Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1939 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Exactly. So if PGA tour players do it, shouldn't you do it? It's the only way to get from a single digit cap to a scratch. By aiming at the flag you learn how to control your trajectory, distance, and precision.

No. Losing a dozen golf balls each time you play because you attempt stupid shots isn't going to improve your game at all. Learn trajectory and distance by practicing, not by taking risks you don't have to.

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I don't know about you, but I'm trying to improve my game. Attacking pins makes you a better player. It provides a visual target whereas the middle of the green provides no visual target, which means you'll learn how to hit more accurate shots. It teaches you how to control your ball flight; hitting it in the middle of the green does not. It teaches you distance control better. It improves your short game by providing you with more opportunities around the green. I went from a 16 handicap to a 4.6 in two summers playing this style. And I will not change it.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I don't know about you, but I'm trying to improve my game. Attacking pins makes you a better player. It provides a visual target whereas the middle of the green provides no visual target, which means you'll learn how to hit more accurate shots. It teaches you how to control your ball flight; hitting it in the middle of the green does not . It teaches you distance control better. It improves your short game by providing you with more opportunities around the green. I went from a 16 handicap to a 4.6 in two summers playing this style. And I will not change it.

Why? A target is a target..... The difference is in the misses.

  • Upvote 2

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I don't know about you, but I'm trying to improve my game. Attacking pins makes you a better player. It provides a visual target whereas the middle of the green provides no visual target, which means you'll learn how to hit more accurate shots. It teaches you how to control your ball flight; hitting it in the middle of the green does not. It teaches you distance control better. It improves your short game by providing you with more opportunities around the green. I went from a 16 handicap to a 4.6 in two summers playing this style. And I will not change it.

The problem is, I have statistics and the OP's numbers in a study to back me (us) up. You basically have absolutely nothing backing up your opinion except apparently having a telepathic link to every tour player. And the idea that aiming at the center of the green won't make me control my ball flight is laughable. You control your ball flight by working on your swing not by picking a target that leaves you dead if you miss. Nothing can be more satisfying than a perfectly executed shot. I don't care if it's a layup or an approach or whatever. You should pick targets that don't put pressure on your game unless you're forced to.

You don't need the flag as a visual target, there are many shots where you can't see it from your lie; you can use background or foreground objects to mark your line. I view the way I'll play greens from now on as similar to what I do on tee shots (I hit a very good percentage of fairways), which is to be smart and pick the line that will give me a good approach, not jamming it against a bunker or trying to carry the water at the edge of my range.

It does not improve your short game. It will only force you to rely on it more. If you practice your short game it will already be good. I would rather hit as many greens as possible no matter the situation. Opportunities around the green are the same as saying you screwed the shot up; unless you're talking about pitching for eagle.

Congratulations on getting down to a 4.6 handicap. I'm trying to improve from my current handicap as well and I don't think continuing what I've failed to do successfully will help. I think I just need to take what I do well and use a strategy to make the most of it, not expecting my game to somehow allow me to flag it from long distance every time. If I had a nickel for every time I was a yard into the greenside rough last year I'd buy the book.

In My Bag:

Adams Super LS 9.5˚ driver, Aldila Phenom NL 65TX
Adams Super LS 15˚ fairway, Kusala black 72x
Adams Super LS 18˚ fairway, Aldila Rip'd NV 75TX
Adams Idea pro VST hybrid, 21˚, RIP Alpha 105x
Adams DHY 24˚, RIP Alpha 89x
5-PW Maltby TE irons, KBS C taper X, soft stepped once 130g
Mizuno T4, 54.9 KBS Wedge X
Mizuno R12 60.5, black nickel, KBS Wedge X
Odyssey Metal X #1 putter 
Bridgestone E5, Adidas samba bag, True Linkswear Stealth
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I am going to stop replying to this thread for the sake of my own sanity. And everyone else's. Clearly we have two completely different views and nobody is going to agree on one.
  • Upvote 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Last year I started the season aiming full shots to the back center of the green. In those rounds I hit a lot of greens and had a lot of reasonable birdie putts. Even horrible swings resulted in very playable results.


Posted

Exactly. So if PGA tour players do it, shouldn't you do it? It's the only way to get from a single digit cap to a scratch. By aiming at the flag you learn how to control your trajectory, distance, and precision.

Speaking as someone who has actually gotten to a scratch the best way to get there is not by attacking flags and making more birdies but by not making bogies or worse.

I was stuck between a 4 & 8 for a long time until I stopped trying to make lots of birdies. In 18 holes you have 4 - 6 real birdie opportunities on the par 5's and short par 4's. If you can play the par 3's and par 4's even or 1 over and don't have a blow up on a par 5 your chance of shooting even par is pretty good.

I learned this by getting beaten by a guy almost 40 years older than me and 40 yards behind me. The guy was always in the fairway, hit a huge number of greens in regulation and never short sided himself. I made more birdies than he did but I also made more bogies and a double or 2. After the round he explained to me that he played the same way I did when he was younger. It took him 10 years to figure out that there are not enough realistic birdie opportunities in a round to make up for the reckless bogies (or worse). He was absolutely right. It took about 2 months to stop going after almost every pin. In that time my handicap went from 4 to 0.

It is not a sexy way to try and get around the course. If you hit enough greens you will every once in a while roll in a 50 foot birdie putt or hole out from the fairway for eagle.


Posted

I don't know about you, but I'm trying to improve my game. Attacking pins makes you a better player. It provides a visual target whereas the middle of the green provides no visual target, which means you'll learn how to hit more accurate shots. It teaches you how to control your ball flight; hitting it in the middle of the green does not. It teaches you distance control better. It improves your short game by providing you with more opportunities around the green. I went from a 16 handicap to a 4.6 in two summers playing this style. And I will not change it.

The center of the green isn't a specific target enough. You know most golfers never use the flag as a reference point anyways right? If you want your ball to end up near the flag, and the ball curves, then the reference point can not be the fag or the ball will curve away from the flag. Its ball flight laws 101. How many times do you hear a caddie say, "Aim for that". Usually its a tree, or a man made object in the background. Like a part of the clubhouse that might be behind the green. They NEVER aim at the flag. So by this your logic is BLOWN UP. I love blowing up logic, so much fun. So if Pro's don't aim at flags. They aim at something else. Can't they aim at something else to get the ball in the center of the green? Just saying :-D

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
The center of the green isn't a specific target enough. You know most golfers never use the flag as a reference point anyways right? If you want your ball to end up near the flag, and the ball curves, then the reference point can not be the fag or the ball will curve away from the flag. Its ball flight laws 101. How many times do you hear a caddie say, "Aim for that". Usually its a tree, or a man made object in the background. Like a part of the clubhouse that might be behind the green. They NEVER aim at the flag. So by this your logic is BLOWN UP. I love blowing up logic, so much fun. So if Pro's don't aim at flags. They aim at something else. Can't they aim at something else to get the ball in the center of the green? Just saying :-D

That reminds me of a birdie I once hit on a par 3. It was the ninth hole of a course I had never played before, and I was hitting a consistent 10 yard fade all day. The pin was on the right edge of the green, so I lined up and aimed for the clubhouse door, which was left center of the green. Stuck that baby to three feet. Not sure if that qualifies as aiming for the center of the green, but if I aimed any farther right, I would have shortsided myself.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Sound advice for average handicaps 10-20+ I tell people to grade based on 10% miss ratios. 100 yds is 300 feet anything inside 10% or 30 feet is good. A low handicap is 5% and pros are 3%. Thats their good shots. Same with putting. If you miss within 10% of the hole its a good putt. This takes pressure off people realizing if you have a 50 foot putt, within 5 feet is good. 100 yard wedge and 30 feet is good. Golf is a gane of good misses. If you played perfect the score would be 18 under in a round as Hogan said.

Posted
Low cappers and plus see the pin in quadrants. Draw a 18 foot radius around the hole and divide into 4 sections. They hit to the section that gives them the slightly uphill putt. Its not about GIR for low cappers and plus players. Im often just on fine fringe 12 feet from cup with nice uphill putt. i'll take that missed green all day instead of being 30 feet downhill slider on the green. OP was explaining how higher handicaps should look at a pin. The guys that go low hit sections of the pin. Short left or right etc. In order to be close with a highly makeable putt. I'll take a foot or two on fringe below a hole all day from 12 feet over a GIR with a bad path to the hole. Low cappers hit the right side of a pin, high cappers just see a big green goblin when they look at the hole. But for high cappers that still hit lots of fat or topped shots and need to be grooving a more sound swing, center of green is sound advice to break 90 or 80. You cant shoot in the 60's unless you hit the right side of a pin, not just a green.

Posted
How about this: I'll play 10 rounds aiming at the middle of the green from 100 yards and out, and 10 rounds aiming at the middle of the green from 145 yards and out. If I play more strokes over par from the latter scenario, I will aim at the middle of the green from 100 yards and out every round from then on.

I think that is a fair plan. And I think it is fair to say that there are small adjustments to be made with any strategy. The problem is that the potential variables for SMALL adjustments are just too many to list here. That is why broad scope advice is difficult to give. That said, most people, without an in person GamePlan structure (which we will be offering with schools, etc. btw once the book is released) should heed this advice to shoot lower scores.  It is easy enough to pick an exact target in line with your start line in order to finish your ball in the center of the green. The statistics, very much, speak for themselves.

Well, he is a great putter. Me on the other hand... Not so much. I make about 1 putt from over 20 feet in 3 rounds. The only way I can make birdies on par 4's is if I play somewhat aggressive when given the opportunity.

This makes you almost exactly as good as a tour player. Your perception of yourself can be misleading. Sometimes you will get hot/lucky and make more but, in itself, this shouldn't change how you look at the advice. Not to mention that your score will improve if you worry more about making pars (less bogeys) and less about making birdie.

David Wedzik
Director of Instruction, Golf Evolution

LOWEST SCORE WINS! <- Check it out!!!

   

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
You know long putting is the only stat amateurs beat pros at. 24+ feet a pro is not trying to hole it, take the two putt and keep the million buck check in sight. So pros are approximately 5% make ratio 24 feet range. The amateur takes a line and hits the back of cup it goes in 11% of the time. Thats why anateurs three putt, its backboarding back of cup in or 12 feet by from 24 feet. Ptos are dying the ball into the cup so they tap in the miss.

  • Administrator
Posted
You know long putting is the only stat amateurs beat pros at. 24+ feet a pro is not trying to hole it, take the two putt and keep the million buck check in sight. So pros are approximately 5% make ratio 24 feet range. The amateur takes a line and hits the back of cup it goes in 11% of the time.

Cite your source, please, because I've never seen anything even close to that. Amateurs are pretty good putters, but at EVERY distance pros are better.

  • Upvote 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Speaking as someone who has actually gotten to a scratch the best way to get there is not by attacking flags and making more birdies but by not making bogies or worse.

I was stuck between a 4 & 8 for a long time until I stopped trying to make lots of birdies. In 18 holes you have 4 - 6 real birdie opportunities on the par 5's and short par 4's. If you can play the par 3's and par 4's even or 1 over and don't have a blow up on a par 5 your chance of shooting even par is pretty good.

I learned this by getting beaten by a guy almost 40 years older than me and 40 yards behind me. The guy was always in the fairway, hit a huge number of greens in regulation and never short sided himself. I made more birdies than he did but I also made more bogies and a double or 2. After the round he explained to me that he played the same way I did when he was younger. It took him 10 years to figure out that there are not enough realistic birdie opportunities in a round to make up for the reckless bogies (or worse). He was absolutely right. It took about 2 months to stop going after almost every pin. In that time my handicap went from 4 to 0.

It is not a sexy way to try and get around the course. If you hit enough greens you will every once in a while roll in a 50 foot birdie putt or hole out from the fairway for eagle.

Good stuff lefty, totally agree.

Say, @tmac20 what did you say your handicap was again???? :-P

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Pretty easy for me to keep track of what works best for me (can't speak for anybody else) because I play about 1/3 of my rounds as part of a team game where making as many birdies as I can is the key to winning. Pars have very little importance in those games because somebody on the team is almost always going to make a par anyway.

On those rounds where I shoot at every pin and take more chances I make more birdies...But I also make quite a few more bogies and almost always have a higher score. Very, very seldom do any of my better scores come in a team game.

I shoot lower scores on almost all of my rounds outside of a team game because pars are good and I play for them and only get birdies on the really good birdie opportunities (which are mostly the par 5s).


Posted

What I get from this is trying to eliminate "tunnel vision" for almost all amateur players. When focusing on the flag many golfers focus so much they dont see all the other factors that go into a solid score on the hole. I would say its much like shooting pool, a good player always looks several shots ahead. A not so good player just wants to get the ball in the pocket. By aiming the middle and not aiming at a 4'25" hole, I believe, will take pressure off thus allowing a better more rhythmic swing (good tempo)...

I also came to the conclusion long ago that comparing myself to a Tour Professional is absolutely absurd. Im simply not even close to that caliber.


Note: This thread is 1939 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.