Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

When do you consider someone a "good golfer"?


Note: This thread is 5406 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

The "good golfer."

Could their be an any more ambiguous definition?

I have an opinion, but I'd prefer to share it later in the discussion. (At least I hope there will be a discussion.)

At what point do you consider a golfer a "good" player?

Simple as that.


Posted

Constantly shooting 80's or lower.

:cobra: Speed ld-f 10.5 Stiff
:snake_eyes: 3 & 5 Woods
:adams:A4 3 hybrid
:bridgestone: J33 Forged Irons 4-pw
:ping: 50th Aniv. Karsten Ansr Putter56*, 60* wedges


Posted

Depends on who your talking too, I consider myself ok.  others consider me good, some may say I suck.  I play off a guesstimate of 6-8, lowest round, even par 72 usually 76-82


Posted


Originally Posted by Steel

Depends on who your talking too, I consider myself ok.  others consider me good, some may say I suck.  I play off a guesstimate of 6-8, lowest round, even par 72 usually 76-82



Insightful, but the question was meant to be interpreted is what level do you consider a "good golfer."  Third person.


Posted

Someone who shoots in the 70s consistently

:tmade: SLDR X-Stiff 12.5°
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Wood Stiff
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Hybrid Stiff
:nike:VR Pro Combo CB 4 - PW Stiff 2° Flat
:cleveland:588RTX CB 50.10 GW
:cleveland:588RTX CB 54.10 SW
:nike:VR V-Rev 60.8 LW
:nike:Method 002 Putter


Posted


Originally Posted by adamgoodman

Insightful, but the question was meant to be interpreted is what level do you consider a "good golfer."  Third person.



Semantically speaking…

Your post is asking for a first person response to a second person interrogative.

Here is my response: A good golfer is someone who can shoot in the 70’s from the tips on a championship course.

"Every man is his own hell" - H.L. Mencken


Posted

It's always going to be subjective based on your personal level as well as the type of players you often play with or encounter on the course.  I think a good player is anyone that breaks 90 on a consistent basis following the rules of golf.  They are certainly in the minority, so I think that justifies the tag of good.

  • Upvote 1

CARBITE Putter


Posted

Handicap 10 and below is in my eyes a good golfer from a neutral point of view. Once you get below 15, progressing towards 10, you must have a somewhat consistent swing.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

A good golfer is someone who has fun on the course and is respectful of the rules/etiquette/other players. Someone that no matter what their skill level, I would enjoy playing with.

I consider a talented/skilled golfer to be someone who consistently shoots under 85.

  • Upvote 1

Posted

As a professional golfer/golf instructor, I consider any player good if they regularly play to a 9 handicap or less from the regular tees.

"Success is going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." – Winston Churchill


Posted

It seems like it's all kinda relevent, especially when you look at the fact that the majority of golfers fail to beak 100 on a consistant basis.

I play with 2 different groups of friends, one group where I'm consistantly the better player (Mid 90s) and one group where I'm consistantly the worst player(HCs between 10-16). When I play with the first group, am I considered a good player? Probably not, but I consider the guys in the second group to all be good players.

my get up and go musta got up and went..
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

..hmm...where have i seen this thread before? research goes a long way.

In my Titleist 2014 9.5" Staff bag:

Cobra Bio+ 9* Matrix White Tie X  - Taylormade SLDR 15* ATTAS 80X - Titleist 910H 19* ATTAS 100X - Taylormade '13 TP MC 4-PW PX 6.5 - Vokey TVD M 50* DG TI X100 - Vokey SM4 55 / Vokey SM5 60* DG TI S400 - Piretti Potenza II 365g


Posted

..hmm...where have i seen this thread before? research goes a long way.

A friendly reminder will always triumph over satirical remarks. But thanks for making me aware.


Posted


Originally Posted by adamgoodman

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gioguy21

..hmm...where have i seen this thread before? research goes a long way.

A friendly reminder will always triumph over satirical remarks. But thanks for making me aware.



was just sarcasm, i meant nothing by it...my apologies. to answer your question, i'd say a good golfer who shoots in the 70's consistently and touches low 80's maybe 1/5 rounds...

In my Titleist 2014 9.5" Staff bag:

Cobra Bio+ 9* Matrix White Tie X  - Taylormade SLDR 15* ATTAS 80X - Titleist 910H 19* ATTAS 100X - Taylormade '13 TP MC 4-PW PX 6.5 - Vokey TVD M 50* DG TI X100 - Vokey SM4 55 / Vokey SM5 60* DG TI S400 - Piretti Potenza II 365g


Posted

There is an old saying that would address this question.  It is "what you see depends upon where you stand".  From my perspective anyone that can consistently score in the 80s or lower is a pretty good golfer.

On an earlier thread someone published some statistics from the National Golf Foundation on the distribution of golf scores across the US.  If I recall less than 50% of the golfers in the US can consistently break 100 and less than 20% can consistently break 90.  But that is just my recollection and you might find the older thread and look it up.

  • Upvote 1

Butch


Posted

Score wise I'd say someone who regularly shoots in the low 80s and occasionally in the 70s. (This from a 13.)

Personally though I'd say that anyone with good golf etiquette, that maintains a good pace, and has a pleasant attitude, is a good golfer.

  • Upvote 1

Posted


Originally Posted by Dloy

Personally though I'd say that anyone with good golf etiquette, that maintains a good pace, and has a pleasant attitude, is a good golfer.


+1

In my Titleist 2014 9.5" Staff bag:

Cobra Bio+ 9* Matrix White Tie X  - Taylormade SLDR 15* ATTAS 80X - Titleist 910H 19* ATTAS 100X - Taylormade '13 TP MC 4-PW PX 6.5 - Vokey TVD M 50* DG TI X100 - Vokey SM4 55 / Vokey SM5 60* DG TI S400 - Piretti Potenza II 365g


Posted

I think that if you can keep up the pace of play and not slow anyone down, you are a good golfer regardless of your handicap.

It's hard to say that "X" handicap is a skilled golfer.  It's not really what this game is about to me.  A 15 handicap can have a good match against a scratch golfer because of the handicap system.

That said, as a 6 handicap I still feel like I am not that good of a golfer.  I can skank the ball just as well as the 20 handicap, I just do it less often.


Note: This thread is 5406 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Never practiced golf when I was young and the only lesson ever taken was a driver lesson. I feel like I'm improving every year. However, the numbers don't support my feeling about improving. I usually drop to 12-13 during the summer while playing the familiar courses around home and then go on golf trips in the fall to new courses and increase to end the year between 15-17. Been a similar story for a number of years now but hey, it's the best thing there is in life so not too bothered but reaching 9.9 is the objective every year. Maybe a few lessons and practice could help me achieve it since I pretty much have no idea what I'm doing, just playing and never practice.
    • I am semi-loyal. Usually buy four dozen of one ball and only play that until out and then determine whether to continue or try another one. Since starting my semi-loyal path to success, I've been playing the below, not in order: ProV1 ProV1x ProV1x left dash AVX Bridgestone BXS Srixon Z-star XV I am not sure if it has helped anything, but it gives a bit of confidence knowing that it at least is not the ball (while using the same one) that gives different results so one thing less to mind about I guess. On the level that I am, not sure whether it makes much difference but will continue since I have to play something so might as well go with the same ball for a number of rounds. Edit: favorite is probably the BXS followed by ProV1/Srixon Z-star XV. Haven't got any numbers to back it up but just by feel.  
    • Will not do it by myself, going to the pro shop I usually use after Cristmas for input and actually doing the changes, if any, but wanted to get some thoughts on whether this was worthwhile out of curiosity. 
    • In terms of ball striking, not really. Ball striking being how good you are at hitting the center of the clubface with the swing path you want and the loft you want to present at impact.  In terms of getting better launch conditions for the current swing you have, it is debatable.  It depends on how you swing and what your current launch conditions are at. These are fine tuning mechanisms not significant changes. They might not even be the correct fine tuning you need. I would go spend the $100 to $150 dollars in getting a club fitting over potentially wasting money on changes that ChatGPT gave you.  New grips are important. Yes, it can affect swing weight, but it is personal preference. Swing weight is just one component.  Overall weight effects the feel. The type of golf shaft effects the feel of the club in the swing. Swing weight effects the feel. You can add so much extra weight to get the swing weight correct and it will feel completely different because the total weight went up. Imagine swinging a 5lb stick versus a 15lb stick. They could be balanced the same (swing weight), but one will take substantially more effort to move.  I would almost say swing weight is an old school way of fitting clubs. Now, with launch monitors, you could just fit the golfer. You could have two golfers with the same swing speed that want completely different swing weight. It is just personal preference. You can only tell that by swinging a golf club.     
    • Thanks for the comments. I fully understand that these changes won't make any big difference compared to getting a flawless swing but looking to give myself the best chance of success at where I am and hopefully lessons will improve the swing along the way. Can these changes make minor improvements to ball striking and misses then that's fine. From what I understood about changing the grips, which is to avoid them slipping in warm and humid conditions, is that it will affect the swing weight since midsize are heavier than regular and so therefore adding weight to the club head would be required to avoid a change of feel in the club compared to before? 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.