Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

A perfect round, or sandbagging?


Note: This thread is 4997 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

This made the local news yesterday. From http://www.sacbee.com/2012/08/22/4746690/working-the-honor-systemgolf-counts.html:

Quote:

In a regional qualifier for the Audi Quattro Cup, a worldwide handicap tournament whose regional winners earn an expenses-paid trip to the national final [ at Pebble Beach ], Granno and Pappas played lights out. In the "selected drives" format in which each player tees off, and then alternate hitting shots after the preferred drive is selected until the hole is completed, they posted a 1-over-par 73.

Taking their handicaps into consideration and the Stableford scoring, that translated to 45 points. That total would have won, or been within a point of winning, almost every other qualifier in the country.

"We played phenomenally well," Pappas said.

They finished second at Catta Verdera. A distant second.

Dave Featherstone and John Paul Vandersluys shot an 11-under 61. Taking their handicaps at the time – a 6.5 for Featherstone and a 14.4 for Vandersluys – into consideration and the Stableford scoring, that translated to 58 points.

58 points in Stableford scoring is 22-under. That's net eagles on all 4 par 5s and net birdies on the 3s and 4s. A perfect (net) round.

It gets better:

Quote:

Turns out, the same pair also won last year's Catta Verdera Quattro Cup qualifying trip – to Whistling Straits in Wisconsin. Featherstone and Vandersluys also won last year's local qualifier for the ESPN National Golf Challenge, which provided a trip to Las Vegas.

...

While winning three of the most lucrative prizes available to area handicap golfers in the past year seems improbable in competitions designed to make all teams equal, Featherstone said the trips are not a particularly big incentive.

" I play Pebble all the time," he said. "It's not that big of a deal with me . I just play golf and write the scores down..."

Hmm, what did the twosome playing with Featherstone and Vandersluys have to say about their amazing play?

Quote:
As for the twosome who played alongside Featherstone and Vandersluys and were responsible for verifying the accuracy of their score, Catta Verdera member Brad Beerbohm said, "I have no comment about that round," while Jacob Brawner does not have an established handicap, at least not with the NCGA, even though Quattro Cup rules state that all competitors must.

So one "no comment", and one apparently not qualified to comment because he doesn't have an established handicap? (Which was contrary to the rules of the competition.)

Interesting. There are some reader comments in that article from folks who were there playing in the tournament that are rather interesting as well.


Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/2012/08/22/4746690/working-the-honor-systemgolf-counts.html#storylink=cpy

Bill


  • Administrator
Posted

Uhm, I'm going with "both groups sandbagged."

Those kinds of tournaments are rife with sandbagging.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Some tournaments aren't worth entering in.  Most of these tournaments are definitely not worth it.

Sounds like sandbagging to me.  It could happen once, but three times.


Posted

Punishment for sandbagging should be death.  After they hang the first one, we'll see who attempts it again.

In my bag

Driver:      SLDR 10.5*

Hybrids:   Taylormade RBZ Stage 2

Irons:       NikeVR PRO 4-PW

Wedges:   Nike VR Pro 50* 54* 58*

Putter:      2014 Newport 2

Ball:          E6


Posted
Originally Posted by iacas

Uhm, I'm going with "both groups sandbagged."

Same here.

Originally Posted by VMAN

Some tournaments aren't worth entering in.  Most of these tournaments are definitely not worth it.

Unless you're a professional sandbagger I guess.  That's really what a lot of these tournaments boil down to  - not who's the best golfer, but who's the best at gaming the system.

Bill


Posted

I hope my next round is my  "+2 Round"   but somehow I always shoot pretty close to my handicap.....

I guess if those guys didn't make a stink it wouldn't have gained any traction,  but it's funny that once it all comes out, you find out that they only turn in a dozen scores in an entire year  (where golf can be played year-round)  despite belonging to a club,  yet still carry a single-digit handicap.

Looks like 4 scratch golfers sandbagging,  and two did it better than the other two.


Posted

2 9 handicappers shooting a 73 in the alternating driver format (that has to be worth 4 or 5  strokes right? ) seems somewhat plausible.  Shooting a 61 for an 6.5 and 14.4 should getting you disqualified. Reading the full article the 14.4 was a 8.9 earlier in the year. Thats a heck of a lot of strokes to go up.

In their defense the course they said the course was under 6000 yards. That is probably like a par 69 and if you have a couple of good drivers, you are going to be hitting short wedges into every hole that you don't drive the green on.

But doing 3 times in a row makes it a no way in hell type thing.

Uhm, I'm going with "both groups sandbagged."

Those kinds of tournaments are rife with sandbagging.


Posted

I hate scrambles.  They're great for work events: organizational day, in conjunction with a conference, the annual local bar association charity tournament, etc., so that folks who don't really play can get in on the fun.  But why anyone would enter an organized prize-money scramble competition is beyond me.  Scramble golf isn't even that fun, and winning is rarely based on who plays the best golf.

  • Upvote 1

Kevin

Titleist 910 D3 9.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Titleist 910F 13.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Adams Idea A12 Pro hybrid 18*; 23* with RIP S flex
Titleist 712 AP2 4-9 iron with KBS C-Taper, S+ flex
Titleist Vokey SM wedges 48*, 52*, 58*
Odyssey White Hot 2-ball mallet, center shaft, 34"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Once could happen. Three times? No. Did they shoot the score? Sure. But what inflated handicaps. I don't care if the course was playing 6400 yards "short."

I shot 75 as a 25 handicap -- ONCE. It can happen. ONCE. I shot 95 the second round on the same day and same course. I was at an event once where a guy shattered his personal best, won a car with a hole in one, and won a drawing for a trip to Mexico in one night. It happens.

"I play Pebble all the time" is a heck of an argument for why you couldn't possibly have cheated to win three times.

Russ - Student of the Moe Norman swing as taught by the pros at - http://moenormangolf.com

Titleist 910 D3 8.5* w/ Project X shaft/ Titleist 910F 15* w/ Project X shaft

Cobra Baffler 20* & 23* hybrids with Accra hybrid shafts

Mizuno MP-53 irons 5Iron-PW AeroTech i95 shafts stiff and soft stepped once/Mizuno MP T-11 50.6/56.10/MP T10 60*

Seemore PCB putter with SuperStroke 3.0

Srixon 2012 Z-Star yellow balls/ Iomic Sticky 2.3, X-Evolution grips/Titleist Lightweight Cart Bag---

extra/alternate clubs: Mizunos JPX-800 Pro 5-GW with Project X 5.0 soft-stepped shafts


Posted
Originally Posted by x129

...In their defense the course they said the course was under 6000 yards...

FWIW, it's possible the reporter got that wrong. One of the reader comments is claiming it was actually 6400. Still not terribly long of course...

Bill


Posted
Originally Posted by rustyredcab

Once could happen. Three times? No. Did they shoot the score? Sure. But what inflated handicaps. I don't care if the course was playing 6400 yards "short."

I shot 75 as a 25 handicap -- ONCE. It can happen. ONCE. I shot 95 the second round on the same day and same course. I was at an event once where a guy shattered his personal best, won a car with a hole in one, and won a drawing for a trip to Mexico in one night. It happens.

"I play Pebble all the time" is a heck of an argument for why you couldn't possibly have cheated to win three times.

Yeah I am with you here.  If I had played Pebble a bunch of times it wouldn't mean I'd like to win another trip out there..       Oh shucks, fellas, I've been to Pebble Beach quite a few times so need for me to win an all expense paid trip out there again!

Jeff

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
Originally Posted by k-troop

I hate scrambles.  They're great for work events: organizational day, in conjunction with a conference, the annual local bar association charity tournament, etc., so that folks who don't really play can get in on the fun.  But why anyone would enter an organized prize-money scramble competition is beyond me.  Scramble golf isn't even that fun, and winning is rarely based on who plays the best golf.

Okay, but this wasn't a scramble.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by x129

2 9 handicappers shooting a 73 in the alternating driver format (that has to be worth 4 or 5  strokes right? ) seems somewhat plausible...

Originally Posted by k-troop

I hate scrambles.

Just to clarify, it was a best drive, then alternate shot format. So kind of a semi-scramble. But yeah, taking the best drive of the two would be worth a few shots.

Bill


Posted
Sandbaggers. No doubt. I will say, many of the governing bodies are getting better at catching these guys, but they still exist.

Michael

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by mchepp

Sandbaggers. No doubt. I will say, many of the governing bodies are getting better at catching these guys, but they still exist.

My buddy played a 28 index in league play on Wednesday who shot a 37. Just like he shot last week. The guys who run my league are afraid to call guys out, but I'm not. I haven't made any friends in the sandbagger posse (there are about a dozen of them - both genders) but at least you know where you stand with them. All you have to do is shoot the course record and you have a chance at a single point. Easy peasy. My membership and league fees will be spent elsewhere in 2013.

Anyway, I'm probably not the only one who had to read the article a couple times to confirm the 61 wasn't the net score and that the event wasn't a full on scramble.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted

Maybe they should give the prize to the 3rd place winner, this way having an overly excellent score doesn't guarantee a win. The format is a joke so why not the award position...

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Don't forget that the one guy is one of the best putters in CA.  Ignoring their handicaps, how often do you think 2 scratch golfers would go out and shoot a 61 in this format? Maybe picking the drives is a bigger advantage than I think but I have to imagine that is a 1 in 100 type day. Did they cheat on the course in addition to their handicaps?

If you have a weekly league, only using scores from it works out ok (granted the first couple weeks are rough). These type of scrambles with pretty much self reported handicaps and big prizes are a joke. Unless you start disqualifing all the guys with 1 in 10k rounds, it is all about who cheats the most.

Originally Posted by sean_miller

Anyway, I'm probably not the only one who had to read the article a couple times to confirm the 61 wasn't the net score and that the event wasn't a full on scramble.


Note: This thread is 4997 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I work with a lot of golfers who want more shaft lean at impact, who currently have AoAs that range from +2° to -2°, and who love to see the handle lower and more "in front of their trail thigh" from face-on at P6. And a lot of these golfers try to solve the issue by working on the downswing. They do something to drag the handle forward. Or they just leave their right thigh farther back so the same handle location "looks" farther forward. Or they move the ball back in their stance. Or they push themselves down into the ground to get the handle lower and increase (decrease?) their AoA (to be more negative). The real fix is often to get wider in the backswing. To do LESS in the backswing. To hinge less, fold the trail arm less, abduct the trail arm less. I had a case of this over the weekend. Before, the player had 110° of trail elbow bend, "lifted" his trail humerus only a few degrees, etc. The club traveled quite a bit around him, and he tended to "pick" the ball from the fairways. In the "after" swings below (which are mild exaggerations — this golfer does not need to end up at < 70° of elbow bend. These were slower backswings with "hit it as hard as you normally would" intent downswings), you can see that he bent his elbow about 70° instead of 110° and lifted his right arm an extra ~15° or more. You can't see how much less this moved his hands across his chest (right arm abduction), but it was also decreased. His hands stayed more "in front of" his right shoulder rather than traveling "beside" them so much. The two swings look like this: The change at P6, without talking about the downswing one little bit (outside of him telling me that he tends to pick the ball), is remarkable: Without 110° of elbow bend to get out (which he gets to 80°, a loss of 30°), the golfer actually loses slightly less elbow bend (70 - 50 = 20), but delivers 30° less elbow bend, lowering the handle and letting the elbow get "in front of" the rib cage… because it never got "behind" or "beside" the rib cage. If you look at this video showing the before/afters of P6, you'll note the handle location (both vertically and horizontally) and the shoulders (the ball is in the same place in these frames). This golfer's path was largely unaffected (still pretty straight into the ball, < 3° path and often < 1.5°), but his AoA jumped to -5° ± 2°. I've always said, and in talking with other instructors they agree and feel similarly, that we spend a lot of time working on the backswing. This is another example of why.
    • We had a member of our senior club who developed a mental block on pulling the trigger. I played with him to see what the membership was talking about. I timed him a few times when he would get over the ball. 45 seconds. He knew he had a mental block and would chide himself, “Just hit it!” Once on the green he was okay and chipping was a bit better. It was painful to watch him struggle. Our “bandaid” was to put him in the last tournament  tee time with two understanding players. We should have suggested to him to take a break from our tournaments. I agree with the idea that when a player realizes they have a problem, the answer is to go fix it and not return until they are able to play at an acceptable pace.
    • Day 56 (4 May 26) - Worked on some ball-then-ground drills - going from P3 thru impact - with a slowed tempo, working to keep all parts in sync.   
    • Wordle 1,780 3/6 🟩⬜🟨🟨🟨 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,780 4/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨 ⬜🟨🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟨🟩🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.