Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Would you take lessons from a Pro that doesnt use Video?


Note: This thread is 5433 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. Is video a MUST for you when choosing an instructor?

    • Yes- I want to see what my mistakes are.
      14
    • No- I want a more hands on lesson.
      11


Recommended Posts

Posted

Title Says it all. Video seems to be integral to many coaches now, heck you can even get online coaching now, which soley depends on video use. If your instructor told you he doesnt use video, is that a deal breaker for you?


Posted

Not necessarily...

My current guy is in his 60s and has been around.  He was a great player in his youth, played some mini-tour, and went to work at some really nice clubs while learning to teach from top pros (ie he has a resume).  He is a feel teacher, is hands-on and can demonstrate what he is talking about.  He knows more about the golf swing than most I have ever talked to and has a natural way to get you to feel what he is talking about. His methodology is sound, meshes with my goals, and has produced results.  He doesn't stop with the basics, and has taught me some more advanced shots and methods especially with the short game.  After my first lesson with him, I knew that this was a good match because I had been looking for the type of instruction that my body could remember, not just my mind.  I can and will use video tape from time to time, but it just really validates what I have learned.  The results he points to are ball flight, trajectory, target, sound, swing, etc. on an outdoor range and of course my ability to hit great shots on a consistent basis.

I also have a friend that works for a golf legend (literally a household name) that uses video to validate what she sees and then to show the student.  She then works on drills and positions and goes back to video at the end to show the student the improvement.  Again, she has been around, has an extensive resume, played LPGA, and knows her stuff.  She doesn't rely on video, but she uses it as a tool.  I also enjoyed her teaching and liked how she incorporates feel.

I have also met some guys that put you up on a screen and then see the obvious flaw and try to work on something that is a result and not a cause because they lack the understanding of a swing.  I am a little wary of someone who can't watch you swing without video and can't at least give you an idea.  I would run.  Video is a tool but it is not a substitute for knowing the golf swing and it is certainly not a substitute to actually teaching you how to improve your golf swing.

Callaway AI Smoke TD Max 10.5* | Cobra Big Tour 15.5* | Rad Tour 18.5* | Titleist U500 4i | T100 5-P | Vokey 50/8* F, 54/10* S,  58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback 1


  • Moderator
Posted

I'll make exceptions if the teacher is really good and normally uses video, but can't or opts not to on a particular lesson. Of course, there's such a thing as over-relying on video. That I'd watch out for.

If I were teaching, I'd make sure I have video available. No doubt about it. It's a sine qua non.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Video is great, but I think ball flight is a better gauge of success in general.  You don't need a text book looking swing to be able to golf the ball efficiently.  I think some of us get hung up on trying to make the swing look a certain way, when in fact the only thing that matters is ball flight.

I agree with it being overused by some teachers as well.  One of the guys at the range I goto that gives a lot of lessons is constantly trying to teach people Tiger's old swing.  I think that is absolutely ridiculous.  How are you going to compare a 25 handicap which limited athletic ability to possibly the greatest player ever?


Posted


Originally Posted by DBC

Title Says it all. Video seems to be integral to many coaches now, heck you can even get online coaching now, which soley depends on video use. If your instructor told you he doesnt use video, is that a deal breaker for you?


It they were follow up lessons and the instructor was very good (not for a first lesson...baseline video is very important and as I have asked many times...why not?) and KNEW your motion it could be OK to work with someone without video.  That said, outside of rare circumstances (never say never) I would not recommend taking lessons from someone not using video. Just my .02.

Dave

David Wedzik
Director of Instruction, Golf Evolution

LOWEST SCORE WINS! <- Check it out!!!

   

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Video is an absolute must.

It's so much more important to have video, that way I know that my swing looks good and pretty.

Who wouldn't rather have a swing that looks good rather than one that actually works right?


Posted

Video is definitely a deal breaker... Just taking video on my own and analyzing that has helped a tremendous amount.  It is one thing for somebody to tell you what you are doing wrong but when you can actually see it it makes a world of difference.  Some of the things I never realized I actually did or I felt like I was doing something different, but as they say, feel isn't real and video shows that.

Tristan Hilton

My Equipment: 
Titleist TSR2 Driver (Fujikura Pro 2.0 TS; 10.5°) · PXG 0211 FWs (Diamana S+ 60; 15° and 21°) · PXG 0211 Hybrid (MMT 80; 22°) · Edel SMS Irons (SteelFiber i95; 5-GW) · Edel SMS Pro Wedges (SteelFiber i110; 56°, 60°) · Edel Classic Blade Putter (32") · Maxfli Tour Ball · Pinned Prism Rangefinder · SuperStroke Grips · Flightscope Mevo · TRUE Linkswear Shoes · Vessel Player V Pro 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Not using video would be like a doctor diagnosing you without taking an x-ray or blood test.  Video is a must for a lesson, no way you can see how everything is moving at full speed.  Also shows the student where they are and where they need to be, the whole feel isn't real thing.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by TourSpoon

Not necessarily...

My current guy is in his 60s and has been around.  He was a great player in his youth, played some mini-tour, and went to work at some really nice clubs while learning to teach from top pros (ie he has a resume).  He is a feel teacher, is hands-on and can demonstrate what he is talking about.  He knows more about the golf swing than most I have ever talked to and has a natural way to get you to feel what he is talking about. His methodology is sound, meshes with my goals, and has produced results.  He doesn't stop with the basics, and has taught me some more advanced shots and methods especially with the short game.  After my first lesson with him, I knew that this was a good match because I had been looking for the type of instruction that my body could remember, not just my mind.  I can and will use video tape from time to time, but it just really validates what I have learned.  The results he points to are ball flight, trajectory, target, sound, swing, etc. on an outdoor range and of course my ability to hit great shots on a consistent basis.

I also have a friend that works for a golf legend (literally a household name) that uses video to validate what she sees and then to show the student.  She then works on drills and positions and goes back to video at the end to show the student the improvement.  Again, she has been around, has an extensive resume, played LPGA, and knows her stuff.  She doesn't rely on video, but she uses it as a tool.  I also enjoyed her teaching and liked how she incorporates feel.

I have also met some guys that put you up on a screen and then see the obvious flaw and try to work on something that is a result and not a cause because they lack the understanding of a swing.  I am a little wary of someone who can't watch you swing without video and can't at least give you an idea.  I would run.  Video is a tool but it is not a substitute for knowing the golf swing and it is certainly not a substitute to actually teaching you how to improve your golf swing.



+1. This is spot on from my experience. Of course I would not tell anyone how to use video but I don't believe the absence of video means a lower quality lesson.


Posted

Video is a requirement for me (as a high handicapper) as I need visuals to see what I did wrong rather than descriptions.

SWING DNA
Speed [77] Tempo [5] ToeDown [5] KickAngle [6] Release [5] Mizuno JPX EZ 10.5° - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye (with Harrison ShotMaker) Mizuno JPX EZ 3W/3H - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye Mizuno JPX 850 Forged 4i-PW - True Temper XP 115 S300 Mizuno MP R-12 50.06/54.09/58.10 - Dynamic Gold Wedge Flex Mizuno MP A305 [:-P]


Posted

For my learning style video is a must.  What I feel is happening and what is actually happening often are very different.  For me to properly implement something I need to learn it visually first and then get the correct feeling.  Video is very helpful for me to know what the correct positions feel like as opposed to the improper ones.

|Callaway I-MIX FT-9  - Driver | Callaway Diablo Octane - 3 Wood | Callaway Diablo Edge Tour [3H & 4H] - Hybrids | Callaway X-forged 2009 - Irons | Callaway JAWS [52, 56, 60] - Wedges | SC Studio Style Newport 2 / Laguna 1.5 / Kombi-S - Putter |
 


Posted

If there was someone I wanted to learn from, and he (or she) didn't use video, I'd probably still go ahead with the lessons. Luckily I didn't have to make that choice.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
I currently take lessons from a swing coach that doesn't use vidoe and will continue to take instruction from him. Have taken lessons from others where video was used and certainly learned from it but don't have to have it and actuaaly prefer not looking at video.

Posted

I kind of have a problem with the "no" answer. Just because someone uses video doesn't mean that they aren't "hands on."

However, in regards to the original question, I'd be weary of taking lessons from someone that doesn't use video. And my answer is coming from an instructors point of view more than a students. I make that point, because as an instructor I don't really understand how anyone could tell a student that they can do what a video camera does. With a camera you can rewind and slow the video down as much as you want. You turn a 2 second swing into a 30 second swing... that can be viewed over and over again.

Theres no way you can be as precise without a video camera as you can with one.  Not to mention a decent camera is only going to cost you around $300, so why wouldn't you?

However, that doesn't mean that Teacher A is better than Teacher B because Teacher A uses video. Theres a lot more that goes into being a good teacher. The point is more that Teacher B could be even better if he used video.

  • Upvote 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

The poll question is disingenuous.

I'm "hands on" - perhaps more so - than some other guys I know who don't use video.

At the end of the day I do all I can reasonably do - and a $300 camera is well below the threshold of "reasonable" - to help my students. They get better, they get video, they get hands-on, they get drills, they get knowledge, they get feelings, etc. They may not get all of them every time, but video is done every time unless it's pitching, putting, etc.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

As an instructor myself, I believe video is simply another tool in my tool box. My rates are the same regardless of what I use during the lesson. A lot of pros I know have increased their rates in order to pay for the video camera they've bought and I don't think that's right. The use of my tools totally depends on the student and the stage of their development. I don't care what I use as long as I get the job done i.e. helping them improve.

When I was an amateur, I had the odd lesson videoed and was not impressed but I was probably unlucky: 1) most of the hour-long lesson was wasted while the pro fiddled with the camera set-up and how to use the software and 2) the flaws in my swing were obvious but he couldn't tell me how to correct them.

"Success is going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." – Winston Churchill


Posted

I'm not so much into video analysis.  To quote a line from the movie Tommy Boy:  "Course, I could get a hell of a good look at a T-Bone steak by sticking my head up a bull's ass, but I'd rather take the butcher's word for it."

In my Bag:

Driver - SLDR 430 - 10.5 deg
3 Wood - SLDR HL
Irons - TM Tour CB's                                                                                                                                                                 Wedges - TM                                                                                                                                                                               Putter - Odyssey White Ice 2 Ball


Posted

The thread title is contradictory to the actual poll question: "would you take lessons w/o video..(no I wouldn't)", vs. "is video a must? (yes I think so)" If someone were to not read closely, they might select the wrong answer. Just wanted to point that out.

I feel it is a must without a doubt.


Note: This thread is 5433 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.