Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5420 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

After reading the post about a new driver or GPS and the fact I have been reading too much on all of the new drivers coming out...  How long do the majority of golfers keep using a driver?  I understand the argument of if it ain't broke... And I get the "want the latest and greatest"... But, I am looking for honest answers concerning tech advances and so on.

What I Play
905T 9.5 NV65
AP1 3-W
56deg
Studio Select - Newport 2 34" e6+ Studio Design 2 - in the barn for now


Posted


Originally Posted by Fishinjdb

After reading the post about a new driver or GPS and the fact I have been reading too much on all of the new drivers coming out...  How long do the majority of golfers keep using a driver?  I understand the argument of if it ain't broke... And I get the "want the latest and greatest"... But, I am looking for honest answers concerning tech advances and so on.

Remember that new driver 'technology' is just as much marketing as it is innovation.  Driver fitting has more merit than the latest and greatest new driver release, in my opinion.

Check your 905T with a fitter if you can.  If that $400 is really burning a hole in your wallet, seek out a head in the last 5 years that you like and get fit for a shaft that will optimize it for you.

In the Bag: TaylorMade R11 TP - TaylorMade R7 TP TS - Cleveland Halo - TM TP 2009 3-PW - Vokey SM 52 - Vokey SM 60 - Rife Barbados CS - ProV1x 


On the Computer:  Analyzr Pro 
 


Posted

Got to agree with Delav .

Fitting with the right shaft will give you the best result and once you got fitted , the driver will stay quite long in the bag.

It take some time to get use to the driver too.

What I Play:
913D3 9.5°Diamana Kai'li 70 Stiff  "C3" | 910F 15°, Diamana Kai'li 80 Stiff "D2" | 910H 19°,  Diamana Kai'li for Titleist 85 Hybrid Stiff | Titleist 714 AP2 4 to P Aerotech Steelfiber i110 S | SM4 Vokey 50.12, 54.14 & SM5 60.11K| 34" Edel Umpqua + 40g Counter Weight
 

Posted

Back in the day I used a Mac Gregor-Tommy Armour 983 for probably 7 or 8 years. Since then if they stay for a Season, it is a long time .Age has caught up to me. Now it is a search for the Holy Grail of Length and Straight  all the time.  I love my Nickent Evolver4DX head, but It allows me to try different shafts.

Wishon  715 CLC-AXE5 A shaft -hard steppedt -44.5"
4 wood-Infiniti 17*-UST IROD A shaft-Hard stepped(2009 model)
Hybrids 19* & 24*-Trident DSW-UST IROD Hybrid A shaft-hard stepped (2009 model)
Irons-5-PW- Wilson Staff Progressive Forged-TT Release  sensicore( 5&6-Soft stepped R-7,8&9-R-wedge hard stepped R
Wedges-52*-Wilson JP BeCE(54* bent to 52*)-TT-Release sensicore-hard stepped R

              56*Wilson R-61 BECU Sandy Andy- Release sensicore tipped same as 8 iron

               60* Wilson Harmonized BECU-Release sensicore tipped same as 8 iron

Woods- Star Grips  Irons Energy Grips

:Putter-Rife IBF with Ping Blackout Grip-35"

Ball-Wilson Staff Zip Golf. or C-25


Posted

I played a 8.5* Cleveland Launcher for 5 years, it started losing pop in it so it was just time

to change to something new. I am now playing a 9.5* Titleist 909d2.

 titleist.gif909 D2 w/ Aldila NV 75 x
titleist.gif909 F2 w/ VooDoo s
nike.gifVR TW Forged 3-PW 
nike.gifVR 52.10*, 56.14*, 60.10*ping.gifAnser  


Posted


Originally Posted by Fishinjdb

After reading the post about a new driver or GPS and the fact I have been reading too much on all of the new drivers coming out...  How long do the majority of golfers keep using a driver?  I understand the argument of if it ain't broke... And I get the "want the latest and greatest"... But, I am looking for honest answers concerning tech advances and so on.


Keep your driver as long as there is no proven Trackman data of another driver that is significantly better in the distance and accuracy department as your own, assuming your driver isn't broken !

Who cares about tech advances, new names, new colors, the latest and greatest.  It is the distance and accuracy that is of importance to you !  And that can be measured objectively with a Trackman !


Posted

I personally think your driver should be the newest club in your bag. With the technology and money they put into these, it is well worth it. I know some of it is advertising and I'm not saying you need a new driver every year. Simply, it's never a waste of money to invest in a new club that fits you.

taylormade.gif - R9 SuperTri TP 8.5˚ Driver
taylormade.gif - R9 TP 15˚ 19˚ Fairway Woods
nike.gif - VR Split Cavity 2-PW Irons
nike.gif - VR Black 52° 56° Wedges
cameron.gif - Newport 2 34" Putter

Posted

Keep it as long as you're happy with its' performance and it isn't broken.  Inspect it once in awhile as I cracked the face on my driver after 3 years.  I believe the newer thinner faced drivers will fatigue and crack after extensive use.  When this began with me I notice a different sound at impact and thought the head was coming loose.  But after a close look I could see a crack along the top of face just below the weld.

Butch


Posted

I had my Nickent for a season and a half....but the face went 'dead'....it lost the feel and the sound....no rattling or anything, just dull.

Then my last round of the year I got my Nike for $150 at a pro shop at a course.....couldn't bypass that deal.....I've hit it a few times, but I am going to get it fitted this weekend.....with a shorter shaft

Replaced a driver whenever you want to....it all comes down to how much money you have!

:tmade: SLDR X-Stiff 12.5°
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Wood Stiff
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Hybrid Stiff
:nike:VR Pro Combo CB 4 - PW Stiff 2° Flat
:cleveland:588RTX CB 50.10 GW
:cleveland:588RTX CB 54.10 SW
:nike:VR V-Rev 60.8 LW
:nike:Method 002 Putter


Posted

I tend to run my drivers about 2 years behind the "latest and greatest" and haven't played with anyone who is outperforming me on technology alone.  The current technology from Taylor Made is really just designed to give you all the options a traditional clubfitter would normally do - only now you can trial and error it on your own.

Titleist 910D3 8.5* Aldila RIP
Titleist 910F 13.5* Diamana Kai'li
Nickent 4DX 20* and 24*
Tour Preferred 5-PW
52.08, 56.14, 60.04 Titleist Vokey

Odyssey Metal-X #9 Putter

Pro V1x


Posted

Quote:

I personally think your driver should be the newest club in your bag. With the technology and money they put into these, it is well worth it. I know some of it is advertising and I'm not saying you need a new driver every year. Simply, it's never a waste of money to invest in a new club that fits you.

At this point, I think driver technology is close to maxed out due to USGA restrictions.  Will 2016 drivers be more efficient than today's?  Sure.  But the amount of improvement going forward will be insignificant in my opinion compared to shaft optomization.

What's in the Bag:
Driver: Taylormade SLDR 12*
3-wood: Taylormade Burner 15*
Hybrid: Taylormade Burner 19*
Irons: Callaway XR

Wedges: Vokey 50*, 54*, 58*
Putter: Scotty Newport Studio


Posted

Devil's Advocate-I also think drivers made a big jump 6-8 years ago, and then shortly after that they maxed out at 460cc.  I'll put it this way, my 1999 TaylorMade Ti Bubble 2 driver is nothing like my 3 other drivers.  I can still hit it, but it's an entirely different experience, it's just noticeably less forgiving than modern drivers and feels different.  But I also have a Titleist 983E that came out in 2003 or 2004.  I got it as an unhit demo a year and a half ago, and it doesn't feel all that different than my newer drivers, or any other new drivers I've hit.  The head is smaller than 460cc, but it's just as long as anything else, and the same goes for pretty much any driver from the last 5-6 years (with the proper shaft for my swing).

Originally Posted by JoshuaVnyrd1817

I personally think your driver should be the newest club in your bag. With the technology and money they put into these, it is well worth it. I know some of it is advertising and I'm not saying you need a new driver every year. Simply, it's never a waste of money to invest in a new club that fits you.




Posted


Originally Posted by nickel_aTm

Quote:

At this point, I think driver technology is close to maxed out due to USGA restrictions.  Will 2016 drivers be more efficient than today's?  Sure.  But the amount of improvement going forward will be insignificant in my opinion compared to shaft optomization.


I very much agree with you. I just see much more improvement in the years with woods over other clubs.

taylormade.gif - R9 SuperTri TP 8.5˚ Driver
taylormade.gif - R9 TP 15˚ 19˚ Fairway Woods
nike.gif - VR Split Cavity 2-PW Irons
nike.gif - VR Black 52° 56° Wedges
cameron.gif - Newport 2 34" Putter

Posted

In the past, I have kept a set of clubs (woods and irons) for 10 years or more.

From talking to mid-level golfers who play frequently, one factor seems to be driver damage. With the superthin faces, players sometimes dent the clubhead just hitting a normal shot. Also, some players say a driver can get internal damage, and suddenly not work well. Test for this is if you driver "goes dead," have a friend try it out and see if they can hit decent shots with it.

Also, some golfers reshaft a driver head after a couple of years to get a better ball flight.

I have tested my Hyper X Tour driver (2008) against newer models at demo days. It hits the ball just as well, and sometimes better, than the newer ones. Plus, more than any other club, there's a learning curve to hitting a particular driver.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by WUTiger

From talking to mid-level golfers who play frequently, one factor seems to be driver damage. With the superthin faces, players sometimes dent the clubhead just hitting a normal shot.



I play quite a bit.. and I've only seen a driver damaged from a normal shot ONCE in about 15 years.  The crown cracked.  The guy's driver was ~4 years old... and it was the first round he played after he got back from a trip.  It could have been damaged in baggage handling at the airport.

I've never heard of a dent in the clubhead from normal use... at least not from any reputable manufacturer.


Posted


Originally Posted by nickel_aTm

Quote:

At this point, I think driver technology is close to maxed out due to USGA restrictions.  Will 2016 drivers be more efficient than today's?  Sure.  But the amount of improvement going forward will be insignificant in my opinion compared to shaft optomization.



I agree.  That's why we're seeing more work put in to adjustable drivers.


Posted

If you hit it as far as you would like to, with acceptable accuracy, and if not, know it is a swing issue, stick with what you got. It is of course OK to try out different drivers from time to time, but if you don't see a big increase in distance or accuracy, I'd rather spend the money on other stuff.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5420 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.