Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3636 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm about to get fitted for some new AP1 irons in a couple of weeks.  2 of the shafts offered are KBS and Tru Temper.  I hit the KBS Tour at Dick's Sporting Goods and thought it felt pretty good.  

 

Anyone have suggestions or opinions of which one they think is better?


  • Moderator
Posted

I tested both shafts in the AP2 irons a little over a year ago.  For my swing, the KBS produced a slightly higher ball flight, and that's what I chose.  

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
3 minutes ago, DaveP043 said:

I tested both shafts in the AP2 irons a little over a year ago.  For my swing, the KBS produced a slightly higher ball flight, and that's what I chose.  

I liked the KBS shaft when I hit it.  I've hit some Tru Temper shafts but not with the AP1 clubhead on it.  I'm going to get fitted then go hit the AP1s with the correct flex and gram shaft at Golfsmith after to see which shaft I prefer.  


Posted

I am partial for KBS. They tend to feel a bit softer, launch a few degrees higher with slightly less spin. At least for me :) 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Used both KBS by far for me, higher ball flight and a softer feel put them in my new Ap2's love them.


  • Moderator
Posted
9 hours ago, CoachKG1984 said:

Anyone have suggestions or opinions of which one they think is better?

"Better" depends on what works best for the player and their needs. True Temper and KBS make a variety of shafts that launch the ball high, low, medium and in multiple weight and spin options.

If you are referring the KBS Tours and TT Dynamic Gold S300, then it's basically what others have said, KBS tends to launch the ball higher than Dynamic Gold and feels softer.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
15 hours ago, CoachKG1984 said:

I'm about to get fitted for some new AP1 irons in a couple of weeks.  2 of the shafts offered are KBS and Tru Temper.  I hit the KBS Tour at Dick's Sporting Goods and thought it felt pretty good.  

 

Anyone have suggestions or opinions of which one they think is better?

 

5 hours ago, mvmac said:

"Better" depends on what works best for the player and their needs. True Temper and KBS make a variety of shafts that launch the ball high, low, medium and in multiple weight and spin options.

If you are referring the KBS Tours and TT Dynamic Gold S300, then it's basically what others have said, KBS tends to launch the ball higher than Dynamic Gold and feels softer.

The new AP1s come with TT XP90 shafts, which are light and high launching. They have other stock shafts you can go with, but if you launch high already, you may want to consider a low launching shaft. 

I would recommend you spend some time evaluating both.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I've always heard that KBS has better quality control. In years past, clubmakers have mentioned that they must go through a lot of TT shafts to get consistency within a set. That may have changed - I haven't played TT in years. I went to Nippon Steel, have played irons previously with KBS, which seem friendly as to feel and launch. I play KBS now in wedges only.

  • Upvote 1

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, Mr. Desmond said:

I've always heard that KBS has better quality control. In years past, clubmakers have mentioned that they must go through a lot of TT shafts to get consistency within a set. That may have changed - I haven't played TT in years. I went to Nippon Steel, have played irons previously with KBS, which seem friendly as to feel and launch. I play KBS now in wedges only.

My biggest selling point for the shaft I choose is consistency and control.  I don't have any desire to look for distance.  I don't mind playing an extra club if I have to increase distance.  


Posted

I've always like TT Dynamic Gold shafts. I don't feel and difference in how soft they are compared to the KBS, They both feel fine to me. I go with Dynamic Gold because the KBS launches too high for me. The Dynamic Gold is cheaper so I'd recommend that if you're worried about price at all. Unless you're talking about the TTDG Tour model, which is a much nicer shaft, I recommend that as well, but to me that one feels too whippy in their flexes. Stiff feels like regular, etc. Maybe it's just me idk.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
28 minutes ago, freshmanUTA said:

I've always like TT Dynamic Gold shafts. I don't feel and difference in how soft they are compared to the KBS, They both feel fine to me. I go with Dynamic Gold because the KBS launches too high for me. The Dynamic Gold is cheaper so I'd recommend that if you're worried about price at all. Unless you're talking about the TTDG Tour model, which is a much nicer shaft, I recommend that as well, but to me that one feels too whippy in their flexes. Stiff feels like regular, etc. Maybe it's just me idk.

Price really isn't an issue.  I'm ordering them through my cousin who is a head pro in South Florida, so I'm getting a pretty decent discount.  I've looked through the Titliest fitting guide and there are multiple options that don't have an upcharge and then there are other options with an upcharge.  The FST KBS Tour and FST KBS Tour 90 don't have an upcharge.  The rest of the KBS shafts do.  

TT has 6 options that aren't an upcharge, but multiples that are.  They do also offer a couple of Nippon options that aren't upcharged.  

QUESTION:  A couple of people have said that KBS has a higher launch.  Is there a negative to that?

  • Upvote 1

Posted
2 minutes ago, CoachKG1984 said:

Price really isn't an issue.  

QUESTION:  A couple of people have said that KBS has a higher launch.  Is there a negative to that?

It's like maybe one to two degrees of dynamic loft. It might be more beneficial for longer irons. 

The shafts are only 6 bucks more per shaft for KBS. 

If you want something inbetween then check out the project x shafts. Those where designed by the guy who designed KBS when he worked for True Temper. 

  • Upvote 1

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
27 minutes ago, CoachKG1984 said:

 

QUESTION:  A couple of people have said that KBS has a higher launch.  Is there a negative to that?

Not a negative when spin is kept to desired levels. KBS attempts to design so the shaft releases like a whip to release more energy onto the ball. Take a look at their website   http://kbsgolfshafts.com

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

More than the launch characteristics what I like about KBS is I can feel where the club head is. Never feels like just swinging something the shaft feels more reactive.

I get that with all their shafts. I have three iron sets with KBS, Tour, Tour90 and CTaper. That good feel is there with all of them the variable is trajectory. 

Dave :-)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
3 hours ago, CoachKG1984 said:

QUESTION:  A couple of people have said that KBS has a higher launch.  Is there a negative to that?

If you already play shots that are high with shafts that don't launch higher there could be. But usually it's mostly for longer irons as @saevel25 said. 

The AP1's are great clubs, if I had a spare thousand lying around I'd pick up a properly fitted set. As of now my nikes are starting to feel weird, so I may go back to my old pings, but that's off topic.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
14 hours ago, CoachKG1984 said:

QUESTION:  A couple of people have said that KBS has a higher launch.  Is there a negative to that?

Only if you want to lower the flight of your irons ;-)

The good thing about KBS shafts compared to "standard" S300 shafts is that even though they do launch higher the spin is controlled.

  • Upvote 1

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3636 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I have a couple of trips planned, although golf was a secondary component in each.  In February we're going to visit some friends near Naples, so Mary Anne and I have added on a few days to stay and play at Streamsong.  Then In March we're going to Hawaii (again), and will almost certainly get in a few rounds there.
    • My next golf trip will probably be a short one, but I’m really looking forward to it. I’m thinking of staying relatively close, picking a spot with a few solid courses and making a long weekend out of it. For me, the best golf trips are about good courses, relaxed vibes, and time away with friends.
    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.