• Announcements

    • iacas

      GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Contest   09/22/2016

      Join our GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Challenge to win an autographed GAME GOLF, a Pebble Steel watch, and many more great prizes!
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
D-Man

Hitting down on the ball

17 posts in this topic

I'm a self taught player and despite my size and stature, I don't get the distance I should be getting.  In a round late fall last year, I got paired up with a random guy and we were talking about ball striking and hitting down on the ball.  He said I'll get the extra distance I'm looking for, which after some research, I believe him.  The problem I'm having is doing it.

I've read advise saying to imagine a ball right in front of the ball I'm trying to hit, this causes me to top it.  I've tried looking at the front of the ball, but I still end up hitting just a fraction behind the ball.  I don't know what my problem is, I can't seem to hit down on the ball.  Does anyone have any advice on doing so?  Thank you in advance.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

You have to truly understand what you are trying to accomplish.  You are trying to strike the ball just before the lowpoint of the swing arch, which will mean that the club is still decending towards the lowpoint, hence "hitting down.  If you place the ball in the wrong place in relation to your arch that is when you will create all of the topped, thinned, skulled, and fat shots.  Each club has a slightly different place on the swing arch that it must be struck on to create the desired shot.

There are two ways to setup for the shot: The first way is to keep the stance the same and adjust the positon of the ball, and the second one is to keep the ball in the same place and then adjust the width of the stance.  I prefer the ladder and here is the video that helped me get squared away:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sr0JGugTu0I&list;=UUykiLP4DaZ025SSx__-rLMg&index;=41

You shouldn't have to actively try to hit down on  the ball, the ball should be placed in the proper place in your swing arch so that it happens naturally. Hope this helps.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply.  I'm at work right now and can't watch the video, but I'll watch it as soon as I get home.  I've already tried moving the ball around and it seems like my brain is determined to have the club head strike the ground a fraction before it hits the ball no matter where it is in my stance.  So I'm excited to see what the video says, as it's something I haven't tried yet.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would recommend getting your swing bottom forward without the distraction of a ball. The book "The Impact Zone" has a good drill (as does the Stack and Tilt book) where you draw a line in a sandtrap (SnT book uses spray paint on grass) and address the line as if it were you ball position and practice taking divots on the target sign of the line.

Alternatively, what I do at the range when on mats, place a piece of painters tape directly behind your ball and a piece a few inches in front of your ball. Practice striking balls while missing the tape behind the ball and scraping the tape in front of the ball.

Both "Impact Zone" by Bobby Clampett and "Stack and Tilt" by Bennet and Plumber will help you (you don't need to convert to SnT to benefit from reading their book, it contains a lot of Universal Truths.)

Have'nt seen the 5SK video package but I've heard great things, check it out on this forum.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Check out the videos in this thread.  http://thesandtrap.com/t/61376/5sk-video-thread.  Specifically the forward leaning shaft at impact.  This is essentially what hitting down on the ball means.

+1 on The Impact Zone as well.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

You have to truly understand what you are trying to accomplish.  You are trying to strike the ball just before the lowpoint of the swing arch, which will mean that the club is still decending towards the lowpoint, hence "hitting down.  If you place the ball in the wrong place in relation to your arch that is when you will create all of the topped, thinned, skulled, and fat shots.  Each club has a slightly different place on the swing arch that it must be struck on to create the desired shot.  There are two ways to setup for the shot: The first way is to keep the stance the same and adjust the positon of the ball, and the second one is to keep the ball in the same place and then adjust the width of the stance.  I prefer the ladder and here is the video that helped me get squared away: [URL=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sr0JGugTu0I&list;=UUykiLP4DaZ025SSx__-rLMg&index;=41]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sr0JGugTu0I&list;=UUykiLP4DaZ025SSx__-rLMg&index;=41[/URL] You shouldn't have to actively try to hit down on  the ball, the ball should be placed in the proper place in your swing arch so that it happens naturally. Hope this helps.

That video is interesting. Solid logic for sure, I'm just not sure about hitting a PW that far up in my stance. I wish I could try it now, but there is a bunch of snow on the ground. I scheduled time on an indoor range for tomorrow, so I'll give it a try. Maybe it will be my eureka moment on hitting down on the ball. Ernest, I like the tape idea! I'll try that as well, tomorrow. Boogie, thanks for the link to the videos. I saved the link in my browser. I'll watch them tomorrow after my range session. I don't want to overwhelm myself with too much stuff at once.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You're hitting behind the ball because you're left wrist isn't flat or the weight isn't forward enough.  Good drill here http://thesandtrap.com/t/61376/5sk-video-thread#post_783068

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by mvmac

You're hitting behind the ball because you're left wrist isn't flat or the weight isn't forward enough.  Good drill here http://thesandtrap.com/t/61376/5sk-video-thread#post_783068

I think I saw that video earlier.  I'm not sure though, I'm at work again and can't watch them right now.  I'll watch it again after my range session, or possibly during it.  However, I don't think that's my problem, my weight and left wrist are two things I've paid close attention to in my swing.  I think it's a mental thing.  For years I've been trying to strike the ball just right at the back of the ball, ground and ball at the same time or ground just a fraction before the ball.  I thought that's where you should hit it.  Now that I realize that's not how it's done, I'm having a hell of a time striking the ball on the downswing.  I became very good at doing it the way I though it should be done.  Now I have to break that, and allow my brain to realize the club should be striking the ground in front of the ball, not at the base of the back of the ball.

I've had a steep downswing due to striking the ball where I though it should be.  So I'm sure I will have to flatten my swing out a little.  Later today I'm going to mess with the first video and adjust my stance around the ball, to see how that feels.  Like I said, I'm not excited about hitting a PW and low irons that far forward, but it's worth trying.  I like the logic of it, it gives you an easy way to insure you are always lined up at address.  What are you're thoughts on the first video posted in the tread mvmac?  I'm also going to get some painters tape down and mess with that a little.  I really don't want to get a ton of new stuff in my head and totally screw myself up.  I know why my handicap is high, it's due to my short game.  So it's not like I don't have control with the way I've been striking the ball.  I'm hoping striking the ball the way it should be done will add enough distance so I'm going to the green with a short iron rather than a long iron.  That's going to shave some strokes off as well.  Then this spring I'll start working on the short game.  The goal is to shave 5 strokes off my index this year, which I think it very attainable.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have a FO video of your swing? It sounds like you are losing lag pressure(casting)and hitting the ground behind the ball, throwing the club.

Look at how Anthony Kim maintains his angles with his wrists, they call this the flying wedges.

The club is parallel to the ground and you can see how he maintains his right wrist wedge(angle).

Shaft leaning foward at impact(hands leading)and a flat left wrist and a slight bend in the right at impact.

This could be whats going on, but with out video of your swing its hard to say.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by D-Man

That video is interesting. Solid logic for sure, I'm just not sure about hitting a PW that far up in my stance. I wish I could try it now, but there is a bunch of snow on the ground. I scheduled time on an indoor range for tomorrow, so I'll give it a try. Maybe it will be my eureka moment on hitting down on the ball.

Ernest, I like the tape idea! I'll try that as well, tomorrow.

Boogie, thanks for the link to the videos. I saved the link in my browser. I'll watch them tomorrow after my range session. I don't want to overwhelm myself with too much stuff at once.

It isn't far up in your stance at all if your stance is the proper width. When I first saw this technique I thought there was no way the ball was in the correct spot until I saw myself on video and saw that it wasn't.  It really shallowed out my divots and now I trust it.  As long as you do like he says and sole the club naturally and then adjust your back foot until your armpit is roughly right over the handle of the club you will see that it works and greatly reduces fat contact.  You just gotta try it.  Once you have your ball position ironed out then your can address other things.  A flat wrist doesn't in and of itself cause fat contact in my opinion. Your ball position must be correct first.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by D-Man

I think I saw that video earlier.  I'm not sure though, I'm at work again and can't watch them right now.  I'll watch it again after my range session, or possibly during it.  However, I don't think that's my problem, my weight and left wrist are two things I've paid close attention to in my swing.  I think it's a mental thing.

What are you're thoughts on the first video posted in the tread mvmac?  I'm also going to get some painters tape down and mess with that a little.  I really don't want to get a ton of new stuff in my head and totally screw myself up.  I know why my handicap is high, it's due to my short game.  So it's not like I don't have control with the way I've been striking the ball.  I'm hoping striking the ball the way it should be done will add enough distance so I'm going to the green with a short iron rather than a long iron.  That's going to shave some strokes off as well.  Then this spring I'll start working on the short game.  The goal is to shave 5 strokes off my index this year, which I think it very attainable.

I don't care if you have Tiger Wood's mental game, you're going to struggle with low point control, contact, if you're flipping or the weight is back at impact.  From what you're describing and the handicap you've posted there is a very good chance this is happening.  Post up a swing video or look at it yourself.

Yeah I think for a wedge you can play it somewhere between middle of the stance and off the left heel.  I don't think there's such a thing as "proper" ball position, can change depending on the shot, but it's not going to make or break whether you hit it solid.  Higher handicapper will move it back to try and catch the ball on the back side of the arc.

Originally Posted by Righty to Lefty

A flat wrist doesn't in and of itself cause fat contact in my opinion. Your ball position must be correct first.

Correct which is why I also said weight forward in that other post.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Righty to Lefty

You have to truly understand what you are trying to accomplish.  You are trying to strike the ball just before the lowpoint of the swing arch, which will mean that the club is still decending towards the lowpoint, hence "hitting down.  If you place the ball in the wrong place in relation to your arch that is when you will create all of the topped, thinned, skulled, and fat shots.  Each club has a slightly different place on the swing arch that it must be struck on to create the desired shot.

There are two ways to setup for the shot: The first way is to keep the stance the same and adjust the positon of the ball, and the second one is to keep the ball in the same place and then adjust the width of the stance.  I prefer the ladder and here is the video that helped me get squared away:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sr0JGugTu0I&list;=UUykiLP4DaZ025SSx__-rLMg&index;=41

You shouldn't have to actively try to hit down on  the ball, the ball should be placed in the proper place in your swing arch so that it happens naturally. Hope this helps.

Very interesting video, when the snow melts I am going to give it a try. I have always played the ball in the middle of my stance for all of my irons but without a reference point each time who knows where it really is in  my stance. I am just going off what I see when I look down. I think the result is that my swing has become way too steep and has led to inconsistency. This may explain why I have always had difficulty hitting fairway woods off the deck. Thanks for the link.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by Ernest Jones

I would recommend getting your swing bottom forward without the distraction of a ball. The book "The Impact Zone" has a good drill (as does the Stack and Tilt book) where you draw a line in a sandtrap (SnT book uses spray paint on grass) and address the line as if it were you ball position and practice taking divots on the target sign of the line.

Alternatively, what I do at the range when on mats, place a piece of painters tape directly behind your ball and a piece a few inches in front of your ball. Practice striking balls while missing the tape behind the ball and scraping the tape in front of the ball.

Both "Impact Zone" by Bobby Clampett and "Stack and Tilt" by Bennet and Plumber will help you (you don't need to convert to SnT to benefit from reading their book, it contains a lot of Universal Truths.)

Have'nt seen the 5SK video package but I've heard great things, check it out on this forum.

Ernest you totally stole my thunder!  The first thing I thought of when I read the first post of this thread was that this person needs to read the Impact Zone by Bobby Clampett.

To the OP:  I started golfing in June of 2012 and struggled with this for a while.  Read the Impact Zone.  It helped me visualize things much better including how the bottom of your swing arc should be 3 to 4" or so in front of the ball on an iron shot.  It took a while but after reading that book, hitting lots of balls at the range, and playing as much as I could, I've gone from consistently hitting fat shots to now consistently hitting solid shots by hitting the ball first.  Am I perfect?  No.  I still hit the occasional fat shot just like everyone does from time to time but I hit way more solid shots now than fat ones.

Also, a drill that I have read about many times and even seen recently on tv:  roll up a towel and put it about a grips length behind your ball.  Practice hitting the ball without touching the towel.  This will help you work on hitting down on the ball and hitting the ball first.  Good luck!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by D-Man

That video is interesting. Solid logic for sure, I'm just not sure about hitting a PW that far up in my stance. I wish I could try it now, but there is a bunch of snow on the ground. I scheduled time on an indoor range for tomorrow, so I'll give it a try. Maybe it will be my eureka moment on hitting down on the ball.

Ernest, I like the tape idea! I'll try that as well, tomorrow.

Boogie, thanks for the link to the videos. I saved the link in my browser. I'll watch them tomorrow after my range session. I don't want to overwhelm myself with too much stuff at once.

Look at Tiger's wedge ball position in this video His stance is narrow but the ball is off of his front foot but his left armpit is still inline with the butt end of the golf club:

Or Jack:

Both techniques explained in this video:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After three solid days of practice I'm now able to get pretty clean contact hitting down on the ball.  Right to Lefty, I messed with your advice a little, and i wouldn't say the butt of the club is right under my arm pit, but just very slightly behind it.  Using the tape on the floor while concentrating on the address and adjusting the width my my stance depending on the club helped me out.  Thanks for all the advice.  I've added about 15 yards by doing this.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In golf i found to fix something i need to do something opposite. For me i played golf for years with the ball back in my stance, weight shifted back and flipping at the ball, actually played good golf. So some would look at tops and fat shots as, "Oh the ball needs to be moved back", well that can help with that. But it wont fix the problem.

Get yourself a chalk line from the hardware store, put down a straight line at the driving range, then make sure the divots are ahead of that line. That line must always be ahead of the center of your body. Just get use to getting your divots forward

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Willett's brother tried to be funny, but he was way offline. Bad effort in dry humor.. He should've not written anything like that. It's just going to make things harder for his brother and I'm sure Danny W. is gonna hear it from the crowds.
    • Willett's brother is not a part of the Ryder cup team. Willett made appologies: http://m.bbc.com/sport/golf/37500790
    • I like it. Especially compared to nearly all past US Ryder Cup kits. Actually before I dish out too much praise, do they have a huge Stars and Stripes flag emblazoned on the back?
    • I would say it depends on what club you're talking about. For drivers I would say that the best performing drivers of all time have been made within the last five years. Aerodynamics, material science, and the proliferation of launch monitors and data driven design have resulted in improvements across the board in distance and forgiveness as of late. I know that I personally saw a decent improvement on my G10 when I switched to a G30, in that I gained between 10 and 15 yards without sacrificing accuracy. This is on the high end of what aerodynamics can provide though, simply because higher swing speeds receive a greater benefit from decreased drag. Depending on the individual you may not see much difference so long as the driver itself was made within the last ten years or so. For irons I would be inclined to say that the main difference in the irons of yesteryear and the irons of today is forgiveness. The irons made today are much easier to hit than previous irons, simply because they aren't as drastically punishing on mis-hits as the old blades. The PING Eye2 irons seemed to be the first "widespread" GI iron that sparked the trend towards irons that were easier for the layman to hit. That being said, I found my s55 irons (their "blade" from several years ago) to be more forgiving than the Eye2's. Based on that and observations from other clubs I have hit I would say the average golfer would be best suited by irons made within the last 10 to 15 years that are in good condition with sharp grooves. If you play muscleback irons though, there's pretty much zero difference between modern "true" musclebacks and those of yore, though the current muscle-cavity irons (like the iBlade and MP-15) will likely be at least a bit easier to hit than the older blades while maintaining a similar style.  Wedges are the only thing that I would argue the "latest and greatest" provides a tangible benefit for. The reasoning for this is entirely different however, in that it's based solely off the condition of the grooves in older wedges. As wedges grow old, and get used, the grooves wear to the point that there becomes a noticeable performance difference - especially when playing out of the rough. For this reason alone do I say that the average golfer (assuming they golf at least once a week during the golfing season) is best suited by wedges no older than two or three years old.  Putters are the odd man out here. I don't think it matters in the slightest when your putter was manufactured, so long as you keep a reasonable grip on it so that it doesn't slip out of your hands. I personally am a fan of the newer milled putters for the feel they provide, but it doesn't mean I couldn't probably putt nearly as well with an original Anser putter in the same style. I think the average golfer is best suited by whatever putter style and features allow them to consistently roll the ball along their target line, with no age requirement. In summary, considering the advancement of technology, I would feel comfortable putting these "maximum age caps" on equipment for the average weekend golfer to get the most out of his/her game: Drivers: ~10 years old or newer Irons: ~15 years old or newer Wedges: ~3 years old or newer Putter: Whatever works best for you That being said, you may still enjoy the game with any kind of equipment out there. I just think that equipment that follows these guidelines will let the average weekend golfer get about as much as they can out of their game without necessarily breaking the bank. Like @iacas said, you may find incremental improvements by purchasing the R1 over an old G5 but the question then becomes whether or not this improvement is worth the price difference. This question can only be answered by the person buying the club. It can't be denied, however, that a driver from the 1960's will be severely outclassed by the G5 and the R1, making either of them a much better choice than the 1960's driver. Interestingly enough, I have had the desire to go the opposite way for a while now. I bought the s55's my last go around, and I'm thinking that my next set of irons will be a more "traditional" muscleback iron (since the s55 is mostly a CB), along the likes of the MP-4 irons by Mizuno. I hit the ball consistently enough that I don't care about the lack of forgiveness, and I believe that the wonderful look and feel of those irons, along with the little bit of extra vertical control (can thin it slightly to make punch shots even easier) would offset whatever I lose in forgiveness. I know that I would most certainly never go to an iron like the AP2, the G, or the M2. The chunky look of the club (along with the offset) gets into my head nowadays and makes me feel uncomfortable standing over the ball in a manner similar to how I used to be intimidated by the look of blades at address. I would gain forgiveness, but at the price of distance and trajectory control - an unacceptable trade for me considering I value distance and trajectory control much more highly than forgiveness.
    • My newest clubs are pretty old. Maybe 2006? I don't really remember. The other day, just for the heck of it,  I played using my old Bazooka Iron Woods. (2i-LW) Shot my normal score. Those Ironwoods are probably 15-16 years old. I don't think at this stage of my life, that a new set would make that much difference. 
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. mahariji_slice
      mahariji_slice
      (35 years old)
  • Blog Entries