Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4330 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Posted

As you can see from my wear pattern...  I think I need to change my ball position at address!  I consistently miss on the toe -  just recently had started making corrections.

People who miss off the toe are usually swinging to the left. You don't need to change your address position, typically - your path typically needs to be adjusted.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

JP Golf: This is exactly what I am talking about. I also have spent some time lining up the ball on the toe, usually the toe end of the grooves. (Trying to change it myself too) Obviously the sweet spot is bigger on a oversized GI/SGI iron. Like you said I just care about the distance the sweet spot is from the toe and heal.

I don't need the biggest sweet spot. I just want the most amount of the club face to produce descent results, as in a pretty straight shot with fairly consistent distance.

Saturday: Thanks for the suggestion and trust me I have tried to get myself to fall for the G25s, especially since ping was nice and tried to shave the sole down a bit. But so far I have not been able to get over it. Same thing with the I series, too much sole behind the club face is visible at address. I know I would get over it and it would probably make me feel more confident if I learned to hit them well, but so far I hit them worse so that isn't looking any better to me.

For what it's worth, I have done a lot of research on the mizuno jpx ez forged. People on other forums (sorry tst) are saying the ez forged are comparable to the g25s in forgiveness as far as hitting the ball all over the face. Obviously some people like the help of the large face and sole and offset of the g25 which the ez forged don't offer. But obviously I do not! So far for me the jpx ez forged are probably at the top of my list right now.


Posted

Unfortunately, as someone has said before, its usually a trade off.

Some of us hate the big heads, myself included.  Not sure what causes that, many tour players have mixed sets.  Don't remember who said that recently, but one of the players said that they have bigger heads on their 3-6 irons because all they want to do is hit the green. Not go for the flag, they just want to be on the green.  He also said that bigger head gives them more confidence when hitting the long irons.  When pros talk like that, how they don't mind the bigger heads in longer irons, makes me think I'm not playing the proper clubs for my skill level (JPX 825 PROs).

Always good to go on the monitor, and hit 10-20 shots with some SGI's and GI's and compare the results (not the best shot, the average)

Bettinardi Golf Kuchar #2 Cobra Bio Cell+ Callaway Razr Hawk 3W TaylorMade SLDR 19H Mizuno JPX 825-Pro 4-AW Scor 55 & 60 (Wedges)


Posted

Whatever the club design, the sweet spot is the same size, i.e. very small spot on face. Most likely any CB iron is in GI category on Matlbys ratings.


Posted

Whatever the club design, the sweet spot is the same size, i.e. very small spot on face. Most likely any CB iron is in GI category on Matlbys ratings.

Interesting.  Don't a lot of club makers claim larger sweet spots?

-Matt-

"does it still count as a hit fairway if it is the next one over"

DRIVER-Callaway FTiz__3 WOOD-Nike SQ Dymo 15__HYBRIDS-3,4,5 Adams__IRONS-6-PW Adams__WEDGES-50,55,60 Wilson Harmonized__PUTTER-Odyssey Dual Force Rossie II

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Basically every golf company makes a club that fits what you're looking for @dwade247 . AP2, Adams XTD forged, i25, TaylorMade CB, Callaway X2 Hot Pro, MP-54, Bridgestone J40 Dual Pocket irons.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Unfortunately, as someone has said before, its usually a trade off.

Some of us hate the big heads, myself included.  Not sure what causes that, many tour players have mixed sets.  Don't remember who said that recently, but one of the players said that they have bigger heads on their 3-6 irons because all they want to do is hit the green. Not go for the flag, they just want to be on the green.  He also said that bigger head gives them more confidence when hitting the long irons.  When pros talk like that, how they don't mind the bigger heads in longer irons, makes me think I'm not playing the proper clubs for my skill level (JPX 825 PROs).

Always good to go on the monitor, and hit 10-20 shots with some SGI's and GI's and compare the results (not the best shot, the average)

I feel the same way. I always here about pros and low handicappers using big head irons. That also makes me feel silly (like a poser) when I only like to use my MP-30s.


Posted

Basically every golf company makes a club that fits what you're looking for @dwade247. AP2, Adams XTD forged, i25, TaylorMade CB, Callaway X2 Hot Pro, MP-54, Bridgestone J40 Dual Pocket irons.


So these are as forgiving on off center strikes as Ping G series or JPX EZ or AP! or Xhots?

  • Upvote 1

Posted

People who miss off the toe are usually swinging to the left. You don't need to change your address position, typically - your path typically needs to be adjusted.


I agree with your general assumption.  I don't address the ball in the middle of the club and hit the toe, that would indicate swing to the left and your path coming outside in as you described.

I used to swing inside out and extend a little on all my shots in which aligning the ball slightly towards the toe allowed me to consistently hit center (resulted in a draw also).  However, I don't have the same swing that I used to or the consistency, yet I still address the ball with it aligned on the toe of the club.  Unfortunately, that's exactly where I've been hitting it... if I put the ball in the middle of the club face at address and swing the same- I should be around the center of the club face on contact.

JP

In the bag:  R1 Diver, Rocketballz 3 tour spoon (13*), Adams A12 pro 18* hybrid, 4-P Callaway Razr x black (dg s400 shafts), 50* & 58* Ping Tour S, and TM Ghost Manta Putter cut down to 32". and my Tour V2 Rangefinder (with extra batteries of course)!  Ball - Srixon Z Star XV

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Whatever the club design, the sweet spot is the same size, i.e. very small spot on face. Most likely any CB iron is in GI category on Matlbys ratings.

Interesting.  Don't a lot of club makers claim larger sweet spots?

There is no "size" to a sweet spot. It's a point in space, two intersecting lines, where they cross is the sweet spot. Some clubs may be more forgiving as you drift away from the sweet spot but the sweet spot itself isn't "larger". It's like the center of gravity, it has no "size", either it's the center or it isn't, nobody has a larger center of gravity.  Marketing BS.

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

JP Golf: This is exactly what I am talking about. I also have spent some time lining up the ball on the toe, usually the toe end of the grooves. (Trying to change it myself too) Obviously the sweet spot is bigger on a oversized GI/SGI iron. Like you said I just care about the distance the sweet spot is from the toe and heal.

I don't need the biggest sweet spot. I just want the most amount of the club face to produce descent results, as in a pretty straight shot with fairly consistent distance.

I know what you mean @dwade247 .  I currently play the Razr-X black irons- I like the offset and appearance of the smaller head (black finish and longer hozel makes it look smaller).  They are long and accurate (I have shafts fit to me in them which helps a ton).  However, the sole is mid-bulky (I don't like).  They will help you get the ball up in the air but they are hard to flight lower.

If I had to suggest a club, I would say take a look at the new cobra bio cell irons (they don't have the looks for everyone).  TM Rocketblades, Cobra Amp Cell (again looks can throw you off).   Callaway has some decent options too....  Really, it will just take you going and standing over some clubs and hitting them.  Personally, I like to see my true ball flight at a range with demo clubs than on a shot monitor.  Either way I wish you luck!  I know how you feel though!  Let us know what you end up with!

JP

In the bag:  R1 Diver, Rocketballz 3 tour spoon (13*), Adams A12 pro 18* hybrid, 4-P Callaway Razr x black (dg s400 shafts), 50* & 58* Ping Tour S, and TM Ghost Manta Putter cut down to 32". and my Tour V2 Rangefinder (with extra batteries of course)!  Ball - Srixon Z Star XV

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
[QUOTE name="luu5" url="/t/72915/small-gi-irons/18#post_958358"]   Whatever the club design, the sweet spot is the same size, i.e. very small spot on face. Most likely any CB iron is in GI category on Matlbys ratings. [/QUOTE] [QUOTE name="14ledo81" url="/t/72915/small-gi-irons/18#post_958368"]   Interesting.  Don't a lot of club makers claim larger sweet spots? [/QUOTE] There is no "size" to a sweet spot. It's a point in space, two intersecting lines, where they cross is the sweet spot. Some clubs may be more forgiving as you drift away from the sweet spot but the sweet spot itself isn't "larger". [SIZE=13px]It's like the center of gravity, it has no "size", either it's the center or it isn't, nobody has a larger center of gravity.  Marketing BS.[/SIZE]

That makes sense.

-Matt-

"does it still count as a hit fairway if it is the next one over"

DRIVER-Callaway FTiz__3 WOOD-Nike SQ Dymo 15__HYBRIDS-3,4,5 Adams__IRONS-6-PW Adams__WEDGES-50,55,60 Wilson Harmonized__PUTTER-Odyssey Dual Force Rossie II

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
So these are as forgiving on off center strikes as Ping G series or JPX EZ or AP! or Xhots?

No, if you want that level of forgiveness you go with those irons. You said you were looking for irons that were similar looking to blades but went further and were more forgiving than blades. Those were the irons I listed.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Well looks like I am just going to have to develop a better swing. Darn! I was hoping to reach a different solution with the forum!

But seriously maybe I will try to find a set of ping G2s for cheap and compare them to my mp-30s on the course. Idk it's worth a shot I guess.


Posted

Check out this review of the Callaway X hot pro irons...

Quote from review:

"I've never been a big fan of oversized club heads instead preferring clubs that are slightly smaller with thinner top lines. These do quite well in that regard. While not nearly as small as some clubs aimed at the better player, these do not resemble shovel either. The soles are not over-the-top wide the top lines aren't thick. My single complaint with the way these clubs look is with the offset of the clubs....

players on both ends of the ability spectrum should see some desirable qualities in the X Hot Pro as lower handicap players looking for a little more help will appreciate them as will a mid handicap player that is making strides to improve their game."

http://thesandtrap.com/b/clubs/callaway_x_hot_pro_iron_review

JP

In the bag:  R1 Diver, Rocketballz 3 tour spoon (13*), Adams A12 pro 18* hybrid, 4-P Callaway Razr x black (dg s400 shafts), 50* & 58* Ping Tour S, and TM Ghost Manta Putter cut down to 32". and my Tour V2 Rangefinder (with extra batteries of course)!  Ball - Srixon Z Star XV

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Well looks like I am just going to have to develop a better swing. Darn! I was hoping to reach a different solution with the forum!

But seriously maybe I will try to find a set of ping G2s for cheap and compare them to my mp-30s on the course. Idk it's worth a shot I guess.

Yeah unfortunately a set of clubs can only do so much. I think going with the G2's is a good idea.

Check out this review of the Callaway X hot pro irons...

Quote from review:

"I've never been a big fan of oversized club heads instead preferring clubs that are slightly smaller with thinner top lines. These do quite well in that regard. While not nearly as small as some clubs aimed at the better player, these do not resemble shovel either. The soles are not over-the-top wide the top lines aren't thick. My single complaint with the way these clubs look is with the offset of the clubs....

players on both ends of the ability spectrum should see some desirable qualities in the X Hot Pro as lower handicap players looking for a little more help will appreciate them as will a mid handicap player that is making strides to improve their game."

http://thesandtrap.com/b/clubs/callaway_x_hot_pro_iron_review

Thanks for sharing the review. Just sent the X2 Hot Pro irons to one of our staff guys. From the few shots I've hit, really impressed and they certainly don't look "game improvement" but the ball comes off the face fast and high.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I'm a little confused here.. You want clubs that look similar to blades but you want maximum forgiveness right? Why are you not getting fit for clubs? There have been plenty suggestions for irons, including the AP1's, G series, i20, i25's, JPX ez's, etc. I can play blades if I wanted to, and sure they're visually pleasing but why when I can get better results with my ping g25's? We pay to play, the game is hard enough as it is - no point making it harder.

:titleist: 913 D2 w/ Oban Kiyoshi Purple :ping: G25 3 Wood w/ Graphite Design Tour AD-DJ6 :titleist: 913H 21* w/ Diamana Blue :ping: G25 4 - PW :vokey: SM4 Oil Can - 52, 56, 60 :cameron: Studio Select Newport 2 :golflogix: :bushnell: Tour V3


Posted

I'm a little confused here..

You want clubs that look similar to blades but you want maximum forgiveness right? Why are you not getting fit for clubs? There have been plenty suggestions for irons, including the AP1's, G series, i20, i25's, JPX ez's, etc.

I can play blades if I wanted to, and sure they're visually pleasing but why when I can get better results with my ping g25's? We pay to play, the game is hard enough as it is - no point making it harder.

I have not gotten fitted for two reasons. 1) I am a broke college student and this whole new irons thing is probably just dreaming. At least until next year when maybe I can gather some gift cards. So I am basically just looking for suggestions of clubs to watch out for. 2) Since I obviously hit better or worse on different days with different clubs I don't want to get fit for the "right club of the day" if you know what I mean.

I agree that the game is hard enough as it is and therefore we should make it as easy as we can and that is the reason I am even considering the large head SGI irons. However my point in this thread has been that I do not hit the g25s any better than my mp-30s. And I feel it is mostly due to the bulky head. Therefore I was looking for something that looked like my mp-30s and gave me the feeling of being in control but were forgiving when I missed by a bit.


Note: This thread is 4330 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.