Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
sacm3bill

A perfect round, or sandbagging?

37 posts in this topic

This made the local news yesterday. From http://www.sacbee.com/2012/08/22/4746690/working-the-honor-systemgolf-counts.html:

Quote:

In a regional qualifier for the Audi Quattro Cup, a worldwide handicap tournament whose regional winners earn an expenses-paid trip to the national final [ at Pebble Beach ], Granno and Pappas played lights out. In the "selected drives" format in which each player tees off, and then alternate hitting shots after the preferred drive is selected until the hole is completed, they posted a 1-over-par 73.

Taking their handicaps into consideration and the Stableford scoring, that translated to 45 points. That total would have won, or been within a point of winning, almost every other qualifier in the country.

"We played phenomenally well," Pappas said.

They finished second at Catta Verdera. A distant second.

Dave Featherstone and John Paul Vandersluys shot an 11-under 61. Taking their handicaps at the time – a 6.5 for Featherstone and a 14.4 for Vandersluys – into consideration and the Stableford scoring, that translated to 58 points.

58 points in Stableford scoring is 22-under. That's net eagles on all 4 par 5s and net birdies on the 3s and 4s. A perfect (net) round.

It gets better:

Quote:

Turns out, the same pair also won last year's Catta Verdera Quattro Cup qualifying trip – to Whistling Straits in Wisconsin. Featherstone and Vandersluys also won last year's local qualifier for the ESPN National Golf Challenge, which provided a trip to Las Vegas.

...

While winning three of the most lucrative prizes available to area handicap golfers in the past year seems improbable in competitions designed to make all teams equal, Featherstone said the trips are not a particularly big incentive.

" I play Pebble all the time," he said. "It's not that big of a deal with me . I just play golf and write the scores down..."

Hmm, what did the twosome playing with Featherstone and Vandersluys have to say about their amazing play?

Quote:
As for the twosome who played alongside Featherstone and Vandersluys and were responsible for verifying the accuracy of their score, Catta Verdera member Brad Beerbohm said, "I have no comment about that round," while Jacob Brawner does not have an established handicap, at least not with the NCGA, even though Quattro Cup rules state that all competitors must.

So one "no comment", and one apparently not qualified to comment because he doesn't have an established handicap? (Which was contrary to the rules of the competition.)

Interesting. There are some reader comments in that article from folks who were there playing in the tournament that are rather interesting as well.


Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/2012/08/22/4746690/working-the-honor-systemgolf-counts.html#storylink=cpy
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Uhm, I'm going with "both groups sandbagged."

Those kinds of tournaments are rife with sandbagging.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Some tournaments aren't worth entering in.  Most of these tournaments are definitely not worth it.

Sounds like sandbagging to me.  It could happen once, but three times.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Punishment for sandbagging should be death.  After they hang the first one, we'll see who attempts it again.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by iacas

Uhm, I'm going with "both groups sandbagged."

Same here.

Originally Posted by VMAN

Some tournaments aren't worth entering in.  Most of these tournaments are definitely not worth it.

Unless you're a professional sandbagger I guess.  That's really what a lot of these tournaments boil down to  - not who's the best golfer, but who's the best at gaming the system.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope my next round is my  "+2 Round"   but somehow I always shoot pretty close to my handicap.....

I guess if those guys didn't make a stink it wouldn't have gained any traction,  but it's funny that once it all comes out, you find out that they only turn in a dozen scores in an entire year  (where golf can be played year-round)  despite belonging to a club,  yet still carry a single-digit handicap.

Looks like 4 scratch golfers sandbagging,  and two did it better than the other two.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 9 handicappers shooting a 73 in the alternating driver format (that has to be worth 4 or 5  strokes right? ) seems somewhat plausible.  Shooting a 61 for an 6.5 and 14.4 should getting you disqualified. Reading the full article the 14.4 was a 8.9 earlier in the year. Thats a heck of a lot of strokes to go up.

In their defense the course they said the course was under 6000 yards. That is probably like a par 69 and if you have a couple of good drivers, you are going to be hitting short wedges into every hole that you don't drive the green on.

But doing 3 times in a row makes it a no way in hell type thing.

Uhm, I'm going with "both groups sandbagged."

Those kinds of tournaments are rife with sandbagging.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hate scrambles.  They're great for work events: organizational day, in conjunction with a conference, the annual local bar association charity tournament, etc., so that folks who don't really play can get in on the fun.  But why anyone would enter an organized prize-money scramble competition is beyond me.  Scramble golf isn't even that fun, and winning is rarely based on who plays the best golf.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Once could happen. Three times? No. Did they shoot the score? Sure. But what inflated handicaps. I don't care if the course was playing 6400 yards "short."

I shot 75 as a 25 handicap -- ONCE. It can happen. ONCE. I shot 95 the second round on the same day and same course. I was at an event once where a guy shattered his personal best, won a car with a hole in one, and won a drawing for a trip to Mexico in one night. It happens.

"I play Pebble all the time" is a heck of an argument for why you couldn't possibly have cheated to win three times.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by x129

...In their defense the course they said the course was under 6000 yards...

FWIW, it's possible the reporter got that wrong. One of the reader comments is claiming it was actually 6400. Still not terribly long of course...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by rustyredcab

Once could happen. Three times? No. Did they shoot the score? Sure. But what inflated handicaps. I don't care if the course was playing 6400 yards "short."

I shot 75 as a 25 handicap -- ONCE. It can happen. ONCE. I shot 95 the second round on the same day and same course. I was at an event once where a guy shattered his personal best, won a car with a hole in one, and won a drawing for a trip to Mexico in one night. It happens.

"I play Pebble all the time" is a heck of an argument for why you couldn't possibly have cheated to win three times.

Yeah I am with you here.  If I had played Pebble a bunch of times it wouldn't mean I'd like to win another trip out there..       Oh shucks, fellas, I've been to Pebble Beach quite a few times so need for me to win an all expense paid trip out there again!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by k-troop

I hate scrambles.  They're great for work events: organizational day, in conjunction with a conference, the annual local bar association charity tournament, etc., so that folks who don't really play can get in on the fun.  But why anyone would enter an organized prize-money scramble competition is beyond me.  Scramble golf isn't even that fun, and winning is rarely based on who plays the best golf.

Okay, but this wasn't a scramble.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by x129

2 9 handicappers shooting a 73 in the alternating driver format (that has to be worth 4 or 5  strokes right? ) seems somewhat plausible...

Originally Posted by k-troop

I hate scrambles.

Just to clarify, it was a best drive, then alternate shot format. So kind of a semi-scramble. But yeah, taking the best drive of the two would be worth a few shots.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sandbaggers. No doubt. I will say, many of the governing bodies are getting better at catching these guys, but they still exist.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by mchepp

Sandbaggers. No doubt. I will say, many of the governing bodies are getting better at catching these guys, but they still exist.

My buddy played a 28 index in league play on Wednesday who shot a 37. Just like he shot last week. The guys who run my league are afraid to call guys out, but I'm not. I haven't made any friends in the sandbagger posse (there are about a dozen of them - both genders) but at least you know where you stand with them. All you have to do is shoot the course record and you have a chance at a single point. Easy peasy. My membership and league fees will be spent elsewhere in 2013.

Anyway, I'm probably not the only one who had to read the article a couple times to confirm the 61 wasn't the net score and that the event wasn't a full on scramble.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe they should give the prize to the 3rd place winner, this way having an overly excellent score doesn't guarantee a win. The format is a joke so why not the award position...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Don't forget that the one guy is one of the best putters in CA.  Ignoring their handicaps, how often do you think 2 scratch golfers would go out and shoot a 61 in this format? Maybe picking the drives is a bigger advantage than I think but I have to imagine that is a 1 in 100 type day. Did they cheat on the course in addition to their handicaps?

If you have a weekly league, only using scores from it works out ok (granted the first couple weeks are rough). These type of scrambles with pretty much self reported handicaps and big prizes are a joke. Unless you start disqualifing all the guys with 1 in 10k rounds, it is all about who cheats the most.

Originally Posted by sean_miller

Anyway, I'm probably not the only one who had to read the article a couple times to confirm the 61 wasn't the net score and that the event wasn't a full on scramble.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Some stats on the U.S. squad and potential picks:   SG-Tee SG-Appr SG-ARG SG-Putt SG-Total Drive Dist Birdies Bogeys Bird/Bog Dustin Johnson 1.077 0.489 0.073 0.272 0.548 314.4 4.37 2.67 1.70 Phil Mickelson 0.085 0.703 0.244 0.786 0.471 294.5 4.06 2.48 1.68 Jordan Spieth 0.465 0.217 0.391 0.710 0.403 295.5 4.28 2.67 1.63 Brooks Koepka 0.595 0.224 -0.014 0.483 0.336 303.0 4.15 3.08 1.39 Jimmy Walker -0.127 0.561 0.305 0.253 0.272 300.1 3.79 3.19 1.22 Patrick Reed 0.246 0.229 0.436 0.195 0.261 297.0 3.78 2.61 1.50 Brandt Snedeker 0.119 0.185 0.324 0.351 0.219 292.5 3.83 2.74 1.42 Zach Johnson -0.257 0.291 0.315 0.388 0.159 280.0 3.69 2.88 1.30 AVERAGE 0.275 0.362 0.259 0.430 0.334 297.1 3.99 2.79 1.48                     Rickie Fowler 0.619 0.366 0.432 0.255 0.427 301.3 3.72 2.33 1.64 Bubba Watson 0.941 0.504 -0.018 -0.177 0.420 310.2 3.80 3.09 1.28 Matt Kuchar 0.371 0.352 0.252 0.475 0.363 285.9 3.87 2.65 1.48 Gary Woodland 0.498 0.549 0.042 -0.049 0.346 307.2 3.61 2.59 1.44 Billy Horschel 0.460 0.481 -0.038 0.085 0.321 293.0 3.67 3.17 1.18 Daniel Berger 0.322 0.480 -0.082 0.253 0.305 298.8 3.83 2.79 1.39 Jason Dufner 0.305 0.557 0.097 -0.354 0.249 292.5 3.84 2.99 1.31 Brendan Steele 0.581 0.363 -0.136 -0.172 0.248 302.1 3.58 2.84 1.30 Ryan Moore -0.021 0.374 0.259 0.373 0.245 282.5 3.70 2.78 1.35 Ryan Palmer 0.631 0.192 -0.063 -0.048 0.231 304.4 3.87 3.05 1.32 Justin Thomas 0.048 0.597 -0.027 -0.223 0.196 301.0 3.72 3.14 1.22 Kevin Kisner 0.391 0.013 -0.307 0.657 0.184 289.0 3.82 3.01 1.31 Jim Furyk -0.251 0.479 0.239 0.159 0.179 281.8 3.17 2.85 1.14   I think Fowler should be a lock. His total strokes gained is above the current squad average, solid ballstriking and pop, the third best birdie/bogie ratio, and he has a balanced game that should make him easy to pair with. Bubba's still crazy strong off the tee and on approach, but his short game & putting seem to have slipped this year. Probably a stronger option for better ball / fourball or maybe with the right partner in alternate shot / foursomes. His length is likely to be an advantage at Hazeltine if he isn't put up against one of the top Euro players with better all-around games in singles. Woodland, Horschel, or Steele, might be interesting options for better ball. Kuch has a solid overall game. is very consistent, and is stronger off the tee than Zach Johnson to boot so he could add to the squad - particularly in alternate shot. I wonder with Mickelson, Walker, Snedeker, and Johnson already on board if they don't need to be more plus on the driving though.
    • Sad. But, like the title of the old George Harrison album, All Things Must Pass. One night my brother and I were having dinner with our Mom. Somehow the subject of movies was raised, and Blazing Saddles and Young Frankenstein came up. We discovered that our Mom had never seen either film. So plans were made for a couple of "Movie Nights with Mom". My bro provided the DVD's, and we provided the food. My Mom being in her early 80's at the time, we weren't sure how she'd react to the films. I'm delighted to report that she howled with laughter. Mom always did have an active and acute sense of humor. She thanked us for showing her two of the funniest movies she had ever seen! RIP Gene Wilder.
    • For those who don't know, for my actual "job," I am a professional photographer. I recently picked up a few putters from a now out-of-business company called PLOP, and they are just gorgeous putters, so I had to photograph them and I wanted to share. I was looking for a center shafted putter, as it was what I was fit into. Unfortunately I can't stand the look of center shafted putters so every one I've ever tried was just not an option. That is, until I found an old (what would be original version) of a putter my grandfather had in his bag called a PLOP. I looked up this particular brand and found that it was no longer in business, but best of all, the owner/inventor of the putter made what he calls a CSH putter, that is Center shafted hosel, but the hosel is "floated" through the heel end of the putter, still welded and attached to the center. Even better, he was selling the rest of what he had milled on Ebay, including a few special putters. So I get to look down at what is a blade style, while still having my center shafted putter. It was a downright bargain for a milled putter, too.  I have in photography what we call GAS (Gear Acquisition Syndrome), and sadly it translates to golf, too. I ended up buying 3 putters. One is a very wonderful black PVD finish, and the other is a nickel PVD finish that was tour-stamped, both very limited editions. I will do my best to photograph these and upload at some point, too.  In any case, I wanted to share a few of the images here. Unfortunately I can't upload the full size quality files but hopefully everyone enjoys a few of these. On a side note, golf clubs are actually extremely fun photographic subjects.  (Wasn't sure if this would fall under "clubs," but I thought it was more of a golf story/tidbit with the pictures. When I find the time to sit down and create a blog, I can put them there.) Feedback welcome, of course.   -Andrew.
    • I was about to ask what the birdie conversion rate was at the Barclays, to you know, get back on topic !
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. OR Cat
      OR Cat
      (55 years old)
  • Blog Entries