Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Tiger Woods will never regain golf dominance


Note: This thread is 5576 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Wow - some people have issues.

Yes, it's another bloody Sunday for Tiger ... but it's tough to evaluate him until he gets his game together.

The rush to judgment is just that .... premature.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I said Tigers on the way down, lots of people made excuses and say no, then the results come out and they prove my original point to be true.

Welcome to the Sandtrap forums where the board moderators will ban you if you say anything against their has-been, slut chasing, false Idol, Tiger Woods.

So much for freedom of speech... the moderators here are obviously a bunch of Godless Communists that cant handle the truth.

-LM


Posted


Originally Posted by Zeph

Not at all. His short game is pretty solid, but he can't expect to get up and down from all over the course. If he can find the fairway and green, preferably somewhat close to the flag, he will be dangerous.


I think you could say that of every golfer. Fact is, he has become just like every golfer these days.  Better than most, sure.  But nowadays, just an also-ran on tour.  Maybe that will change, maybe it won't.


Posted

I said Tigers on the way down, lots of people made excuses and say no, then the results come out and they prove my original point to be true.

Welcome to the Sandtrap forums where the board moderators will ban you if you say anything against their has-been, slut chasing, false Idol, Tiger Woods.

So much for freedom of speech... the moderators here are obviously a bunch of Godless Communists that cant handle the truth.

-LM

Everyone is allowed to post their opinion, but none is more correct than the other. Some think Tiger will play better as the year goes on, some don't. What's the point about getting so offensive? And since when did a tournament or two become a year?

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by largermarge

I said Tigers on the way down, lots of people made excuses and say no, then the results come out and they prove my original point to be true.

Welcome to the Sandtrap forums where the board moderators will ban you if you say anything against their has-been, slut chasing, false Idol, Tiger Woods.

So much for freedom of speech... the moderators here are obviously a bunch of Godless Communists that cant handle the truth.

-LM


There's a difference between making a point and making a point uttered with insulting, disgusting, vulgarities (in your previous post).

As to the truth, you may have something as to Tiger having already had his best years. But it's tough to measure until he's had time to adjust to a new swing. Look at Harrington, he changed everything after his last major win, and we haven't heard from him since that time -- I suggest we measure Tiger's progress at the end of the year.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

My observations about Tiger:

If memory serves, Tiger has never been the most accurate off the tee or the best at the short game. But what I think made Tiger a great player was his approach shots. That great iron play put him in tight to many pins. He was also great at getting out of trouble (on the course) usually due to an errant drive off the tee.

While sometimes the occasional club toss and/or colorful metaphor may be funny, Tigers childish behavior on the course really gets old fast.

He doesn't even look like he's having any fun.

David


Posted


Originally Posted by Mr. Desmond

The rush to judgment is just that .... premature.



Agreed. He didn't play much at all last year and he's had two tourneys this year...?   Judgment now is very premature.

Yes, golf is very much a mind game and what TW went thru very much hurt his game but he will get past it and it won't be a factor any more. He's not going to decline just because of this.

In my opinion, the only reason to believe (if you do) that he is on his way down is his age and the wear and tear he has done on his body playing golf. Regardless of his personal struggles, he's the same athlete (mindset wise) he was when he was winning, he will work to overcome his aging/damaged body and probably will to some point.

I think we'll still see TW win this year.


Posted


Originally Posted by keb

Short game and not the new swing is what seems to be holding Tiger back.

What? Have you seen his driving?

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


Posted


Originally Posted by dmnoland

My observations about Tiger:

If memory serves, Tiger has never been the most accurate off the tee or the best at the short game. But what I think made Tiger a great player was his approach shots. That great iron play put him in tight to many pins. He was also great at getting out of trouble (on the course) usually due to an errant drive off the tee.

While sometimes the occasional club toss and/or colorful metaphor may be funny, Tigers childish behavior on the course really gets old fast.

He doesn't even look like he's having any fun.

These are the best observations about TW so far on this forum (including my own) imho.  Except that I would add that when he was winning big and often his short game was also stellar - he saved a lot of pars and made a bunch of birdies that way.  Not so now.  Did Woods make appearance money at this event btw?  If so, how much?



Driver: Cobra 460SZ 9.0, med.
3 Wood: Taylor stiff
3-hybrid: Nike 18 deg stiff
4-hybrid:
Taylor RBZ 22 deg regular
Irons:5-9, Mizuno MP30, steel
Wedges: PW, 52, 56, 60 Mizuno MP30
Putter: Odyssey 2-ball


Posted


Originally Posted by Zeph

Quote:

Originally Posted by largermarge

I said Tigers on the way down, lots of people made excuses and say no, then the results come out and they prove my original point to be true.

Welcome to the Sandtrap forums where the board moderators will ban you if you say anything against their has-been, slut chasing, false Idol, Tiger Woods.

So much for freedom of speech... the moderators here are obviously a bunch of Godless Communists that cant handle the truth.

-LM

Everyone is allowed to post their opinion, but none is more correct than the other. Some think Tiger will play better as the year goes on, some don't. What's the point about getting so offensive? And since when did a tournament or two become a year?


No-one is more correct than the other in your opinion, is that what you really believe Zeph?  I rather doubt it.  I know what you're saying I think and we agree - let people have their say.  Which would include negative comments about the man TW, just like other pros who get slated by some at times on this forum.  What's the big deal?

The poster was making a point - rather floridly perhaps - that anyone who isn't a reflex TW fan would see as having some truth.  The people doing most of the flaming and insulting on this forum  (how could XYZ be such an idiot to believe that he won't come back and win win win ....?) are mostly those who take strong personal offense to anything negative said about their man Tiger, including his risk of never returning to former glory.  You can criticize just about any other golfer in similarly terms here on the Trap and no such hostility will result.  There's a word for that but I won't use it - no wish to offend and some at least will know what it is.

I'm expecting TW to win quite a few more PGA tour events over the years (if he doesn't take his money and run out of frustration at some point), but whether he overtakes Jack in Majors, well it's too difficult to estimate with any accuract at the moment IMO.  Let's just say the hazard ratio has shifted back towards 1.00.  As to where the 95% confidence intervals lie in relation to 1.00, I wouldn't presume to know .....

Driver: Cobra 460SZ 9.0, med.
3 Wood: Taylor stiff
3-hybrid: Nike 18 deg stiff
4-hybrid:
Taylor RBZ 22 deg regular
Irons:5-9, Mizuno MP30, steel
Wedges: PW, 52, 56, 60 Mizuno MP30
Putter: Odyssey 2-ball


  • Administrator
Posted

Originally Posted by largermarge

Welcome to the Sandtrap forums where the board moderators will ban you if you say anything against their has-been, slut chasing, false Idol, Tiger Woods.

Actually, you were put in the Penalty Box (that's not a ban) because you've not made arrangements to pay your bet(s). Are you a dishonorable person, or do you pay your bets? Where's the $10 you owe at least one person?

If you joined to post ONLY negative rambling comments about Tiger Woods, go elsewhere. You won't be missed. Signing up for a second account just to behave like an ass is in no way acceptable behavior.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Thanks for explaining Erik, I must say you had me wondering.  That seems reasonable.

Note to self: never make an open bet on this forum, noway never nohow.  Anyway I hardly ever bet - I almost always lose.   Pool and snooker would be the exception to that personal rule.

So what's your fancy, 8-ball or 9-ball?

Driver: Cobra 460SZ 9.0, med.
3 Wood: Taylor stiff
3-hybrid: Nike 18 deg stiff
4-hybrid:
Taylor RBZ 22 deg regular
Irons:5-9, Mizuno MP30, steel
Wedges: PW, 52, 56, 60 Mizuno MP30
Putter: Odyssey 2-ball


Posted


Quote:

Originally Posted by Chas

No-one is more correct than the other in your opinion, is that what you really believe Zeph?


Depends what the topic is. In this event, we are discussing wether Tiger will regain his former form and start winning again. In such a discussion there is no answer until Tiger does get his game back, or resigns. I can't use one tournament he wins as proof that he will get as good again, and nobody else can use one tournament he places 20th in as proof he has lost it. Attacking the forum management in a discussion like this doesn't do much to make our impression of him any better.

It's like discussing which golfer you like, which partly is what is going on here. Some like Tiger, some don't, neither is correct, seeing as it is an individual observation.

I'll take the 8-ball!

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by Zeph

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chas

No-one is more correct than the other in your opinion, is that what you really believe Zeph?

Depends what the topic is. In this event, we are discussing wether Tiger will regain his former form and start winning again. In such a discussion there is no answer until Tiger does get his game back, or resigns. I can't use one tournament he wins as proof that he will get as good again, and nobody else can use one tournament he places 20th in as proof he has lost it. Attacking the forum management in a discussion like this doesn't do much to make our impression of him any better.

It's like discussing which golfer you like, which partly is what is going on here. Some like Tiger, some don't, neither is correct, seeing as it is an individual observation.

I'll take the 8-ball!


You were really going out on a limb when you suggested that if Tiger starts hitting his approach shots closer to the pin, he'll shoot better scores. That was ballsy.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted

Originally Posted by sean_miller

You were really going out on a limb when you suggested that if Tiger starts hitting his approach shots closer to the pin, he'll shoot better scores. That was ballsy.


Seems obvious, but with everyone chiming in on their opinions of where Tiger struggle, I made mine. I stand fast on my opinion that the reason Tiger has struggled last year and so far this year is his swing, not putting or short game (breaking news, he is making a swing change). Last time it took him two years to get a swing change fully implemented, so we can't expect him to get it working after half a year this time. I don't think it will take two years, but he will be struggling like this for some time during the transition. There are glimpses of greatness, he's making both eagles and birdies, but in the end of the day he makes too many bogies. And that is not because he is making three-putts or not having a good enough short game, that is because he hits the ball into too much trouble. There are a lot of the rights in his driving. Same with Rory McIlroy the last couple of days. First two he was in the fairway and being an excellent iron player he hit a lot of good approach shots. When that part of the game fails, it becomes too difficult.

  • Upvote 1

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


I agree with Zeph here...

Also, you have to understand that Torrey and Dubai were playing real windy on the weekends...i mean come on, it was so damned windy in Dubai that the bunkers were causing 'mini-sandstorms' !

The guy's making a swing change as it is, when it blows a gale, you make adjustments to your swing, not something easy whilst you're undergoing a major swing change...that's why he played really well on Day 2, in the morning where it was probably the calmest throughout the tournament...

However, having said that..unless he's going to practice really hard in the next few weeks prior to the WGC Matchplay (instead of taking a break to focus on his family, which is obviously important to him right now ), Arizona would be a BAD idea...

Ray

Originally Posted by Zeph

Quote:

Originally Posted by sean_miller

You were really going out on a limb when you suggested that if Tiger starts hitting his approach shots closer to the pin, he'll shoot better scores. That was ballsy.

Seems obvious, but with everyone chiming in on their opinions of where Tiger struggle, I made mine. I stand fast on my opinion that the reason Tiger has struggled last year and so far this year is his swing, not putting or short game (breaking news, he is making a swing change). Last time it took him two years to get a swing change fully implemented, so we can't expect him to get it working after half a year this time. I don't think it will take two years, but he will be struggling like this for some time during the transition. There are glimpses of greatness, he's making both eagles and birdies, but in the end of the day he makes too many bogies. And that is not because he is making three-putts or not having a good enough short game, that is because he hits the ball into too much trouble. There are a lot of the rights in his driving. Same with Rory McIlroy the last couple of days. First two he was in the fairway and being an excellent iron player he hit a lot of good approach shots. When that part of the game fails, it becomes too difficult.




Posted



Originally Posted by Zeph

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chas

No-one is more correct than the other in your opinion, is that what you really believe Zeph?

Depends what the topic is. In this event, we are discussing wether Tiger will regain his former form and start winning again. In such a discussion there is no answer until Tiger does get his game back, or resigns. I can't use one tournament he wins as proof that he will get as good again, and nobody else can use one tournament he places 20th in as proof he has lost it. Attacking the forum management in a discussion like this doesn't do much to make our impression of him any better.

It's like discussing which golfer you like, which partly is what is going on here. Some like Tiger, some don't, neither is correct, seeing as it is an individual observation.

I'll take the 8-ball!


I think we all understand the subject of the discussion.  Of course there is an answer, and it is what we are predicting will happen.  Pure speculation.

Let's say there are 2 views in a controversy, X and Y.  If I favor X and you favor Y, then naturally I will believe that others who believe X are correct, whereas you would believe those who favor Y are correct.  It's an inevitable inference, a syllogism.  You may not agree with the logic or rationale for their belief (with which you happen to agree), but that doesn't matter - you still gotta agree with their conclusion because it's the same as yours.  Neither of us can credibly believe that every opinion is equally "correct", even if it's all speculation (not related to a knowable fact).  Why?  Because we've taken a position - right or wrong, which we will only learn in the fullness of time.

8-ball is it then.  On a smaller (8 ft) table like mine I prefer 9-ball but that's OK.  Your place or mine?

Driver: Cobra 460SZ 9.0, med.
3 Wood: Taylor stiff
3-hybrid: Nike 18 deg stiff
4-hybrid:
Taylor RBZ 22 deg regular
Irons:5-9, Mizuno MP30, steel
Wedges: PW, 52, 56, 60 Mizuno MP30
Putter: Odyssey 2-ball


Posted


Originally Posted by LargeMarge

Well all you tiger fanboy circle jerkers, heres how he finished up:

71

66

72

75

284

Three average rounds and one flash of brilliance. Whoop de fuc_ing doo. As of this post hes tied with 8 other meidiocre souls for 20th place.

So all of you who disagree about his continual steady decline from the top of this game and out of the starshine of greatness - you my friends, as Tiger would say, can "suck it."

My Warmest Regards,

-LargeMarge


Those are some very strong words.  You do know that these words will be on this forum for a long time and you may just be eating them somewhere in the near future.

As for people's hate towards Tiger's transgressions, just as a "food for thought," do you all REALLY think that Tiger WAS and IS the only golfer or athlete for that matter messing around on his wife (now former wife)???  The reality is that he got caught...1. and 2. caught in a time where media is at an all time high when it comes to coverage and the paying off of people by the media; specifically, the woman who came out and admitted to his whoring.

Now, re-wind to the 60s and 70s and you better believe that Arnold and Jack in their hay day had their share of "fun."  What was the difference?  A LOT more people willing to keep it hush hush and a lack of blatant media tracking their every move (internet, twitter, facebook, TMZ, etc etc etc).  Anyone who thinks Tiger's whoring i ssomething new is either extremely naive or in a serious need of a wake up call.  Get over it already people...

In going back to the original post.  Tiger doesn't NEED to dominate again.  All he needs to do is win occasionally and get 4 more majors over the next 10 years.  Is that still a possibility? Hell yes.

Deryck Griffith

Titleist 910 D3: 9.5deg GD Tour AD DI7x | Nike Dymo 3W: 15deg, UST S-flex | Mizuno MP CLK Hybrid: 20deg, Project X Tour Issue 6.5, HC1 Shaft | Mizuno MP-57 4-PW, DG X100 Shaft, 1deg upright | Cleveland CG15 Wedges: 52, 56, 60deg | Scotty Cameron California Del Mar | TaylorMade Penta, TP Black LDP, Nike 20XI-X


Note: This thread is 5576 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 41, June 14.  I spent 10 minutes, half hitting W half hitting 6-iron, practice shots (indoors, off a mat, into a net)
    • Day 620 - 2026-06-14 Got some work in before and after lessons. Definitely didn't adduct my arms 130° in doing so.
    • Day 79: played 18. Shot a +5 76. Iron play was much better - 11 GIR. Hit a drive 380. Normal day. 
    • Day 14 (14 Jun 26) - Continued work with irons (8i-Pw), hard foam balls and getting consistent impact - same as previous drills - using gates for 1/2 and “simulated” course conditions on the second half.  
    • I like discussing the golf swing. Whether you call it "swing theory" or what, I like to talk about things that can expand the potential for what I know and understand. As a scientist, I like being shown that I'm wrong, too, because as I've said a bunch of times… "you're wrong and here's why" is an instant opportunity to upgrade my knowledge. I also like to help golfers, and one of the things I'm most glad to have moved away from from 15 years ago was the "Hands In" idea from S&T. Jim Waldron is often credited (probably rightly so) with explaining why so many Tour players and good players talk about "keeping their hands in front of themselves" while it appears that they're moving their arms around their bodies. From over 30 years ago: I've also got videos like… this (Instagram link here😞 I'm happy to say that I've become friends with Shaun and Mike at Athletic Motion Golf (AMG), too. I tend to get along with other smart folks who measure things, who look critically at information, who don't assume that what they thought 20 years ago holds true today. I get along with folks who look for chances to instantly upgrade their knowledge. Andy Plummer remains one of the people who does not look for these opportunities. He didn't care in early 2013 when we had evidence that the information in their S&T 2.0 DVDs was bogus, and they seemingly don't care now. They've been attacking (it's their favorite pastime) AMG in particular for the better part of a year now. There have been a few shots back at them from AMG (like… this), no doubt. But as is typical of the AMG fellas, it's with measured data. Well, recently, Andy took yet another shot at AMG: https://www.instagram.com/p/DZfHe0DuPXC/. Andy demonstrates that true power in the golf swing comes from doing stuff like this: Andy claims that the idea that the arms mostly lift and lower, while the body turns, is bogus. What golfers should be doing is using "angular velocity" to abduct and adduct their shoulders to move the club fast like this (above). Then he makes a ridiculous example of what AMG supposedly teaches, but misses by a mile. Now, it doesn't take a biomechanist to know that you can't possibly swing as Andy demonstrates. His right arm is so far around and behind him that his left arm would have to grow several feet to reach the grip of the club (or alignment stick), and a follow-through with the right arm position like that would be absolutely silly. But, it's a demonstration, so let's not read too much into it. However, I find ideas like this dangerous. Again, I like to help golfers, and in my opinion, the idea that you should abduct and adduct your arms a lot is a dangerous one. There's some adduction and abduction going on, but… it's not much. Anyway, this statement was posted: 130 degrees of dynamic range of horizontal abduction and adduction is quite the claim! I posted some comments to Andy and others, and was issued a challenge: Well, okay then. Here's Bryson's lead shoulder adduction: This measures the angle between the "virtual spine," the left shoulder, and the elbow. Bryson has a 97.34° "adduction angle" at P1, a 62.53° angle at P4, and returns to an 89.21° angle at impact. Rounding, that's a change of 34° from address to the top, and then a change (back toward the angle at address) of about 26° from the top to impact. If we want to worry about only horizontal abduction and adduction (where D = adduction and B = abduction): Left shoulder: 8.33° D, 38.74° D, 14.67° D Right shoulder: 1.03° D, 55.75° B, 14.04° B If we call moving the arms farther around you as negative, those are changes of -30.41° from P1 to P4 for the left shoulder and +24.07° from P4 to P7 for the left shoulder and -56.78° and +41.71° for the right shoulder. I have no idea on earth where he gets 130°. From the last frame of Bryson's swing where he's at 126.98°? But the lowest that number gets is 62.53°, for a range of 64.45, or less than half of the 130° claimed (plus it includes part of the swing, post-impact, that has no bearing on what the ball does). For good measure, another pretty good player: Left: 22.55° D ➡️ 33.35° D (∆ 10.8°) ➡️ 17.36° D (∆ 15.99° from P4, 5.19° from P1) Right: 15.03° D ➡️ 24.29° B (∆ 39.32°) ➡️ 1.93° D (∆ 26.22° from P4, 13.1° from P1) Of the biomechanists and experienced 3D users (on any platform), none of them have seen anything like 130° of dynamic adduction/abduction from a good player P1 to P7. And, like my little joke above, even if you go to the end of the swing, you rarely get much more than a little over halfway there. Maybe Andy is adding them? He does say in the video "and then add it to that with the lead arm." (I think that's what he says, but this isn't an additive type system.) I regularly coach golfers out of positions with a lot of adduction and abduction. I regularly work golfers away from moving their arms around their bodies. Even my juniors (the ones who have paid attention anyway! 🤣) can recite "arms = up/down, body = around." Like this: So, I don't know where this leaves us. Andy claims to have seen something on GEARS that shows 130° of dynamic adduction/abduction. I'm open to being wrong, but… I don't think I am here on this one. And, until that comes to be, I will continue to stand up for what I think is the best information, and do my best to work with golfers toward simpler, easier moves that don't get them stuck. Simpler, easier moves like the moves Tour players and great players tend to make, not complicated, difficult moves. Shaun and Mike said it in a video once where they demonstrated that the average Tour player adducts their lead arm 20° across their chest from the top to impact (P4 to P7), while the amateur often tries to go 40°. They said something like "the amateur is trying to move their arm TWICE the distance in the same amount of time as the professional athlete." Yep. The swings of great players are often easier and simpler. They are not abducting and adducting their arms much in comparison to average golfers. As a smart man once said: "Why would you teach something (abduction in this case) that bad golfers already do?" On a related note… the S&T crowd continues to be… well, who they've been as long as I've known them. Take this comment for example: I mean… I would think that this is pretty self-explanatory, but then again… I didn't think it needed explaining to begin with. P.S. As I was finishing up this article, another biomechanist replied with something so simple I hadn't even thought of it as I had immediately jumped into looking at the actual measurements: "90 doesn’t even seem physically possible.“ No, sir. It doesn't.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.