Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Tiger on the Range with ProTracer


Note: This thread is 4302 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I saw this video on YouTube of Tiger on the driving range with ProTracer. Normally, we see ProTracer on tee shots and occassionaly on approaches while on the course but I thought it was nice to see it repeatedly while on the range. He's working on hitting low stingers with his 3 (or 2) iron, 3 wood, and driver.

  • Upvote 2

Best Regards,
Ryan

In the :ogio: bag:
:nike: VR-S Covert Tour Driver 10.5 :nike: VR-S Covert Tour 3W :titleist: 712U 21*
:nike: VR Pro Blades 4-PW :vokey: Vokeys 52*, 56* & 60* :scotty_cameron: Studio Select Newport 2
:leupold:
:true_linkswear: 


  • Administrator
Posted

Faxon: "I think he can hit the ball up in the air if he has to, don't you?"

Brandel: (silence)

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I remember watching this live, and Brandel kept mentioning that every ball had some curve to it. I just assumed Tiger was trying to do that. They weren't big banana balls for the most part, just playable draws and fades.

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Funny, how many times I have heard "Pro's don't just stand and reload and pound balls..."  "Pro's go through their routine on every shot..." "Pro's always have some sort of alignment aid out...".   Obviously they don't.  The best pro of them all is standing there reloading ball after ball doing none of the "Pro's only...".

Now, he's 1 or 2 best all time, so yes he can do that and be fine.  But that's not the point.


Posted

Funny, how many times I have heard "Pro's don't just stand and reload and pound balls..."  "Pro's go through their routine on every shot..." "Pro's always have some sort of alignment aid out...".   Obviously they don't.  The best pro of them all is standing there reloading ball after ball doing none of the "Pro's only...".

Now, he's 1 or 2 best all time, so yes he can do that and be fine.  But that's not the point.

The difference is that he is simply warming up immediately before a round.  Most of the talk you are referring to is when people are practicing.

Warming up and practicing are two totally different animals.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The shot at 3:00 is really cool.

They are starting to use the tracer more often on tee shots and regular shots this season (at least I notice it more than in years past), which I think is a good development.


Posted
Faxon: "I think he can hit the ball up in the air if he has to, don't you?"

Brandel: (silence)

LOL.

@RPMPIRE Thanks for the video link. Really fun to watch.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gridiron

Funny, how many times I have heard "Pro's don't just stand and reload and pound balls..."  "Pro's go through their routine on every shot..." "Pro's always have some sort of alignment aid out...".   Obviously they don't.  The best pro of them all is standing there reloading ball after ball doing none of the "Pro's only...".

Now, he's 1 or 2 best all time, so yes he can do that and be fine.  But that's not the point.

The difference is that he is simply warming up immediately before a round.  Most of the talk you are referring to is when people are practicing.

Warming up and practicing are two totally different animals.

Yea, but I gotta admit... a lot of them do hit balls just like Tiger does here in this video, even if it's a Tuesday. I'm not saying we ams should do it too (we aren't savants and golf isn't our job)... just that I have noticed what Gridiron is saying.

Still, you're right. They're at the driving range of the course where they're about to play a PGA event. They're not at their home course range... where many of these pros are slowing down and hitting quarter shots to make improvements during an off-week.

Constantine

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Did it ever occur to Brandel that he might, you know, be hitting those shots with curve on purpose ?

Plus, Tiger isn't hitting the ball ten feet off the ground, for Christ's sake.

Hunter Bishop

"i was an aspirant once of becoming a flamenco guitarist, but i had an accident with my fingers"

My Bag

Titleist TSI3 | TaylorMade Sim 2 Max 3 Wood | 5 Wood | Edel 3-PW | 52° | 60° | Blade Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

When Brandel starts talking about anything to do with a golf swing - I throw up a little in my mouth. He needs to stick to the politics and drama, and leave the instruction for people who know what they're talking about.

:tmade: SLDR X-Stiff 12.5°
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Wood Stiff
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Hybrid Stiff
:nike:VR Pro Combo CB 4 - PW Stiff 2° Flat
:cleveland:588RTX CB 50.10 GW
:cleveland:588RTX CB 54.10 SW
:nike:VR V-Rev 60.8 LW
:nike:Method 002 Putter


Posted

Brandel Chamblee and his 2 professional wins sure seems like the right guy to critique the swing of one of the 2 greatest golfers of all time.

A little off topic but I never understood how the The Golf Channel couldn't get analysts that had accomplished a little bit more in the game of golf and had a little more respected voice. Chamblee, Nobilo, Isenhour, Oberholser, Browne... I mean its a pretty sad group of analysts. John Cook and Brad Faxon are probably the most accomplished and we all know Cookie and Notah both have jobs cause of their connection to Tiger. They've got Lanny Wadkins stuck in the booth at Champions Tour events, get this guy in a more prominent role. I guess its funny to me that the only network that covers golf exclusively has such a poor group of analysts to go to.


Posted

Brandel Chamblee and his 2 professional wins sure seems like the right guy to critique the swing of one of the 2 greatest golfers of all time.

A little off topic but I never understood how the The Golf Channel couldn't get analysts that had accomplished a little bit more in the game of golf and had a little more respected voice. Chamblee, Nobilo, Isenhour, Oberholser, Browne... I mean its a pretty sad group of analysts. John Cook and Brad Faxon are probably the most accomplished and we all know Cookie and Notah both have jobs cause of their connection to Tiger. They've got Lanny Wadkins stuck in the booth at Champions Tour events, get this guy in a more prominent role. I guess its funny to me that the only network that covers golf exclusively has such a poor group of analysts to go to.

Chamblee having won twice on Tour is actually pretty impressive. Besides that, I don't think its necessary to have Tour winners in the booth because many of them don't have a clue what they're talking about anyways. Being a good player doesn't mean you know a lot about the golf swing, or the like.

Hunter Bishop

"i was an aspirant once of becoming a flamenco guitarist, but i had an accident with my fingers"

My Bag

Titleist TSI3 | TaylorMade Sim 2 Max 3 Wood | 5 Wood | Edel 3-PW | 52° | 60° | Blade Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Brandel Chamblee and his 2 professional wins sure seems like the right guy to critique the swing of one of the 2 greatest golfers of all time.

A little off topic but I never understood how the The Golf Channel couldn't get analysts that had accomplished a little bit more in the game of golf and had a little more respected voice. Chamblee, Nobilo, Isenhour, Oberholser, Browne... I mean its a pretty sad group of analysts. John Cook and Brad Faxon are probably the most accomplished and we all know Cookie and Notah both have jobs cause of their connection to Tiger. They've got Lanny Wadkins stuck in the booth at Champions Tour events, get this guy in a more prominent role. I guess its funny to me that the only network that covers golf exclusively has such a poor group of analysts to go to.

You don't have to be a good golfer to be a good analyst.  That logic would also mean that you'd have to be a good golfer to be a good golf coach.  I don't think Haney, Harmon(s), or Foley were good golfers.  Do any of them have any professional wins?

Now, is Brandel a good swing analyst?  Probably not ... but he is very good at his job, and I do think that some of those other guys are as well.  Especially Nobilo.  :)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Brandel Chamblee and his 2 professional wins sure seems like the right guy to critique the swing of one of the 2 greatest golfers of all time.

A little off topic but I never understood how the The Golf Channel couldn't get analysts that had accomplished a little bit more in the game of golf and had a little more respected voice. Chamblee, Nobilo, Isenhour, Oberholser, Browne... I mean its a pretty sad group of analysts. John Cook and Brad Faxon are probably the most accomplished and we all know Cookie and Notah both have jobs cause of their connection to Tiger. They've got Lanny Wadkins stuck in the booth at Champions Tour events, get this guy in a more prominent role. I guess its funny to me that the only network that covers golf exclusively has such a poor group of analysts to go to.


I'll take Nobilo's instruction over Chamblee's any day

:tmade: SLDR X-Stiff 12.5°
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Wood Stiff
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Hybrid Stiff
:nike:VR Pro Combo CB 4 - PW Stiff 2° Flat
:cleveland:588RTX CB 50.10 GW
:cleveland:588RTX CB 54.10 SW
:nike:VR V-Rev 60.8 LW
:nike:Method 002 Putter


Posted

The shot at 3:00 is really cool.

I noticed that too.  Did you see how his setup totally changed!  I was watching and seeing him subtly alter his setup or swing for the draws vs fades, then he walks up to that one and I'm thinking, "What the heck is that for?"  I though maybe he was going to try to hit a harder fade.  Nope, totally wrong. Super low baby draw.

Matt

Mid-Weight Heavy Putter
Cleveland Tour Action 60˚
Cleveland CG15 54˚
Nike Vapor Pro Combo, 4i-GW
Titleist 585h 19˚
Tour Edge Exotics XCG 15˚ 3 Wood
Taylormade R7 Quad 9.5˚

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Quote:

Originally Posted by Conrad

Brandel Chamblee and his 2 professional wins sure seems like the right guy to critique the swing of one of the 2 greatest golfers of all time.

A little off topic but I never understood how the The Golf Channel couldn't get analysts that had accomplished a little bit more in the game of golf and had a little more respected voice. Chamblee, Nobilo, Isenhour, Oberholser, Browne... I mean its a pretty sad group of analysts. John Cook and Brad Faxon are probably the most accomplished and we all know Cookie and Notah both have jobs cause of their connection to Tiger. They've got Lanny Wadkins stuck in the booth at Champions Tour events, get this guy in a more prominent role. I guess its funny to me that the only network that covers golf exclusively has such a poor group of analysts to go to.

You don't have to be a good golfer to be a good analyst.  That logic would also mean that you'd have to be a good golfer to be a good golf coach.  I don't think Haney, Harmon(s), or Foley were good golfers.  Do any of them have any professional wins?

Now, is Brandel a good swing analyst?  Probably not ... but he is very good at his job, and I do think that some of those other guys are as well.  Especially Nobilo.  :)

Butch Harmon was on tour from 1970 to 1972 or something like that. He had one win: the 1971 BC Open.

I agree though with what you said. You don't need to have been a great player to be an intelligent analyst or great instructor.

Constantine

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Brandel Chamblee and his 2 professional wins sure seems like the right guy to critique the swing of one of the 2 greatest golfers of all time. A little off topic but I never understood how the The Golf Channel couldn't get analysts that had accomplished a little bit more in the game of golf and had a little more respected voice. Chamblee, Nobilo, Isenhour, Oberholser, Browne... I mean its a pretty sad group of analysts. John Cook and Brad Faxon are probably the most accomplished and we all know Cookie and Notah both have jobs cause of their connection to Tiger. They've got Lanny Wadkins stuck in the booth at Champions Tour events, get this guy in a more prominent role. I guess its funny to me that the only network that covers golf exclusively has such a poor group of analysts to go to.

Because the "good" guy are still out there and earning a paycheck from actually playing golf.


Posted

Chamblee having won twice on Tour is actually pretty impressive. Besides that, I don't think its necessary to have Tour winners in the booth because many of them don't have a clue what they're talking about anyways. Being a good player doesn't mean you know a lot about the golf swing, or the like.

I didn't say that you had to be and I wasn't intending to slight any of those guys. I enjoy Nobilo quite a bit along with Cook and a few others but in general the GC has a weaker group of analysts and "color" guys compared to other networks. I'd much rather listen to Azinger, Strange or Andy North over most of the guys on the GC. I don't think analysts have to be the most knowledgable of what they are talking about all the time. Leave all that to the former teachers or guys who currently teach rather than former players. Anyone can analyze a swing, that doesn't mean the viewing audience is going understand it or believe it.

I'd rather listen to guys who have accomplished a lot in the game who have an interesting personality infused with their experiences. The GC definitely lacks pizzazz with their color crews. Chamblee creates that pizzazz but most of the time I think he does it to self indulge in his own percieved image. Its like the production crews tell him "Okay you have to go out and be the devils advocate and be controversial all the time."

Maybe just picking on the accomplishments on the GC crew isn't the best way to describe what I was trying to say. Frankly I just don't find most of them particularly interesting or care what most of them have to say.

You don't have to be a good golfer to be a good analyst.  That logic would also mean that you'd have to be a good golfer to be a good golf coach.  I don't think Haney, Harmon(s), or Foley were good golfers.  Do any of them have any professional wins?

Now, is Brandel a good swing analyst?  Probably not ... but he is very good at his job, and I do think that some of those other guys are as well.  Especially Nobilo.  :)

I believe that some of the best coaches in any sport were probably not very good at playing their respective sport. The cerebral part of any sport is much harder to master than the the physical side of the sport and its rare you find a player with both. The cerebral players always make the best coaches but are usually not the best at playing the sport.

I also think being a golf coach or a swing coach is much different than being a coach in any other sport. Golf coaches teach mechanics, biomechanics and all that good stuff. A basketball coach or a baseball coach generally doesn't teach the finest nuances on the sport the way a golf coach would but rather a style of the game and the strategy behind it. Yeah sure basketball coaches will fine tune your shot or how to pass proerly but they can't tell you how to run or jump or any basic athletic ability.


Note: This thread is 4302 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.