Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3812 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
Posted

The average person trying to hit a long shot tends to rip from the top and give away all their lag.  Swinging hard is not swinging fast.

Swinging slower does not create more lag. Ok, now back on topic

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Swinging slower does not create more lag.  Ok, now back on topic


Hang on a minute. Many players know what is meant here - I imagine. What I think he's saying is that often the longer irons are hit too hard from the top (because we all know they're meant to go a long way, right?), primarily via impetus from the hands/arms/shoulders instead of generating impetus from an initial weight shift/hip slide. Trying to hit long irons, by hitting from the top like this is, IMO, very difficult, very unreliable, likely to lead to OTT moves, casting and all sorts of other problems.

It's not a literal 'slow' that's being meant here. Anyone who's hit a perfect shot would, I suspect, comment that it feels effortless and that they had no feeling of swinging 'fast'. I guess it's about timing, rhythm and correct sequencing.

  • Upvote 1

Home Course: Wollaton Park GC, Nottingham, U.K.

Ping G400, 9°, Alta CB 55S | Ping G400, 14°, Alta CB 65S | Adams Pro Dhy 18°, 21°, 24°, KBS Hybrid S | Ping S55 5-PW, TT DGS300 | Vokey 252-08, DGS200 | Vokey 256-10 (bent to 58°), DGS200 | Ping Sigma G Anser, 34" | Vice Pro Plus

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Swinging slower does not create more lag.  Ok, now back on topic

Adding to sarcastic and mocking you are going with dismissive, interesting.  You are quite the businessman.  So are you trying to intimidate people into not participating.  How does that further your cause.  If you say something the moderator doesn't agree with they insult you?

You know what I am talking about.  You are playing a game of semantics.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
Adding to sarcastic and mocking you are going with dismissive, interesting.  You are quite the businessman.  So are you trying to intimidate people into not participating.  How does that further your cause.  If you say something the moderator doesn't agree with they insult you?

You know what I am talking about.  You are playing a game of semantics.

And now that you've had your say in public and in private, I encourage you to talk about the topic at hand, either by responding to Mike or ignoring him. Also, semantics are often important.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I don't think most amateurs think they need to swing hard with longer irons compared to other clubs. I think most amateurs swing hard for all their clubs because their swing isn't that good. I play with a ton of golfers who are 15-40+ handicaps. None of them swing easy for short irons, and suddenly decide they need to swing hard for longer irons. They all have basically the same bad tempo for all their swings. The problem is, longer irons are not forgiving at all. This is why Hybrids have helps so many amateurs, because of the high MOI, the clubhead design, the longer sole.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

And now that you've had your say in public and in private, I encourage you to talk about the topic at hand, either by responding to Mike or ignoring him. Also, semantics are often important.

Thanks for your reply.  I'll just move on and take all that has been said with a positive spin.  I am certainly not always right nor do I always explain myself well so I am guilty but I am not the only one with fault in this case in my opinion.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Thanks for your reply.  I'll just move on and take all that has been said with a positive spin.  I am certainly not always right nor do I always explain myself well so I am guilty but I am not the only one with fault in this case in my opinion.

inthecup, sorry about all this, didn't realize at the time how my post might sound.

Ok getting back on topic, common mistake I see players make with a long iron is to play the ball too far back with a long iron which leads to them having to tip back to try and get it in the air.  Players would have a better chance if they played it just inside the left heel and had the weight go forward with the head steady.  Not the head moving back, just centered.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I agree 100% with MVMAC

I was at the range last night hitting 6 irons, I couldn't figure out what was my problem hitting the iron slightly heavy, almost like I was spanking the ground. I noticed the ball was in the middle of my stance. So I moved it forward, it caused me to move my hands forward more, tilt my right shoulder slightly more, and keep my head behind the ball. From there I was able to hit with a shallower angle, and hit the ball with a nice ball flight.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 4 months later...
Posted

I know that 2-iron is quickly become extinct. For mid-high handicappers, hybrid is a much better alternative indeed. However, I particularly interested in learning and mastering 2-iron. I believe that I can hit them purely, then hitting any other club shouldn't be a problem.

So, what are the fundamentals of hitting 2-iron? Grips, setup, stance, posture? Does it have to be very quick on the downswing? Comments and suggestions are appreciated.

Life is too short to learn how to hit a 3 or 4 iron, much less a 2.

.

A 4 hybrid is the highest "iron" I have.

.

I wouldn't waste my time trying to hit 2 iron. But, if you must, good luck.


Posted

Sorry if someone has already offered this, and allowing that the approach may be different for some of the better golfers..... But for an "average to below' hacker like me, here are the fundamentals of hitting a 2-iron:

- Grip the two iron with your dominant hand (Right for Righty, Left for Lefty).

- Position yourself, back to target.

- Begin counterclockwise spins (clockwise for Lefty) in the fashion of an Olympic hammer throw.

- Make sure you are positioned on the edge of a steep, high cliff.

- After approximately 2.5 rotations, release the club over the edge of the cliff.

- Assuming a floor of rocks, water, hard dirt, etc., the resulting hit of the 2-iron upon such surface will be most satisfactory.


  • Moderator
Posted
I dunno, shouldn't one not try and adjust to hit a 2 iron but improve one's swing so that hitting a 2 iron w/o adjustments is no problem?

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Sorry if someone has already offered this, and allowing that the approach may be different for some of the better golfers..... But for an "average to below' hacker like me, here are the fundamentals of hitting a 2-iron:

- Grip the two iron with your dominant hand (Right for Righty, Left for Lefty).

- Position yourself, back to target.

- Begin counterclockwise spins (clockwise for Lefty) in the fashion of an Olympic hammer throw.

- Make sure you are positioned on the edge of a steep, high cliff.

- After approximately 2.5 rotations, release the club over the edge of the cliff.

- Assuming a floor of rocks, water, hard dirt, etc., the resulting hit of the 2-iron upon such surface will be most satisfactory.

I disagree.  If you position yourself facing the target you'd get an extra half turn in, so that would just add to the power, no? :-P:beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

I dunno, shouldn't one not try and adjust to hit a 2 iron but improve one's swing so that hitting a 2 iron w/o adjustments is no problem?

That's one way to think about it. The reality is hybrids and high lofted fairway woods are just much easier to hit higher and farther. Most golfers don't have enough time to practice and get better, some don't even care about getting better. Even if your "average" golfer does improve their low point control enough to hit a 2 iron, they probably don't have the speed to launch it high enough.

A well struck 2 iron is going to launch lower, carry shorter, than a hybrid. One of the reasons it's kind of become extinct, even on tour. I'd much rather hit a hybrid 215 in the air, have it land and stop on the green rather than carry a 2 iron 210 yards and hope it doesn't run off the back of the green.

  • Upvote 1

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

That's one way to think about it. The reality is hybrids and high lofted fairway woods are just much easier to hit higher and farther. Most golfers don't have enough time to practice and get better, some don't even care about getting better. Even if your "average" golfer does improve their low point control enough to hit a 2 iron, they probably don't have the speed to launch it high enough.

A well struck 2 iron is going to launch lower, carry shorter, than a hybrid. One of the reasons it's kind of become extinct, even on tour. I'd much rather hit a hybrid 215 in the air, have it land and stop on the green rather than carry a 2 iron 210 yards and hope it doesn't run off the back of the green.

Question for you just out of interest: say you were playing a typical scottish links course where playing the ball low and out of the wind is crucial would you still take the hybrid over the 2-iron? i know a lot of the pro's switch out their hybrids for the Open as they like the lower flight of the iron. But would do the same or keep the easier to hit hybrid but just try to lower the flight?

Henry

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Question for you just out of interest: say you were playing a typical scottish links course where playing the ball low and out of the wind is crucial would you still take the hybrid over the 2-iron? i know a lot of the pro's switch out their hybrids for the Open as they like the lower flight of the iron. But would do the same or keep the easier to hit hybrid but just try to lower the flight?

Not sure what you mean, when I was in Scotland last summer it was warm with a light breeze ;-)

Regarding pros switching to long irons instead of hybrids for the Open

- I think the idea is but overdone. I remember watching Louis Oosthuizen hit plenty of 5 woods at St. Andrews.

- The guys that are making a change aren't going to a "true" 2 iron, more something like the Titleist 712U or Callaway X Utility.

- They are switching to these clubs because they'll be using them mostly off the tee. My last post was dealing more with shots from the fairway.

So I would say it depends. If you can hit a 2 iron solid and prefer the lower ball flight for a links style course, the great. Again 2 irons are hard to hit, 3 irons are now 20-21 degrees of loft, not much room for error with a 2 iron. So even though you're keeping it out of the wind, you're not really advancing the ball that far because contact sucks. To me, an average shot with a hybrid or a utility iron is going to advance the ball farther than a 2 iron which you maybe hit one good shot once every ten swings.

For a more skilled golfer, I would agree in windy conditions it would be best not to go with a standard hybrid and more of a "pro" hybrid or a utility iron because you have the ability to hit those lower when you need to.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Couldn't a less skilled player use a hybrid with less loft? Or put the ball back in the stance/stay in flexion and hit it lower?

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
Or put the ball back in the stance/stay in flexion and hit it lower?

They already do that ;-)

Couldn't a less skilled player use a hybrid with less loft?

Sure but then instead of going a 2 iron distance it's going a 1 iron/5 wood distance and could run into a gaping problem. Obviously you could ditch the 3 wood and go with 16* hybrid and then a 19 or 20. Or keep the 3-wood and go with an 18* hybrid and 21* or something like that. Tough to answer because I don't know the set makeup.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Not sure what you mean, when I was in Scotland last summer it was warm with a light breeze

Regarding pros switching to long irons instead of hybrids for the Open

- I think the idea is but overdone. I remember watching Louis Oosthuizen hit plenty of 5 woods at St. Andrews.

- The guys that are making a change aren't going to a "true" 2 iron, more something like the Titleist 712U or Callaway X Utility.

- They are switching to these clubs because they'll be using them mostly off the tee. My last post was dealing more with shots from the fairway.

So I would say it depends. If you can hit a 2 iron solid and prefer the lower ball flight for a links style course, the great. Again 2 irons are hard to hit, 3 irons are now 20-21 degrees of loft, not much room for error with a 2 iron. So even though you're keeping it out of the wind, you're not really advancing the ball that far because contact sucks. To me, an average shot with a hybrid or a utility iron is going to advance the ball farther than a 2 iron which you maybe hit one good shot once every ten swings.

For a more skilled golfer, I would agree in windy conditions it would be best not to go with a standard hybrid and more of a "pro" hybrid or a utility iron because you have the ability to hit those lower when you need to.

Thanks, your answer was pretty much what i was thinking. I know i certainly would never swap my hybrid for a long iron, i saw ian poulter somewhere on youtube talking about swapping out his hybrid for a 2 iron bend to 16 o i seem to remember which to me seems ridiculous! I know many people have more loft on their 3 wood (or 4 wood etc) because a standard 15 o is too difficult to hit.

Henry

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3812 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.