Jump to content
IGNORED

Range ball vs. premium ball distance


Note: This thread is 4821 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I have been hitting the range a lot practice my swing and getting a feel for my distance.

Only able to play a couple of rounds so far this year but I am noticing a big differnce in how far I hit on the course.

Nailed a 4 iron 198 yards with a Bridgestone RX on the course but only hitting a 4 iron 175-180 on the ragne.

Can the ball make that big a differnce?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


range balls run the entire gambit they can be longer or significantly shorter.  Many ranges use limited flight balls because it keeps them in a smaller area from which to pick them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Also, range yardage markers can be off. Look at Google Earth in satellite mode, find the range, and measure the distance from the teeboxes to the flags, just to be sure that they're correct.

"Golf is an entire game built around making something that is naturally easy - putting a ball into a hole - as difficult as possible." - Scott Adams

Mid-priced ball reviews: Top Flight Gamer v2 | Bridgestone e5 ('10) | Titleist NXT Tour ('10) | Taylormade Burner TP LDP | Taylormade TP Black | Taylormade Burner Tour | Srixon Q-Star ('12)

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Originally Posted by B-Con

Also, range yardage markers can be off. Look at Google Earth in satellite mode, find the range, and measure the distance from the teeboxes to the flags, just to be sure that they're correct.



Or use a rangefinder.. Much faster if you or a friend has one!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I think it's a combination of

  • The range markers are off
  • The range is only 200 yards so they probible do have limited flight balls

Never knew about the balls or thought to check the markers.

Really eye-opener

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites



There's a number of reasons why your ball on the course went 198 yards but on the range it's less

  1. Range uses limited flight balls - already said
  2. Range markers are off - already said
  3. Course had a downward slope that gave you some extra roll out
  4. Wind was at your back
  5. You hit the ball in the sweet spot or thin and it traveled further than usual.
  6. Some combination of the above.
Originally Posted by Stonecold

I have been hitting the range a lot practice my swing and getting a feel for my distance.

Only able to play a couple of rounds so far this year but I am noticing a big differnce in how far I hit on the course.

Nailed a 4 iron 198 yards with a Bridgestone RX on the course but only hitting a 4 iron 175-180 on the ragne.

Can the ball make that big a differnce?



Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

BTW, keep in mind that a "premium/tour" ball (ie. proV, penta, z-star...) is not the longest ball.  i always chuckle when people list those in threads that ask for the longest ball out there.

Colin P.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

A lot of range balls (at least at the places I go) are nearly smooth. A lot of dimples have worn off, and that can make the ball go shorter.

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

ive noticed that at most driving ranges i can barely get over 250 yards, but on the course using my e5's i can get closer to the 300 mark

range balls definately cannot compare to the balls we use on the course

TM RBZ Stage 2 9.5* Kuro Kage Silver 60s
TM V-Steel 13* 3w
Callaway BB Heavenwood 3H 20*
Cobra S2 Forged Irons
Callaway Forged Copper Wedges 52*-58*
Oddysey White hot #1

Link to comment
Share on other sites


A couple of days ago I was at the range and they use Nike practice balls.  Not sure which model though.  Anyways, I was having a decent day striking the ball, and hitting it well with the driver I picked up on Ebay recently ($25, TM 320 Tour TI 8.5*).  So I decided to toss a couple in the bag and see how they played out on the course when I played 9 yesterday.

Holding the ball I initially teed off with.. it's scuffed a bit, but it survived the 9 holes and to be honest... one of the better balls I've played with.  It was nice around the greens, and off the tee it was great.

In my stand Bag:

R7 Superquad 10.5* Fujikura REAX 65-S
Hi-Bore XLS 19* Hybrid Dynamic Gold S300
MP-60 4 thru PW Dynamic Gold S300 .588 REG 54* SW Vokey 58* LWSTX Greeny IV putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I tend to hit range balls [i]longer[/i] with my driver than I do normal balls. I liken that to a combination of range rocks being much harder versus premium balls and the reduced stress of not really caring if I mishit. I mean, I want them all to go well, but on the range it's "oh, that was a duff" compared to "oh man, my next shot is gonna be tough" on the course. Do you know what I mean? Fewer consequences make for a little more "free-wheeling" swings at the range maybe?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I took a lesson late May and really rebuilt my swing from the ground up on the practice range in June.

As a result of always thinking about my swing I was hitting the ball well and strait but short.

Now I feel more comfortable and find that on the course I am thinking about the goose that hissed at me on the last green.

"I didn't do anything to him,  maybe he's just a jerk..."

An than wham the ball is flying (hopefully down the fairway) but a good 10-20 yards further than what I hit when I was thinking about hitting.

And I am thinking "eh maybe that goose is just having a bad day..."

I guess the free wheeling part of my game is making a come back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 4821 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Eh. Do your hips back when they swivel like he demonstrates? Or do they tend to go forward as they rotate?
    • Uh, that's not what happened. I'm highly dubious about how your results would work going forward, you showed nothing about your setup, etc. I trust the physics (your 3 dB over a meter is off substantially) and sound engineers over claimed "good" results.
    • I actually really like the video. I feel like it speaks to my own issues of hip movement (lunge towards the ball). I think he also presents a very good and detailed explanation of the why from biomechanical perspective, not forcing the clubs in position and instead let it work a proper planar path by providing it space (hip swivel) the most efficient way. As far as tech speak/catch phrases etc., that some may not like, it doesn't bother me and even necessary. For eg., the spiral line sounds like it is the same thing as a kinematic chain, but directionally specific along with the set of muscles joints it engages. If the club is not dynamically aligned to the 'spiral line' it will force other compensation like locking joints, etc. That's simple logic, and from my perspective not brought up enough. Good stuff.
    • Thanks! it was a fun experiment and I hope is going to be useful for people that like to go down the rabbit hole like i do but can't afford a launch monitor or even a cheap speed meter. Of course I'm glad the results were positive, even better than I spected, but it is funny to see that only you took the time to post after the results were given, the only one in the thread that was open minded about the idea. The other posters that daily brought down the idea without proper arguments or proof, disappeared after been confronted with actual data. Maybe they are testing this by themselves and are in shock that they are getting the same results as me!     
    • It would certainly be a good thing if more people would at least give walking the course a chance, but "great crime" is awfully melodramatic.  On the Faxon end, I think he's probably just speculating that these guys might be new to golf. That position when teeing up the ball normally suggests that. It shouldn't be too much of a surprise that newbies would be riders. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...