Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3896 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Divot tool?  

81 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you use a divot tool?

    • Yes
      72
    • No, I use a tee
      9


Recommended Posts

Posted

You holding a course record means nothing. Tees can more readily damage the green than a proper tool. This makes it a very undesirable tool to use when other tools that are less damaging than a tee. 

I respect your opinion, and would never suggest what type of tool that you, or anyone else, should be using. I happen to have been using a tee for a long time, and the USGA's Course Care video (viewable at usga.org) shows a tee as one of several acceptable choices for fixing ball marks. 

I would add that any course would be lucky to have someone like iacas on their professional staff. Clearly, he's very dedicated to educating his members in proper golf course maintenance techniques, and should be commended for that. But it's his OPINION (yours, too, I guess) that tees should never be used to fix ball marks...the USGA and I think otherwise. We'll have to agree to disagree.

I'm flabbergasted at how much discussion has been generated over the use of divot tools. If I'm counting correctly, my initial comment about using a tee hasprompted 6 replies...wow! But nobody has said anything about the USGA's video on the subject. If tees are so undesirable for this purpose, why does the sport's foremost governing body endorse their use? Thanks for your input. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I respect your opinion, and would never suggest what type of tool that you, or anyone else, should be using. I happen to have been using a tee for a long time, and the USGA's Course Care video (viewable at usga.org) shows a tee as one of several acceptable choices for fixing ball marks. 

I would add that any course would be lucky to have someone like iacas on their professional staff. Clearly, he's very dedicated to educating his members in proper golf course maintenance techniques, and should be commended for that. But it's his OPINION (yours, too, I guess) that tees should never be used to fix ball marks...the USGA and I think otherwise. We'll have to agree to disagree.

I'm flabbergasted at how much discussion has been generated over the use of divot tools. If I'm counting correctly, my initial comment about using a tee hasprompted 6 replies...wow! But nobody has said anything about the USGA's video on the subject. If tees are so undesirable for this purpose, why does the sport's foremost governing body endorse their use? Thanks for your input. 

 

They endorse fixing pitch marks, but they also endorse using the best method available to do the best job possible.  Why do you feel that just because you've used a tee for 100 years or whatever, that there might not be a better solution?  Are you so fixed in your ways that you can't take a suggestion?  

 

By the way, I've been playing for more than 40 years myself, I don't hold a course record, but I did play tournament competition for 22 years, yet I'm willing to try something new if it's suggested that it just might be better than what I'm doing.   I know that I never owned a pitch mark repair tool in my early days, but I so rarely hit the ball to the green with anything more than a pitch that it really wasn't important.  I don't even remember when I got the first one, but I know I've had at least one in my bag (and in my pocket when I play) for at least 35 years.  I've got a half dozen of the fancy ones the USGA sends out to commemorate US Opens, but I don't use them because they have rounded tines and they do NOT do work as effectively as the flat tined ones.  

 

I have at least 3 different versions of the flat style in my bag right now, and I use whichever one comes to hand.   The fancy ones sit in a box in my desk at home until some day when I might find a way to display them.  That's about all I feel they are good for.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

There's no argument here, despite your trying to start one. When someone makes a blanket statement that tees are not acceptable for fixing ball marks, I reserve the right to disagree. And it looks like the USGA agrees with me. 

The USGA video I saw has a note that implies that using a tee is "a common but less turf-friendly method you should avoid."

Repair_ball_mark.thumb.png.2366358d009a3

  • Upvote 2

Craig
What's in the :ogio: Silencer bag (on the :clicgear: cart)
Driver: :callaway: Razr Fit 10.5°  
5 Wood: :tmade: Burner  
Hybrid: :cobra: Baffler DWS 20°
Irons: :ping: G400 
Wedge: :ping: Glide 2.0 54° ES grind 
Putter: :heavyputter:  midweight CX2
:aimpoint:,  :bushnell: Tour V4

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I often forget to grab a divot repair tool at the beginning of the game, so on the first green I'll use a tee instead of leaving it unfixed.  I'll then get my divot tool.

Driver.......Ping K15 9.5* stiff 3 wood.....Ping K15 16* stiff 5 wood.....Ping K15 19* stiff 4 Hybrid...Cleveland Gliderail 23* stiff 5 - PW......Pinhawk SL GW...........Tommy Armour 52* SW...........Tommy Armour 56* LW...........Tommy Armour 60* FW...........Diamond Tour 68* Putter.......Golfsmith Dyna Mite Ball..........Volvik Vista iV Green Bag..........Bennington Quiet Organizer Shoes.... ..Crocs


Posted

The USGA video I saw has a note that implies that using a tee is "a common but less turf-friendly method you should avoid."

Repair_ball_mark.thumb.png.2366358d009a3

Nice try, Swede. There's no reference anywhere in the USGA video that singles out tees as being less effective. The clip that you show is detailing different methods of fixing ball marks, and has nothing to do with any specific tool or utensil. In fact, towards the end of the video, the proper way is shown and the player is using a tee. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Nice try, Swede. There's no reference anywhere in the USGA video that singles out tees as being less effective. The clip that you show is detailing different methods of fixing ball marks, and has nothing to do with any specific tool or utensil. In fact, towards the end of the video, the proper way is shown and the player is using a tee. 

The USGA video says the ball marks vary in shape and severity, and says virtually any pointed tool will work as long as the proper method is used. I disagree with this. The type of soil and the overall dryness of the soil matters a lot. 

As pointed out in the article listed above certain tools are OK when used in soft conditions but are not good for dry conditions. I have to agree with that from experience. If you have dry conditions I've see tees just rip through the grass unable to repair the pitch mark correctly even with proper technique. The reason being the dry soil becomes unstable for the tee to properly repair the pitch mark. In the end tees will just tear through the grass and soil with out doing any proper repair.

I give credit that the USGA at least puts out a video on how to properly repair a pitch mark. They do not go into enough detail on the proper tools to use and under what conditions certain tools should not be used. 

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The USGA video says the ball marks vary in shape and severity, and says virtually any pointed tool will work as long as the proper method is used. I disagree with this. The type of soil and the overall dryness of the soil matters a lot. 
As pointed out in the article listed above certain tools are OK when used in soft conditions but are not good for dry conditions. I have to agree with that from experience. If you have dry conditions I've see tees just rip through the grass unable to repair the pitch mark correctly even with proper technique. The reason being the dry soil becomes unstable for the tee to properly repair the pitch mark. In the end tees will just tear through the grass and soil with out doing any proper repair.

I give credit that the USGA at least puts out a video on how to properly repair a pitch mark. They do not go into enough detail on the proper tools to use and under what conditions certain tools should not be used. 

 

do you usually check the dryness and then decide to use a tee or not?  You mentioned that you tend to use a tee, but do you carry a repair tool as well?

I never learned how to do it with a tee myself, I use one of the tools sold by a fancy country club.. You know one of those that are unacceptable and disrespectful to the course.. :)

:adams: / :tmade: / :edel: / :aimpoint: / :ecco: / :bushnell: / :gamegolf: / 

Eyad

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Bull. I know the type, and they're bad. Unless you've shaved it down to be really narrow, thin, and pointy, it's a bad tool.

repairtool.jpg

P.S. The graphic isn't mine, and so yes, the spelling of "unacceptable" is unacceptable to me, too.

Interesting, I have one that would appear to land in the "unacceptable" side but the tines are pretty sharp and thin. The opening is a bit wide, but no wider than the left most of the 3 best options in that picture. I picked it up at the store because it was inexpensive and it had the ball mark integrated. Being that it was so cheap it wouldn't hurt me to have to stop using it and get a different one, but it seems to do the job as well as the stamped ones I had bought from the course previously.

KICK THE FLIP!!

In the bag:
:srixon: Z355

:callaway: XR16 3 Wood
:tmade: Aeroburner 19* 3 hybrid
:ping: I e1 irons 4-PW
:vokey: SM5 50, 60
:wilsonstaff: Harmonized Sole Grind 56 and Windy City Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Nice try, Swede. There's no reference anywhere in the USGA video that singles out tees as being less effective. The clip that you show is detailing different methods of fixing ball marks, and has nothing to do with any specific tool or utensil. In fact, towards the end of the video, the proper way is shown and the player is using a tee. 

Have you ever actually tried a proper tool?  Or are you so stuck in your ways that you can't be bothered with listening to polite suggestions.  I've used most every type of repair tool there is and I can say from that point of experience that the tee does NOT work as well as a dedicated tool, no matter how carefully you use it.  Whether you agree or not doesn't matter - that is a simple fact.

 

Since you have failed acknowledge any of my attempted explanations, I have to assume that your mind is closed on this subject, so I'm not going to try any more after this post.  

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I just went through the accessory pouch in my golf bag and these are the ones I was currently carrying.  The one in the middle of the bottom row is my most used one.  That and the Old Works one are the only ones I've ever actually bought.  I paid $2 for it at my former home course many years ago.  It works well.  

 

The bottom left one is not much good, even though it has flat tines, because they are straight and spread too wide apart - they tend to rip through rather than push the turf toward the center.  The same is true for the one bottom right.  

 

The one at top left I've never used because it has rounded tines - looks pretty but isn't very effective.  I found it on the course a few years ago and it's been on a free ride ever since (shows how often I clean out my bag :-( ).

 

The three in the middle of the bottom row, and the one top right are the best ones, and they are the ones that make up my regular rotation.

 

i-vq94RvF-M.jpg

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

do you usually check the dryness and then decide to use a tee or not?  

You mentioned that you tend to use a tee, but do you carry a repair tool as well?

I never learned how to do it with a tee myself, I use one of the tools sold by a fancy country club.. You know one of those that are unacceptable and disrespectful to the course.. :)

I'll take extra care with the repair if I notice the green is extra dry or just tearing apart. I am going to try not to use the tee anymore. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I'll take extra care with the repair if I notice the green is extra dry or just tearing apart. I am going to try not to use the tee anymore. 

I have to wait till I'm back home to actually get a good repair tool.. I only own bad ones..  But they do a pretty good job still IMO.. I can't tell there was a pitch mark usually..

:adams: / :tmade: / :edel: / :aimpoint: / :ecco: / :bushnell: / :gamegolf: / 

Eyad

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

I have never bought a ball repair tool. I have dozens lying around that I have accumulated over the years and all of them were either tee gifts or gratis from golf clubs who are interested in people taking care of their golf course.

Edited by phan52

Bill M

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

i-vq94RvF-M.jpg

My favorite ball mark repair tool is one of the same design as the one stamped "Old Works" in this picture. I got four or five of them for free when a course changed names (Vista Ridge became Colorado National after being acquired by a new owner) and they seem to work the best of any I've used previously.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I use one like the one on the bottom row second from the right. I think I have a dozen of them.

Julia

:callaway:  :cobra:    :seemore:  :bushnell:  :clicgear:  :adidas:  :footjoy:

Spoiler

Driver: Callaway Big Bertha w/ Fubuki Z50 R 44.5"
FW: Cobra BiO CELL 14.5 degree; 
Hybrids: Cobra BiO CELL 22.5 degree Project X R-flex
Irons: Cobra BiO CELL 5 - GW Project X R-Flex
Wedges: Cobra BiO CELL SW, Fly-Z LW, 64* Callaway PM Grind.
Putter: 48" Odyssey Dart

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

After watching the video again the other night, I modified mine with a grinder.

Jon

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

This is one of those thread where the tool of choice is less important....................

What matters?..............does the golfer understand the proper method to repair a pitch mark?   I cringe when I see golfers ripping roots loose in the middle and pulling the middle up........or tossing loose dirt on top and patting down...ugh..

 

 

What's in Paul's Bag:
- Callaway Big Bertha Alpha Driver
- Big Bertha Alpha 815 3-wood
- Callaway Razr Fit 5-wood
- Callaway Big Bertha 4-5 Rescue Clubs
-- Mizuno Mx-25 six iron-gap wedge
- Mizuno Mp-T4 56degree SW
- Mizuno Mp-T11 60degree SW
- Putter- Ping Cadence Ketsch


Posted (edited)

The guy in the video looks to be using a tool with fairly big tines.  I think the technique is more important than the size of the tines.  I see no problem using a tee.  It can do the same job as the tool.  I like the tool because it is just easier to handle and quicker.  He calls it a pitch fork.  When I hear divot, I think of the turf in the fairway.

Edited by vangator

Driver.......Ping K15 9.5* stiff 3 wood.....Ping K15 16* stiff 5 wood.....Ping K15 19* stiff 4 Hybrid...Cleveland Gliderail 23* stiff 5 - PW......Pinhawk SL GW...........Tommy Armour 52* SW...........Tommy Armour 56* LW...........Tommy Armour 60* FW...........Diamond Tour 68* Putter.......Golfsmith Dyna Mite Ball..........Volvik Vista iV Green Bag..........Bennington Quiet Organizer Shoes.... ..Crocs


Note: This thread is 3896 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 41, June 14.  I spent 10 minutes, half hitting W half hitting 6-iron, practice shots (indoors, off a mat, into a net)
    • Day 620 - 2026-06-14 Got some work in before and after lessons. Definitely didn't adduct my arms 130° in doing so.
    • Day 79: played 18. Shot a +5 76. Iron play was much better - 11 GIR. Hit a drive 380. Normal day. 
    • Day 14 (14 Jun 26) - Continued work with irons (8i-Pw), hard foam balls and getting consistent impact - same as previous drills - using gates for 1/2 and “simulated” course conditions on the second half.  
    • I like discussing the golf swing. Whether you call it "swing theory" or what, I like to talk about things that can expand the potential for what I know and understand. As a scientist, I like being shown that I'm wrong, too, because as I've said a bunch of times… "you're wrong and here's why" is an instant opportunity to upgrade my knowledge. I also like to help golfers, and one of the things I'm most glad to have moved away from from 15 years ago was the "Hands In" idea from S&T. Jim Waldron is often credited (probably rightly so) with explaining why so many Tour players and good players talk about "keeping their hands in front of themselves" while it appears that they're moving their arms around their bodies. From over 30 years ago: I've also got videos like… this (Instagram link here😞 I'm happy to say that I've become friends with Shaun and Mike at Athletic Motion Golf (AMG), too. I tend to get along with other smart folks who measure things, who look critically at information, who don't assume that what they thought 20 years ago holds true today. I get along with folks who look for chances to instantly upgrade their knowledge. Andy Plummer remains one of the people who does not look for these opportunities. He didn't care in early 2013 when we had evidence that the information in their S&T 2.0 DVDs was bogus, and they seemingly don't care now. They've been attacking (it's their favorite pastime) AMG in particular for the better part of a year now. There have been a few shots back at them from AMG (like… this), no doubt. But as is typical of the AMG fellas, it's with measured data. Well, recently, Andy took yet another shot at AMG: https://www.instagram.com/p/DZfHe0DuPXC/. Andy demonstrates that true power in the golf swing comes from doing stuff like this: Andy claims that the idea that the arms mostly lift and lower, while the body turns, is bogus. What golfers should be doing is using "angular velocity" to abduct and adduct their shoulders to move the club fast like this (above). Then he makes a ridiculous example of what AMG supposedly teaches, but misses by a mile. Now, it doesn't take a biomechanist to know that you can't possibly swing as Andy demonstrates. His right arm is so far around and behind him that his left arm would have to grow several feet to reach the grip of the club (or alignment stick), and a follow-through with the right arm position like that would be absolutely silly. But, it's a demonstration, so let's not read too much into it. However, I find ideas like this dangerous. Again, I like to help golfers, and in my opinion, the idea that you should abduct and adduct your arms a lot is a dangerous one. There's some adduction and abduction going on, but… it's not much. Anyway, this statement was posted: 130 degrees of dynamic range of horizontal abduction and adduction is quite the claim! I posted some comments to Andy and others, and was issued a challenge: Well, okay then. Here's Bryson's lead shoulder adduction: This measures the angle between the "virtual spine," the left shoulder, and the elbow. Bryson has a 97.34° "adduction angle" at P1, a 62.53° angle at P4, and returns to an 89.21° angle at impact. Rounding, that's a change of 34° from address to the top, and then a change (back toward the angle at address) of about 26° from the top to impact. If we want to worry about only horizontal abduction and adduction (where D = adduction and B = abduction): Left shoulder: 8.33° D, 38.74° D, 14.67° D Right shoulder: 1.03° D, 55.75° B, 14.04° B If we call moving the arms farther around you as negative, those are changes of -30.41° from P1 to P4 for the left shoulder and +24.07° from P4 to P7 for the left shoulder and -56.78° and +41.71° for the right shoulder. I have no idea on earth where he gets 130°. From the last frame of Bryson's swing where he's at 126.98°? But the lowest that number gets is 62.53°, for a range of 64.45, or less than half of the 130° claimed (plus it includes part of the swing, post-impact, that has no bearing on what the ball does). For good measure, another pretty good player: Left: 22.55° D ➡️ 33.35° D (∆ 10.8°) ➡️ 17.36° D (∆ 15.99° from P4, 5.19° from P1) Right: 15.03° D ➡️ 24.29° B (∆ 39.32°) ➡️ 1.93° D (∆ 26.22° from P4, 13.1° from P1) Of the biomechanists and experienced 3D users (on any platform), none of them have seen anything like 130° of dynamic adduction/abduction from a good player P1 to P7. And, like my little joke above, even if you go to the end of the swing, you rarely get much more than a little over halfway there. Maybe Andy is adding them? He does say in the video "and then add it to that with the lead arm." (I think that's what he says, but this isn't an additive type system.) I regularly coach golfers out of positions with a lot of adduction and abduction. I regularly work golfers away from moving their arms around their bodies. Even my juniors (the ones who have paid attention anyway! 🤣) can recite "arms = up/down, body = around." Like this: So, I don't know where this leaves us. Andy claims to have seen something on GEARS that shows 130° of dynamic adduction/abduction. I'm open to being wrong, but… I don't think I am here on this one. And, until that comes to be, I will continue to stand up for what I think is the best information, and do my best to work with golfers toward simpler, easier moves that don't get them stuck. Simpler, easier moves like the moves Tour players and great players tend to make, not complicated, difficult moves. Shaun and Mike said it in a video once where they demonstrated that the average Tour player adducts their lead arm 20° across their chest from the top to impact (P4 to P7), while the amateur often tries to go 40°. They said something like "the amateur is trying to move their arm TWICE the distance in the same amount of time as the professional athlete." Yep. The swings of great players are often easier and simpler. They are not abducting and adducting their arms much in comparison to average golfers. As a smart man once said: "Why would you teach something (abduction in this case) that bad golfers already do?" On a related note… the S&T crowd continues to be… well, who they've been as long as I've known them. Take this comment for example: I mean… I would think that this is pretty self-explanatory, but then again… I didn't think it needed explaining to begin with. P.S. As I was finishing up this article, another biomechanist replied with something so simple I hadn't even thought of it as I had immediately jumped into looking at the actual measurements: "90 doesn’t even seem physically possible.“ No, sir. It doesn't.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.