Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
FrankfurtDave

Club fitting - do you trust simulators

0  

  1. 1. What is your preference when it comes to club fitting?

    • Would only use a range/trackman solution where I can see ball flight
      3
    • Simulator is perfectly fine and believe end result is the same
      1


Recommended Posts

I am planning on going for a fitting of new irons in the New Year and in searching for appropriate places I have the choice of a local simulator version or a 2 hour drive to a range/trackman solution

Hence wondered whether people trust fitting centres with simulators or whether they would only get fitted at a place where you can see the real ball flight?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

A few things about simulators...

  • They're computer-driven devices, so they have to be calibrated time to time to make sure they're simulating accurately
  • Some golf shops "soup up" the simulator to make you think the club will deliver more yardage than it actually will. As a test, always get baseline data with your current club. If you're suddenly carrying your driver 250 yds., when you only get 220 yds. on the course, maybe the machine is off a little.
  • If possible, bring along a couple of sleeves of the ball you play on-course to use in the tests
  • Make sure you warm up first. Do some stretches - if possible, hit a small bucket at a nearby range - and then warm up a little when you get to the shop.  If you get out of the car cold and start hitting full shots 3 minutes later, it probably won't accurately gauge your swing.

The local Golf Galaxy actually cautions us that their simulator measures things "a little short." I find I hit iron shots about a half-club longer outdoors than I do on the simulator.

Besides the machine, you need a player's rep who can help you interpret the data (unless you have a personal Trackman in your back yard, and just didn't bother to bring it along).

Also, a formal club fitting takes longer than just comparing Your Driver vs. New Driver for 10 minutes. A formal fitting should allow you to hit different shafts in the club(s) in question.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Question - do you think the curve of the ball is accurately represented? Even if the machine reads long does it still show slices and hooks to the same severity as the real flight?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by colin007

Question - do you think the curve of the ball is accurately represented? Even if the machine reads long does it still show slices and hooks to the same severity as the real flight?


That seems to depend on how it's setup.  I have been on machines that I have seemed to be hitting the ball exceptionally straight and put a big cut swing on the ball and it's a small fade on the simulator.  I agree with bringing your current club so that you can compare what you typically see on the course to what the simulator is showing and base your decision off that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Curve is a bit hard to replicate i found, i usually just go for ball speed, launch angle, and backspin are the only three things i look at, with these i can keep tabs on my equipment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I would never by a club, especially a set of irons,  without seeing the ball flight on the range. Simulators are just that. The only time I go looking for a simulator is for driver feedback, spin, launch angle and ball speed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was just fitted at Carl's Golfland using the Trackman 3.   They have heated garages setup with computers and you hit the ball onto the range so you can see the flight of the ball.   I'm a visual person and wanted to see the ball instead of just hitting into a net.   I felt the flight of the ball was very accurately captured by the computers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    Talamore Golf Resort
    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Mission Belt
    Snell Golf
    Frogger Golf
    PitchFix USA
  • Posts

    • It is and it isnt. For the most part Id say it isnt. At the end of the day it really is as simple as calories in and calories out BUT because that piece of cake is not particularly nutritious nor does it take very long to digest you tend to need to eat more cake to say full which tends to promote overeating. You pretty much have to decide to stay hungry for a while to compensate.  
    • When did I ever say I was talking about them using to RUN FASTER. Never. If the ball flies further guess what. The club was moving faster. THEY GOT FASTER. Yes steroids have a multitude of benefits for an athlete but for the sake of this discussion I didint think it was relevant to list every one of them. For sure they benefitted from the faster recovery aswell as the increased performance.   Dont tell me about my logic when its obvious you havent even read what Ive said. To quote myself: "Also keep in mind were not talking about going from Bubba to Arnold here. Theres a healthy middle point for optimal performance. Tour players just do not look like athletes(on average)." "Youre always going to find exceptions" You are uninformed to put it nicely. 450*10 does not happen all the time outside of powerlifting gyms. Especially not for a guy weighing 165. His estimated max is around 600-640 lb. Please dont get started on the way estimations work. The american record is like 700 for the 165. Either way he is very strong both in relative and absolute terms and its a very impressive lift. Ofcourse there comes a point where if he bulks up too much it wont help thats exactly what Ive said. At no point have is said tour players should look like bodybuilders. Infact to quote myself again: "Strength = speed potential. Speed athletes are not inherently going for size its just a byproduct of getting stronger and faster. If it was we would have meat balls like IFBB pros breaking records at everything speed related. The whole bulking up too much is pretty much a myth for natural athletes anyways."
    • Yes Daniel Im is a CP-ish player with kind of an inline downswing, he likes the way "swinging left" with his body feels. He does hit up a little with the driver. CP is not optimal for clubs over a 6 iron....typically. It's just a much easier pattern, easier way to swing and hit all the trajectories, especially with today's equipment. Hogan didn't have the left arm as far out as Mac wants it and Snead hit pull draws. Like I just said CP isn't good for the longer clubs, Mac never played a tournament going CP, he went with CF fades.  It's also a complicated pattern, lots of sequencing and movements have to be in order and most importantly you need a lot of speed to do it functionally. I could make the case Hogan had more CF pieces than CP pieces. Anyway, I agree with what @iacas has been posting. Mac's info isn't the answer to the golf swing, it's an attempt in the right direction but there is better and more functional information out there.
    • Oh, gosh, on the range tonight, I discovered that my address position was too far away from ball, and I had lowered my hands at address. I was setup for failure. Made  a few minor changes, and was hitting fairways high again. Now I can determine whether the shafts fit on some new Tour Edge woods - I fear the regular is too soft. Another winter project - shafts. I want to be done with clubs.
    • Personally, if i got better range of motion, I would not care if the muscle was actually longer . Good point though 
  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. hockeyref18
      hockeyref18
      (18 years old)
    2. Mike86
      Mike86
      (31 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon

×

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.