Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Will the Tour Championship ever take over majors as the biggest event in golf?


Note: This thread is 4826 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. Will the Tour Championship (and FedEx cup) ever become more prestigous than the 4 majors?

    • Yes.
      6
    • No.
      27


Recommended Posts

Posted
See, this is part of the reason why I don't see it rising to the level of a major - it's called the Fed Ex Cup, not the PGA Playoffs or Tour Playoffs sponsor by Fed Ex or whatever. So part of it is a marketing issue - "I won The Masters." "Oh yeah? I won the Fed Ex Cup." "Your point?"

I don't know if that's much of a problem unless they change names after their deal with FedEx expires. Maybe it's just me, but I don't think of Federal Express the company one bit when I hear the name, "FedExCup." It's just become a name to me at this point.

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by jamo

I don't know if that's much of a problem unless they change names after their deal with FedEx expires. Maybe it's just me, but I don't think of Federal Express the company one bit when I hear the name, "FedExCup." It's just become a name to me at this point.

If there's still a deal after FedEx expires.

Not that I doubt there will be one, but what then? The Waste Management Cup?

The Masters, US Open, Open Championship & PGA Championship don't have or need sponsors (Yes I know The Travelers & Cadillac's generosity allow us to watch The Maters with limited commercial interruption...but it's not The Masters Presented By Cadillac). And yeah, maybe that's not an issue with many players or fans, but it's what will always make it, at best, a notch below the majors. An important series of tournaments for sure, with a unique 'elimination' format spread over four tournaments. It's a great idea; gives a nice coda to the season that used to kinda just string along until some minimal event in late October or whatever.

But the level of a major? I just don't see it.


Posted
Originally Posted by jamo

I don't know if that's much of a problem unless they change names after their deal with FedEx expires. Maybe it's just me, but I don't think of Federal Express the company one bit when I hear the name, "FedExCup." It's just become a name to me at this point.

Even if they did change the name, I don't know that that would be too big of a deal.  I don't mean to try and claim apples to apples here (because its not) but one could make a comparison here to NASCAR.  The Winston Cup became the Nextel Cup became the Sprint Cup, and the name really means absolutely nothing.  Its just the "championship" that everybody is after, regardless of what they name it.

I would think that the Fedex Cup could take a similar path.  But the tradition of the majors is pretty well ingrained at this point so I can't see it quite catching up to the majors anytime soon in prestige.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Wansteadimp

The problem is comparing golf to other sports - longish streaks are a rarity in golf but  much more common in other sports - there have been 4 players who have had 3 win streaks in the last 30 years - admittedly Tiger has multiple 3 win (and longer) streaks but they are still very rare.

Looking at past history (not a reliable predictor of the future but never mind) Rory would have been better tanking at Crooked Stick to ensure he didn't go into the Tour Championship looking for his 3rd straight victory.


For the record, there have been 8 winning streaks of 4 or more events.  Three of them by Tiger (7, 6, and 5).  Two by Nelson (11 and 4).  Two by Hogan (6 and 4).  One by Jack Burke, Jr. (4).

Your second comment reminds me of a joke:

Q: Why did the statistician always carry a bomb with him when he had to fly on an airplane?

A. Because he knew that the odds of there being TWO bombs on the plane were astronomically small.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4826 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 ⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Is it? I bought the Stack radar to replace my PRGR based on what Stack told me! When I am swinging for speed, the PRGR would miss 50%-80% of my backswings due to a higher speed. The stack seldom misses those- at least for me.
    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.