Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Which wedge (degree)


Note: This thread is 5586 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Looking at a new set of clubs that finish with a 45 degree pitching wedge and 50 degree gap wedge. If I were to add one more wedge, what would it be? Thinking 54 or 56, but not sure which.

Another option would be to scrap the gap wedge and pick up a 52 and 58. Thoughts?

CARBITE Putter


Posted
I carry four wedges 45, 51, 56 & 60. I find them all useful and use them all. But if I had to give one up it would be the gap wedge (51*). You can cut a 45* (flop) for the gap wedge distance an chip with a slightly closed sand wedge (56*) if necessary. But since a lot of my game problems are short game I believe giving up my 7 wood was for the gap wedge was a good trade.

Butch


Posted
Looking at a new set of clubs that finish with a 45 degree pitching wedge and 50 degree gap wedge. If I were to add one more wedge, what would it be? Thinking 54 or 56, but not sure which.

What kind of swing do you have?

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I carry:

47 130 yards
52 100 yards
56 90 yards
60 80 Yards

what are your yardage of your 45? and 50? and what distance gap are you trying to fill?

Titleist 910 D2 9.5 Driver
Titleist 910 F15 & 21 degree fairway wood
Titleist 910 hybrid 24 degree
Mizuno Mp33 5 - PW
52/1056/1160/5

"Yonex ADX Blade putter, odyssey two ball blade putter, both  33"

ProV-1


Posted
Looking at a new set of clubs that finish with a 45 degree pitching wedge and 50 degree gap wedge. If I were to add one more wedge, what would it be? Thinking 54 or 56, but not sure which.

How's that Tommy Armour 1-iron working out for you?

Anyway, I'd go with a versatile 56 - one you can open up. I can't think of that type of grind but old Mizuno Pro and some Vokeys sit flat when opened up. The flange is not overly long. Imagine the opposite of a Ben Hogan "sure out".

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
The 1-iron sits at home in the bedroom, awaiting someone that may come through a window one day.

I currently carry driver, 3-wood, 2-hybrid, 3-P, gap and sand. But these new clubs and stronger lofts just suck. My current P is 48, but now looking at a set with a P at 45. Hence, my question.

CARBITE Putter


Posted
matt, good to see you have ambition and own a 1 iron.

4 deg increments is the norm
and 48 is normal for a PW

the 52 is a great club under 100 yards and versatile to chip greenside with

and a 56 is 4 above that.

i carry 52 deg and 57 deg


also what is equally important is the degree of bounce on the club you buy, generally the better golfer has a lower degree of bounce...
if i was to recommend deg bounce on 25 HCP i would give someone 8 - 10 deg bounce on their wedges

always give way to the Greenskeeper!!

in my bag:
whatever clubs i find left behind on the course... But the Ping Anser will never be beaten!!


BALL: only get off tractor for PRO v1's..... Now, which way to Q School???


Posted
...Another option would be to scrap the gap wedge and pick up a 52 and 58. Thoughts?

Scope out your possible new iron set. Are the PW and GW the same shaft length?

Reason I ask: For numbered irons, the rule of thumb is 1/2" shaft difference and 4* loft difference equals about 10 yards distance difference between clubs for the average golfer. But when stock wedges made for iron sets come into play, sometimes it's only 1/4" between shafts. Or no difference at all. Shaft lengths, plus the loft, will help determine how far the distance difference is between clubs. Then, if you bring in specialty wedges (CG15, Vokeys, Mizuno T series), you have to determine what distance gap between stock PW (most keep it) and the specialty wedges you bring into your mix. So, you might want to start by comparing the specs/shaft length for all clubs involved in your plan.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
The 1-iron sits at home in the bedroom, awaiting someone that may come through a window one day.

Is there any way that the stronger lofts allow you to drop a longer club? If not it really depends on what kind of shots you like to hit. If you like to hit flop shots and/or prefer chipping with clubs of higher lofts, I would scrap the GW and get a 52 and a 58 (or 60). If you like chipping with a SW, you should keep the 50 and just add a 56. Keep in mind though in my experience, if you are getting a strong lofted set that usually means they are cavity backs, and chipping with a cavity backed 50* GW can be kind of tricky. It's just not very versatile. If you were to get rid of the 50* GW and get a 52*, it would most likely be a blade, which are easier to chip with IMO.

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
56.10 is solid.

Geomax 16 reg - driver
G10 17 4 wood reg
Sumo2 20 hybrid Reg
MX-100 4h, 5h, 6-gap Reg
MP T 10 56.10, 60.08Bullseye putter


Posted
Thanks for the advice. I went with the gap that matches the set. Stopping at 4 iron, I do have room to add two wedges. Yesterday I played with just the 50 gap and a 60. I was ok on most holes, but I will probably add a 54 or 56 to the mix.

CARBITE Putter


Posted
56.10 is solid.

yep. 56.10 is what i've been using as my main SW and all-around greenside wedge for years now. Really can't go wrong with it.

The alternative I used thoroughly is 54.10 which is also a good all around wedge. For me, distance with wedges isn't a big factor...it seems whether I go with 54*, 56*, or 58*, all my wedges go just about 90-100 yards on full shots. I'm just much more comfortable now with 56*.

DST Tour 9.5 Diamana Whiteboard
909F3 15* 3 FW stock Aldila Voodoo
909F3 18* 5 FW stock Aldila Voodoo
'09 X-Forged 3-PW Project-X 6.0 Flighted
CG15 56* X-Tour 60* Abaco


Posted
The 1-iron sits at home in the bedroom, awaiting someone that may come through a window one day.

Might want to switch that 1-iron out with a bat. With a golf club you would have to hit someone with the head of the club; if you hit them with the shaft, it will just bend and they will hardly feel much pain.


Posted
45 is a very strong PW, it's a 9i in some sets. My PW is 47, which is still kind of strong. I do not carry gap wedge, I have a 54.10 and 60.05.

Note: This thread is 5586 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.