4. Greens constructed in such a way that there are locations from which you cannot reasonable putt at the hole (a flop shot is the best option -- bad design.) Maybe number 7 at Riviera is a historical exception
5. Railroad ties or obstructions that come into play exactly where a very well struck ball should land. Why punish a good driver by creating an unplayable lie and penalty in the middle of the fairway?
6. Par 4s that are played something like mid iron, followed by mid iron through a slot in the trees, or around a mountain, etc. Par fives that are played 4 iron, 4 iron, 4 iron... I don't get these
7. And the worst is a maintenance issue -- last year I played in a tourney where the tee shot from the back tees was completely obstructed by over grown trees so that the only shot was a knock down hard fade under the canopy of limbs.

RC

 


Posted
There are a few holes I have played that I would consider unfair. Sometimes the holes are short, but do not have enough area to hit any kind of tee shot, even if it is an iron. Other times the holes are short, but the green is sloped so much that ball will roll off the green if they have any speed on them at all. One hole in particular has both problems. The hole is lined with trees and the fairway sloped so that almost every ball will roll into the rough. Then the green is bad that if you are not directly underneath the hole, you will putt if off the green into a bunker. The only time I play the hole is in a scramble, so I have some help. We have taken bogey more than once there.

My swing thoughts:

- Negative thinking hurts more than negative swinging.
- I let my swing balance me.
- Full extension back and through to the target. - I swing under not around my body. - My club must not twist in my swing. - Keep a soft left knee


Posted
I hate bunkers that are so hard I can't leave footprints in.
I hate bunkers that don't have enough sand, only have a half inch deep of sand.
I hate over watered greens that anyone over 200 Lbs, leaves deep footprints around the hole.
I hate over watered fairways where they leave the grass cuttings on the fairway and my ball looks like a green hairball.
I hate greens that don't have a line from a ball on the green to a 4 foot circle around the hole.

Posted
there's one particular hole on a local course here that i just utterly loathe. it's a par 4, it's about 450 yards long, and 230 yards off the tee is a canal cutting across the entire fairway, and this canal is a good 20 yards across. then you get about 125 yards worth of fairway before you're hit with ANOTHER canal, this one about 40 yards across, that's right in front of the green. and this course is totally flat with no trees, too, so the wind really can get ahold of your ball.

That is not cool at all. I have the urge to fill one of those canals with dirt.

I'm thinking its the one 240 out in the middle of the fairway (into the wind)

HiBore XLS Tour 9.5*
Adams Fast10 15* 3W
A2OS 3H-7iron 60* LW
8iron Precept Tour Premium cb
9iron and 45* PW 50* GW 56* SW m565 and 455 VfoilPutter Anser Belly Putter Ball in order of preference TPblack e5 V2  AD333


Posted
Something I can't stand are short Par 4's that are 90 degree dogleg... in which you can't go for the green off the tee.

One hole on the course I usually play is about 240 yards. You hit your tee shot straight towards a pretty wide fairway.. you want to hit it anywhere from 180-220. From there, it's a dogleg 90 left.. with about a 20-50 yard shot to the green. Because of the REALLY tall pines on the left that surround the green, you simply cannot go for the green off the tee. It doesn't matter how high you can hit or how much you can draw it. The hole is simply boring. An iron/hybrid/fairway wood off the tee and lob wedge to the green is just pathetic. Holes are usually like this because they need to cram a Par 4 in as small a space as possible because they don't have room to stretch it out.


Blind shots (tee, approach, anything) are my other pet peeve. Nothing ticks me off worse than playing a course for the first time.. hitting a great shot.. then finding that it went too far and is in the hazard because there was no yardage book or anything and you had no way of knowing...

Posted

Wow this thread goes back to 2004! I would have to say I can't stand blind shots. Especially blind driving holes. I also can't stand courses that are hard for the mere fact of being hard. We played a course in the Newport Cup called Thunder Hill in Ohio. It had every little dirty course trick you can think of, hidden water, sharp doglegs where you have to hit 7 iron then 4 iron into a hole, false fronts, blind shots, etc. And it was ridiculously firm, it was like playing on concrete. Stupid just stupid.

Danny    In my :ping: Hoofer Tour golf bag on my :clicgear: 8.0 Cart

Driver:   :pxg: 0311 Gen 5  X-Stiff.                        Irons:  :callaway: 4-PW APEX TCB Irons 
3 Wood: :callaway: Mavrik SZ Rogue X-Stiff                            Nippon Pro Modus 130 X-Stiff
3 Hybrid: :callaway: Mavrik Pro KBS Tour Proto X   Wedges: :vokey:  50°, 54°, 60° 
Putter: :odyssey:  2-Ball Ten Arm Lock        Ball: :titleist: ProV 1

 

 

 

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
design flaws... hmmm...
little ditches/ruts that are designed to improve drainage but make certain lies unplayable... just make it a frikken creek and call it a water hazard...

design tricks... ummm...
courses with poor risk/reward options... i dont mind a challenge but to make it impossible for a mid/high handicapper to enjoy the course is ridiculous...

the course and corresponding teebox's should play to your handicap... if im playing the right teebox for my index i should in no way be shooting 20 more strokes than usual...

forced carries that are impossible...
bunkers/trees in the middle of teh fairway...
tiny turtleshell greens...
RUSS's avg drive - 230yrds and climbing

Posted
I'd have to say a Par 5 made unreachable in two by a dogleg at the end. Although this is rare there is one at my course, and after bombing a drive it is nearly impossible to hit the green in two unless you pure one long and high over the trees.

in the bag

Driver: 909D2 9.5° Oban Devotion Shaft

3 Wood: G10 15.5°
Hybrid: 3dx RC 20° Ironwood 

4-PW: MP-57's S300

Wedges: 51° MP-T Black Nickel 56° Vokey Spin Milled 

Putter: Tracy II 35" Iomic Grip 

Ball: Pro V1x


Posted

In no particular order:

Hazards (including bunkers) that are invisible from the tee. Holes which are out of character for the overall design. Par 3's that are all near the same length. Some designers seem to have gotten stuck on the 200 yard number for par 3's. I don't mind irregular fairways, but they shouldn't look like a VW Beetle graveyard. Greens that are irrationally sloped just to create a level of difficulty that the designer was too unimaginative to build in elsewhere. Not opposed to tiered greens in general. Courses which force a player into the designer's style of play in order to have a chance to do well on the course. I'm not referring to just a course that favors a drawer or fader, but one that generally limits how far you can play each shot on each hole as well. A well designed course should allow the player to use his imagination. I really dislike a course where anything off the green grass is OB, hazard, or otherwise unplayable. The recovery shot is one of the most enjoyable parts of the game for me, and courses which NEVER give that opportunity simply aren't fun.
I'd have to say a Par 5 made unreachable in two by a dogleg at the end. Although this is rare there is one at my course, and after bombing a drive it is nearly impossible to hit the green in two unless you pure one long and high over the trees.

Ya know... that's why they call them par FIVE's. Sometimes it actually takes 3 shots to reach the green.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Excessive use of blind shots; I hate them. Definitely a sign of course design that's a bit .

Oh yes, long for the sake of it isn't necessarily big or clever either.

Home Course: Wollaton Park GC, Nottingham, U.K.

Ping G400, 9°, Alta CB 55S | Ping G400, 14°, Alta CB 65S | Adams Pro Dhy 18°, 21°, 24°, KBS Hybrid S | Ping S55 5-PW, TT DGS300 | Vokey 252-08, DGS200 | Vokey 256-10 (bent to 58°), DGS200 | Ping Sigma G Anser, 34" | Vice Pro Plus

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I hate greens were its an uphill putt and if it doesn't go in it comes back to your feet.

Posted
I can't stand par 5's where your only option from the tee is a fairway metal (hazard, severe dog-leg, etc… @ about 250 yards).

Callaway X-Hot Tour GD Tour AD DI-7 Sonartec SS-3.5 16* FTP-X Adams Idea Super S 19* Matrix Kujoh
Bridgestone J33B DG X100 Mizuno MP 53*6 Mizuno MP 56*10 WRX Sq. Gr. GTO Ported
Mizuno MP 60*6 WRX Sq. Gr. GTO Ported Odyssey White Hot Tour #5 Callaway Tourix

GHIN: 10436305


Posted
I have 2 problems.

1) A local course that I love has a par 3 that plays 230 yards from the tips...into the 10-20mph wind. Now it might by my fault that I dont have the perfect club for this hole, but this hole plays like 250 yards most of the time, with two bunkers front left and front right. I have hit a soft driver, and blown it over, and hit a hybrid all I could and been all over, but mostly in front. It always comes down to a pitch and a putt for par. Ive only seen one guy in my group hit the green with a driver once. If the hole was 200 yards, I would love it.

2) Fescue that lines the fairways is some of the newer style designs, which punishes ANY off-fairway drive. I dont mind long rough, but if I am five yards right of the fairway 280 yards out cutting a dog-leg, and I can't find my ball, it is more than annoying.

Whats in the bag?
909 D3 8.5* UST Mamiya Tour Green X
909 F3 13* UST ATTAS X
909 F3 18* UST ATTAS X
909 H 21* DG S300 735cm chrome 5-PW DG S300 54.08 SM 58.04 SM 64.07 SM Studio Select Newport 2 Sonic Blue Dot...


Note: This thread is 6167 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.