Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2927 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I like the above post. One Moe Norman was supposed to be even better ballstriker to Hogan and he was also alone (like Mac is presented here) and accomplished nothing on tour.

Mac O'Grady Acolyte, or "Macolyte"


  • Administrator
Posted

He didn’t try to.

And he purposefully lost events to avoid the spotlight.

You continue to talk yourself down some bad paths.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

This thread is about posting Mac swings and discussing his swing and his swing theories. Not for talking about the mental game or Moe Norman.

43 minutes ago, Secretmove said:

"Fowler and J.B. have won more, competed longer and hit better shots in tournaments than Mac. A big change with my own thinking the last several years is that there is a lot to be learned from guys that don't have "textbook" swings. Possibly more to be learned than just analyzing Adam Scott and 2000 Tiger because you're looking at the stuff that matters and not the distracting "pretty" moves. "

Could it be that the physical ability to strike a golf ball with a stick is only one of many complex things that successful tour pros have to win tournaments and amass ball striking statistics on the pga tour. 

Could it be that Ball Striking stats gathered from the PGA tour have little or nothing to do with physical ability or technical perfection?  Could it be that success has more to do with mental ability and social confidence and physical confidence than being a technical genius. 

I'm asking these questions, but I already am pretty sure that most PGA pros, like Duffner for example, number 6 best ball striker before his divorce, and now what......??????..... he got kicked in the balls by some beautiful gold digger and all his self confidence he had locked in a box in his head leaked out.  Now he's what on the ball striking stats. 

O'Grady was in his time considered by his peers as the best ball striker with the most beautiful moves of anybody since Hogan.  He could hit any shot on the range better than anyone because of his technical perfection.  So what does it take to take it to the course? 

Well, I just watched a video of Elk interviewing Duff, and Duff has exactly one, count 'em, one swing thought he uses.  What is my right shoulder doing.  He swings it back perfectly flat, and then steepens the plane like all pros do.  That's it.  He's long ago found that works for him, and has locked that into a bank vault, put on blinders and ear plugs and it works for him.  Good for him, because there are 100 million "pros" who would destroy that swing and confidence in a heart beat. 

I honestly believe if I was ever playing O'Grady for money, I might have a chance, every time he hit one good, I would compliment his third accumulator or just say wow that was a perfect swing.  End of day, he'd be paying me. 

If you look at the positions O'G makes you can't do any better.  End of story.   Fowler is 5'9", is way more confident and stupid than O"G, completely unanalytical, Butch Harmon would never even think of changing any of that straight push with right leg with flip compensation, he just encourages more of what works for him.  JB holmes is an animal who should be a grave digger.   Monster strong.  Swings left and would be a slugger in the minor leagues. 

Ball striking stats on the PGA tour are about mental ability and not getting mentally in your own way.  OG is a poster child, an analytical guy who doesn't like being in the spotlight, exact opposite of McCord, you can tell videos, McCord just takes over.  Now OG is a recluse guru, who gives a crap what he is now.  If he had the mentality of Fowler, who knows how many tournaments he could have won.  Its a tribute to his talent he did as much as he did.  What would his ball striking stats be if he could have turned off all thought like the DUFF??? 

PGA tour is 99.9999% mental.  I haven't even talked about the fact the PGA tour is 99.999999999 percent right wing republican, and that encludes evangelical Christian as well.  What if Mac was a closet liberal atheist?  Do you think not fitting in socially is an asset to ball striking stats?  Who is Mac supposed to talk to when he can't make it work on the course.  He's got nobody. 

So, part of that PGA tour being 99.9999999% mental, a lot of that is fitting in to the country club scene.  A lot of that is Alpha male greed and ambition where there is an automatic response to academic mumbo jumbo:  does that make me more money or get in my way?  You almost have to be born with that genetic ability.  Did Mac hang out with Jack?  Did Jack send an invite to Mac to come over to his Mansion, hang out and talk about his theories?  F!@#$!@#$@# no he didn't.  Mac was too busy suing Beman and asking to play two ball tournaments as both a righty and lefty.  I love that.  But that's not the kind of thinking that will get you F!@Q#!$@#$@# ball striking stats on the PGA tour. 

I strongly disagree with your post. Short answer is if you give me Fowler's mental game I'm not playing on the PGA Tour. If you want to continue to discuss mental game please do so here.

 

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
3 hours ago, Secretmove said:

Could it be that the physical ability to strike a golf ball with a stick is only one of many complex things that successful tour pros have to win tournaments and amass ball striking statistics on the pga tour.

It is, by far, the most dominant thing.

3 hours ago, Secretmove said:

Could it be that Ball Striking stats gathered from the PGA tour have little or nothing to do with physical ability or technical perfection?  Could it be that success has more to do with mental ability and social confidence and physical confidence than being a technical genius. 

Theoretically? Anything is possible… I guess?

But if we limit the discussion to this universe? Absolutely no way whatsoever.

3 hours ago, Secretmove said:

If you look at the positions O'G makes you can't do any better.  End of story.

:doh:

3 hours ago, Secretmove said:

Ball striking stats on the PGA tour are about mental ability and not getting mentally in your own way.

They're really not.

You're not appreciating how thin the line between good and bad is. Read up on the topic.

Screen%20Shot%202018-01-02%20at%206.47.1

Three feet: first to last. You don't seem to appreciate how good modern PGA Tour players are, and how tightly bunched they are, and how a tiny thing can change things for a player.

3 hours ago, Secretmove said:

If he had the mentality of Fowler, who knows how many tournaments he could have won.

Rickie Fowler hits the ball better than Mac O'Grady.

3 hours ago, Secretmove said:

PGA tour is 99.9999% mental.

No, it's not.

3 hours ago, Secretmove said:

Do you think not fitting in socially is an asset to ball striking stats?

Oh brother.


Look…

I should give you a warning you again for posting off-topic stuff, because none of this discusses Mac O'Grady's swing, MORAD, etc. Instead, I'll simply warn you here, in this text. Do not respond to my post, or @mvmac's post, here in this topic. If you want to post about the mental game, or continue your posts about how awesome Mac O'Grady was as a golfer… post elsewhere. This isn't the topic for that.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Where on the forum can we discuss freely various meanders of ballstriking class without being threatened then?

Mac O'Grady Acolyte, or "Macolyte"


  • Moderator
Posted
11 minutes ago, Yff Theos said:

Where on the forum can we discuss freely various meanders of ballstriking class without being threatened then?

No one was "threatened". We're trying to keep threads on topic.

To answer your question:
Screen Shot 2018-01-03 at 8.57.11 AM.png

Screen Shot 2018-01-03 at 8.57.22 AM.png

  • Like 1

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
9 minutes ago, Yff Theos said:

Where on the forum can we discuss freely various meanders of ballstriking class without being threatened then?

Start a new topic somewhere.

 

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
10 minutes ago, mvmac said:

 

Beauty! What year could it be, Mike? Mid 90-ties?

Mac O'Grady Acolyte, or "Macolyte"


Posted
12 minutes ago, Yff Theos said:

Beauty! What year could it be, Mike? Mid 90-ties?

That would be much later. Wouldn't be surprised if it was 2012 ish.


Posted
On ‎8‎/‎15‎/‎2012 at 6:04 AM, dak4n6 said:

Mac is really a space alien who feeds on the sun's gamma rays and lives simultaneously in two parallel universes.

He also posts under his other name Phil McGleney.

Mike Rooker


  • Administrator
Posted
4 minutes ago, Veteran Golf Fan said:

He also posts under his other name Phil McGleney.

His other name (not this user) is @Phil McGleno.

His birth name.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
25 minutes ago, Yff Theos said:

Beauty! What year could it be, Mike? Mid 90-ties?

The video quality certainly doesn't look like it's from over 20 years ago.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
44 minutes ago, virtuoso said:

That would be much later. Wouldn't be surprised if it was 2012 ish.

Well, Virtuoso, if it is 2012 it would suggest the guy was over 60 years old with that swing. Phenomenal.

 

33 minutes ago, billchao said:

The video quality certainly doesn't look like it's from over 20 years ago.

True, I have not though about it.

Mac O'Grady Acolyte, or "Macolyte"


  • Moderator
Posted

I saw another Instagram of his swing with a video filter to make it look like VCR, 360p quality. The video looks like it went through a filter as well.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
1 hour ago, Yff Theos said:

Beauty! What year could it be, Mike? Mid 90-ties?

It's fairly recent, sometime the last several years.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

This one. White headed driver, 35mm look.

 

Now this one is genuinely old.

 

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

I would peg the maroon shirt at 87 ish. Probably when he hit it his best. (however, he did say that the best he ever hit it was right before he broke his elbow--mid-2000's)

3 hours ago, Yff Theos said:

Well, Virtuoso, if it is 2012 it would suggest the guy was over 60 years old with that swing. Phenomenal.

 

 

Regardless if you are a Mac fan or not, no one disputes that he has always been in incredible physical condition. That swing is also made after he had a broken right elbow and didn't get it set properly.

Edited by virtuoso
  • Like 1

Note: This thread is 2927 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 22 - 2026-01-11 More mirror work. Back outdoors tomorrow.
    • Day 11, 1/11/26.  Today was putting, along about 6' of carpet, with coins on the ground to keep me cognizant of what I'm doing.  I think this is the at-home drill from LSW. (Ugh, missed two of the last four days -- 1/10 and 1/8)
    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.