Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3642 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, boogielicious said:

@RussUK

Check out the thread below. It may be in line with what you are talking about in how your swing change feels. It worked well for me. If I go too far back, my left arm bends, but that is not the issue. The problem is my right arm gets stuck behind my side on the downswing and I will come over the top. Too long a swing can also cause the hips, head, etc. to move back.

shorter-probably-better-swing-keep-the-right-arm-straight

Thanks for the link. feeling that  the right arm is straighter than usual is a weird thought but it does actually make a lot of sense

Russ, from "sunny" Yorkshire = :-( 

In the bag: Driver: Ping G5 , Woods:Dunlop NZ9, 4 Hybrid: Tayormade Burner, 4-SW: Hippo Beast Bi-Metal , Wedges: Wilson 1200, Putter: Cleveland Smartsquare Blade, Ball: AD333

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 11/23/2015, 7:18:05, RussUK said:

 

Most of the instructional material i have read advocates the straight lead arm and the backswing and swing to a wrap around finish or hands high. Is this really needed in order to generate sufficient  power/swing speed?

or can a compact swing done properly achieve the same?

any of the guys here have a compact swing and have good results?

 

I have read articles that would say to not worry too much about a Straight lead arm as it will straighten on the down swing (centrifugal force).  Like most advice the straight lead arm thing can be overdone.  If keeping the arm straight causes tension in your swing it is a bad thing. If you can keep the lead arm straight and still make a decent turn you're better off.  But most of us are not flexible enough to do that.   Especially ones as old as me.  Having said that too much bend in the lead arm at the top isn't so good either.  Just don't overdo it either way.  

I have for a year or so now been using a Stack & Tilt swing and it has helped me with accuracy and I can't see any decrease in distance averages with any of my clubs.  But it does seem to cause me a slightly shorter and more compact swing.  Anyway for me it works.

Final though is make sure you get someone to video you as there is a "feel Vs. real" difference in all of us.  

Butch


Posted
11 minutes ago, ghalfaire said:

I have read articles that would say to not worry too much about a Straight lead arm as it will straighten on the down swing (centrifugal force).  Like most advice the straight lead arm thing can be overdone.  If keeping the arm straight causes tension in your swing it is a bad thing. If you can keep the lead arm straight and still make a decent turn you're better off.  But most of us are not flexible enough to do that.   Especially ones as old as me.  Having said that too much bend in the lead arm at the top isn't so good either.  Just don't overdo it either way.  

I have for a year or so now been using a Stack & Tilt swing and it has helped me with accuracy and I can't see any decrease in distance averages with any of my clubs.  But it does seem to cause me a slightly shorter and more compact swing.  Anyway for me it works.

Final though is make sure you get someone to video you as there is a "feel Vs. real" difference in all of us.  

The stiff straight arm is not mandatory and as you say centrifugal force straightens it....just don't want it to collapse.If you check out Spieth or JB Holmes,their arm bends as does Freddy's.I tried Stack and Tilt and found it ok/pretty good with irons but lost a lot with the driver.

Note: I do not answer direct questions or points raised against my untested and unproven theories, have no history of teaching anyone, and post essentially the same nonsense in everyone's Member Swing threads.


Posted (edited)
27 minutes ago, collapse said:

The stiff straight arm is not mandatory and as you say centrifugal force straightens it....just don't want it to collapse.If you check out Spieth or JB Holmes,their arm bends as does Freddy's.I tried Stack and Tilt and found it ok/pretty good with irons but lost a lot with the driver.

I've swung enough sledge hammers to know that ones arms don't straighten during the down swing due to centrifugal force unless your arms are loose as noodles and then I think it would be much to late.  Only muscle contractions through impact will straighten your arm.  I'll be interested to here what others have to say but I would think that any breaking at the elbow should not be voluntary and the objective should be to keep the arm straight and lengthen the arc.  I know when I'm fighting hitting the ball fat my arms can begin to shorten and I this is even more disastrous.  

Edited by LagShaft

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Then we practice on mats in a perfectly controlled environment. It's difficult to take our range game to the golf course where our lies vary from shot to shot. While this might not bother a low handicapper or a pro so much, it sure bothers us with mid-high HCs. Soft ground will bother us. It would be nice if they had a way of adjusting the tilt of the platform on which we were standing to hit the ball so we could practice off slice lies and hook lies, uphill lies, downhill lies, but I know that would be added equipment and added maintenance. 

I found this video that kind of covers part of the issue. I found it quite interesting.

 

Julia

:callaway:  :cobra:    :seemore:  :bushnell:  :clicgear:  :adidas:  :footjoy:

Spoiler

Driver: Callaway Big Bertha w/ Fubuki Z50 R 44.5"
FW: Cobra BiO CELL 14.5 degree; 
Hybrids: Cobra BiO CELL 22.5 degree Project X R-flex
Irons: Cobra BiO CELL 5 - GW Project X R-Flex
Wedges: Cobra BiO CELL SW, Fly-Z LW, 64* Callaway PM Grind.
Putter: 48" Odyssey Dart

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

It seems like no matter what level of play you are currently playing, golf is hard.

High handicaps just want to get the ball into the air and lmove twoards the tRget.

Mid-high handicaps are more concerned with getting a decent swing, and get somewhat close to their target

Mid handicaps want to feel a decent strike on every shot.

Low handicaps are trying to avoid mishits and hit more greens.

Scratch are trying to save par.

Plus are trying to shoot several rounds in a row without making too many errors. . .etc.

There's always something to make it challenging or difficult no matter what level you play.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3642 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.