Jump to content
IGNORED

Who do you think is the best ball striker of all time? Why?


boil3rmak3r
Note: This thread is 4072 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Originally Posted by newtogolf

I understand your argument, but Hogan played blades where as today a good percentage of pro's use GI irons (Ping G series, cavity backs, etc)  Even the muscle backs of today are more forgiving than the blades of Hogan's era.  Eliminating distance from the equation, I don't think many will dispute that hybrids and more forgiving irons have made it easier for the pro's today to be good ball strikers.

I've seen guys wearing the G series hats but always assumed they were plying the I or S series. Who do you know of that actually plays a G-series on tour? Not doubting you, just surprised.

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Ernest Jones

I've seen guys wearing the G series hats but always assumed they were plying the I or S series. Who do you know of that actually plays a G-series on tour? Not doubting you, just surprised.

I remembered Westwood did, but he's since switched to I-20's.  Only pro listed on Pings website using G-series is Doug Labelle.  The rest are Anser, S or I series.

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

i might put Jim Furyk up there, he's constantly in the top 20 in proximity to the hole from the fairway the past 10 years. This is a guy who isn't long off the tee as well. So he's hitting longer irons into the green than most.

Ben Hogan is probably the most notable.

I think Nick Price is one of the better ball strikers of the 90's, a very very good iron player

Moe Norman would be another one as well

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by clearwaterms

correct me if I am wrong, but as the equipment has changed, so to have the courses and the scores correct?  I am fairly certain that is the case for amateurs.  Pros it might be slightly less noticeable.

Yes, I'm not saying golf is easier now, just different. Pure ball striking is at less of a premium and being able to putt on ultra slick greens (as 1 example) is more important than previously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


On most courses the pro's play today, precision ball striking is not as important as when Hogan and others played. Length is the key and even missing the fairway is not a big deal as long as you don't need a long iron from the rough. Even on a 490 yard par 4, the modern PGA pro is hitting a 7-8 iron approach which they can get close. The only exception would be in majors where the rough is up or in the wind or with a pin tucked behind a bunker. In the case of a tough pin position, the tee or approach better give a good angle to the hole. Only courses like Harbourtown, Riviera, AGNG and a few others require real shot making.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'd probably select Hogan based on everything I've seen, heard and read about him. Moe Norman would be up there for the same reasons. It's hard to recognize sometimes since we have so much media access to players of today that we didn't have then (or weren't really alive or paying attention at the time like myself). Given the unforgiving equipment they played and what they were able to do, they had to be great ball strikers.

RE: Hunter Mahan, outside of the two obviously bad shots on video, isn't he generally considered one of the better ball strikers on tour?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I say Harry Vardon even though it's hard to compare someone from so long ago and not having any video to watch of him. The equipment they used back then was so much harder to play with and be consistent. Also the rules made it so much harder to play when Harry was playing. He was able to hit the ball around 280 yards depending on conditions and if he let it all hang out. Even though that was an occasional drive, you really had to hit it pure to to hit it that far. That was the least of it though. They had no lift and clean rules back then. If the ball plugged anywhere you had to play it where it lay, even on the green. That meant carving the ball out of muddy lies. I remember reading about one instance in the US Open where he had to carve the ball out of a plugged lie on the green and then putt the ball with a chunk of mud on it. He had to actually take into account how the mud would affect the roll of the ball and he made the putt. If an opponents ball was in your way while putting you had to try and make the ball spin around it and make it curve to the hole, there was no marking the balls on the green. The bunkers back then were virtual waste lands with rocks, twigs, mud and whatever else happened to be laying in there. A lot of the time they were trying to just get the ball out of the bunker any way they could much less get it near the hole. The courses were in no where near the pristine condition the courses are now a days. And they had to be consistent for 36 holes a day, not just 18 like they play now. That's a lot harder to strike the ball on the sweet spot over and over. I don't think a lot of people realize how different the game was back then because of the equipment and the rules. I would also add Seve Ballesteros as one of the great ball strikers of all time. He could make any kind of shot with any kind of club and had the imagination to make shots no one else could even think of.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 2 weeks later...

Sam Snead was a better striker than Hogan, much longer and just as straight.

He also won more tournaments on the PGA tour than anyone else (82) and a reputed 200+  worldwide.

He scored 59 on several occasions, one of which was in the Greenbrier Tournament, and achieved before Geiberger's.

He was involved in three playoffs with Ben Hogan, one of which was for the Masters, and won them all.

AND----what a swing!!!!

IMHO, only Bobby Locke made a purer contact with the golf ball than Sam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Hogan was good, no denying that, but his was a forced swing.  He had to practice like 10 hours a day to maintain it.

The name that keeps coming to mind for me, which nobody else has even mentioned, is Byron Nelson.  There is no telling what he might have done had he not had more interest in ranching than golf.  Once he made enough on tour to buy his ranch, he just quit.  Say all you want about the lack of competition, but 11 tournaments in a row is still an amazing feat, and he had to be hitting the ball well over an extended period to accomplish that.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Fourputt

The name that keeps coming to mind for me, which nobody else has even mentioned, is Byron Nelson.  There is no telling what he might have done had he not had more interest in ranching than golf.  Once he made enough on tour to buy his ranch, he just quit.  Say all you want about the lack of competition, but 11 tournaments in a row is still an amazing feat, and he had to be hitting the ball well over an extended period to accomplish that.

Per Ken Venturi, in his interview with Feherty :

"Nicholas was the greatest winner of all time. Hogan was the best course manager. Sam Snead was the most aesthetic. And Byron Nelson was the purest stiker of the golf ball that any man ever---No one hit it straighter than this man."

So, I think I'll have to go with Nelson as well...

"If you watch a game, it's fun. If you play it, it's recreation. If you work at it, it's golf."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by HighlandLaird

He has been forgotten in America, because of the jealousy of the American pros, who did not like him taking what they considered to be "their" money!!  After he left the USA, he invited Sam Snead to play in South Africa, and they played 18 matches against each other.  Locke won 17, and the other one was halved!!

It was 12 out of 16.  Still impressive, but not a complete sweep.

Following the end of World War II, Locke successfully resumed his career in South Africa in 1946. He hosted Sam Snead , one of the top American golfers of the day, for a series of exhibition matches in South Africa in 1946, winning 12 out of the 16 matches. So impressed was Snead that he suggested that Locke come to the United States and give the PGA Tour a try, advice that Locke quickly followed.

Also, he was banned by jealous US pros in 1949 and 1950.  The ban was lifted in 1951, but Locke didn't come back to regularly play in the US.  Plus Locke was mostly known for his putting and actually is credited with the phrase, "drive for show, putt for dough."   Great golfer.  One of the best ever.

Occam's razor

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by HighlandLaird

He has been forgotten in America, because of the jealousy of the American pros, who did not like him taking what they considered to be "their" money!!  After he left the USA, he invited Sam Snead to play in South Africa, and they played 18 matches against each other.  Locke won 17, and the other one was halved!!

It was 12 out of 16.  Still impressive, but not a complete sweep.

Following the end of World War II, Locke successfully resumed his career in South Africa in 1946. He hosted Sam Snead , one of the top American golfers of the day, for a series of exhibition matches in South Africa in 1946, winning 12 out of the 16 matches. So impressed was Snead that he suggested that Locke come to the United States and give the PGA Tour a try, advice that Locke quickly followed.

Also, he was banned by jealous US pros in 1949 and 1950.  The ban was lifted in 1951, but Locke didn't come back to regularly play in the US.  Plus Locke was mostly known for his putting and actually is credited with the phrase, "drive for show, putt for dough."   Great golfer.  One of the best ever.

Occam's razor

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 4072 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,013 4/6* ⬛🟦🟦⬛⬛ ⬛🟦⬛🟦🟦 🟧⬛🟧🟧🟧 🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧 par is good after a double bogey yesterday.
    • I did read the fine print tonight. It said replace with “similar features & function”.  8 yeas ago my purchase had features that today are available on the lower end models and the current version of my model has more “bells & whistles” than what I got 8 years ago.  So I am thinking they honored the agreement and I can’t argue the offer. since getting a credit for the full purchase price all I am really out over the past 8 years was the cost of the extended warranty, which was less than a low end  treadmill would have cost me. now the question is which model to replace with.  I’ll stay with Nordic Track or I forfeit the $1,463 credit so I will get Nordic Track.  And they honored the warranty and were not hard to work with which is a plus.
    • Generally speaking, extended warranties are a terrible deal and should almost always be avoided. They are a huge profit center for the companies that offer them, which should tell you almost everything you need to know about how much value most consumers get when purchasing them.  This is correct, and the old adage applies - only buy insurance when you can't afford the loss. This usually doesn't apply to most consumer goods.  To your second question, no I don't believe the offer is fair. They are replacing it, but it is not being replaced at "no cost to you". Since the amount being disputed (over $500) is non-trivial, I would probably push the issue. Don't waste your time on the phone with a customer service agent or a supervisor. They have probably given you all they have the authority to do. Rather, I would look at the terms of your agreement and specifically legal disputes. The odds are you probably agreed to binding arbitration in the event of a dispute. The agreement will outline what steps need to be followed, but it will probably look something like this.  1. Mail the Nordic Track legal department outlining your dispute and indicate you are not satisfied with the resolution offered.  2. Open up a case with the AAA (American Arbitration Association), along with the required documentation. 3. Wait about 4-5 weeks for a case to be opened - at which point someone from Nordic Track's legal department will offer to give you the new model at no cost to you.  They certainly don't want to spend the time and energy to fight you over $500. 4. Enjoy your new Nordic Track at no cost to you. I recently entered binding arbitration against a fairly large and well known company that screwed me over and refused to make it right. In my demand letter, I made a pretty sizeable request that included compensation for my time and frustration. Once it hit their legal department, they cut me a check - no questions asked. It was far cheaper to settle with me than to send their legal team to defend them in the arbitration.
    • I never thought of looking at it on multiple purchases like you said.  Yes, the extended may help me on 1 or 2 items but not the other 5 or 6.
    • Day 84 - Forgot to post yesterday, but I did some more chipping/pitching.    Back/neck were feeling better today, so I did a much overdue Stack session. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...