Jump to content
IGNORED

Which is easier... Big Greens or Small Greens?


ryohazuki222
Note: This thread is 5444 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. Which is easiest?

    • Big Greens -- let my putter do the talking!
      23
    • Small Greens -- I don't want to try a 100ft putt.
      26
    • No difference -- I hit too close to the pin... I'm that good.
      3


Recommended Posts

Just wondering what you think is an easier course setup.

Most of my local courses have smaller greens. I golfed a little while ago back home where i grew up and the course there had massive greens!

Sometimes I'm amazed by how big the greens on the pro courses look... then again it's TV and who knows how well I can tell size.

I guess one would make GIR easier but could put more pressure on the putter... while the other makes GIR difficult but can maybe be easier for the putter.

Driver: Tour Burner 9.5° Stock Stiff
Wood: Tour Burner TS 13° Stock Stiff
Hybrid: Tour Burner T2 18° Stock Stiff
Irons: Tour Preferred 3-PW Rifle Project X 6.0
Wedges: 54.10|58.08 Z TP Rifle Spinner 5.5 Putter: VP Mills VP2 Ball: TP/Red.LDP Bag: Warbird Hot Stand Bag 2.0Started playing...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Im pretty good with my wedge around the green so Im going to go with small greens. I would rather bump an 8 iron, or hit a wedge to the pin and attempt an 8 foot or less putt, than attempt a 40' putt that breaks 4 times.

This is all void if theres tons of traps, which im not that great out of.

Clubs I havent thrown in a lake yet

Driver: R7 CGB max 9.5*
Woods: R5 3, and 5 woods
Hybrids: Rescue Burner 22*, 25*Irons: CG Red 6 - PWWedges: CG12 52*, 56*, 60*Putter: 1 of 100 handmade pebble beach http://scottycameronblog.com/2007/09...pebble-beach/#Vegas golf sucks!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


it's a mental thing. Small greens get me focusing more on my shots and planning them out better. When I see a whopping sized green, I tend to just hit to it and forget about the rest and let the forgiveness of the size take over. Bad habit but that's how it goes.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

it's a mental thing. Small greens get me focusing more on my shots and planning them out better. When I see a whopping sized green, I tend to just hit to it and forget about the rest and let the forgiveness of the size take over. Bad habit but that's how it goes.

I can relate....same issues here.

909D Comp 9.5* (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-6)
Burner Superfast 3 & 5 woods (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-4.8)
G15 Hybrid 23* (AWT shaft)
G5 5 iron-PW-46*, UW-50*, SW-54 & LW-58 (AWT shaft)
Studio Select Newport 2 Mid SlantGrips: PING cords & Golf Pride New Decade Multi-Coumpound Bag: C-130...
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I went for big greens. My biggest problem with small greens is that you could hit a shot that is 15 feet from the flag (a makeable putt), but you can't putt it because you are 5 feet off the green. I have a great short game from off the green, but anyone will make more with the putter than a sand wedge. Granted, I am not a big fan of a 60 foot putt, that is something I would rather chip. But I will take it, if my closer putts are on the green. Plus, small greens are typically slower than big greens for various reasons and I think fast greens are much easier to putt on.

I will judge my rounds much more by the quality of my best shots than the acceptability of my worse ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Small greens, I grew playing on sand greens, all about the same size all uniformly round. If you hit the middle of the green you had a 10-15 foot putt, max. They converted the sand greens to grass greens but kept the size and shape, so hit for the middle and you always had a makeable putt.

Craig 

Yeah, wanna make 14 dollars the hard way?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Big greens are easier to hit but small greens are easier to putt. Six of one, half dozen of the other.
My Equipment:
Northwestern 3-, 5-, 7- and 9-wood;
Goldwin AVDP Irons (5-10 plus PW);
U.S. Golf 60 degree wedge;
See-More Putter; Bushnell Yardage Pro 1000 Rangefinder;Golflogix GPS.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


It doesnt particuarlly matter to me how big or small the green is. No matter the size of it, my target zone is only about 3 or 4 yard circle. If i cant see my landing zone, im picking a target in the distance behind the green along the line i want my ball to fly.
THE WEAPONS CACHE..

Titleist 909 D2 9.5 Degree Driver| Titleist 906f4 13.5 degree 3-Wood | Titleist 909 17 & 21 degree hybrid | Titleist AP2 irons
Titleist Vokey Wedges - 52 & 58 | Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2 Putter | ProV1 Ball
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'm going to go with small greens. I agree with the sentiment that you focus better on smaller targets. And I would rather chip from around the green than putt anything over 40 feet. The greens I play on aren't that fast which makes for a big stroke if you're far away.

TaylorMade R11S TP Blur 60 X
TayloreMade R11S TP Blur 70 X

Titleist 910H 21&24
Miura Tournament Blades 5-PW DGX100 Tour Issue
Cleveland CG16 52

Miura Black Wedge 56, 60
Newport 2 Teryllium Ten

Titleist ProV1x

Link to comment
Share on other sites


My home course (Champions GC in Houston) has some of the biggest greens of any course. One of the greens (#7 on Cypress) is about 75 yards deep. From the same lie, you cna have a wedge or a 5 iron into the green depending on the pin location.

Having grown up playing there, I tend to think bigger greens are easier for several reasons:

1) It takes a lot of pressure off of your approach shots in that you don't have to be quite as accurate.
2) Usually there is a large "safe" area to shoot at on the green where there a slight push/pull won't result in ending up in a bunker or off the green. In other words, you can much more easily play "safe" golf and aren't forced to hit perfect shots.
3) Hitting more GIR helps build up your confidence, and that will translate to the rest of your game.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Big greens are easier. I'm just about always better off on the green than off. Now if I'm just off the fringe and the cup is cut 10' away from me, then yes that's probably better than a 75' putt, but by and large I'd rather be on the green with a putter in my hand than off with a wedge trying to get up and down.

Nike Vapor Speed driver 12* stock regular shaft
Nike Machspeed 4W 17*, 7W 21* stock stiff shafts
Ping i10 irons 4-9, PW, UW, SW, LW AWT stiff flex
Titleist SC Kombi 35"; Srixon Z Star XV tour yellow

Clicgear 3.0; Sun Mountain Four 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites


i perfer smaller greens- the smaller greens in my area tend to have less slope than the bigger greens. plus, a smaller green makes me think about my shot, and all the other factors in the shot such as club selection, wind, lie, pin placement etc.

Smaller greens are more demanding; which i find to be more rewarding.

Driver: Callaway Big Bertha Diablo 9º
2 Hybrid: Callaway Big Bertha Heavenwood
Irons: Nike Slingshot OSS 6-3 iron
          Taylormade Tour Preferred PW-7 iron
Wedges: Cleveland CG14 50º, 54º
              Taylormade RAC 58º
Putter: Ping Darby 32" shaft


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I said no difference but its not because "im that good". I said it because i really dont have a preferance.

In My Hank Haney IJGA Bag
Driver: FT Tour 9.5 w/ Aldila Voodoo Stiff
3 Wood: i15 15.5 w/ avixcore red stiff
Hybrids: Rescue 09 19, 22 w/ fujikara fit on stiff
Irons: 4 & 5 MP-52, 6-PW MP-58 w/ KBS Tour Stiff Wedges: MP T-10 52*, 58* w/ KBS Tour StiifPutter: Fastback 1 34 inBall: : Pro...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


For me, definitely smaller greens. I would rather have a 20 foot chip than a 60 foot putt any day of the week.

My Tools of Ignorance:

Driver: Ping I20 9.5*
Woods/Hybrids: Cobra AMP 3W and 3 HY

Irons: Cobra AMP 4-GW

Wedges: Callaway Forged Copper 56* and 60*

Putters: Scotty Cameron  35" (Several of the flow neck blade variety)

Ball: Bridgestone B330-RX and Srixon Z-Star

Bag: Nike Performance Carry

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I am use to small greens but I can image you greens on regulation stats would improve but you putts per round could go up if you 3 putt those huge greens.

Titleist 910 D2 9.5 Driver
Titleist 910 F15 & 21 degree fairway wood
Titleist 910 hybrid 24 degree
Mizuno Mp33 5 - PW
52/1056/1160/5

"Yonex ADX Blade putter, odyssey two ball blade putter, both  33"

ProV-1

Link to comment
Share on other sites


For me, definitely smaller greens. I would rather have a 20 foot chip than a 60 foot putt any day of the week.

Seconded for me. I am a bad putter, but putting after GIR goes into the realm of terrible. Chipping has been my strong point the last 4-5 rounds I've played so I have a lot more confidence doing that.

In My Bag:

Driver: HiBore XL 10.5*, Aldila NV Stiff
Fairway Wood: System 2 Midsize 3W
Hybrid: Idea Boxer a3Irons: Bomber Steel Plus 3: 4-PW (Callaway Clone)Wedges: 588 Tour Action BeCu 53* Gap/56* SandPutter: Karsten Anser 2 34"Balls: Back to the drawing board, experimenting with Gamers,...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


small green have to be a little easier. If you miss the green, a chip from 40 feet is a lot easier than a chip from 100 feet. Bunker shot from that far are almost impossible. We played at this week where the bunkers were deep and the sand was really fluffy. We were hitting 40 yrd green side bunker shots with 9 irons.

My swing thoughts:

- Negative thinking hurts more than negative swinging.
- I let my swing balance me.
- Full extension back and through to the target. - I swing under not around my body. - My club must not twist in my swing. - Keep a soft left knee

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 5444 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,013 3/6* ⬛🟨⬛🟨🟨 🟩⬛🟩🟩⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Meanwhile, another old Tour Edge guy switches to Callaway for this season. I have a different problem, course dependent set-ups. What I’m wondering is if @dragonsmhas the 8 iron set 5-PW, AW, GW or just 5-PW, GW. Because the PW is 42°, AW 47°, and GW 52°. Because that could potentially be a gap there. The 5-iron to 6-iron length jump is 5/8” instead of 1/2” so you should be careful of that.    @WUTiger the problem most people have with 3-woods is they don’t play them far enough back into their stance. And they usually don’t have enough loft and the shaft is too long. So 3HL, 4 or 5-wood is probably better for most golfers. I do the “Frankenwood” approach. I have both the 3+ and 5 woods. I typically will either add two degrees to the 3+ on 6600 yards or longer courses, or take a degree off the 5-wood on shorter courses than 6300 or so, and use the 5-wood shaft for both. I don’t usually find a situation where I need both the 3 and 5 wood on a course. I don’t play from 7000 yards it’s no fun. Edit: I mostly agree with @WUTiger on the gapping, although a lot of the newer even fixed hosel fairway woods are made better than what we had when we were playing the old Exotics XRails.
    • Wordle 1,013 4/6* ⬛🟦🟦⬛⬛ ⬛🟦⬛🟦🟦 🟧⬛🟧🟧🟧 🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧 par is good after a double bogey yesterday.
    • I did read the fine print tonight. It said replace with “similar features & function”.  8 yeas ago my purchase had features that today are available on the lower end models and the current version of my model has more “bells & whistles” than what I got 8 years ago.  So I am thinking they honored the agreement and I can’t argue the offer. since getting a credit for the full purchase price all I am really out over the past 8 years was the cost of the extended warranty, which was less than a low end  treadmill would have cost me. now the question is which model to replace with.  I’ll stay with Nordic Track or I forfeit the $1,463 credit so I will get Nordic Track.  And they honored the warranty and were not hard to work with which is a plus.
    • Generally speaking, extended warranties are a terrible deal and should almost always be avoided. They are a huge profit center for the companies that offer them, which should tell you almost everything you need to know about how much value most consumers get when purchasing them.  This is correct, and the old adage applies - only buy insurance when you can't afford the loss. This usually doesn't apply to most consumer goods.  To your second question, no I don't believe the offer is fair. They are replacing it, but it is not being replaced at "no cost to you". Since the amount being disputed (over $500) is non-trivial, I would probably push the issue. Don't waste your time on the phone with a customer service agent or a supervisor. They have probably given you all they have the authority to do. Rather, I would look at the terms of your agreement and specifically legal disputes. The odds are you probably agreed to binding arbitration in the event of a dispute. The agreement will outline what steps need to be followed, but it will probably look something like this.  1. Mail the Nordic Track legal department outlining your dispute and indicate you are not satisfied with the resolution offered.  2. Open up a case with the AAA (American Arbitration Association), along with the required documentation. 3. Wait about 4-5 weeks for a case to be opened - at which point someone from Nordic Track's legal department will offer to give you the new model at no cost to you.  They certainly don't want to spend the time and energy to fight you over $500. 4. Enjoy your new Nordic Track at no cost to you. I recently entered binding arbitration against a fairly large and well known company that screwed me over and refused to make it right. In my demand letter, I made a pretty sizeable request that included compensation for my time and frustration. Once it hit their legal department, they cut me a check - no questions asked. It was far cheaper to settle with me than to send their legal team to defend them in the arbitration.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...