Jump to content
iacas

"The Golfing Machine" by Homer Kelley

124 posts / 95099 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, nevets88 said:

Because it's incredibly technical and some of it is outdated. Many have stood on the shoulders of Kelley and corrected, updated and refined. 

Most that, @cutchemist42. It's outdated as heck and won't help a regular golfer at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Register for free today and you won't see this ad spot again!

On 3/16/2017 at 5:59 AM, iacas said:

Thanks for your insight. :-P

Ok,  a little more detail on my opinion for this book.  I got a version several years ago and studied it quite a bit.  I catalogued my existing swings components.  I then studied and cross referenced to see what components of my swing might not match well when used together.

I did shoot down as low as 89 which for me at the time was an improvement.  I was using what TGM geeks would refer to as a three barrel hitting action.  I threw the book and all my notes on it away or I could probably be more specific.

Anyhoo,  the book is poorly organized and imo does not look like work of a truly qualified engineer.  Truly great engineers thrive on organization.  But I could live with poor organization if the information within had true Quality.

Homer never produced a great golfer.  TGM produced Clampett (flame out) and Erickson (wacko) who never won anything of note at the highest level.  Ogrady was revered for his striking talent but never made it big except as a driving range attraction AND did his own thing with Morad.

So imo the legacy lacks results but that's not my true point.  My true point can be reduced to a question.  If one views golfers as golfing machines as Homer did then what is the tolerance in the machine?

Everything that is manufactured to precision has a tolerance.  Parts made for your cars engine are made to tolerance,  maybe exacting tolerance but nonetheless there's tolerances.

what is the tolerance in the golf swing?

Maybe it's the size of the sweet spot.  So by definition if one uses this TGM approach every movement they train in must be made to exacting tolerances within say an eighth of on inch.

Do we think this is even possible?

Can you tell when you swing if your head dips fractions of inches thus causing fatsies?

whats are the tolerances in The Golfing Machine?

I ask that to any proponents of this methodology.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To elaborate imo the golfing machine approach forces one to play a game Sisson calls 'blame a body part' i.e. On bad swings we have to guess was it our head dipping fractions of an inch or was it our hip motion or right elbow or arms.

This can go on ad infinitum.  IMO it's not the best way to approach the problems we face when playing golf.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not really like that at all.

TGM is just a cataloging of the parts of the golf swing. It's not a "How To" book and it has its flaws. But it's not total tripe. Plenty of great instructors have a background in TGM.

Also Bryson is a proponent. He won NCAAs and the US Am.

Basically, it was never really a book for golfers. It's outdated now, too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Could anyone be so kind, and update pictures of it to the community? If anyone can contribute 5 minutes of your life and send me pictures of pages even taken by phone, then I could make a pdf of it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bryson said:

Could anyone be so kind, and update pictures of it to the community? If anyone can contribute 5 minutes of your life and send me pictures of pages even taken by phone, then I could make a pdf of it.

If the book is still in print, this could qualify as a copyright infringement.      

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

5 minutes ago, dennyjones said:

If the book is still in print, this could qualify as a copyright infringement.      

Is it? If I could order original version by Homer from Amazon, I would be happy to do so. Currently there is version 7.2 corrected by some other guy. Homer unfortunately is not here with us anymore. I am talking about old 6 version.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, bryson said:

Is it? If I could order original version by Homer from Amazon, I would be happy to do so. Currently there is version 7.2 corrected by some other guy. Homer unfortunately is not here with us anymore. I am talking about old 6 version.

The Golfing Machine company still owns the rights.

Look for a version 6 on eBay.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 hours ago, dennyjones said:

If the book is still in print, this could qualify as a copyright infringement.      

Copyright law is not dependent on publication.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

4 minutes ago, bryson said:

ok, I understand you would never lend a book to a playing partner? if anyone does not mind sharing, I would appreciate a lot

Lending someone a book and photocopying it are two completely different things, not to mention the amount of time it would take to do what you asked.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

18 minutes ago, billchao said:

Lending someone a book and photocopying it are two completely different things, not to mention the amount of time it would take to do what you asked.

I will spend 3 times the amount it took you to do it by walking with homeless dogs - so world profits by your effort.

If you walk every day by the rules set by other people - I am impressed. Though it is just my personal point of view, that owning copyrights over somebody who is dead is way wronger than making a photocopy of a book and sharing it (not selling) to another guy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, bryson said:

I will spend 3 times the amount it took you to do it by walking with homeless dogs - so world profits by your effort.

If you walk every day by the rules set by other people - I am impressed. Though it is just my personal point of view, that owning copyrights over somebody who is dead is way wronger than making a photocopy of a book and sharing it (not selling) to another guy.

It's literally illegal, AND someone still OWNS the rights to the book.

Just because an author dies doesn't mean his works become public domain immediately.

Go somewhere else, please, in search of someone who will break the law for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

5 hours ago, billchao said:

Copyright law is not dependent on publication.

When do things become public domain?   I'm not experienced in copyright or patent law.

 

The answer to my question was easy to Google:

S - Copyright expires 70 years after author's death; but if the work is anonymous or made for hire, or the author or the author's death date is unknown,copyright expires on the earlier of 95 years after publication or 120 years after creation.

Edited by dennyjones

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2019 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
  • Posts

    • Boy that is tempting. Being a lefty I’d be very tempted to hit a cut down there close. Especially with the high chance of shanking an iron into that tree line off the tee which of course would peel some bark off and head straight to the water.
    • Rules 5 and 6 tell us about playing the "round" and playing the "hole." Purpose of Rule: Rule 5 covers how to play a round – such as where and when a player may practise on the course before or during a round, when a round starts and ends and what happens when play has to stop or resume. Players are expected to: Start each round on time, and Play continuously and at a prompt pace during each hole until the round is completed. When it is a player’s turn to play, it is recommended that he or she make the stroke in no more than 40 seconds, and usually more quickly than that. Rule 5 - Playing the Round 5.1 Meaning of Round 5.2 Practising on Course Before or Between Rounds 5.3 Starting and Ending Round 5.4 Playing in Groups 5.5 Practising During Round or While Play Is Stopped 5.6 Unreasonable Delay; Prompt Pace of Play 5.7 Stopping Play; Resuming Play https://www.usga.org/content/usga/home-page/rules/rules-2019/rules-of-golf/rules-and-interpretations.html#!ruletype=fr&section=rule&rulenum=5      
    • During spring break last year, I played a nice, but very tricky, course here in Durham.  It’s called Duke University Golf Club. It was probably $100/person, so definitely not cheap. From the tips, the course is a par 72, 7154 yards, course/slope rating 74.8/142. But, I played the whites, which was 6127 yards, course/slope rating 70.2/126. We started off on no 10, and I shot a 52. Then when we made the turn, I shot a 46 on the front for a 98 total. Very slick greens. On probably half the holes, if you missed the green, you had either a bunker shot or a really tough chip shot. My two favorite holes were 12 and 13 (our third and fourth on the day). The 11th is a downhill par 5, with a third shot over a creek. Then the twelfth was a short par 3 (130 from whites) over a lake. I believe I doubled both. But, if you’re in the RDU area, definitely a good course to check out.
    • Let's avoid drifting this into a political discussion. Try to keep it to being golf specific.
    • As you wish. That's the 13th at Southwinds in West Boca Raton.  Each of those white chords is about 150 yards.  Every once in a blue moon, they will have the tees far enough back that you are actually behind the tree line (you have to play this course from the back tees to feel the design).  On that occasion, you can pull out the 3-wood or something and really go for it, but that sorta nerfs the hole.  Also, you can see that final tree is huge  The others are a mass of tall areca palms.  But that last one is a white oak or something.  It gets in your way if you mishit the tee stroke.  Beyond that the hole is a cake walk.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Augie
      Augie
      (61 years old)
    2. Dukes1304
      Dukes1304
      (34 years old)
    3. Mmgolfwiz
      Mmgolfwiz
      (56 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...