Jump to content
IGNORED

Tiger as Captain's pick for Pres. Cup?


Note: This thread is 4837 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Horrible idea.  Tiger isnt even playing very well right now so itwas pretty much a wasted pick.

Whats in my :sunmountain: C-130 cart bag?

Woods: :mizuno: JPX 850 9.5*, :mizuno: JPX 850 15*, :mizuno: JPX-850 19*, :mizuno: JPX Fli-Hi #4, :mizuno: JPX 800 Pro 5-PW, :mizuno: MP T-4 50-06, 54-09 58-10, :cleveland: Smart Square Blade and :bridgestone: B330-S



How did you feel about Greg Norman passing over a couple Asian players to put a slumping Adam Scott on the team?


Originally Posted by Shorty

First of all, you don't "shoot scores" in match play.

Secondly, why is someone who thinks Woods doesn't deserve to be on the team a "hater"? - God I hate that stupid term

Thirdly - Woods may well play really well. But that's not the point. He has not earnt his place on the team and other players and fans know he shouldn't be on the team.

It makes Couples look like a sycophant and reflects poorly on him.



Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.




Originally Posted by sean_miller

How did you feel about Greg Norman passing over a couple Asian players to put a slumping Adam Scott on the team?


I thought it was a bad pick and I believe he went 1-4 so it was a bad pick.

Driver: i15, 3 wood: G10, Hybrid: Nickent 4dx, Irons: Ping s57, Wedges: Mizuno MPT 52, 56, 60, Putter: XG #9 



Originally Posted by sean_miller

How did you feel about Greg Norman passing over a couple Asian players to put a slumping Adam Scott on the team?


An obvious question, but a good one.

Norman had the opportunity to make himself look like  an idiot or a genius. Luckily for everyone, it worked out.

The thing with Scott is that he was still playing. He was struggling, but he hadn't given up. Everyone, including Norman knows how good he is.

Tiger isn't playing. He could have played last week, but he didn't.

To me, that means he has essentially thrown in the towel for this season, and this should have disqualified him in the eyes of Couples.

If Woods does actually play, he has as good a chance as anyone to do well, given the match play format, but it doesn't sit well with me.

Norman's gesture was an act of trust and good faith.

A good performance in Melbourne is not going to prove that Tiger is back.

If I were Couples, I would have said to him - "Let's see how your form is next year. We want you in the Ryder Cup team."

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


I think it was a great idea to add Tiger to the team. He will not be playing against the field it will be against the opposing player. He will be fine and will play well. Tiger and Stricker will most likely play together as a team, so he will play with a guy he loves playing with and when it single he doesnt need to worry about the rest of the field just what the other guy is doing.



I agree.

Originally Posted by Shorty

An obvious question, but a good one.

Norman had the opportunity to make himself look like  an idiot or a genius. Luckily for everyone, it worked out.

The thing with Scott is that he was still playing. He was struggling, but he hadn't given up. Everyone, including Norman knows how good he is.

Tiger isn't playing. He could have played last week, but he didn't.

To me, that means he has essentially thrown in the towel for this season, and this should have disqualified him in the eyes of Couples.

If Woods does actually play, he has as good a chance as anyone to do well, given the match play format, but it doesn't sit well with me.

Norman's gesture was an act of trust and good faith.

A good performance in Melbourne is not going to prove that Tiger is back.

If I were Couples, I would have said to him - "Let's see how your form is next year. We want you in the Ryder Cup team."



Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Has anyone seen the headlines on Yahoo! about this? "Tiger Woods gets big honor"? "Tiger Woods named to prestigious team"? What? Do they think Obama is making these picks or something?

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades



Originally Posted by Shorty

First of all, you don't "shoot scores" in match play.

Secondly, why is someone who thinks Woods doesn't deserve to be on the team a "hater"? - God I hate that stupid term

Thirdly - Woods may well play really well. But that's not the point. He has not earnt his place on the team and other players and fans know he shouldn't be on the team.

It makes Couples look like a sycophant and reflects poorly on him.

No one who is a captain's pick has earned their place on the team.  That's why they are captain's picks.  If anyone has a problem with it they should have played better and got on the team by points.  They are Freddie's picks and he can do with them as he pleases.  I love how you mentioned the Adam Scott pick was "good faith" yet Tiger isn't?  You have no problem showing Adam Scott good faith but you do with Tiger?  Fred Couples believe's in Tiger.  Period.  Or he wouldn't have put him on the team. He has a hell of a lot more of a proven track record than Adam ****ing Scott.

  • Upvote 2

Since your crystal ball obviously reaches out several months, could you tell us who the winner of the tour championship will be so we can make some extra cash?

Originally Posted by TitleistWI

Horrible idea.  Tiger isnt even playing very well right now so itwas pretty much a wasted pick.



  • Upvote 1

  • Administrator

Originally Posted by Shorty

The thing with Scott is that he was still playing. He was struggling, but he hadn't given up. Everyone, including Norman knows how good he is.

Tiger isn't playing. He could have played last week, but he didn't.

To me, that means he has essentially thrown in the towel for this season, and this should have disqualified him in the eyes of Couples.

I don't buy it. He'd just come back, having practiced for two weeks tops, and played in two events, during which time you can't really "practice" the way you need to practice to prepare. A third week of "not so much practicing, more trying to get around a golf course" could easily be seen as a worse choice. He's not "playing" but he's practicing, and contrary to the opinions of the guys who avoid the practice range, the best way to get out of a funk is not to try to play your way out of it, but to practice your way out of it.

Yes, there's a delicate balance - you need to play some tournament rounds in order to cement some things, but you can't ONLY play in tournaments when you need to practice . Monday's a light day. Tuesday and Wednesday are about learning the golf course, and nobody makes any real changes on those days of the week. You've gotta dance with the girl you brought, because the music starts on Thursday.

Bear in mind that if he'd played well enough at the Wyndham, he'd then be committed, basically, for playing every playoff event (he couldn't skip the first because he'd be low in the standings) until he was eliminated, so that three weeks in a row could stretch quite easily to four, five, six...

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades


If I was an international player, the prospect of facing Tiger would be very intriguing. Who's gonna show up? The good Tiger or the completely lacklustre (and borderline embarassing) Foley coached Tiger? It's possible that neither Tiger nor Foley are actually smart enough to see how wrong that partnership is, but maybe playing alongside Stricker for a few days will be a wakeup call - enough tinkering already - just hit the ball!!

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


It's kind of no win for the international player.  If the international player wins, people will say so what he beat a gimpy Tiger, and if he loses, people will wonder how he lost to a gimpy Tiger.

Originally Posted by sean_miller

If I was an international player, the prospect of facing Tiger would be very intriguing. Who's gonna show up? The good Tiger or the completely lacklustre (and borderline embarassing) Foley coached Tiger? It's possible that neither Tiger nor Foley are actually smart enough to see how wrong that partnership is, but maybe playing alongside Stricker for a few days will be a wakeup call - enough tinkering already - just hit the ball!!



Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades



Originally Posted by newtogolf

It's kind of no win for the international player.  If the international player wins, people will say so what he beat a gimpy Tiger, and if he loses, people will wonder how he lost to a gimpy Tiger.

Unless of course, Tiger does play well....and the only way we will know that now is if TitleistWI tells us

:tmade: SLDR X-Stiff 12.5°
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Wood Stiff
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Hybrid Stiff
:nike:VR Pro Combo CB 4 - PW Stiff 2° Flat
:cleveland:588RTX CB 50.10 GW
:cleveland:588RTX CB 54.10 SW
:nike:VR V-Rev 60.8 LW
:nike:Method 002 Putter


I don't think Tiger should be playing for different reasons than you. I disagree with your post quoted below.  To say that Tiger has "thrown in the towel" is as big of a speculative statement as someone who says "Tiger's gonna win the next tournament he enters!"  Imo, Adam was struggling that year, and Tiger is struggling now. Tiger has been quoted as saying that he's working on his game at the moment thus I don't get the "thrown in the towel" comment or the implication that Tiger's given up and Adam had not given up a couple yrs ago.

Greg Norman and Fred Couples both went out on limbs for their guys.  Imagine if Couples had to make his pick from a pool of players from different countries and he picked struggling Tiger who shared his citizenship (as Norman shared with Adam)! That would've really put a lot of folks' panties into a bunch.

Originally Posted by Shorty

An obvious question, but a good one.Norman had the opportunity to make himself look like  an idiot or a genius. Luckily for everyone, it worked out.

The thing with Scott is that he was still playing. He was struggling, but he hadn't given up. Everyone, including Norman knows how good he is.Tiger isn't playing. He could have played last week, but he didn't.

To me, that means he has essentially thrown in the towel for this season, and this should have disqualified him in the eyes of Couples.

If Woods does actually play, he has as good a chance as anyone to do well, given the match play format, but it doesn't sit well with me.

Norman's gesture was an act of trust and good faith.

A good performance in Melbourne is not going to prove that Tiger is back.

If I were Couples, I would have said to him - "Let's see how your form is next year. We want you in the Ryder Cup team."






Originally Posted by sean_miller

If I was an international player, the prospect of facing Tiger would be very intriguing. Who's gonna show up? The good Tiger or the completely lacklustre (and borderline embarassing) Foley coached Tiger? It's possible that neither Tiger nor Foley are actually smart enough to see how wrong that partnership is, but maybe playing alongside Stricker for a few days will be a wakeup call - enough tinkering already - just hit the ball!!

Wow, that's all it takes? Just hit the ball?


Get real people... Tiger is going to be in every major golfing event that he wants to be in for so long as it makes people like you and me more likely to talk about it and then go watch it.

It not about how well hes played or how good his season was.... its about the fact that hes Tiger woods and everywhere he goes big hype(and TV ratings) follow.

nickent.gif4DX Evolver Driver, ping.gif Rapture 3 Wood, taylormade.gif Burner 08 5 Wood, nickent.gif 3DX RC 3-4 & 5DX 5 Hybrid,
nickent.gif 6-PW 3DX Hybrid Irons, cleveland.gif High Bore 09 GW-SW, touredge.gif 60* Wedge, maxfli.gif Revolution Blade Insert Putter
 
Yes I'm Aware That's 16 Clubs!

Perhaps you could call them and share your wisdom!

Originally Posted by sean_miller

If I was an international player, the prospect of facing Tiger would be very intriguing. Who's gonna show up? The good Tiger or the completely lacklustre (and borderline embarassing) Foley coached Tiger? It's possible that neither Tiger nor Foley are actually smart enough to see how wrong that partnership is, but maybe playing alongside Stricker for a few days will be a wakeup call - enough tinkering already - just hit the ball!!

-----

On another note:

I think it's a good idea to have Tiger on the team. One simple reason:

Even if Tiger will play that bad (PGA Championship level), he at least takes a lot of pressure off his teammates. If they lose it's because of Tiger, if they win it's despite of Tiger.

(If Tiger plays great and the team wins, it's because of Stricker carrying Tiger and the great team spirit. If they lose it's somehow because of Tiger (somebody will find a reason, I guess).)


Except the WGCs and the FedEx Cup events

Depends on if you would consider them a big golfing event though...

Originally Posted by LankyLefty

Get real people... Tiger is going to be in every major golfing event that he wants to be in


Note: This thread is 4837 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • If you own a Stack radar…
    • If you own a Stack radar (for now, it's limited to Stack radar only), and want to work on your wedge game… it turns out that wedge distances are 99% correlated to ball speed. So, with a small radar, you can practice your wedge game easily in a gamified way.
    • Day 11: 2/16/2025 Rince and Repeat: Just like yesterday I spent several 5-10 minute sessions working on what I learned on Friday.   
    • Quick update. So, I got the PXG Secret Weapon and I have to say I like it... mostly. (see below) I spent some time with it on the range and I even gathered some data in doors. I'm not going to post data yet, as my swing is still a bit of a work in progress and I'd like to gather some more data after I settle down a little bit more. But here's my review.  First as a driver replacement. ... IMO it is not a replacement, it's clearly more of a supplement... for me anyway. Not long enough to really replace the driver. For me it's about 20 yards short of my driver. It is longer than my 30-wood off the tee. (15 yards-ish) I will say it is easier to hit off the tee than my 3-wood. I get some of my best shots teeing it low, but I also get some of my worst. If I tee it about a full inch off the ground I get very consistent shots. Super repeatable. Amazingly repeatable even with my messy swing. Off the tee, I find it draw biased just a bit. You can tinker with the set up if that isn't your personal cup of tea.  As a 3-wood replacement. For me it's about perfect. It's longer than my 3-wood off the deck (my data showed 10 yards longer) and it has a gentle fade to it, which I love. You do need a clean lie, but I never hit my 3-wood off anything but a clean lie anyway. I found it interesting that I hit a gentle fade off the deck and a slight draw off a tee. I'm sure that's not uncommon. Again, you can tinker with the set up to optimize that if you wanted to... I don't want to.  It's clearly a lot longer than my 3-wood off the tee. Easier to hit off the tee than my 3 wood, and off the deck it's also longer. So, it's a no-brainer 3-wood replacement for me. I will say that over the years I've learned to use my 3-wood for this low-flying-100-yard-punch-out-from-under-a-tree shot.  I'll have to see if the Secret Weapon can handle that duty. But it's going in the bag to replace the 3-wood.  I also turned my 5-wood down from 19 degrees to 17 degrees. ... Incidentally my 3-wood had been 16 degrees. I used to always hit my 5 wood and my hybrid about the same distance. This adjustment helps my gapping a bit at the top of the bag. I can clearly hit my 5-wood farther than my hybrid now.  Overall on the PXG Secret Weapon. The good: It's clearly longer and easier to hit off the tee than my 3-wood. It's a bit longer off the deck than my 3-wood.  It's super forgiving... surprisingly so.  It's uber adjustable. ... Although I do suggest getting fit for it. That will save you having to (or wanting to) buy a weight kit just to try out the infinite number of set ups. The headcover is super cool.  The maybe not so good: Shots out of the middle sound great. Shots off the heal sound great. Shots off the toe sound ... what's the work... clangy? It's very forgiving off the toe and the heal. The flight and the distance are incredibly consistent. But the sound off the toe isn't great.  For me I tend to draw it off the tee and fade it off the deck. You can set it up to be biased either way, but in my hands I think if I set up a draw off the deck, that might induce a duck hook off the tee. ... In fairness that could also be where my swing is at right now.  It's pretty spendy. ... If I really stop and think about it, I paid $450 for a new 3-wood. Granted it's a better performing 3-wood. But for me it's really a 3-wood replacement.
    • I've got my pain mostly under control and the meds are working.   I'd like to join. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...