Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1074 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, iacas said:

Both when done incorrectly.

I may have the wrong understanding.  Right now I am not transferring ANY weight to the right leg or the left leg in the backswing.  I just maintain a 55/45 (ish) weight distribution...i.e. slightly more weight on the left side and then the weight moves further to the left on the downswing.  


  • Administrator
Posted
5 minutes ago, Jay28 said:

I may have the wrong understanding.  Right now I am not transferring ANY weight to the right leg or the left leg in the backswing.  I just maintain a 55/45 (ish) weight distribution...i.e. slightly more weight on the left side and then the weight moves further to the left on the downswing.  

Two things.

1. Feel ain’t real. Don’t rely on feels for what you’re actually doing.

2. You might be doing it poorly then.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 minute ago, iacas said:

Two things.

1. Feel ain’t real. Don’t rely on feels for what you’re actually doing.

2. You might be doing it poorly then.

I only rely on the results. So far so good, but early days.

Sometimes just changing something gives a psychological boost and I just hit it better because of that.  I'll keep at it.

 

 


  • Administrator
Posted

You can also start down a bad path after seeing initially good results.

Weight doesn’t stay forward in an S&T swing done properly and certainly pressure doesn’t.

A good S&T backswing is just a centered pivot.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
19 hours ago, iacas said:

Not sure what you mean. It's inline with a lot of golf swings

It just has the exact look of the swing that Andy and that other guy, Bennett (?), had. 

I’m one of those whom overdid the weight forward. My head still leans towards the target to this day. 

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
19 hours ago, nevets88 said:

It just has the exact look of the swing that Andy and that other guy, Bennett (?), had. 

I’m one of those whom overdid the weight forward. My head still leans towards the target to this day. 

I had to undo that as well. I still have to be conscious of it.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

My guess is lot of folks simply bend sideways towards the target in an effort to keep weight forward instead of rotating in the backswing. And then reverse the bend in the downswing, causing them to come crashing down on the ball with a steep angle.

On 5/25/2019 at 6:55 AM, iacas said:

 

 

A good S&T backswing is just a centered pivot.

Yes, minding first two keys(5S) with a good pivot solves 99 percent of my ills.

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Thank you for helping to keep stack and tilt alive. I have tried just about every method out there of the past thirty years. I watched the youtube videos a few times and tried it on the range. Unbelievable, contact every time. Even the odd miss hit was just a thin. Bought the book and read it cover to cover. Hit the range again and great contact every time again. Took it to the course yesterday and shot my lowest round this by 8 strokes. The only real problem left is some direction inconsistencies caused by my wrists. It will take time to stop doing the normal release of the conventional swing.


Posted (edited)

Have to say things are still working well - really good contact with the irons AND fairway woods/Driver.

I am certain that the biggest difference is the elimination of sway.  My head stays pretty much in the same place in relation to the ball till well after impact - where before it was moving back and up.

One problem is some pulls left with wedges. I think this is to do with the inside path of the club on the backswing and coming over the top a touch on the downswing.  I am working on that.  Also working on really relaxing the arms to try and increase clubhead speed. Driver clubhead speed was 83mph (ouch)... managed to get to 88 consistently.

Still just playing the par3 course at the moment and hitting at the range...1st full round is on Sunday. My club course is longish, just under 7000 yards and a par 73.  Hoping to break 90.

Edited by Jay28

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Still just a few rounds in on learning this swing but made two big discoveries. The first one was I was not able to slide the hips far enough for the driver. I reread the book an noticed outward pressure on the knees. It added 3-4 inches of slide without effort. The second one was "arms straight". I kept concentrating on my left arm but had trouble getting it to straighten fully at impact. This resulting in some thins and fats. Then I started working on keeping the right arm connected on one of the drills and now the left is straight every time, with consistent low point after the ball. I am excited about the last part.


Posted

Three more rounds in the eighties (which is great for me). I have started to have straight pushes right. I have corrected it by not taking it so much inside. It makes it a little less S&T but it works for me. No S&T instructors in my part of the world. We have Golftec and at least I would get the numbers.


  • Administrator
Posted
18 hours ago, Tim Carry said:

No S&T instructors in my part of the world. We have Golftec

Slight contradiction there… 😉

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Handicap still going down. I started following Steve Johnston because he was playing with S&T for a bit. He has gone on to his own method but still preaches stacking and staying centered. The magic for me was when he drew a line on the inside of his right forearm and said try and point that up during the backswing right up to impact. Totally stopped the pushes right and added 10 yards to the irons. The move has cured many things.


  • 3 years later...
Posted

Tom Saguto teaches  S&T. He does a video on you tube "Was Ben Hogan a Stack & tilter". It's about 25 minutes long & done very well.


  • Administrator
Posted
5 hours ago, birdie seeker said:

Tom Saguto teaches  S&T. He does a video on you tube "Was Ben Hogan a Stack & tilter". It's about 25 minutes long & done very well.

He was not.

🙂

  • Thumbs Up 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
3 hours ago, birdie seeker said:

Did you watch the video?

I don't have to, and you didn't embed it. (https://thesandtrap.com/how-to/embed-videos/) 😄 

01.jpg02.jpg03.jpg04.jpg

Hogan was not S&T.


Look, I'll level with you.

  • I was one of the first few S&T instructors.
  • I even created this topic (highlight the white text at the end of the first post, though).
  • We never taught S&T the way it's taught by most.
  • We "left" the S&T "camp" and have probably done the most to show faults with it than anyone else. For example… this topic.
  • I was also younger and dumber. I know a whole lot more now.
  • I have issues with a few of S&T stuff. Other parts are fine. "Hands in" is high on my list of dislikes.

I could go on, but… you're not just talking to someone looking to bash S&T.

Unless you want to twist S&T so far as to basically render the definition useless, Hogan wasn't S&T.

  • Weight Forward - Hogan shifted weight and pressure to his right side during the backswing.
  • Shoulder Down - Every good golfer does this. Left side bend is not nearly as much as S&T has you believe. Most of the side bend comes from the inclination of the hips.
  • Hands In - Really not a good thing for golfers to do. Hogan's trail elbow did not go "around" him like "hands in" implies strongly that you must do. Hogan's hands went UP some, and the "in" was just a matter of rotation.
  • Leg Straight - Many golfers extend their trail knee some.
  • Arms Straight - Most golfers do this too. This isn't super-S&T specific.
  • Tuck Butt - They seem to vacillate on having this in there. Good golfers finish that way, generally.

So…?

Look, here's the deal: do something because it makes sense to you, because you like it, whatever. Every crackpot (and more than a few decent instructors) claim Ben Hogan for themselves. To what end? Are you Ben Hogan? There might be hundreds of golfers who hit the ball as well as Ben Hogan these days. We have learned a LOT about the golf swing since Ben died.

  • Thumbs Up 2

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1074 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.