Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

A Physics Puzzle - Uphill vs. Downhill Putts


Note: This thread is 4641 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

So I was thinking about the difference between uphill, level, and downhill putts. I found this paper , and decided to make a quick simulation. You give it stimp, grade, and putt speed, and it finds the rollout of your putt.

Here's the puzzle:

I'm on a green where my level putt rolls 12ft, and my 4% grade uphill putt rolls 7.5 ft. How far does the same putt go if it's hit down the 4% grade???

Hint: the stimp is 12 (Augusta National?).

Initial Speed % Grade Rollout of Putt
6 ft/s Level 12 ft
6 ft/s 4% Uphill 7.5 ft
6 ft/s 4% Downhill ???

Any guesses?


Posted

It's all about gravity, size of ball, friction of the grass, temperature and humidity, angle of the dangle, and so forth. And about 11 feet past the hole, there you will find the ball.


Posted
Originally Posted by SCfanatic35

19.5 feet

Too lazy to look it up.....can you show your work?  Thks!

College physics was a loooooong time ago.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

12ft + 7.5ft = 19.5ft

No idea what the answer is, just trying to throw out what seems to me a logical possible answer to the question.  The uphill putt stopped 4.5 feet short of the hole.  So I assumed the downhill putt wouldn't stop 4.5 feet past the hole, it must be more because of the downhill.  I didn't think it would go double the distance, so I just added the two lengths of the other two putts. IDK


Posted

How much grain?  Which way is the grain?  Most of the time the grain will lean downhill, thus increasing the speed of the downhill putt even as it kills the pace on the uphill putt.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

If a putt goes 7.5 feet uphill, and goes 12 feet on level ground. Then that is a 4.5 feet difference. Since potential energy is the same, downhill versus uphill, if you hit the same initial speed, your looking at the putt going 16.5 feet.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Hmmm...4% grade. 12 on the Stimp. Hit the putt with the same force as a 12 foot level putt.

Answer: Until it hits the fringe or the rough on the other side of the green (however far away that might be). Ha ha!

Calculated from hole number 4 at the course in Trenton Ga. Probably about a 4% grade that if you hit the ball hard enough to go a foot on level ground you might as well go back to the bag and get your wedge for the next shot, because you're not going to be putting. If you just touch the ball enough to move it an inch you might get lucky and only have a 5 footer back up the hill for the next putt.


Posted
According to the USGA: "Physical Qualities of the Green The USGA suggests that at least a 2-foot radius surrounding the hole “should be as nearly level as possible and of uniform grade.” The hole shouldn’t be placed on a steep slope on which a missed putt from above the hole will roll a long distance past the cup. “ A player above the hole should be able to stop the ball at the hole ,” according to Rule 15-3(iii). Additionally, the hole shouldn’t be located on a former hole’s spot until the old location has healed completely." Of course there are diabolical greenskeepers who thrive on torturing the players. So to the OP, it should stop AT the hole.... IF you hit it on line- it will stop at the bottom of the cup. If not, work on your putting. :-D

Posted

Uphill you have two things stopping the ball. Gravity and Friction. Without friction it would eventually stop and come back the other way.

Downhill only friction is acting on it. Obviously without friction it would roll forever much as it does at the Masters at times.

The point is it will not roll past the hole downhill the same distance it stopped short uphill.

Don't have the exact numbers right now. I'd have to dust off my slide rule. Who am I kidding, I mean my TI-86.


Posted

29 feet

Mike


Titleist 905T 10.5°, 5W Golfsmith SuperSteel 17°, 4W MacGregor Tourney laminate 21°, 3-P MacGregor Colokrom M85 reissue, Snake Eyes 54° and 58° wedge, Odyssey Dual Force 330 blade

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Stimpmeter downhill, St(dn)

St(dn) = 0.82 ft / (CF - sin Φ cos Φ)

12ft St CF = 0.82 / 12

Mike


Titleist 905T 10.5°, 5W Golfsmith SuperSteel 17°, 4W MacGregor Tourney laminate 21°, 3-P MacGregor Colokrom M85 reissue, Snake Eyes 54° and 58° wedge, Odyssey Dual Force 330 blade

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by MS256

Hmmm...4% grade. 12 on the Stimp. Hit the putt with the same force as a 12 foot level putt.

Answer: Until it hits the fringe or the rough on the other side of the green (however far away that might be). Ha ha!

Calculated from hole number 4 at the course in Trenton Ga. Probably about a 4% grade that if you hit the ball hard enough to go a foot on level ground you might as well go back to the bag and get your wedge for the next shot, because you're not going to be putting. If you just touch the ball enough to move it an inch you might get lucky and only have a 5 footer back up the hill for the next putt.

You say that jokingly, however, I don't think you are that far off.  When I took my Aimpoint class I learned that 4% is basically the steepest a green can be where a ball will sit.  Anything steeper than that and you have "rolloff."  I have no idea what the actual answer is, but I would suspect it is way higher than any of the answers given so far.

I also think that there is not enough info to get the answer.  Like Hendog said, gravity and friction are the only outside forces acting on it after the putter hits it.  I think we need to know the friction factor of the green to figure it out.

My wild guess ... 45 feet.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

How close are we to Lake Merced?

  • Upvote 2

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Golfingdad

Quote:

Originally Posted by MS256

Hmmm...4% grade. 12 on the Stimp. Hit the putt with the same force as a 12 foot level putt.

Answer: Until it hits the fringe or the rough on the other side of the green (however far away that might be). Ha ha!

Calculated from hole number 4 at the course in Trenton Ga. Probably about a 4% grade that if you hit the ball hard enough to go a foot on level ground you might as well go back to the bag and get your wedge for the next shot, because you're not going to be putting. If you just touch the ball enough to move it an inch you might get lucky and only have a 5 footer back up the hill for the next putt.

You say that jokingly, however, I don't think you are that far off.  When I took my Aimpoint class I learned that 4% is basically the steepest a green can be where a ball will sit.  Anything steeper than that and you have "rolloff."  I have no idea what the actual answer is, but I would suspect it is way higher than any of the answers given so far.

I also think that there is not enough info to get the answer.  Like Hendog said, gravity and friction are the only outside forces acting on it after the putter hits it.  I think we need to know the friction factor of the green to figure it out.

Seems like we should be able to calculate friction since it's the only unknown in the uphill putt scenario. I.e., gravity is a constant, % grade is a constant (at least we're assuming it is), and we know initial speed and total distance - so we have an algebra equation with friction as the only unknown. Also, friction is basically stimp, which has been given.

Bill


  • Administrator
Posted
A flat 12' putt on stimp 12 goes 12 feet. According to the AimPoint app a 12 foot putt needs to be hit with 20.7 feet of speed (equivalent to flat ground) to go 12 feet. Ditto for the downhill putt, 4.5 feet. Stimp 12 is pretty fast, and 4% is pretty steep.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Interesting... we have answers ranging from 16.5 ft to ball-rolls-forever.

I had this idea because I recently realized how I always go long on downhill putts, but I'm rarely short on uphill putts. It not obvious to me how much I need to change my stroke for an uphill putt vs a downhill putt, as compared to a straight putt of the same length.


I posted this as a fun experiment so people could give a general guess as to what as to what an steep-ish Augusta green might do. I linked the paper, so anyone could work it out if they really wanted to, but that wasn't really the intent. Maybe I'll wait til tonight to post the simulation result.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Golfingdad

Is there a conveyor belt involved?

Why, yes. Actually I forgot to mention this "green" is inside the cabin of a lifting off 747!

Originally Posted by Fourputt

How much grain?  Which way is the grain?  Most of the time the grain will lean downhill, thus increasing the speed of the downhill putt even as it kills the pace on the uphill putt.

The equations assume grain has no effect...I'm just going by what the simulation spits out.

Originally Posted by Golfingdad

I also think that there is not enough info to get the answer.  Like Hendog said, gravity and friction are the only outside forces acting on it after the putter hits it.  I think we need to know the friction factor of the green to figure it out.

Like sacm3bill said, everything you need to know about friction should be wrapped up in stimp. When you roll the ball down the stimpmeter on flat ground, it goes 12 feet. That tells you how much friction there is.


Note: This thread is 4641 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.