• Announcements

    • iacas

      Visit FlagstickRule.com   03/13/2017

      Visit the site flagstickrule.com to read about and sign a petition for the USGA/R&A regarding the one terrible rule in the proposed "modernized" rules for 2019.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
charliek98

Birthday present, which one?

21 posts in this topic

Hi, my birthday is in about a month and the only thing I really want is a golf gadget! I'm trying to decide between a bushnell laser, or a GPS watch. My concerns with a watch are that it's not accurate. A friend if mine bought a garmin, and it was up to 40 yards off? My concern with a laser is that I won't use it all the time(because if laziness to go to bag every shot), and if I'm in trees or not able to see the pin, I'll be unable to use. If the watch is accurate to <5 yards, that's fine with me because I'm only a 12 handicap so it's not incredibly important, I just want the right tool to help me, any and all input is encouraged!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

I don't think I'd like golfing with a watch on, so personally I'd get a rangefinder. I don't know why I don't have one yet.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

If I had to chose one, then the range finder.  There are cheap apps for smartphones that have GPS.  My SkyDroid app was $2.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Hands down, the rangefinder.  You'll use it on every single hole of every single round of golf you play.

I have both, and while each has it's place, I seldom even bring the gps along unless it's a course with which I'm completely unfamiliar.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I have the Garmin S1. Very accurate. I love the fact I can just look down at my wrist and know the yardage, even when in other fairways. I have always golfed with a wrist watch, so I don't even know it's there. I have yet to golf more than 27 holes with the Garmin, so battery life hasn't been an issue. I hear the Bushnell Neo X has a much longer battery life. We have occasional outings where we play 36 holes and that is close to the Garmin's capacity (if not exceeded). Front, middle back is really all I need. I can't dial my irons in to the exact yardage. I don't think I'd like to reach into the cart and shoot the yardage all the time. If they built a rangefinder into a watch, then we're talking.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd get a watch.

I carry my phone with me when I play and out it in my back pocket. It's a pain at times to pull the phone out to find the yardage to the pin... I vote watch.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I disagree with the majority.  I've owned both and much prefer the GPS, but not a watch.  I want more information than the watch can provide, so I have a handheld Garmin Approach  G5 (I believe the newest model is a G6).  The watch can only tell you very limited info, mostly just front, middle and back of the green.  My G5 can tell me every hazard and bunker and most trees, and I can position the pin according the pin location provided by the course (pin sheet or flag color or whatever they use).  It also uses AA batteries so it never needs recharging - I use Energizer lithium and get about 7 rounds per pair.  It also requires no subscription and gets free updates 4 times a year online.

Your friend's experience is not the norm.  I don't know what his issue was but mine had never been more than 2 or 3 yards different from a laser (and usually closer than that), but it can tell me distances when I can't see or focus a laser on the target - over hills, through brush and trees, etc.  It's every bit as accurate as most amateurs need and gives me more information than a laser, so for me it's the best choice by far.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I chose a watch when I was deciding between them. Pulling out a range finder every shot is a pain in the ass for me personally. I don't mind wearing a watch ( I always wear one anyway ) so a quick glance and I get my yardage - and let's be honest - even if it's out a few yards - the majority of us can;t hit to specific yardages anyway.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a personal decision that is relative to your own unique personality. No one can tell you which will work best for you until you've tried both.

I am a nine handicap and have both devices, but prefer the GPS watch. I have a Garmin S1, and like vangator, find it very accurate. I also like the feature that gives you the time with just a press of a button. I hate wearing watches, as a general rule, but had no problem adjusting to wearing the GPS watch.

My friend, Jim, an 18 handicap, likes the rangefinder, and doesn't mind getting it out of his bag, shooting the pin, putting it back in his bag, and finally selecting a club. It can be a pain, as stated by Kieran123, but my friend, Jim, prefers the specific feedback of a rangefinder, and he does not slow down anyone in the process.

However, my personal opinion is that, as a general rule, the low handicappers would prefer the rangefinder because of their level of play. After about a 5 or 6 handicap, the GPS device is more than sufficient.

Best wishes on your selection.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I prefer the rangefinder and have tried GPS's in the past. I prefer the rangefinder as I can shoot different targets around the hole, like bunkers, hills, trees and other features. I like to shoot the flag and get the distance of that then also the front edge of the green if I can see it when the flags are on the front. For example if I shoot the flag and reads back 129 yards and the front edge is 115 I pull a PW, if the front edge was 129, I would pull the 9 iron. I always try to get my yardage as others are hitting their shots so I don't slow anyone down. A few of my friends have given me crap about using one but yep, they all have asked "What's the yardage to....." at one point or another.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I prefer the rangefinder and have tried GPS's in the past. I prefer the rangefinder as I can shoot different targets around the hole, like bunkers, hills, trees and other features. I like to shoot the flag and get the distance of that then also the front edge of the green if I can see it when the flags are on the front. For example if I shoot the flag and reads back 129 yards and the front edge is 115 I pull a PW, if the front edge was 129, I would pull the 9 iron. I always try to get my yardage as others are hitting their shots so I don't slow anyone down. A few of my friends have given me crap about using one but yep, they all have asked "What's the yardage to....." at one point or another.

I do like the feature to shoot different objects particularly for layups. I have several friends that have rangefinders and I ask them to shoot specific things all the time. My GPS is general front, middle, back unless you get the fancy models (bigger bucks and I'm cheap). I find my GPS is spot on the sprinkler heads in the fairway which shoot he middle of the green. So I'm happy. My iron game has really improved by knowing the distance to the pin.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, my birthday is in about a month and the only thing I really want is a golf gadget! I'm trying to decide between a bushnell laser, or a GPS watch. My concerns with a watch are that it's not accurate. A friend if mine bought a garmin, and it was up to 40 yards off? My concern with a laser is that I won't use it all the time(because if laziness to go to bag every shot), and if I'm in trees or not able to see the pin, I'll be unable to use. If the watch is accurate to <5 yards, that's fine with me because I'm only a 12 handicap so it's not incredibly important, I just want the right tool to help me, any and all input is encouraged!

I never thought I'd like the feel of golfing with a watch on but turns out it never bothered me. I have the garmin watch (1st one) its great. never had problems with it. Now they have ones that give yardage to layups so thats even better. As you said its not always convenient using a range finder compared to a quick glance at your watch but the range finder would work better on the driving range. If you're going to spend around $350 get the garmin approach s4 maybe its the s3 the latest one with the layups on it. I think you'll love it and find it tracks more then just yardage. It can tell you how far you drove the ball how many steps you took. Its a great watch

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow. This is a hard decision! What is the best rangefinder for the price?

This is the one I use and would not trade it for anything, but it was $399 supper clear and fast.  Leupold GX3i2 Rangefinder.

I did golf with a guy the other day that used Golf Buddy VOICE GPS $119 that seemed to really work great, he had it clipped to his hat.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Played yesterday at SGCC. 36-40-76 -2 birdies and 2 doubles (ugh), one double was a 3-putt
    • I am going to try the TP version of my old club.  It has a 390CC head.  It was only 30 bucks so I figured it couldn't hurt to see if it helps a little on the forgiveness.  I guess the game is just passing me by...I can't see myself using those gigantic drivers.  The thing I noticed is that with the smaller head, that I am more focused on hitting the sweet spot.  With the giant club it just seems like you hit it anywhere on the face.  Am I correct in thinking that a "sweet spot" is not any larger on the bigger heads?  Is it just that on off center hits there is better chance of hitting it straight?  
    • I'll keep this on the short side because some random person's Member Swing thread isn't really the place for this kind of discussion… By most I'll clarify: the vast, vast majority. I'm not talking about 53% here. That doesn't mean you were doing it right or most efficiently. You may very well have been capable of making the change - and making it more quickly - with a ball if you'd done it differently. Sounds slow. Not for everyone, but for a good chunk of people. That's not what I advocate in the above linked post, either. Generally speaking, here's what I see: You tell people to fix the move without a golf ball. They work and work and film and record, and eventually, they've got a great practice swing. You say "great, now do that with a ball" and they almost immediately and completely revert to their old swing. Simply put, what I recommend to people is: A rehearsal swing or two. Often these too are shorter, slower, simpler swings. A shorter, slower, simpler swing focusing just on the "piece" while hitting a ball. As you become proficient, the swing gets less short, less slow, and closer to the full swing. Practice at the edge of your ability, but do it with a ball. The approach there blends no-ball practice (the first bullet) but immediately ties it to a motion you make with a golf ball. If you're shanking, topping, etc. the ball too much, you're not doing it slowly, "shortly," or simply enough.
    • Shot a 41 in my match play League.  Opponent was giving me 3 strokes.  I won the match 5 to 4. 5 pars 3 bogeys 1 double Good:  Drove 6/7 fairways and the only one that I missed was by about a foot.  Hit some very good approach shots.  I had 4 birdie putts ranging from 6-25 feet.  Alas, i made none. Bad: Other than duffing 2 shots on the first hole (an easy par 5) i played pretty solid.    
    • This entirely depends on where you play. I play courses that usually have three groups and a couple of singles out per side, and I would say no, but then I get to an urban course, like Long. Island, or South Florida, and it's anger management time.  I like to watch my friends's shots, and compliment their successes, I take a couple practice swings if I am in an uneven lie, or whatever, but I am not going to spend time searching for extra balls while walking between shots, or sit and BS at the tee before shooting. For some reason I am always ready to hit first, honors or no, and I just don't get why people take so long there. As long as I can do the things I enjoy, like watching my shots and my friends shots, and take due care taking my shots and putting, I don't feel rushed, but three hours for a foursome means you have four serious golfers. My golfing is more social so that is unlikely to happen. I play with one guy who takes pace seriously, and we do fine.  If we want to pick up the pace of a group, we play best ball. Maybe the conversations on the tee are because that's where everybody gathers together for the next hole and people like to talk. I like to play golf.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Golfgirl10543
      Golfgirl10543
      (43 years old)
    2. jkettman
      jkettman
      (28 years old)
    3. old man1953
      old man1953
      (64 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon