Just Curious - any LPGAers use SnT?

[nevets88]

A search on Google didn't yield much - there's a Yahoo answer that blasts SnT.

I saw the picture of a player in the NYT blog, but I don't she's on the LPGA tour, but the one below it.

[michaeljames92]

A search on Google didn't yield much - there's a Yahoo answer that blasts SnT.

Anna Rawson.

[kafka01]

Anna Rawson made ONE Top10 in around 40 starts on the LPGA - i quickly would forget about her and how she swings. She has a lot in her mind, and golf doesnt seem to take a priorty there.... She is another great example why you cant judge somebodys success (or the lack of it in her case) by the swing pattern she uses - simply put because she uses golf as a platform to promote herself instead of taking the game serious.

[iacas]

Anna Rawson.

Yah, and a few on the Future Tour.

Anna Rawson made ONE Top10 in around 40 starts on the LPGA - i quickly would forget about her and how she swings. She has a lot in her mind, and golf doesnt seem to take a priorty there.... She is another great example why you cant judge somebodys success (or the lack of it in her case) by the swing pattern she uses - simply put because she uses golf as a platform to promote herself instead of taking the game serious.

Unfortunately that's probably the case.

--- The women are a bit of an odd case... they could be helped so much, particularly with distance, if they could do a few things. Very few of them rotate their hlps and utilize jumping quite as much as they could. It's almost a tour of arm swingers. I honestly think it's due in large part to the fact that there's little money to be made by working with an LPGA player. They rarely get the short-game experts that the men get, and the same is true of the full swing guys (except the top few). Go to an LPGA event and it's usually a player working with their caddies. And even if some instructor looking to make a name for himself turned a bunch of LPGA players into S&T; winners, his name would still be relatively small in the golf landscape. Anyway, some videos of Anna.

[Jay-Bird]

Geometry doesn't work for women.

[iacas]

Geometry doesn't work for women.

Does that explain their lousy putting (see the recent Golf Digest article)?

[kafka01]

Sorry i cant read the GD article - are you ironic or are they indeed bad putters?

[iacas]

Sorry i cant read the GD article - are you ironic or are they indeed bad putters?

Women are bad putters. I've always felt it but now it's basically proven.

[jamo]

Sorry i cant read the GD article - are you ironic or are they indeed bad putters?

http://www.golfdigest.com/golf-instr...g-matthew-rudy

[Chilli Dipper]

Women are bad putters. I've always felt it but now it's basically proven.

Somewhere, Ben Wright is shouting "Told you so!" at any passer-by who will listen to him.

[Harmonious]

Gee, I kind of thought that Natalie Gulbis was "stacked", maybe not "tilted". I know, I know, my bad....

[majorchamp]

Anna Rawson made ONE Top10 in around 40 starts on the LPGA - i quickly would forget about her and how she swings. She has a lot in her mind, and golf doesnt seem to take a priorty there.... She is another great example why you cant judge somebodys success (or the lack of it in her case) by the swing pattern she uses - simply put because she uses golf as a platform to promote herself instead of taking the game serious.

I was going to 100% agree...I checked out her website and definitely see golf not being #1 to her...then again its her personal website, not annarawsongolf.com but then it occured to me that LPGA players due struggle a bit more when it comes to tournament purses, publicity, sponsorships, etc.. when compared to their PGA player counterparts. So from a financial standpoint, I can understand why someone on the LPGA would look for other avenues for self promotion and financial gain, versus relying soley on tournament winnings.

But since I don't know her whatsoever, I cannot make a judgment of how serious or not serious she takes the game of golf. I can only comment that unless you are a star player on any Tour, money doesn't rain from the heavens and you have to do what you have to do to make a name for yourself.

[newtogolf]

Pretty much consider her the Anna Kournikova of golf. She has skills, but she's also a beautiful girl with other aspirations.

[Joeyvee]

I had to throw this in here quick. Its hilarious.

[Shorty]

Pretty much consider her the Anna Kournikova of golf. She has skills, but she's also a beautiful girl with other aspirations.

I don't recall Anna Kournikova being hideously underweight. Intellectually, they are probably on a similar level, though. Ever heard Rawson speak?

[sean_miller]

I don't recall Anna Kournikova being hideously underweight. Intellectually, they are probably on a similar level, though. Ever heard Rawson speak?

Kournikova reached the top 10 - unlike golf, in tennis you have to beat the person one-on-one. She made a few singles finals, but just couldn't seal the deal. I think she did win one major though - in doubles.

Basically, she was a gazillion times better at tennis than Rawson is at golf.

[BallStriker]

It's almost a tour of arm swingers.

Agree about as strongly as someone can agree......

[MJP]

Women are bad putters. I've always felt it but now it's basically proven.

That's probably because women have been proven to on average have inferior depth perception to men. I feel like when the ladies miss it it's more often either long or short than off line.