Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
DoubleG

Would you find it more or less difficult to strike a golf ball if it were moving as opposed to it sitting still?

20 posts in this topic

Ive had this on my mind for quite some time. For those of you who grew up playing moving ball/puck sports like baseball, hockey, tennis, cricket etc, do you think (use your imagination here)  that if the golf ball was gently pitched/rolled to you, that you'd find it more instinctual and less of a mental burden to strike it well?  Is it actually more difficult to strike a stationary ball as opposed to a moving ball? Do you think practicing, in some way, with a moving ball may free up the mind or initially help people learn how to swing a club?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

I passed my professional proficiency exams in tennis back in 87.  I don't believe that hitting an oncoming ball would help me.  Not only would I have to worry about my fundamental swing, I would have additional timing issues as well.  The only way it could possibly be helpful is making me focus on the timing instead of over thinking my swing.  This would only work if my swing was flawless and automatic.

My golf swing is not flawless.  So I will have to say no.  You may want to run this one past Happy Gilmore. :-)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting point. To clarify, a moving ball (to practice) may be helpful by making you focus on the timing instead of over thinking your swing. So, since you mentioned, "it would only work if my swing was flawless and automatic", then wouldn't practicing to "make it work" ultimately develop a more "automatic" swing with fewer flaws?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

By the way, when I say "moving" I'm not talking about a 98mph fastball. something much more gentle. Watch this golf instructor in this video for example. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sXqv4Bohf8

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

if it is harder, then would practicing doing something that's harder make striking the stationary ball get even easier?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting point. To clarify, a moving ball (to practice) may be helpful by making you focus on the timing instead of over thinking your swing. So, since you mentioned, "it would only work if my swing was flawless and automatic", then wouldn't practicing to "make it work" ultimately develop a more "automatic" swing with fewer flaws?

You would have to have the flawless swing ahead of time.  Then you would only have to work on "timing".  You don't need "moving" timing consideration in a tee situation.

I you already have the swing.....then you are good to go already.  Think about it.   The swing is what you are ultimately looking for anyway while your focusing on the moving ball. Right?    At this point you really need to think about weight shift and positioning. One does not need a mobile ball to achieve these things.

I still say no to the moving ball.  It cannot help mechanics.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You would have to have the flawless swing ahead of time.  Then you would only have to work on "timing".  You don't need "moving" timing consideration in a tee situation.

I you already have the swing.....then you are good to go already.  Think about it.   The swing is what you are ultimately looking for anyway while your focusing on the moving ball. Right?    At this point you really need to think about weight shift and positioning. One does not need a mobile ball to achieve these things.

I still say no to the moving ball.  It cannot help mechanics.


You make a good point, I cant say one way or the other I just happen to think its an interesting topic. For example, watch this golf instructor here from an old YT video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sXqv4Bohf8
I'm referring to a golf ball that is gently rolled to you (from the opposite side of the target line) And if each and every ball was sent to you at the exact same predictable rate every time, well then, eventually you wouldn't necessarily be hitting a "moving ball" anymore, you'd just be swinging and the ball would just happen to be there when your clubhead simultaneously arrives.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I played baseball before golf. I was pretty good at it too. Baseball paid for my extra 4 years of education. If not for a skiing accident, I might even have been drafted.

I missed quite a few moving balls during my baseball career with my bat. (Strike Outs) I can't remember ever missing a ball at rest, on the ground, with my golf club. I never, 100% of the time, hit the golf ball correctly, but I never missed it.

Now can I throw a golf ball up in the air,  then hit it on the way down with my 7i?  Yes, but not as well as I could hit a baseball with my aluminum bat. .

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Do you think practicing, in some way, with a moving ball may free up the mind or initially help people learn how to swing a club?

What are you trying to do to the Sand Trap community? I've been feeling inadequate ever since the Tiger Woods ad where he bounces a ball on the face of a short iron several times, and then flips it up and slams it down range like a baseball. :cry:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Try running after a golf ball, and trying to hit it...lol

Kind of a silly question imho. Of course it would be harder, small ball, small club head, unlike tennis, med size ball, Large racket.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

You make a good point, I cant say one way or the other I just happen to think its an interesting topic. For example, watch this golf instructor here from an old YT video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sXqv4Bohf8

I'm referring to a golf ball that is gently rolled to you (from the opposite side of the target line) And if each and every ball was sent to you at the exact same predictable rate every time, well then, eventually you wouldn't necessarily be hitting a "moving ball" anymore, you'd just be swinging and the ball would just happen to be there when your clubhead simultaneously arrives.

It may be an interesting drill to improve your mental focus.  However, I would be astounded if that instructor was remotely as accurate with those shots versus a stationary ball.  His dispersion would increase significantly because you would have to add the variable of ball position to the other variables in a golf swing.

Interesting thread though @DoubleG .  Thanks for posting it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Ive had this on my mind for quite some time. For those of you who grew up playing moving ball/puck sports like baseball, hockey, tennis, cricket etc, do you think (use your imagination here)  that if the golf ball was gently pitched/rolled to you, that you'd find it more instinctual and less of a mental burden to strike it well?  Is it actually more difficult to strike a stationary ball as opposed to a moving ball? Do you think practicing, in some way, with a moving ball may free up the mind or initially help people learn how to swing a club?

To each of those questions..... No.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Clubs were designed to hit still balls and get them up in the air to travel more distance! Rackets, bats etc are designed to hit moving balls and return the force! Was this even a real question???
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You got a full ride in baseball? Those are somewhere between few and far between and never around here. In answer to the OP's question: Absolutely not, but I would like my chances against most other people doing the same thing.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive had this on my mind for quite some time. For those of you who grew up playing moving ball/puck sports like baseball, hockey, tennis, cricket etc, do you think (use your imagination here)  that if the golf ball was gently pitched/rolled to you, that you'd find it more instinctual and less of a mental burden to strike it well?  Is it actually more difficult to strike a stationary ball as opposed to a moving ball? Do you think practicing, in some way, with a moving ball may free up the mind or initially help people learn how to swing a club?

Similar to Patch i also played college baseball (i was a pitcher in college but did quite a bit of hitting practice even if i didnt get many at bats during a season) and i can say that this almost certainly say that a moving target is always more difficult to hit than a stationary one---that is why professional and college baseball players hit balls off of a tee so much and especially when working on grooving their swing. Also if you hit a moving golf ball you are risking your swing mechanics because you have to adjust to hit a target that is not in the same spot every time which can lead to some funky swings--practicing poor mechanics is a very risky move because it can quickly become muscly memory--dont forget that practice makes permanent!  Keep in mind that in the sports you mentioned accuracy is not really all that important when hitting the ball--in baseball a lot of the best hitters tend to spray the ball all over the field--- and for the sports where it is, you are hitting the ball a much, much smaller distance than you are in golf and have a little more room for error.

The one thing that you will get out of hitting a moving ball is that if you do strike it well you will be able to crush the ball, other than that...meh

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Similar to Patch i also played college baseball (i was a pitcher in college but did quite a bit of hitting practice even if i didnt get many at bats during a season) and i can say that this almost certainly say that a moving target is always more difficult to hit than a stationary one---that is why professional and college baseball players hit balls off of a tee so much and especially when working on grooving their swing. Also if you hit a moving golf ball you are risking your swing mechanics because you have to adjust to hit a target that is not in the same spot every time which can lead to some funky swings--practicing poor mechanics is a very risky move because it can quickly become muscly memory--dont forget that practice makes permanent!  Keep in mind that in the sports you mentioned accuracy is not really all that important when hitting the ball--in baseball a lot of the best hitters tend to spray the ball all over the field--- and for the sports where it is, you are hitting the ball a much, much smaller distance than you are in golf and have a little more room for error.

The one thing that you will get out of hitting a moving ball is that if you do strike it well you will be able to crush the ball, other than that...meh


What if the moving golf balls delivery, was precision "controlled" and the balls were delivered to the exact same spot/location (the impact zone) at precisely the same speed of delivery for each ball. Say a ball was projected towards the "Impact Zone" the moment you started you swing and it was guaranteed to "arrive" at the impact zone in precisely (for example) 1.5 seconds from the start of your swing. So you'd only have 1.5 seconds in which to hit the ball. If you are to quick you miss. If you are to slow you miss. If your clubhead arrives at impact zone in precisely 1.5 seconds you strike it money! I think this would be pretty easy. What do you think?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What if the moving golf balls delivery, was precision "controlled" and the balls were delivered to the exact same spot/location (the impact zone) at precisely the same speed of delivery for each ball. Say a ball was projected towards the "Impact Zone" the moment you started you swing and it was guaranteed to "arrive" at the impact zone in precisely (for example) 1.5 seconds from the start of your swing. So you'd only have 1.5 seconds in which to hit the ball. If you are to quick you miss. If you are to slow you miss. If your clubhead arrives at impact zone in precisely 1.5 seconds you strike it money! I think this would be pretty easy. What do you think?

than what is the point of having the moving ball?  if you know exactly where it is going to be then why not just have it on a tee or laying in the same spot because all you would be working on is how well you can time your swing to an incoming ball which is a situation that you will never see on a golf course.

The bold part is just tempo which is unique to every golfer--some go fast and some go slow but as long as it is smooth and controllable who cares?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

Advertisement
Advertisement


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • He started off playing the first hole exactly how he should: fairway, 20-footer for birdie to the fat side of the green, tap-in par.
    • @iacas-Tho it is nice to be able to take your time and type out what you mean to say this is one of the downsides to a forum too-You have to respond to a whole bunch of crap and a person can get all of their thoughts out uninterrupted. If you were been sitting in a room with @natureboy and he started drawing that entirely stupid picture with the lines you could have cut him off and spared all of us the pain of having to watch him so badly miss the point. I bet @natureboy is still going to look at the response-And I bet he is still not going to see where he went wrong. But that is because he is just that way and he is unable to see how stupid his own posts are and how little they actually deal with golf swings. His stick drawing is exactly why you asked for a video-Even though he posted it after you asked. His errors and flaws and stupid thoughts would have been even more evident if he had actually tried to make a vid.
    • Or… golf is hard, and he got hot for awhile. Wouldn't be the first flash in the pan. We'll have to wait to see what the true version is. He could be quiet for ten years and then win a few majors.
    • That makes a great third bullet point. Or a first bullet point, bumping my two down.
    • This photo and the text above illustrate pretty well exactly why I and the entire moderation team is now done with you. The image fails on two levels: The center image is not representative of an actual good golf swing. The right hip is closer to the right foot in the center image, yet you maintain that it's farther away. Whether the second thing is done intentionally or accidentally I don't know. I don't care to know. But it's very representative of how you argue, and why you're now going to be prevented from arguing. You pervert arguments to the point where we're no longer discussing the golf swing. You get basic facts or concepts wrong (like when arguing about course rating, misunderstanding the radius vs. diameter in faulting the rating process for higher handicappers). You focus on some small thing - which often isn't even something anyone else has said - and lose sight of the forest or the big picture. You're not here to help golfers. You're here to "win" an argument, a goal that as yet is unmet, and you have to post absolute crap like the above to try to do it. I had a bit of free time this morning. So I responded to your last post in some detail. It, as one would expect, contains a number of typical @natureboy traits: cherry picking a photo while ignoring the concept, failure to understand basic points, perversion of the statements of others, putting words in the mouths of others, use of vague words like "a lot" (often in combination with the "putting words in the mouths of others), and hyper-focus on some small largely negligible point. Nobody else should waste their time to read the below, or open the spoiler and read that. It will not shed light on anything, it will not help you with your golf swing, and you will not glean any useful information. It exists simply as my last effort at illustrating to @natureboy a small part of the reason why we're tired of him… even though as I post it I know with certainty it too will fail. I gave you twenty warning points last night. It was made clear to you what you had to do, and you failed to do so, flaunting the requirement in several posts. The entire moderation team - @mvmac, @RandallT, @boogielicious, @jamo, @billchao, @nevets88, @mchepp, others - and myself have simply gotten sick and tired of your entire persona here. You're constantly and never-endingly arguing stuff to the point where you bastardize things so much you're no longer even talking about the golf swing, and you fail to comprehend or respond to what's written to you in response. You have two real choices once your current suspension is over: You can ignore these warnings, continue to be a belligerent arguer, and receive a final 50-point warning that will result in your permanent ban. You can avoid behaving in the manner that infuriates the entire moderation team. That will likely mean limiting the topics in which you post quite a bit, because though you fancy yourself to be capable of discussing the golf swing from a theoretical perspective, you've proven that you are not. Now, I want to be very clear about something. You're not being warned or "handled" because you disagree. You're being handled here because you contribute nothing positive. You're belligerent. You don't help people. You don't demonstrate anything. You pervert and distort topics in order to make a point that often has little or nothing to do with how people actually play golf. You're on a mission to "win" an argument, not to further the understanding. You speak as if you know and fail to ask questions, despite the holes in your logic and posts being constantly exposed as gaping. You quite often fail to read what's written, take a beat, and try to understand it. P.S. This requirement is anything but arbitrary. The list of reasons are long, the surface of which was only scratched in this post. Arbitrary would have been to say something like "to continue posting here you must dress up in a purple outfit and post a photo of yourself diving from a diving board into a pool of jello." Asking you to post a video illustrating your point is the opposite of arbitrary.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Catcher20
      Catcher20
      (27 years old)
    2. JD15
      JD15
      (52 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon