Jump to content
IGNORED

"The Putting Bible" by Dave Pelz


Note: This thread is 1684 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I am on the fence with Pelz. I agree with his ideas and his research data. I agree with him on how to read greens and what kind of shots to hit in different situations, and overall concepts of the short game. I do not agree with how he gets people to use that information. The short game is more about feel than perfect mechanics. It is easy to have too much information and lose your imagination. Imagination is the key to good golf, not perfect mechanics.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

For whom?

I entirely understand what you mean by "manipulation." But I believe that is a misleading and ultimately inaccurate term. You essentially imply that there is some qualitative biomechanical diff

Correction----That portion of his spine, in the vicinity of his shoulders, between the hump and the base of his SKULL, is quite close to HORIZONTAL

It's the biggest paperweight that I have.

Waaaaay too much information for any practical use, other than something to read while being holed up away from golf during a snowy winter.

I found an old Tom Watson short game book at a used book store and it is pretty good. Tom talks about his approach to the short game with some practical tips for practice. It also has some nice drawings by Anthony Ravielli(sp?) . Great book.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with a lot of the other comments. The research is great and I don't think the average player thinks about or practices their short game and putting enough (myself included) but I find the book way too complicated and detailed into practice.

In saying that, my main take from both his books was to practice my short game and putting more which has improved my scoring so I guess the books did have a positive influence on my game just not the instructional type that I expected
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Discuss "The Putting Bible" by Dave Pelz here.

A must read for the serious golfer! Dave Pelz is a retired physicist who takes a very scientific approach to the art of putting in 'The Putting Bible'.

His understanding of putting is based on a careful experimental study. He talks of the importance of the ball travelling 17 inches past the hole on missed putts - even with the short ones! The reason why is hitting the putt firmly into the hole minimizes any adverse effects of uneven terrain that come into play when you 'baby' the ball into the hole. This book will save 5 strokes off your game. Hit 'em Long and Staright! John Lynch
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
I bought this book when it first came out several years ago. I like to practice, so I had no problem trying his pendulum putting stroke so I could become a more consistent putter.

My putting actually got worse, the more technical I got. I went through four putters and an increase in my handicap trying to make it work for me. I finally put my old Ping Anser 2 back in the bag, and threw his book on the bottom of the shelf.

For me, it's a very unnatural stroke. I am much more suited to the open, close putting stroke mentioned earlier in the thread. If it helps someone great, more power to them, but me, I can't recommend this book to anyone.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Administrator
This book will save 5 strokes off your game.

Strongly disagreed. The whole "straight back, straight through" method is a terrible way for 99+% of golfers. Even Phil Mickelson continues to putt with an arc stroke.

But I'm happy to putt the better way and let others continue to suffer, so by all means, carry on Pelzians.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

There's some good stuff in there. Watched Crenshaw on some show last year, think it was on the GC. He was demonstrating technique on long putts, maybe Texas wedges, and clearly an arc and release because of the distance. I started trying to incorporate that into my long putting and it really made a difference. On shorter putts, I think I'm going straight back and straight through, but I really believe when I'm putting well and not "thinking" about it, it's not that way at all. Going to be working on admitting an arc (first step to recovery) this Spring and see what happens.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
can someone comment on how a center shafted putter effects the arc stroke vs the straight back and through stroke, as well as why most of scotty camerons are heel shafted putters?

I know thats a load of questions. I didn't even know people putted with an arc till a year ago. I have tried it some but drift back and forth. Is this the best book to pick up on putting, or is there a better one?
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Administrator
can someone comment on how a center shafted putter effects the arc stroke vs the straight back and through stroke, as well as why most of scotty camerons are heel shafted putters?

Not without going off topic they can't. Short answer (so we can stay on topic): Scotty believes the arc stroke is best. Even his straight-shafted putters have toe hang.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm about 41 pages into it so far. Pretty interesting. Definitely a lot of things I've never thought about. I found his break down of the lumpy donut pretty interesting. Makes you wonder how you ever make a putt.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
I liked pelz before, but I bought and read the putting bible and shortgame bible and he comes off as pushy and trying to sell himself too much to me. The books are like a giant infomercial. Yes some of the parts are very nice and informative. But you better believe the next page will have some sort of outline dealing with you coming to his golf school or something.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I liked pelz before, but I bought and read the putting bible and short game bible and he comes off as pushy and trying to sell himself too much to me. The books are like a giant infomercial. Yes some of the parts are very nice and informative. But you better believe the next page will have some sort of outline dealing with you coming to his golf school or something.

I wouldn't go as far as to say it felt like an infomercial but I know what you're talking about. I finished the book this past week. As someone who's very technical and has never really thought about putting, I really enjoyed the book. It definitely gives you a lot to think about.

I did not like how he constantly suggests using his learning aids. I'm fine with him promoting them but give us some alternatives as well. Like home made aids. I tallied up all the aids he recommends and they totaled over $500. Did you notice that the only item he gave a home made alternative to was the ball balancer? It's also the only "aid" he doesn't sell on his website? Hmm. Either way I still enjoyed the book and will read the short game version.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I think anyone who is really serious about putting should at least open this book one time or another. His methods sound like they are made for robots at times, but at times I would like to be a robot at the greens.

I didn't have a book about putting until I got this one. His take on the grip and stance is as valid for pils stroke as other type of strokes, but if you do not like the straight back straight through then at least there is 80% of the book that deal with other interesting things about putting. I am (I think) using his stroke, and have been getting gradually better and have more "feel" for distance than ever. Maybe I'm turning into a robot

Link to post
Share on other sites

Haven't read the book but am quite familiar with Pelz's work and theories. He's brilliant, no doubt, but I've always felt his methods would require a LOT of practice to master -- to make the "robotic" nature of his techniques "instinctive."

Of course, you could say the same about most anything in golf. The golf swing, chipping and putting strokes are anything but natural. Just watch any non-golfer attempt to emulate a golf swing.

Sean

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could somebody please post the tests from his book which allow you to calculate your Putting Handicap. I'm having fun with his 8 Short Game Handicap tests right now! I'm off scratch but have a SGH of 11 according to Pelz!! THANKS!
Link to post
Share on other sites

Note: This thread is 1684 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    Whoop
    SuperSpeed
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo and the code "iacasjun21" for 10% off SuperSpeed.
  • Posts

    • Ah, yes, great.  Haven't got to #19 and interpretations in my studies!  Thank you!! Hypothetically, if a player had this situation, and took an unplayable, and then dropped it in the wrong place (i.e. the fairway).  That's DQ yes? I guess it'd have to be, a serious breach, nothing else makes sense. I see it in 14.7b(1).  
    • Day 115 (7/30/21) - 9-hole league tonight. I hit really good drives, but didn't follow-up very well. Generally speaking, my short game was mediocre. Between my tennis elbow acting up and a bad scrape and bruise on my left wrist which I managed to do cleaning the garage today, I've decided to take the week off to heal, so my next entry will be starting over at 1 after league next Friday night.
    • Day 66, July 30, 2021: Played 27 holes today. Still haven’t made many longer putts, maybe I’m saving them for member-guest next week.
    • They are a fun group of guys.  The stories they tell are epic.  
    • 19.2a/2 – Stroke-and-Distance Relief Is Allowed Only at Spot of the Last Stroke The option to take stroke-and-distance relief for an unplayable ball applies only to where the last stroke was made; a player is not allowed to go back to the spot of any earlier strokes made before that. If the stroke-and-distance relief option or the back-on-the-line option are not favourable, the only option is to take lateral relief multiple times, taking a penalty each time, until the player can get a ball into a playable location.
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. CrappyGolfer
      CrappyGolfer
      (68 years old)
    2. Jacob Vance
      Jacob Vance
      (25 years old)
    3. jax731
      jax731
      (54 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...