Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Jack vs. Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?


Greatest Golfer (GOAT)  

222 members have voted

  1. 1. Tiger or Jack: Who's the greatest golfer?

    • Tiger Woods is the man
      1628
    • Jack Nicklaus is my favorite
      820


Recommended Posts

Posted

Jack played in 586 PGA tournaments 

Tiger played in 336 PGA Tournaments.

They both came in second around 10% of the time. Tiger is about 1% less often, but he has more PGA Tour wins in 250 less tournaments. 

This total number argument is irrelevant. Tiger was more dominant in nearly 75% less number of tournaments. Imagine if Tiger wasn’t hurt! 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Upvote 1

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

Jack played in 586 PGA tournaments 

Tiger played in 336 PGA Tournaments.

They both came in second around 10% of the time. Tiger is about 1% less often, but he has more PGA Tour wins in 250 less tournaments. 

This total number argument is irrelevant. Tiger was more dominant in nearly 75% less number of tournaments. Imagine if Tiger wasn’t hurt! 

Actually those win per start stats are irrelevant. Jack played in tour events until he was 65.

And Tiger's injuries were probably almost entirely because of poor life choices. Tiger is more beat up than NFL running backs. Nobody forced him to put that kind of strain on his body with 4 (5?) completely different golf swings. Nobody forced him to wreck his knee in Navy Seal training (source Haney's book). Tiger made the tabloid lifestyle choices he made that caused him to miss tournaments.  And BTW, it is somewhat interesting judgment to go to Anthony Galea as doctor? I don't have any evidence that he did anything improper with Tiger, but at a minimum it is not what he should have done. All of those were bad choices Tiger made.  Consistently bad choices have a way of catching up with you.

Something people here don't like hear, Jack was just a lot better at life than Tiger was. Jack may not have been a better golfer, but he was an infinitely better decision maker and life manager which lead to a better career.

 

Edited by Fidelio

  • Administrator
Posted
16 minutes ago, Fidelio said:

Seems like a pretty devastating argument actually.  37 top 2s and 73 top 10s vs 41 top 10s.

And if I played a PGA Tour event against 5 current PGA Tour players and a 140 or so other twelve year olds, I'd rack up the top ten finishes, too.

16 minutes ago, Fidelio said:

And guys like Watson, Floyd, and Miller would have zero trouble adapting to the modern game.

Pure speculation.

16 minutes ago, Fidelio said:

Trevino might not adjust as well but do guys like Spieth, Koepka, DJ rank in the same stratosphere as Lee? Not even close at this point.

Uhhhhhhh… This is where you're just stating your opinion as if it's a fact. I think you could more easily support the idea that they're actually better.

Lee, like Jack, didn't have to beat that many people.

16 minutes ago, Fidelio said:

I just came back to see how much Tiger humping there would be.

Less than your Jack humping, in part because the facts are on our side… 🙂

16 minutes ago, Fidelio said:

It is interesting that I have heard Butch Harmon in three separate interviews saying Jack has the superior career.

So now you're citing someone else's opinion? Uhm, I could do the same thing:

Jack Nicklaus, in 1996 (paraphrased): "Modern tour players would have been superstars in my day. The modern tour is so much more competitive, so much deeper."

6 minutes ago, Fidelio said:

Something people here don't like hear, Jack was just a lot better at life than Tiger was.

We don't really care one way or the other about that… because it's off topic here.

  • Like 2
  • Thumbs Up 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Look who Tiger beat to win his 15th major.

Koepka, DJ, Finau, Xander, Frankie, Rickie, Poulter... that’s a who’s who of golf right now. Not a bunch of nobody’s. Jack did beat the cream of the crop in 1986 however.

What's in Shane's Bag?     

Ball: 2022 :callaway: Chrome Soft Triple Track Driver: :callaway:Paradym Triple Diamond 8° MCA Kai’li 70s FW: :callaway:Paradym Triple Diamond  H: :callaway: Apex Pro 21 20°I (3-PW) :callaway: Apex 21 UST Recoil 95 (3), Recoil 110 (4-PW). Wedges: :callaway: Jaws Raw 50°, 54°, 60° UST Recoil 110 Putter: :odyssey: Tri-Hot 5K Triple Wide 35”

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
40 minutes ago, Fidelio said:

Why didn't Hogan, Snead, Nelson, or anyone else do it? Why didn't Tom Watson do it? Why didn't Seve or Faldo or Norman do it?

Have you ever bothered to count up how many majors Hogan, Snead or Nelson actually played in compared to how many Jack played?  Somehow I doubt it, although it would be VERY germane.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 minute ago, iacas said:

So now you're citing someone else's opinion? Uhm, I could do the same thing:

 

I explicitly said it wasn't a good argument. But it is interesting, Butch has gone all in on Jack. Obviously it could be sour grapes. I just thought it was worth noting. And I also thought it was interesting how the majority of people who overlapped with Jack and Tiger pick Jack.  Ernie Els, a guy Jack dumped on for not being that great when he talked about Tiger's competition, effusively says Jack belongs ahead of Tiger.

Faldo is a guy who overlapped with Tiger and Jack and would have a pretty good feel for the competition differences seems kind of offended at the notion someone would refer to Tiger as the greatest. 

 


Posted
29 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

Jack played in 586 PGA tournaments 

Tiger played in 336 PGA Tournaments.

They both came in second around 10% of the time. Tiger is about 1% less often, but he has more PGA Tour wins in 250 less tournaments. 

This total number argument is irrelevant. Tiger was more dominant in nearly 75% less number of tournaments. Imagine if Tiger wasn’t hurt! 

But, math is hard.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
1 minute ago, Fidelio said:

But it is interesting,

It's not.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
10 minutes ago, Fidelio said:

Actually those win per start stats are irrelevant. Jack played in tour events until he was 65.

His stats are inflated due to the number of starts he has and the weak competition he played against. 

15 minutes ago, Fidelio said:

Something people here don't like hear, Jack was just a lot better at life than Tiger was. Jack may not have been a better golfer, but he was an infinitely better decision maker and life manager which lead to a better career.

That matters how to this discussion? it doesn't. The last bit of argument you have is character! that is laughable. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 minute ago, turtleback said:

Have you ever bothered to count up how many majors Hogan, Snead or Nelson actually played in compared to how many Jack played?  Somehow I doubt it, although it would be VERY germane.

 

Not a relevant argument outside of WWII and the cost to play in the British Open. Ben Hogan has almost 50% fewer top 10s. 


Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Fidelio said:

 

Not a relevant argument outside of WWII and the cost to play in the British Open. Ben Hogan has almost 50% fewer top 10s. 

Not relevant, except for that it happened and why.


So, that would no.  I'm done with your trolling.

Edited by turtleback

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Just now, saevel25 said:

The last bit of argument you have is character! that is laughable. 

I  literally made no argument about character. The argument was about decision making and the influence it had on the length of Tiger's career.  I have no idea how you interpreted what I said otherwise. I don't care if Jack is a swell guy.


Posted

If we exclude Amateur starts Tiger and Jack's peak win percentages (both at the age of 33 coincidentally) were 29.7% and 19.6% respectively. It is hard to fathom just how insane Tiger was and apparently still is! Now after a few lean years Tiger's number has dropped slightly to 24% while Jack was at 17% at the same point in his career.

 


Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, turtleback said:

So, that would no.  I'm done with your trolling.

That's fine. Your argument is sighs and eye rolls. My argument is grounded in reason and facts. 

But just for fun. I just did. Hogan missed 33 events because of WWII and not playing the British in the period between his first and last top 10 in major.  So, if he would have finished in the top 10 in EVERY ONE of the those events he would fall 1 short of Jack.

Apology accepted. Try harder. Be better.

Edited by Fidelio

Posted
25 minutes ago, Fidelio said:

Jack was just a lot better at life than Tiger was. Jack may not have been a better golfer, 

Fine. Debate is finished. We’re not discussing who’s the better person. It’s who’s the GOAT golfer. And that’s Tiger. You just don’t like to hear that.

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
6 minutes ago, Fidelio said:

I  literally made no argument about character. 

Yes you did.

1 minute ago, Fidelio said:

That's fine. Your argument is sighs and eye rolls. My argument is grounded in reason and facts. 

Uhhh, his argument is based on the number of tournaments (and majors) that Snead and Hogan and others were able to play.

15x >> 18y, where "x = strength of Tiger's fields" and "y" is Jack's.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Just now, iacas said:

Yes you did.

 

No. I didn't. I made an argument about judgment and how it negatively influenced Tiger's career.  

Other people have made that argument about Jack's a swell guy so he is better. I think it is a bad one and irrelevant. I don't care even a little bit about the character of the two men as relates to this debate. I made no such argument. I am pretty sure I know what I wrote 3 minutes ago.


Posted
2 minutes ago, Fidelio said:

That's fine. Your argument is sighs and eye rolls. My argument is grounded in reason and facts. 

But just for fun. I just did. Hogan missed 33 events because of WWII and not playing the British in the period between his first and last top 10 in major.  So, if he would have finished in the top 10 in EVERY ONE of the those events he would fall 1 short of Jack.

Apology accepted. Try harder. Be better.

So you still haven't counted them up.  And of course it was Hogan's fault that he got into an accident, nearly died, had a very severely leg, and as a result couldn't play the PGA until they changed it to stroke play.

Just because Tiger beat the oddsvand won a major does not somehow provide any validation for these long discredited arguments you are resucitating.  I've done the numbers several times and you are welcome to go looking for them.

2 hours ago, Gunther said:

Props to Tiger,  I'm one who said 3 years ago it would never happen again.  Payin out $2,000 because of it, fk!, but really did enjoy his celebration with the kids and his mom.  One of the most amazing sports stories in our lifetime. Erik, ur fanboyness has been paid.

You had a good impulse.  Too bad you had to spoil it at the end.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • The first post is here:   Do you have an overly long backswing that ruins sequencing and leads to poor shots? In nearly 20 years of teaching, I've found 5 common faults. You don't have to swing like Jon Rahm, but a shorter swing will probably help you #PlayBetter golf. Which is your fatal flaw? #1 - Trail Elbow Bend Average golfers ♥️ bending their trail elbows. It can feel powerful! Tour players bend their trail elbows MUCH less. A wider trail elbow creates a longer hand path and preserves structure. It also forces more chest turn; not everything longer is bad! Overly bending your trail elbow can wreak havoc on your swing. It pulls your arms across/beside your body. It requires more time to get the elbow bend "out," ruining your sequencing. The lead arm often bends and low point control is destroyed. The misconception is that it will create more speed, but that's often the opposite of what happens. Golfers often feel they swing "easier" but FASTER with wider trail elbows. Want to play better golf with a shorter backswing? Don't bend your elbow so much. #2 - Hip (Pelvis) Turn I see this all the time: a golfer's hips are only 5-10° open at impact, but he turns them back 60°+ in the backswing. Unless your father is The Flash, your hips are probably not getting 40° open at impact from there! That's more rotation than Rory! Golfers who over-rotate their pelvis often over-turn everything - trail thigh/knee, chest/shoulders, etc. They have more work to do in the same ~0.3 seconds as a Tour player who turns back ~40° and turns through to impact 40° or so. Want to shorten the pelvis turn a bit? Learn to internally rotate into the trail hip, externally rotate away from the lead hip, and do "less" with your knees (extending and flexing) in the backswing. Learn some separation between chest and pelvis. #3 - Rolled Inside and Lifted Up Amateurs love to send the club (and their arms) around them. You see the red golfer here all the time at your local range. The problem? Your arms mostly take the club UP, not around. Going around creates no height until you have to hoist the club up in the air because you're halfway through your backswing and the club is waist high and three feet behind your butt! 😄  Learn to use your arms properly. Arms = up/down, body = around. Most golfers learn how little their arms really have to do in the backswing. The picture here is all you've gotta do (but maybe with a properly sized club!). #4 - Wide Takeaway Width is good, no? Yes, if you're wide at the right time and in the right spots. Golfers seeking width often don't hinge the club much early in the backswing… forcing them to hinge it late. Hinging the club late puts a lot of momentum into the club, wrists, and elbow just before we need to make a hairpin turn in transition and go the other direction at the start of the downswing. When you're driving into a hairpin curve, you go into it slowly and accelerate out of it. Waiting to hinge is like coasting down the straightaway and accelerating into the hairpin. Your car ends up off the road, and your golf ball off the course. Give hinging at a faster rate (earlier) then coasting to the top a try. You'll be able to accelerate out of the hairpin without the momentum of the arms and club pulling in the wrong direction.   #5 - Sway and Tilt Some sway is good but sometimes I see a golfer who just… keeps… swaying… Their chest leans forward a bit for balance, resulting in a whole lotta lean. The green line below is the GEARS "virtual spine." Pros sway a bit, but stay ~90°. This sway often combines with the extra pelvis turn because this golfer is not putting ANY limits on what the "middle of them" (their pelvis) is doing in the backswing. These golfers spend a lot of energy just to get back to neutral! The best players begin pushing forward EARLY in the backswing. Often before the club gets much past their trail foot! Pushing forward (softly) first stops your backward sway and then begins to get your body moving toward the target. Push softly, but early!  
    • I  no longer spend the time and effort trying to sell something I no longer need. Instead, if the clubs are in good condition, I go to my local golf shop or even Dicks Sporting Goods. Trade the clubs in for store credit and pick up something I need, like a hat. Cause you always need another golf hat!
    • Day 205 3-10 Wider backswing, reconnecting arm in downswing/arching wrist through. Also worked on less pause at the top. Recorded and hit a few foam balls. 
    • I really enjoyed this episode with Nick from Callaway. I didn't know the problem with swing weight and female golfers, but it makes sense. I actually think swing weight might not matter that much. If everyone senses the club differently, then wouldn't it mean that people might feel swing weights differently? Swing weight is a way to classify how heavy a club feels during the swing. Yet for a 70-year-old golfer, a D0 might feel like a D4 for a 25-year-old golfer? I think stronger people would consider higher swing weights lighter. Maybe a C8 equals a D2 in terms of feel?   
    • Wordle 1,725 3/6 ⬜🟨⬜🟨⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.