• Announcements

    • iacas

      GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Contest   09/22/2016

      Join our GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Challenge to win an autographed GAME GOLF, a Pebble Steel watch, and many more great prizes!
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
DerekR

TLink - World Lightest Golf GPS Watch $99

28 posts in this topic

Hey Everyone!

Derek Rucki here, founder of TLink Golf. Just wanted to personally share my new product with all of you and why I created it :)

I loved the idea of the golf GPS watches when they were first released because of how convenient it was to have those yardages just a quick glance of the wrist away. But as an avid golfer I immediately was thrown off by the size and weight of the watch during my swing as I do not usually where one anyways.

So with that in mind I decided to try and create something that was actually made with golfers in mind, and TLink was born. After bringing on a team that has worked on projects for companies like Motorola, Dell, Nokia, and past wearable tech successes we are ready for production. TLink uses Bluetooth Low Energy to run off already exiting GPS golf apps on your smartphone. Although it is the lightest GPS golf watch in the world coming in at only 30 grams, we decided to build it to give golfers a choice. TLink is an individual unit that comes with both a silicon wristband skin and a belt clip skin allowing you to choose how exactly you would like to wear it, so if watches don't exactly tickle your fancy we got you covered! Another beauty of this design is that we are able to offer multi colored wristband skins so you can match your outfit for the day. On top of this TLink will also be able to count steps, distance walked, and calories burned on or off the golf course.

So after months of research and development/testing we are finally accepting pre-orders for a discounted price of $99 and will be shipping before the holiday season. My intent is not to make this a big sales pitch but just want to let the golf community about this product because as an extreme golf enthusiast myself I would have liked to know about it :)

To get more information and pre-order go to www.golftlink.com and because I am a big fan of this forum and want to make this available to truly everyone you can use the discount code SANDTRAP to receive another $10 off.

Please fire away at any questions, comments, or concerns and I will happily answer!

Cheers,

Derek

www.golftlink.com

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

To get more information and pre-order go to www.golftlink.com and because I am a big fan of this forum and want to make this available to truly everyone you can use the discount code SANDTRAP to receive another $10 off.

Please fire away at any questions, comments, or concerns and I will happily answer!

Cheers,

Derek

www.golftlink.com

Welcome to The Sand Trap Derek, thanks for the coupon code for our community.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Welcome to The Sand Trap @DerekR !  I think will make a great Christmas present for some friends of mine.  I also like the layout of your website.

Thanks for being a sponsor!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Welcome!!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It looks as though TLink uses the Smartphone GPS, so it doesn't need (or have) a GPS of it's own?. Is it simply a display? Nothing wrong with that. Makes battery life of the watch longer.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the warm welcomes and feedback everyone!

@vangator you are exactly right, we decided to make TLink run 100% off the GPS in your smartphone which has helped us save tremendously on size, weight, and cost :)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks as though TLink uses the Smartphone GPS, so it doesn't need (or have) a GPS of it's own?. Is it simply a display? Nothing wrong with that. Makes battery life of the watch longer.


I imagine it would save your phone battery too since you don't have the screen on all the time.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Thanks for the warm welcomes and feedback everyone!

@vangator you are exactly right, we decided to make TLink run 100% off the GPS in your smartphone which has helped us save tremendously on size, weight, and cost :)

Welcome to the site!  My question is, what do you have to do to switch from hole to hole?  Do you change the hole on the smart phone app, on the unit itself, or does it change automatically?  Sorry if this is a stupid question, but I have never used a GPS device before.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Welcome to the site!  My question is, what do you have to do to switch from hole to hole?  Do you change the hole on the smart phone app, on the unit itself, or does it change automatically?  Sorry if this is a stupid question, but I have never used a GPS device before.

Im wondering the same thing myself.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Neat concept. The biggest complaint I hear about using smart phone gps apps are that they chew up your phone's battery. Does the Bluetooth connection reduce battery life any further, or is it somehow enhanced due to not needing to look at the screen? What's the range on the Bluetooth? Do I need to carry the phone in my pocket, or can I leave it in the cart or in my bag?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

@cipher @RonTheSavage Thanks for the question guys. The device itself has three buttons on the right hand side. Just use the top and bottom buttons to change between the next and previous hole, no need to take your phone out.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Neat concept.

The biggest complaint I hear about using smart phone gps apps are that they chew up your phone's battery. Does the Bluetooth connection reduce battery life any further, or is it somehow enhanced due to not needing to look at the screen?

What's the range on the Bluetooth? Do I need to carry the phone in my pocket, or can I leave it in the cart or in my bag?

@David in FL @CarlSpackler We looked extremely close into the phone battery issue using the GPS apps and had some great results. Through out testing we found that when using TLink with the GPS app it will save roughly 30% more battery life than if you were to be using the phone by itself. Thanks to the advancements in Bluetooth Low Energy the power consumption from the connection is almost nothing and you can expect to run about 30% of your phone battery in a long round of golf.

As for the connection TLink will stay connected to the phone up to 100 feet away so just keeping that in mind you should be able to leave it in your bag. As a precaution if it does disconnect it will automatically reconnect when back in range so you don't have to worry about taking your phone out again.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@cipher @RonTheSavage Thanks for the question guys. The device itself has three buttons on the right hand side. Just use the top and bottom buttons to change between the next and previous hole, no need to take your phone out.

Very cool, thanks!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

@cipher @RonTheSavage Thanks for the question guys. The device itself has three buttons on the right hand side. Just use the top and bottom buttons to change between the next and previous hole, no need to take your phone out.

Dammit! My debit card is trying to escape my wallet! I want this bad!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@David in FL @CarlSpackler We looked extremely close into the phone battery issue using the GPS apps and had some great results. Through out testing we found that when using TLink with the GPS app it will save roughly 30% more battery life than if you were to be using the phone by itself. Thanks to the advancements in Bluetooth Low Energy the power consumption from the connection is almost nothing and you can expect to run about 30% of your phone battery in a long round of golf.

As for the connection TLink will stay connected to the phone up to 100 feet away so just keeping that in mind you should be able to leave it in your bag. As a precaution if it does disconnect it will automatically reconnect when back in range so you don't have to worry about taking your phone out again.

That's big.  I can't wear anything on my wrist when I play, so I really like the clip option.  Seems like it would be a great complement to a laser rangefinder too.

I'm looking forward to seeing some reviews when it starts getting into the hands of golfers.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • No offense, but in my opinion this makes you unprepared to discuss it.
    • Every year, something is changed in a club design.  The real differences are minimal, assuming your current clubs are from within the last 10 or so years (just throwing out a random number).

      However, I just got upgraded to the Ping G driver from the Ping G30, and the big change I noticed is the face of the driver has a bit more friction on the G (at least as I understand it).  What it seems to do is reduce side spin, while retaining normal-ish back spin (I use the low-spin tec version).  When I miss-hit a drive with my old driver vs the newer one, I see noticeably less slice or hook with the newer version.
        When I go through those articles, I mostly read through the reviews of them.  It gives a better idea of what might be better.
    • Right, but then you're just getting into however different people value different things (including money, the performance of their golf clubs, the looks of the golf clubs, the value of a name brand, etc.). People have different values. For something like this, there's rarely any agreement on those, nor is there any "right" or "wrong" answers. I use a set of muscle backs that could just as easily be from the 1950s as now. The tech on those isn't really improving much (though the shafts are undoubtedly much better).
    • We went round and round a bit on this last year, but I don't remember seeing decision 15-3b/1 mentioned.  The difference between this decision and 27/6 seems to be that B's ball is found in a timely manner.  The finding of the "other" ball makes it virtually certain that A's ball was moved by an outside agency (Player B).  In the other thread, B's ball is never found.  27/6 allows the same kind of relief as long as the "other" ball is found within the 5-minute search limit.  As I read the rules and decisions, this is a timing issue,  the rules require a decision to be made within 5 minutes of beginning the search for A's ball.  If the "other ball" isn't found, its presumed lost.   In a way this is somewhat similar to another discussion we had, where a player's ball apparently hit a cart path and went much further than anticipated.  He searched and didn't find it at the expected distance, went back and played another tee shot for the lost ball, and eventually found the original much closer to the green.  He couldn't then put the original into play and "negate" the second tee ball, as he'd already searched for 5 minutes. I don't know if the difference in the timing of the discovery is adequate justification for the different outcomes, but that seems to me to be the defining factor.  It would be interesting to get the take of some of the USGA rules experts on this, not on what the rules say, but on why they draw the distinction.
    • I'd have thought there would be a sliding scale, akin to a volume discount. Not just $x/18 = per-hole cost. Or if there are obvious points where it's not terrible to get back to the clubhouse, make 3-hole, 7-hole, 11-hole, 15-hole, and 18-hole rates. Then you could even consider the par of the holes. Heck, if the course started par 5, 4, 5 I'd be tempted to just play the first three holes three times.  I'd get more for my money than playing holes 4, 5, and 6 which are pars 3, 4, 3.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. bandstan
      bandstan
      (46 years old)
    2. boobiemiles
      boobiemiles
      (25 years old)
    3. ElsieOlson
      ElsieOlson
      (77 years old)
    4. Matt66
      Matt66
      (26 years old)
  • Blog Entries