Jump to content
IGNORED

Should the "Wind moves ball after putter is grounded" rule be changed?


Zeph
Note: This thread is 4752 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Webb Simpson suffered a penalty today, like Harrington some time ago, because wind moved the ball after he had grounded his putter on the green.

This situation comes up from time to time, and I think it's a stupid rule.

If the ball moves before you ground the club, you have to play it where it lies. If it moves after you ground the club, you are penalized. I think the rule should be changed. Ball replaced, no penalty. It is not an intentional move, you can never control it 100% (except if you hover the putter), and it give you no advantage as long as you have to move the ball back.

If you putt without grounding the putter, you are exempt from this problem. Nothing change when you ground the putter, you have still not touched the ball or started your stroke. The easiest way to solve this would probably be to define wind as an outside agency. If the wind blow a plastic bag which again move your ball, you are not penalized.

Some say you should just hover the putter in windy conditions, but that's easier said than done. If you are in the middle of a round and going good, you don't want to change your putting routine. A gust can suddenly move the ball, it may be sitting on the edge of a spike mark or something like that.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades


Originally Posted by Zeph

Nothing change when you ground the putter, you have still not touched the ball or started your stroke.

What's changed is, grounding the putter brings in the possibility of you having caused the ball to move. So you're going to have to change the rule that penalizes that as well, otherwise there will be arguments about whether the ball was moved by the player's actions, vs the wind or some other outside force.

I think the rule is fine as is.

  • Upvote 1

Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites


That's why, although it takes a little extra time, you should mark your ball and replace it before every putt. That makes it less likely that it will move.

Simpson wasn't doing this on short putts even after the penalty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Originally Posted by Texian

That's why, although it takes a little extra time, you should mark your ball and replace it before every putt. That makes it less likely that it will move.

Simpson wasn't doing this on short putts even after the penalty.


And/or simply don't ground the club.

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Texian

That's why, although it takes a little extra time, you should mark your ball and replace it before every putt. That makes it less likely that it will move.

Simpson wasn't doing this on short putts even after the penalty.



How many do you see marking a 1-feet putt?

Like I said, hovering the putter can mess with your stroke if you're not used to it.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think it's a case where it occasionally results in an "unfair" penalty, but the certainty of application (i.e., avoiding arguing over whether the wind caused it, or whether it was the ground shifting, etc) is more good than that is bad.

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"

Link to comment
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by Texian

That's why, although it takes a little extra time, you should mark your ball and replace it before every putt. That makes it less likely that it will move.

Simpson wasn't doing this on short putts even after the penalty.





Originally Posted by sacm3bill

What's changed is, grounding the putter brings in the possibility of you having caused the ball to move. So you're going to have to change the rule that penalizes that as well, otherwise there will be arguments about whether the ball was moved by the player's actions, vs the wind or some other outside force.

I think the rule is fine as is.


Maybe amateurs do it on occasion, but my guess is that it is pretty rare that a pro actually causes a ball to move accidentally, especially on a green.  While I like clear and objective rules, I think I would prefer rules that help to promote faster play for routine situations rather than rules that may have to be interpreted once every blue moon- I know I certainly don't want to play behind a foursome that marks all their 1 foot putts.

:mizuno: MP-52 5-PW, :cobra: King Snake 4 i 
:tmade: R11 Driver, 3 W & 5 W, :vokey: 52, 56 & 60 wedges
:seemore: putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Originally Posted by MEfree

Maybe amateurs do it on occasion, but my guess is that it is pretty rare that a pro actually causes a ball to move accidentally, especially on a green.  While I like clear and objective rules, I think I would prefer rules that help to promote faster play for routine situations rather than rules that may have to be interpreted once every blue moon- I know I certainly don't want to play behind a foursome that marks all their 1 foot putts.



How much time do you suppose that takes?  I don't think the suggestion is "mark and wait," but rather that they should mark the ball, pick it up, put it down, and then step up and putt it.   I doubt it will affect how close to the group ahead of them they are, even if they're the only group on the course doing this.

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Webb Simpson suffered a penalty today, like Harrington some time ago, because wind moved the ball after he had grounded his putter on the green.

This situation comes up from time to time, and I think it's a stupid rule.

If the ball moves before you ground the club, you have to play it where it lies. If it moves after you ground the club, you are penalized. I think the rule should be changed. Ball replaced, no penalty. It is not an intentional move, you can never control it 100% (except if you hover the putter), and it give you no advantage as long as you have to move the ball back.

If you putt without grounding the putter, you are exempt from this problem. Nothing change when you ground the putter, you have still not touched the ball or started your stroke. The easiest way to solve this would probably be to define wind as an outside agency. If the wind blow a plastic bag which again move your ball, you are not penalized.

Some say you should just hover the putter in windy conditions, but that's easier said than done. If you are in the middle of a round and going good, you don't want to change your putting routine. A gust can suddenly move the ball, it may be sitting on the edge of a spike mark or something like that.

I think the rule only makes sense when you're not on the green, because you can disturb the ground behind the ball and cause the ball to move. On the green, a supposedly stable surface, I don't see how grounding a putter could cause the ball to move unless you leaned on it and compacted the ground behind the ball.

"Golf is an entire game built around making something that is naturally easy - putting a ball into a hole - as difficult as possible." - Scott Adams

Mid-priced ball reviews: Top Flight Gamer v2 | Bridgestone e5 ('10) | Titleist NXT Tour ('10) | Taylormade Burner TP LDP | Taylormade TP Black | Taylormade Burner Tour | Srixon Q-Star ('12)

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Originally Posted by Zeph

How many do you see marking a 1-feet putt?

Like I said, hovering the putter can mess with your stroke if you're not used to it.


Emphasis added .


So maybe they should get used to it. It's not rocket science. Either don't ground the club or mark the ball.

  • Upvote 1

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


This is the stupidest rule in golf....it moves half a cm and they get penalized?

They didn't touch the ball or have any effect on it's movement.

Needs to be changed.

:tmade: SLDR X-Stiff 12.5°
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Wood Stiff
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Hybrid Stiff
:nike:VR Pro Combo CB 4 - PW Stiff 2° Flat
:cleveland:588RTX CB 50.10 GW
:cleveland:588RTX CB 54.10 SW
:nike:VR V-Rev 60.8 LW
:nike:Method 002 Putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Originally Posted by Kieran123

This is the stupidest rule in golf....it moves half a cm and they get penalized?

They didn't touch the ball or have any effect on it's movement.

Needs to be changed.


Agree 100%....penalize God instead

If I cause a ball to move that's different

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Originally Posted by scv76

Agree 100%....penalize God instead


That might be a bit tough to enforce.

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

There are valid arguments for and against, that's for sure. On the other hand, these cases where wind moves the ball after address mainly concern professionals. We amateurs hardly ever play on such greens where it might happen, on the other hand we are the ones most likely to move our ball accidentally.

It is for sure this issue has been dealt with a number of times amongst those who make the Rules but so far no change has taken place. There must be reasons for that as well but it does not mean the Rule is as good as it could be. Changing the definition of address or similar to take away penalty on the green as suggested by one of the previous posters might be a good idea. It would put green and the rest of the course in a different position but there are already such things in the Rules. The only concern I have is if this kind of liberation would be abused. Would we end up on having vast discussions about whether 'Paddy's' or 'Simpson's' ball was moved by him or by the wind instead of discussing whether it moved at all?

All in all, these events are rare and it is perfectly allowed to learn how to address without grounding the club, so maybe the professional golfers should learn how to do it. Jack Nicklaus could learn it and play well, why not others?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by Ignorant

All in all, these events are rare and it is perfectly allowed to learn how to address without grounding the club, so maybe the professional golfers should learn how to do it. Jack Nicklaus could learn it and play well, why not others?

Heck, I can learn to do it, too... Playing in heavy wind already requires adjustments that take a lot more skill than putting without grounding the putter, so I don't see it as an onerous burden.

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"

Link to comment
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by zeg

Heck, I can learn to do it, too... Playing in heavy wind already requires adjustments that take a lot more skill than putting without grounding the putter, so I don't see it as an onerous burden.



Not a burden, and I could probably do it, but I'm thinking about tour pros playing for winning a tournament having to change their routing in the middle of the round. Marking the ball won't guarantee it won't move, so hovering the putter is the only option that guarantee it.

I'm sure it would not be a problem for them, but I just don't see the reasoning behind the rule. Especially since you can hover the club and not having to worry about the rule. Why then have the rule at all? I doubt a lot of people would start bumping their ball and claiming the wind did it, especially since you have to move the ball back anyways. No advantage gained whatsoever.

For me, it's not an issue, but I don't like seeing what happened to Simpson yesterday.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades



Originally Posted by sacm3bill

What's changed is, grounding the putter brings in the possibility of you having caused the ball to move. So you're going to have to change the rule that penalizes that as well, otherwise there will be arguments about whether the ball was moved by the player's actions, vs the wind or some other outside force.

I think the rule is fine as is.

I would agree, I understand the OP that hovering the putter my not be your style and could throw you off, but that is part of the uniqueness of golf.  No two lies are ever the same either, you have to adapt to the conditions, the more shots you have in your bag the better.  Very tough break to lose a tournament because of that, but that's what makes it such a wonderful game (or box of chocolates), you never know what will happen next.

Craig 

Yeah, wanna make 14 dollars the hard way?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 4752 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • after some years experimenting around, I've settled on a mixed bag of mostly Pat Simmons vintage Tiger Sharks (the ones with the blue enamal on back of the clubheads): 3 thru 9 iron, + 3 wedges (PW, sand, chipper). Those super heavy clubheads really help me get my swing down and thru the ball. Also I carry an old Taylor 18-degree rescue club, 17-degree and 14 degree ImagineGolf metalwoods, and the famous Pat Simmons "alien" 1-iron. Finally a real brick-on-a-stick, the big-headed Bettinardi Ben Hogan model putter which is excellent for taking the break out of short putts and getting the ball hole high on long ones. Wait....is that 15 clubs? Oh well....
    • this topic brought to mind one my favorite golf-spectator memories. Back when, living in Santa Barbara CA, parked in my yellow cab just behind the 10th tee  (c. 380 yard par 4) at SB Muni golf course while eating lunch. A twosome comes by, and first up is this fat little mexican guy who takes a kinda squirelly practice swing, then addresses the ball and bashes a long, high, perfectly straight drive up to w/in about 5 yards of the green. Other guy is dressed to the 9's, pulls out what looks like a $300 driver....and hits a maybe 150-yard pop fly. Slams clubhead to the ground and yells, "it's fat! It's fat! Everything is fat today!!"  And that's how I learned what a "fat" shot is.
    • day 57. Technique practice in the net. Really trying to slow down. 
    • It may not be surprising that in the previous 7,064 posts, this particular point has been discussed. To which I will counter: If we're talking about results, why only the majors? Unless you know something that I don't, neither of us are in any position to judge whether Woods or Nicklaus lived their overall life better, not that such a thing is even objectively measurable, nor is it relevant to the discussion.
    • As we've had to tell other people, the topic is which is the better GOLFER, not human being.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...