Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Great putting is just luck, why we should make the cup bigger.


Note: This thread is 5029 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I approach golf courses like a puzzle or video game.  I could be way off here, but I think the golf course designer approaches their course design like a military strategist designs a fortress or a linear video game designer where there's an optimal path to navigate through the hazards to get the ball into the hole.  Once you navigate the water and other hazards, get past the bunkers and onto the green you reach a different challenge (lke the boss stage in video games).  The challenge is different, you must figure out the path to the hole by reading the greens and making the proper stroke, from this viewpoint, the putting stroke is just as important as others.

While they can be frustrating, as a former video game developer, I appreciate the design of greens and how they are designed to be approached and penal if you don't approach them as intended or mishit your putt.  The hole size would be considered a difficulty setting, but I always play video games at the highest difficulty so I'd prefer to keep the cup size as is.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by newtogolf

I approach golf courses like a puzzle or video game.  I could be way off here, but I think the golf course designer approaches their course design like a military strategist designs a fortress or a linear video game designer where there's an optimal path to navigate through the hazards to get the ball into the hole.  Once you navigate the water and other hazards, get past the bunkers and onto the green you reach a different challenge (lke the boss stage in video games).  The challenge is different, you must figure out the path to the hole by reading the greens and making the proper stroke, from this viewpoint, the putting stroke is just as important as others.

While they can be frustrating, as a former video game developer, I appreciate the design of greens and how they are designed to be approached and penal if you don't approach them as intended or mishit your putt.  The hole size would be considered a difficulty setting, but I always play video games at the highest difficulty so I'd prefer to keep the cup size as is.

To take this analogy a bit farther,  in a video game, as you approach the culminating battle, the defenses get tougher.  In golf, the green lacks the defenses of the rest of the course.  There are no water hazards or rough on the putting green.  All the hole has left is slope to defend itself with.  Remove a large part of that defense by increasing the hole size and you finish each hole with an anticlimax.

The funnest part of the game is the short game.  Each stroke becomes more critical as you get closer to the hole.  Screw up a chip and it's too late in the play of the hole for a recovery shot unless you get very fortunate with the next one.  Hit a bad 30 foot putt and leave a 6 foot comebacker and you will stand over it with your knees shaking, especially if it's a critical turn in a match.  This is how it should be, it's what golf is all about.  Open that hole up to 6 inches and all the drama is gone.  All the fun is gone.  Anyone who doesn't embrace the challenge of facing a putt like that doesn't really understand golf.  Those of us who truly love the game in its entirety would fight to the death the right to retain that challenge.

  • Upvote 1

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Fourputt

The funnest part of the game is the short game.  Each stroke becomes more critical as you get closer to the hole.  Screw up a chip and it's too late in the play of the hole for a recovery shot unless you get very fortunate with the next one.  Hit a bad 30 foot putt and leave a 6 foot comebacker and you will stand over it with your knees shaking, especially if it's a critical turn in a match.  This is how it should be, it's what golf is all about.  Open that hole up to 6 inches and all the drama is gone.  All the fun is gone.  Anyone who doesn't embrace the challenge of facing a putt like that doesn't really understand golf.  Those of us who truly love the game in its entirety would fight to the death the right to retain that challenge.

Well said, I couldn't agree more. Those types of situations on and around the green are the best part of golf.

My Tools of Ignorance:

Driver: Ping I20 9.5*
Woods/Hybrids: Cobra AMP 3W and 3 HY

Irons: Cobra AMP 4-GW

Wedges: Callaway Forged Copper 56* and 60*

Putters: Scotty Cameron  35" (Several of the flow neck blade variety)

Ball: Bridgestone B330-RX and Srixon Z-Star

Bag: Nike Performance Carry


  • Administrator
Posted
Originally Posted by Fourputt

The funnest part of the game is the short game.

That's true. While I really like hitting a great shot, unless it goes in the hole it doesn't top making a snake of a putt from 30 feet for birdie. Or converting the seven-footer after a great mid-iron.

It seems to me that you're more likely to remember a shot that goes in the hole than ones that simply get close to it or travel really far.

The hole size is perfect, IMO.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

See, all in all, I dont have a problem with OP wanting a bigger hole. What is annoying is that he's trying to make out that putting is luck, and we should want a bigger hole too. Seems that this thread wasn't to create discussion, it was to try to force his own 'wants' on us.

In the Ogio Kingpin bag:

Titleist 913 D2 9.5* w/ UST Mamiya ATTAS 3 80 w/ Harrison Shotmaker & Billy Bobs afternarket Hosel Adaptor (get this if you don't have it for your 913)
Wilson Staff Ci-11 4-GW (4I is out of the bag for a hybrid, PW and up were replaced by Edel Wedges)
TaylorMade RBZ 5 & 3 Fairway Woods

Cobra Baffler T-Rail 3 & 4 Hybrids

Edel Forged 48, 52, 56, 60, and 64* wedges (different wedges for different courses)

Seemore Si-4 Black Nickel Putter


Posted
Originally Posted by ApocG10

See, all in all, I dont have a problem with OP wanting a bigger hole. What is annoying is that he's trying to make out that putting is luck, and we should want a bigger hole too. Seems that this thread wasn't to create discussion, it was to try to force his own 'wants' on us.


If that's what it seemed like I'm sorry. I was just trying to provide my side of the argument by providing the best reasons that I could come up with, and just because you didn't like them or think they were reasonable doesn't necessarily mean that I was trying to force them upon you. I would also say that an element of arguing is trying to get other people to come to the same conclusion that you have.

I didn't say that they used a bigger cup in the bible or anything and that you are all going to hell, that would've been trying to force you.

:whistle:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

with this mindset, why not get rid putting all together.  from now on, when you hit it onto the green, you win the game and a gold star.  The game is supposed to be hard.  You cant make it easier just because you're not getting better.


Posted
Originally Posted by MajorSlice

with this mindset, why not get rid putting all together.  from now on, when you hit it onto the green, you win the game and a gold star.  The game is supposed to be hard.  You cant make it easier just because you're not getting better.


Again, pointing the fingers at my putting... you clearly didn't read very much.

:whistle:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by jshots

Again, pointing the fingers at my putting... you clearly didn't read very much.


I dont think anyone is calling you a bad putter. You are playing off a 7, you dont get that far being a horrible putter. Just seemed you were pushing the idea. That said, Im not upset and I dont dislike you, was just  pointing out the vibe I got. Don't worry about it. Its a small issue, and we all know the hole size will not change in our lifetime. Not with players getting better and better every day.

In the Ogio Kingpin bag:

Titleist 913 D2 9.5* w/ UST Mamiya ATTAS 3 80 w/ Harrison Shotmaker & Billy Bobs afternarket Hosel Adaptor (get this if you don't have it for your 913)
Wilson Staff Ci-11 4-GW (4I is out of the bag for a hybrid, PW and up were replaced by Edel Wedges)
TaylorMade RBZ 5 & 3 Fairway Woods

Cobra Baffler T-Rail 3 & 4 Hybrids

Edel Forged 48, 52, 56, 60, and 64* wedges (different wedges for different courses)

Seemore Si-4 Black Nickel Putter


Posted
Originally Posted by jshots

Again, pointing the fingers at my putting... you clearly didn't read very much.

dont make the post if you cant take the criticism.  you brought the subject up and there is no other aspect of the game that involves the hole besides putting.  so yes, i am pointing at your putting.


Posted
Originally Posted by MajorSlice

dont make the post if you cant take the criticism.  you brought the subject up and there is no other aspect of the game that involves the hole besides putting.  so yes, i am pointing at your putting.

lol don't respond to the post if you don't know what it's about. I'm not talking about MY putting. MY putting has nothing to do with why I'm saying the hole could be bigger. But I'm done with this thread and I've moved on to bigger and better things.

Originally Posted by ApocG10

I dont think anyone is calling you a bad putter. You are playing off a 7, you dont get that far being a horrible putter. Just seemed you were pushing the idea. That said, Im not upset and I dont dislike you, was just  pointing out the vibe I got. Don't worry about it. Its a small issue, and we all know the hole size will not change in our lifetime. Not with players getting better and better every day.

I understand. I don't dislike you either. And I agree that it will never ever change. And I won't shed any tears over that fact.

:whistle:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Putting isn't luck.  Not saying there isn't a certain amount of luck involved in small sample sizes (IE a round of golf).  But the more good putts you hit the more you will make over time.  Sure, we all hit those perfect putts that just don't go in.  But I don't want the hole to be bigger.  I just want to keep hitting it well with the right speed and I will make my fair share.  You can't judge your putting skills on one round.  Changing the hole size would make the game different and take away some of the skill in the great equalizer in golf.

Brian


Posted

Another aspect of making the hole bigger - course designers would adjust!  It's a matter on unintended consequences.  Let's say the cup is increased to 6".  Next thing you know, the pros are shooting in the 50's consistently.  The course designers and greenskeepers are just going to narrow the fairways, shrink the greens, add water, add sand, add length...  Whatever they can do to keep thier slope at a reasonable rating.  Remember the slope is based on what a scratch golfer would shoot (more or less).

So the weekend chopper is going to be hacking out of nasty, hosel-grabbing rough, hitting hybrids into tiny greens, dropping out of the water, blasting out of Lytham-sized traps, just to finally get on the green so he can get at the marginally bigger hole.  And it'll seem like a thimble by the time he gets there.

Occam's razor


Posted
Originally Posted by CraiginKSA

Another aspect of making the hole bigger - course designers would adjust!  It's a matter on unintended consequences.  Let's say the cup is increased to 6".  Next thing you know, the pros are shooting in the 50's consistently.  The course designers and greenskeepers are just going to narrow the fairways, shrink the greens, add water, add sand, add length...

We already have one Pete Dye, there's really no need to encourage the rest of the lot...

In My Bag:

Adams Super LS 9.5˚ driver, Aldila Phenom NL 65TX
Adams Super LS 15˚ fairway, Kusala black 72x
Adams Super LS 18˚ fairway, Aldila Rip'd NV 75TX
Adams Idea pro VST hybrid, 21˚, RIP Alpha 105x
Adams DHY 24˚, RIP Alpha 89x
5-PW Maltby TE irons, KBS C taper X, soft stepped once 130g
Mizuno T4, 54.9 KBS Wedge X
Mizuno R12 60.5, black nickel, KBS Wedge X
Odyssey Metal X #1 putter 
Bridgestone E5, Adidas samba bag, True Linkswear Stealth
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by CraiginKSA

Another aspect of making the hole bigger - course designers would adjust!  It's a matter on unintended consequences.  Let's say the cup is increased to 6".  Next thing you know, the pros are shooting in the 50's consistently.  The course designers and greenskeepers are just going to narrow the fairways, shrink the greens, add water, add sand, add length...  Whatever they can do to keep thier slope at a reasonable rating.  Remember the slope is based on what a scratch golfer would shoot (more or less).

So the weekend chopper is going to be hacking out of nasty, hosel-grabbing rough, hitting hybrids into tiny greens, dropping out of the water, blasting out of Lytham-sized traps, just to finally get on the green so he can get at the marginally bigger hole.  And it'll seem like a thimble by the time he gets there.


Actually it is the course rating that is based on the scratch player.  Slope is based on the bogey golfer.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5029 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 254 5-4 Arms off chest in backswing and downswing. Short swing, pause and then hit.  Hit foam balls. Keeping arching of wrist a focus as well. 
    • I would think of it in terms of time. The time it takes to get the arm angle into a good position to deliver the club with proper shaft lean. Another component is rotation, but that is also a matter of timing. It relates to how the body stalls to give the golfer time to hit the ball. If you have to get 80+ degrees out of that right elbow in one third of a second versus 50 degrees in the same time then you have to steal time from somewhere. It is usually body rotation. That does not help with shaft lean.  I agree in that amateurs tend to make the swing more complicated than pro golfers. 
    • I haven't been able to practice like I wanted and won't for the next week.  1. The weather sucks in Ohio this year. I have been mostly inside hitting foam balls. Just kind of my basic stuff.  2. I woke up last Saturday with a left side rib muscle on fire. If I turned or leaned a certain way it would spasm that almost buckled my knees. I have been taking a break to let that settle. I don't want to get a long term injury. I think I pinched a nerve or just aggravated a muscles.   3. I am going on a mini-vacation to Florida (screw you Ohio weather) with a friend, and rolling that into a work conference I have next week. I will be with out my clubs for a week.  I will be back next in two Fridays to hit the ground running with some warmer temps and better weather in Ohio, hopefully. I would really like to get more out on the course and the range.     
    • Day 580 - 2026-05-04 Played eight holes. Sometimes golf kicks you in the nuts. 😉 
    • I work with a lot of golfers who want more shaft lean at impact, who currently have AoAs that range from +2° to -2°, and who love to see the handle lower and more "in front of their trail thigh" from face-on at P6. And a lot of these golfers try to solve the issue by working on the downswing. They do something to drag the handle forward. Or they just leave their right thigh farther back so the same handle location "looks" farther forward. Or they move the ball back in their stance. Or they push themselves down into the ground to get the handle lower and increase (decrease?) their AoA (to be more negative). The real fix is often to get wider in the backswing. To do LESS in the backswing. To hinge less, fold the trail arm less, abduct the trail arm less. I had a case of this over the weekend. Before, the player had 110° of trail elbow bend, "lifted" his trail humerus only a few degrees, etc. The club traveled quite a bit around him, and he tended to "pick" the ball from the fairways. In the "after" swings below (which are mild exaggerations — this golfer does not need to end up at < 70° of elbow bend. These were slower backswings with "hit it as hard as you normally would" intent downswings), you can see that he bent his elbow about 70° instead of 110° and lifted his right arm an extra ~15° or more. You can't see how much less this moved his hands across his chest (right arm abduction), but it was also decreased. His hands stayed more "in front of" his right shoulder rather than traveling "beside" them so much. The two swings look like this: The change at P6, without talking about the downswing one little bit (outside of him telling me that he tends to pick the ball), is remarkable: Without 110° of elbow bend to get out (which he gets to 80°, a loss of 30°), the golfer actually loses slightly less elbow bend (70 - 50 = 20), but delivers 30° less elbow bend, lowering the handle and letting the elbow get "in front of" the rib cage… because it never got "behind" or "beside" the rib cage. If you look at this video showing the before/afters of P6, you'll note the handle location (both vertically and horizontally) and the shoulders (the ball is in the same place in these frames). This golfer's path was largely unaffected (still pretty straight into the ball, < 3° path and often < 1.5°), but his AoA jumped to -5° ± 2°. I've always said, and in talking with other instructors they agree and feel similarly, that we spend a lot of time working on the backswing. This is another example of why.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.