Jump to content
IGNORED

The Dan Plan - 10,000 Hours to Become a Pro Golfer (Dan McLaughlin)


Jonnydanger81
Note: This thread is 2557 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
I respectfully disagree that he doesn't have the physical makeup to be scratch. Imho, he looks strong enough. Imho, I think he has not been getting enough good info for an extended period of time. Like for 4+ years, ouch. If he doesn't get to scratch it's lack of coordination, athleticism, not a strength thing. And his followthrough, ouch, my back hurts just mentally visualizing it. I also wonder why there isn't a blog post on his site addressing Gladwell's article in the New Yorker, where Gladwell adds conditions to his opinion on the 10K hypotheses. If he gets a tv show, would you watch? Stream it? I dunno, but I probably wouldn't pay for it.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I never take this thread seriously, and have thought the 10,000 hour thing was utter nonsense from the first time I heard of it.

I do wonder how much competitive golf Dan plays. I'm not talking about the tournaments he enters occasionally but just something like a daily game at a club or something where everybody knows what he shot.

It would get him used to either beating people or going home broke. If you can't beat the guys at the club you definitely aren't going anywhere on a national level.

Somebody half-jokingly told me one time that if you can't beat a scramble of the best two players at the local club you have no chance to be a touring pro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Proper mechanics increase your swing speed.

I was on the simulator at GG a week ago trying out hybrids...and one of my smoothest feeling swings hit 103 mph. Some of my swings that felt much faster were closer to 95-97 mph.

Proper technique will get you far, but unless you have a fast swing speed, you won't get a lot of distance off the tee. You need both.

I'll admit not knowing the formula but I'm sure someone swinging at 98mph with a efficient launch angle and smash factor can consistently outdrive someone swinging 105mph that is all over the clubface.

Rich C.

Driver Titleist 915 D3  9.5*
3 Wood TM RBZ stage 2 tour  14.5*
2 Hybrid Cobra baffler 17*
4Hybrid Adams 23*
Irons Adams CB2's 5-GW
Wedges 54* and 58* Titleist vokey
Putter Scotty Cameron square back 2014
Ball Srixon Zstar optic yellow
bushnell V2 slope edition

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I never take this thread seriously, and have thought the 10,000 hour thing was utter nonsense from the first time I heard of it.

I do wonder how much competitive golf Dan plays. I'm not talking about the tournaments he enters occasionally but just something like a daily game at a club or something where everybody knows what he shot.

It would get him used to either beating people or going home broke. If you can't beat the guys at the club you definitely aren't going anywhere on a national level.

Somebody half-jokingly told me one time that if you can't beat a scramble of the best two players at the local club you have no chance to be a touring pro.

Money games are actually a great way to prepare for tournament pressure. My high school coach unofficially encouraged us to gamble with each other during practices and practice rounds. When you're on the 18th tee and you know there's a 5 hole carryover (with a press) on the line, it makes you behave as you would in a tournament!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
I'd bet he'd lose less money playing money games than he's paying for Vision 54 and associated expenses. I know I ain't taking no clinic that makes me take a stinkin' pledge. Big eyeroll.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Dan has been to see a few pros and bottom line is he doesn't want to follow the instruction, I mean for the last year he has the same swing flaw. He claims to be doing deliberate practice 6 days a week but just ends up "playing 18". For some crazy reason he seems to think his swing is good and he needs mental work, he obviously has never been to the range at a pga tournament.

Yes he does need to see what real ball striking looks like in person, however it may wind up discouraging the crap out of him. The one thing that I always found so amazing watching the worlds best players was just how steady they were over the ball and how every ounce of energy found it's way to impact position, Dan it seems to me doesn't swing the club within his control limits that are compromised by his technical flaws, his driver is the club that shows this the most.

Rich C.

Driver Titleist 915 D3  9.5*
3 Wood TM RBZ stage 2 tour  14.5*
2 Hybrid Cobra baffler 17*
4Hybrid Adams 23*
Irons Adams CB2's 5-GW
Wedges 54* and 58* Titleist vokey
Putter Scotty Cameron square back 2014
Ball Srixon Zstar optic yellow
bushnell V2 slope edition

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'll admit not knowing the formula but I'm sure someone swinging at 98mph with a efficient launch angle and smash factor can consistently outdrive someone swinging 105mph that is all over the clubface.

Right, and the person swinging at 105 with an efficient launch angle and smash factor will outdrive both of them.


That was the point. :)

Ryan M
 
The Internet Adjustment Formula:
IAD = ( [ADD] * .96 + [EPS] * [1/.12] ) / (1.15)
 
IAD = Internet Adjusted Distance (in yards)
ADD = Actual Driver Distance (in yards)
EPS = E-Penis Size (in inches)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I never take this thread seriously, and have thought the 10,000 hour thing was utter nonsense from the first time I heard of it.

I do wonder how much competitive golf Dan plays. I'm not talking about the tournaments he enters occasionally but just something like a daily game at a club or something where everybody knows what he shot.

It would get him used to either beating people or going home broke. If you can't beat the guys at the club you definitely aren't going anywhere on a national level.

Somebody half-jokingly told me one time that if you can't beat a scramble of the best two players at the local club you have no chance to be a touring pro.


I agree, the vast majority of my posted rounds are under tournament like conditions meaning money on the line and yes it is invaluable to some degree. I gotta figure Dan plays a lot of meaningless casual rounds with no real pressure other than the score and like everyone else me included that's where some of our lowest rounds come from, further evidence was in his blog where he said he shot a practice round somewhere in the 70's the day before and then blows it wide open with an 88 and 87 over the weekend, that is where some people are getting the opinion he's closer to an 8-10 than a 5 or lower.

Rich C.

Driver Titleist 915 D3  9.5*
3 Wood TM RBZ stage 2 tour  14.5*
2 Hybrid Cobra baffler 17*
4Hybrid Adams 23*
Irons Adams CB2's 5-GW
Wedges 54* and 58* Titleist vokey
Putter Scotty Cameron square back 2014
Ball Srixon Zstar optic yellow
bushnell V2 slope edition

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Yes he does need to see what real ball striking looks like in person, however it may wind up discouraging the crap out of him. The one thing that I always found so amazing watching the worlds best players was just how steady they were over the ball and how every ounce of energy found it's way to impact position, Dan it seems to me doesn't swing the club within his control limits that are compromised by his technical flaws, his driver is the club that shows this the most.

Watching Pro's hit the ball in person should have been at the top of his list when he embarked on this adventure so that he could get a perspective on how well they hit it. Seeing how the Pro's hit it gives the amateur golfer an idea of what a good player's shot looks like.

I haven't read all 90+ pages but it doesn't seem Dan has a very good plan.

 - Joel

TM M3 10.5 | TM M3 17 | Adams A12 3-4 hybrid | Mizuno JPX 919 Tour 5-PW

Vokey 50/54/60 | Odyssey Stroke Lab 7s | Bridgestone Tour B XS

Home Courses - Willow Run & Bakker Crossing

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Money games are actually a great way to prepare for tournament pressure. My high school coach unofficially encouraged us to gamble with each other during practices and practice rounds. When you're on the 18th tee and you know there's a 5 hole carryover (with a press) on the line, it makes you behave as you would in a tournament!

I still don't get why everyone thinks he should play tournaments and work on pressure situations. If you want to play on the pga you need to be able to go out and shoot a mid 60s round at any courses, Dan can not even come close to this. Who cares if he can shoot a 77 in some tournament ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I still don't get why everyone thinks he should play tournaments and work on pressure situations. If you want to play on the pga you need to be able to go out and shoot a mid 60s round at any courses, Dan can not even come close to this. Who cares if he can shoot a 77 in some tournament ?

I agree. Confidence in pressure situations will come from good scores and good shots.

 - Joel

TM M3 10.5 | TM M3 17 | Adams A12 3-4 hybrid | Mizuno JPX 919 Tour 5-PW

Vokey 50/54/60 | Odyssey Stroke Lab 7s | Bridgestone Tour B XS

Home Courses - Willow Run & Bakker Crossing

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I still don't get why everyone thinks he should play tournaments and work on pressure situations. If you want to play on the pga you need to be able to go out and shoot a mid 60s round at any courses, Dan can not even come close to this. Who cares if he can shoot a 77 in some tournament ?

Part of the reason is that you can kill two birds with one stone. Practice in pressure situations and get practice with your mechanics etc. He's done the last section of his plan with no tournaments, and look how that turned out. Playing in pressure situations isn't going to make it any worse than it already is (if you consider it to be going badly based on his goals and timeframe, which I do).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Part of the reason is that you can kill two birds with one stone. Practice in pressure situations and get practice with your mechanics etc. He's done the last section of his plan with no tournaments, and look how that turned out. Playing in pressure situations isn't going to make it any worse than it already is (if you consider it to be going badly based on his goals and timeframe, which I do).

Well I don't see how that would ever work.... He's never shot a 65 but work on the 65 during a tournament ....

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Well I don't see how that would ever work.... He's never shot a 65 but work on the 65 during a tournament ....

No, you work on improving in tournaments. You don't go out looking for a 65 and being disappointed with anything less. As he gets more comfortable with pressure situations it will also help him figure out if he's a good competitor or not. Good competitors usually tend to rise to the occasion and score better than usual in tournaments or money matches, whereas others may have a hard time in those situations and flounder. I'm just saying I would advise him to play in tournaments or money games so he can find out how he actually plays, instead of leading himself and the rest of the world on by overestimating his abilities. I did the same thing while I was improving my game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

No, you work on improving in tournaments. You don't go out looking for a 65 and being disappointed with anything less. As he gets more comfortable with pressure situations it will also help him figure out if he's a good competitor or not. Good competitors usually tend to rise to the occasion and score better than usual in tournaments or money matches, whereas others may have a hard time in those situations and flounder.

I'm just saying I would advise him to play in tournaments or money games so he can find out how he actually plays, instead of leading himself and the rest of the world on by overestimating his abilities. I did the same thing while I was improving my game.

If I want to see who the best players are going to be on the high school team in a couple of years all I have to do is drive down to the country club and see which kids are playing in the adult games (usually against a few college players).

They are getting their butts kicked right now but playing against better players will make high school seem like a piece of cake. Happens all the time.

BTW there is a 10 year old that has been playing in our Saturday game all summer. I'll bet my next pay check he ends up at least being a good college player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Right, and the person swinging at 105 with an efficient launch angle and smash factor will outdrive both of them. That was the point. :)

Exactly. More to the point, Dan does not have 105 built into him.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Exactly. More to the point, Dan does not have 105 built into him.

If his TM was calibrated properly and you're going by TM, he does. One of his drives went 275+. And his swing could be more... optimized, duh, you could say that for everyone but you know what I mean. Plus his average driver AA was negative. http://thedanplan.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Dan-Plan-2013-01-25-Multi-Group-Report.pdf Now all this assumes the TM data is accurate. I've never seen the guy swing live, or have an idea of how strong he is by watching his workouts, so I'm neither saying he is or isn't capable of a 270 yard drive under normal conditions. We don't know yet what he's truly capable of because he hasn't really gotten the most out of his swing yet. And I'm not going state definitively what he's capable of. How can we know that?

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

No, you work on improving in tournaments. You don't go out looking for a 65 and being disappointed with anything less. As he gets more comfortable with pressure situations it will also help him figure out if he's a good competitor or not. Good competitors usually tend to rise to the occasion and score better than usual in tournaments or money matches, whereas others may have a hard time in those situations and flounder. I'm just saying I would advise him to play in tournaments or money games so he can find out how he actually plays, instead of leading himself and the rest of the world on by overestimating his abilities. I did the same thing while I was improving my game.

Well I agree that it would give him a true indication of his skill level, I don't see the point. I mean the pga requires around a +5 handicap which is worlds away from where Dan is now. He needs to shave at least 10 strokes off, playing tournaments is not going to do that. After he can break 70 regularly I think he should work on playing under pressure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 2557 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • I know there are a lot of people on the site with science and engineering backgrounds here so @p1n9183 is getting a lot of questions about how this theory would even work, but I’m going to ask the obvious one here… why? Like what is the purpose if you already have a speed radar, even if such a thing as you proposed was feasible?
    • It might be at some distances, but none are realistic. For example, if I put a microphone 2.5m away from a sound source and another 3.5m away, the fall-off there is only about 3 (2.98 I think), but your sound would have to be incredibly loud. A microphone that picks up an 80 dB sound at 1 millimeter will only pick up about 12 dB at 2.5 meters (and it's still only 20 dB at 1m from an 80 dB sound source). I also don't think swinging a club generates a very loud sound, and sounds that can injure your hearing require 85 dB or so. In other words… You need to generate (at the source) an ear-injuring level of sound with your club, and if the microphone is as little as one foot away, that 85 dB is already down to ~43.5 dB. It's almost half of what it was. Swing 14" away with the same 85 dB swing instead of 12" and the same swing will read 42 dB. Sound attenuation is subject to similar laws like light fall-off because it radiates, so it diminishes in the inverse square: I have also talked to some sound engineers, and they've laughed and said that unless you were controlling EVERY aspect of this, including: temperature distance of max clubhead speed from the microphone angle (both axes) to the microphone clubface orientation (a face open or closed will change the frequency) location of the max clubhead speed (reaching peak speed at the same exact place) everything in the vicinity, including the shoes and clothes you're wearing, the surface you're on, etc. ideally with all of them producing virtually no noise even when moving. You'd have to control all of those to within very small margins. Even just the doppler effect is going to dramatically change your input. No. No, you need to realize how wrong you've gotten all of this. See above about the doppler effect. Unless you're a swing robot, you're not going to generate the max speed at the same exact location every time. Tell me, @p1n9183, why do you think recording artists (singers) put their mouths so damn close to the microphone?
    • Digging deeper... you can use the frequency of the woosh also.  It is possible to measure the speed of an object using the noise it generates when passing through a decibel reader,  but with some limitations and considerations. The method relies on the relationship between the frequency of the sound emitted by the moving object and its speed.  When an object moves at a constant speed, it generates sound with a characteristic frequency, known as the "Doppler frequency." The frequency of the sound emitted by the object can be related to its speed using the formula: f = (v / c) * f0 where: - f: frequency of the emitted sound - v: object speed - 😄 speed of sound (approximately 343 m/s in air at standard temperature and pressure) - f0: frequency of the sound emitted when the object is at rest Having "C" been constant, and "f0" been unknown but equal for both swings you only need to compare the frequency of  each swing to know how much faster or slower is a swing over the other.  
    • As I told you before, the sound attenuation is 3 db at 1 meter (38").  At 7" (your example) is a wooping 1 db less, for an 80db 7 iron is under 1% error. I know for sure that my PRGR is not that accurate, even my skytrak isn't that accurate. For a FREE unit seams to be promising if you can't afford a speed meter.   Again, you are swinging in the same spot, over and over again in the same session. Phone position is the same , background sound is the same, environment is the same. The only difference is the peak sound you produce when you whoosh the club.     You need to do a lot better to discharge an idea.     
    • Wordle 1,194 5/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟨⬜⬜ 🟨🟨🟨🟨⬜ ⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...