Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3591 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, bkuehn1952 said:


Average Score / Birdies a Round 
71 - 3.2 birdies a round 
75 - 2.4 birdies a round 
79 - 1.8 birdies a round 
81 - 1.5 birdies a round 
85 - 0.8 birdies a round 
89 - 0.1 birdies a round 
91+ pretty much make so few as to be irrelevant. 

I've kept hole by hole stats for many years and I'd say the above is pretty accurate based on my personal experience as my game has evolved over the years.   

What's in Paul's Bag:
- Callaway Big Bertha Alpha Driver
- Big Bertha Alpha 815 3-wood
- Callaway Razr Fit 5-wood
- Callaway Big Bertha 4-5 Rescue Clubs
-- Mizuno Mx-25 six iron-gap wedge
- Mizuno Mp-T4 56degree SW
- Mizuno Mp-T11 60degree SW
- Putter- Ping Cadence Ketsch


  • Moderator
Posted
2 hours ago, RandallT said:

Your scores ranged from low 80s to 109. For the low 80s round, you had 3 of your 4 birdies!

Yea I remember that round well. I had a "career" day on ballstriking (like that one day I was sinking putts from everywhere). Hit my drives long and straight. Two of those birdies came from putts inside 4'.

Even if we dismiss this particular round as an outlier, I'm still 0.2 birdies per round, way above the expected average.

2 hours ago, RandallT said:

Whew, does the rollercoaster ride get tiring? :beer:

Must not, because I keep getting back on the ride ;-)

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Same home course, same tee stat for the last 3 years:

2016 = 95.29 strokes & 0.18 birdies per round.   

2015 = 98.27 strokes & 0.10 birdies per round

2014 = 99.83 strokes & 0.15 birdies per round

 

Better birdie stat than the chart but I have a relatively better putting skill than average 90+ stroke player.  

RiCK

(Play it again, Sam)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

I make 13% birdies. In one round, that's 2.34.

I don't make a lot of birdies, but I manage to avoid making very many bogeys and definitely don't make many double bogeys.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Made one today.  That's one in the last 27 holes and counting (all that I've played this year).

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

My Game Golf average score is 98.5 and I average 0.4 birdies per round.  

It seems that I tend to go on runs where I'll make birdies and then runs where I won't make anything.  

* shrug *

CY

Career Bests
- 18 Holes - 72 (+1) - Par 71 - Pine Island Country Club - 6/25/2022
- 9 Holes - 36 (E) - Par 36 - Pine Island Country Club - 6/25/2022

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

This seems fairly accurate, I usually get between 1-2 per round with the occasional 3 and even 4 birdie round, if I could putt a little better I'm beyond positive my hdcp would be 2 points lower and of course the birdies would be double too.

Rich C.

Driver Titleist 915 D3  9.5*
3 Wood TM RBZ stage 2 tour  14.5*
2 Hybrid Cobra baffler 17*
4Hybrid Adams 23*
Irons Adams CB2's 5-GW
Wedges 54* and 58* Titleist vokey
Putter Scotty Cameron square back 2014
Ball Srixon Zstar optic yellow
bushnell V2 slope edition


Posted

It's going to vary somewhat depending on the course. Higher skill on shorter / easier course = higher birdie % and vice versa. I had a chart done up by average score which is relatable to HCP for a 'typical course'. Ask @Lihu if he still has it. I'll see if I can find my copy.

Kevin


Posted
3 hours ago, natureboy said:

It's going to vary somewhat depending on the course. Higher skill on shorter / easier course = higher birdie % and vice versa. I had a chart done up by average score which is relatable to HCP for a 'typical course'. Ask @Lihu if he still has it. I'll see if I can find my copy.

I looked for it, but didn't find it in my inbox. I think attachments might have been lost when we went to this new site system. Sorry about that. . .

I will say that Game Golf seems to track everything pretty well. Although my birdie percentage is only 4%. Possibly because of my terrible short game, or just my terrible overall game. :-P

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
26 minutes ago, Lihu said:

I looked for it, but didn't find it in my inbox. I think attachments might have been lost when we went to this new site system. Sorry about that. . .

I will say that Game Golf seems to track everything pretty well. Although my birdie percentage is only 4%. Possibly because of my terrible short game, or just my terrible overall game. :-P

Your percentage seems in the right range.

Caveat that these charts are relative to a long-term average and approximate - individual games do vary (steady players vs. long-hitting but erratic). Amounts are in # per round you'll have to convert for %.

~ Scoring distribution vs. Avg Score.

56e39d2006750_ScoreDist-AvgScore.thumb.p

~ Scoring distribution vs. HCP for CR of 72. Higher course rating shifts x-axis values to the right.

56e39d4341cd5_ScoreDist-HCP-CR72.thumb.p

  • Upvote 1

Kevin


Posted
21 hours ago, natureboy said:

Your percentage seems in the right range.

Caveat that these charts are relative to a long-term average and approximate - individual games do vary (steady players vs. long-hitting but erratic). Amounts are in # per round you'll have to convert for %.

~ Scoring distribution vs. Avg Score.

56e39d2006750_ScoreDist-AvgScore.thumb.p

~ Scoring distribution vs. HCP for CR of 72. Higher course rating shifts x-axis values to the right.

56e39d4341cd5_ScoreDist-HCP-CR72.thumb.p

Cool, so my putting is not that horrible, I suppose?

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Yesterday's round included 1 birdie and 3 pars.  Carded 87.  Think I only had 2, (maybe 3) doubles as well.

My take on the initial chart posted is that ratio of birdies to actual score might be UNDERstated.

If I have 1 birdie, I'm breaking 90.  If I had 3 birdies in a round I'd maybe card 80-82.  No WAY 3 birdies on my card would result in a 71.  Ever!

dave

The ultimate "old man" setup:

Ping G30 driver
Ping G Fairway woods - 5 and 7 woods
Callaway X-Hot #5 hybrid; Old school secret weapon
Ping G #6-9 irons; W and U wedges
Vokey 54 and 58* Wedges
Odyssey Versa Putter
Golf Balls

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I just took a look at my last 15 tournament rounds. I was averaging 3.46 birdies per round. Average score should be between +1 and +2.

 

The results are pretty accurate with what I had on my mind ...  I am making more birdies than a lot of players, but I also make a lot more bogies ... For this year, I am really determined to use a better course management :D


Posted

Most rounds I have one birdie.  Yesterday was two.  I have a tendency to turn a lot of birdies into pars.

Driver.......Ping K15 9.5* stiff 3 wood.....Ping K15 16* stiff 5 wood.....Ping K15 19* stiff 4 Hybrid...Cleveland Gliderail 23* stiff 5 - PW......Pinhawk SL GW...........Tommy Armour 52* SW...........Tommy Armour 56* LW...........Tommy Armour 60* FW...........Diamond Tour 68* Putter.......Golfsmith Dyna Mite Ball..........Volvik Vista iV Green Bag..........Bennington Quiet Organizer Shoes.... ..Crocs


Posted
17 hours ago, dave s said:

... If I had 3 birdies in a round I'd maybe card 80-82.  No WAY 3 birdies on my card would result in a 71.  Ever!

dave

The "Score" reflects one's average score over an extended period of time, say a year or so.  If you averaged 3 birdies a round for a year, you just might shoot "71" now and again.

  • Upvote 1

Brian Kuehn

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

29 birdies in 23 rounds (1.26 per round). Average score over those rounds is 77.93. That seems about right, maybe slightly lower than average birdies for the average total score.

If you are including non-competition rounds then my average is almost exactly 2 birdies per round. 

Edited by Pete
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
55 minutes ago, bkuehn1952 said:

The "Score" reflects one's average score over an extended period of time, say a year or so.  If you averaged 3 birdies a round for a year, you just might shoot "71" now and again.

I would say if you averaged 3 birdies a round over a year, you would shoot 71 or better quite often. A lot of those rounds will have 4 or 5 birdies and a few with 6.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3591 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • My next golf trip will probably be a short one, but I’m really looking forward to it. I’m thinking of staying relatively close, picking a spot with a few solid courses and making a long weekend out of it. For me, the best golf trips are about good courses, relaxed vibes, and time away with friends.
    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.