Jump to content
IGNORED

Bent Wrist at the Top


Note: This thread is 2908 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

In order to keep a square clubface throughout my swing, I was told that I need to have more bend in my right wrist at the top.  I was flat at the top in the right.  Can someone explain to me what that means and how to get there?  Is it simply add bend in the wrist at the top or is it something that occurs as a result of something I did earlier in the swing?  Every time I try to do it, it seems extremely unnatural and makes my swing feel very rigid and forced. Can someone shed some light?  Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


1 hour ago, zimmerbz said:

In order to keep a square clubface throughout my swing, I was told that I need to have more bend in my right wrist at the top.  I was flat at the top in the right.  Can someone explain to me what that means and how to get there?  Is it simply add bend in the wrist at the top or is it something that occurs as a result of something I did earlier in the swing?  Every time I try to do it, it seems extremely unnatural and makes my swing feel very rigid and forced. Can someone shed some light?  Thanks!

An easier way to remember is to keep your lead wrist flat. This will kind of force the trailing wrist to bend at the appropriate angle. It might also feel "limiting", but that's not necessarily a bad thing. Most people tend to over swing anyway.

Post some pictures of your wrists and it will be easier to see.

If you can post a DTL swing video that might help some of the more experienced folks on this site to help you.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Positions at the top of the swing can vary greatly. I don't think you will find much commonalities at the top of the swing. There could "recommendations" but no hard a set position. Keegan on the left has a radial deviation of his left wrist and JB on the right is closer to ulnar deviated. Dustin Johnson is ulnar deviated the most. Relatively less pros radial deviate but it can happen. 

Screen Shot 2016-05-03 at 9.36.11 AM.png

When discussing the wrist we should use biometrical terms like radial/ulnar deviation rather than bent/flat. 

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, mchepp said:

Positions at the top of the swing can vary greatly. I don't think you will find much commonalities at the top of the swing. There could "recommendations" but no hard a set position. Keegan on the left has a radial deviation of his left wrist and JB on the right is closer to ulnar deviated. Dustin Johnson is ulnar deviated the most. Relatively less pros radial deviate but it can happen. 

Screen Shot 2016-05-03 at 9.36.11 AM.png

When discussing the wrist we should use biometrical terms like radial/ulnar deviation rather than bent/flat. 

How about the supination/pronation in the wrist as well as the palmar flexion and dorsar flexion?

Should everything ideally be neutral?

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

24 minutes ago, Lihu said:

How about the supination/pronation in the wrist as well as the palmar flexion and dorsar flexion?

Yes, also a component. 

25 minutes ago, Lihu said:

Should everything ideally be neutral?

I guess, but it is not a commonality. For example there is no key dedicated to your wrist condition. 

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think what these science nerds are trying to say is what your wrist does at the top of the backswing is a helluva lot less important than what it does at impact.    If whatever you're doing at the top helps you get a flat left wrist at impact, it's all good.  I believe the original name for Key #3, inline impact was "flat left wrist" or something like that. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


As far as movements around the wrist are concerned, we know there are a couple of those:

1. Before starting back swing, there is waggle which I think involve the wrist movement;

2. Apply cocking to the wrist;

3. At the top of back swing, apply even more bend which is the topic of this post.

I saw many world- leading Pro golfers including men and women who even do not maintain flat level at the top of back swing, yet generate great power.

So, if the goal is to maintain the square club face through out the swing (I really like this post because author zimmerbz is really sending the right message), then I would say that we need to minimize the movement/turning of wrist (if possible, no movement at all around the wrist), yet carry enough power right before the impact.   I am not support 1 above and support only just a little to 2 and 3 above.  I think we can form the handle (at the addressing right before the back swing) with relatively firm wrist and maintain the square face throughout the swing (a.k.a. swing journey from addressing to backswing to the top to downswing to impact with right swing path and finally to the Finish like SoaringEagle).  

Thanks.

Thanks for sharing Golf tips!
danielS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


On 5/3/2016 at 0:41 PM, mchepp said:

Positions at the top of the swing can vary greatly. I don't think you will find much commonalities at the top of the swing. There could "recommendations" but no hard a set position. Keegan on the left has a radial deviation of his left wrist and JB on the right is closer to ulnar deviated. Dustin Johnson is ulnar deviated the most. Relatively less pros radial deviate but it can happen. 

Screen Shot 2016-05-03 at 9.36.11 AM.png

When discussing the wrist we should use biometrical terms like radial/ulnar deviation rather than bent/flat. 

That would be fine if we were all biometricians.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

But isn't the goal to deliver the club head square at impact with your weight transferring forward, and hitting the ball to target? Does it really matter how much the wrist is bent if you get there?

Fred%20Couples_zps3lny8enf.jpg

Julia

:callaway:  :cobra:    :seemore:  :bushnell:  :clicgear:  :adidas:  :footjoy:

Spoiler

Driver: Callaway Big Bertha w/ Fubuki Z50 R 44.5"
FW: Cobra BiO CELL 14.5 degree; 
Hybrids: Cobra BiO CELL 22.5 degree Project X R-flex
Irons: Cobra BiO CELL 5 - GW Project X R-Flex
Wedges: Cobra BiO CELL SW, Fly-Z LW, 64* Callaway PM Grind.
Putter: 48" Odyssey Dart

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2908 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • @boogielicious and I are definitely in for the Stay & Play and will need the extra night's stay on Friday. I don't know what the plans are for our group on Friday but even if we don't make it for dinner with the rest of the Friday arrivals, I'll be more than happy to meet up somewhere for a beer or something.
    • Taking your dispersion and distance in consideration I analyzed the 4 posible ways to play the hole, or at least the ones that were listed here. I took the brown grass on the left as fescue were you need to punch out sideways to the fairway and rigth of the car path to be fescue too.  Driver "going for the green"  You have to aim more rigth, to the bunker in order to center your shotzone in between the fescue.  Wood of 240 over the bunkers I already like this one more for you. More room to land between the fescue. Balls in the fescue 11% down from 30% with driver. Improve of score from 4.55 to 4.40. 4 iron 210 yards besides the bunkers.    Also a wide area and your shot zone is better than previous ones. This makes almost the fescue dissapear. You really need to hit a bad one (sometimes shit happens). Because of that and only having 120 yards in this is the best choice so far. Down to 4.32 from 4.40. Finally the 6 Iron 180 yards to avoid all trouble.    Wide area an narrow dispersion for almost been in the fairway all the time. Similar than the previous one but 25 yards farther for the hole to avoid been in the bunkers. Average remains the same, 4.33 to 4.32.  Conclusion is easy. Either your 4iron or 6 iron of the tee are equaly good for you. Glad that you made par!
    • Wish I could have spent 5 minutes in the middle of the morning round to hit some balls at the range. Just did much more of right side through with keeping the shoulders feeling level (not dipping), and I was flushing them. Lol. Maybe too much focus on hands stuff while playing.
    • Last year I made an excel that can easily measure with my own SG data the average score for each club of the tee. Even the difference in score if you aim more left or right with the same club. I like it because it can be tweaked to account for different kind of rough, trees, hazards, greens etc.     As an example, On Par 5's that you have fescue on both sides were you can count them as a water hazard (penalty or punch out sideways), unless 3 wood or hybrid lands in a wider area between the fescue you should always hit driver. With a shorter club you are going to hit a couple less balls in the fescue than driver but you are not going to offset the fact that 100% of the shots are going to be played 30 or more yards longer. Here is a 560 par 5. Driver distance 280 yards total, 3 wood 250, hybrid 220. Distance between fescue is 30 yards (pretty tight). Dispersion for Driver is 62 yards. 56 for 3 wood and 49 for hybrid. Aiming of course at the middle of the fairway (20 yards wide) with driver you are going to hit 34% of balls on the fescue (17% left/17% right). 48% to the fairway and the rest to the rough.  The average score is going to be around 5.14. Looking at the result with 3 wood and hybrid you are going to hit less balls in the fescue but because of having longer 2nd shots you are going to score slightly worst. 5.17 and 5.25 respectively.    Things changes when the fescue is taller and you are probably going to loose the ball so changing the penalty of hitting there playing a 3 wood or hybrid gives a better score in the hole.  Off course 30 yards between penalty hazards is way to small. You normally have 60 or more, in that cases the score is going to be more close to 5 and been the Driver the weapon of choice.  The point is to see that no matter how tight the hole is, depending on the hole sometimes Driver is the play and sometimes 6 irons is the play. Is easy to see that on easy holes, but holes like this:  you need to crunch the numbers to find the best strategy.     
    • Very much so. I think the intimidation factor that a lot of people feel playing against someone who's actually very good is significant. I know that Winged Foot pride themselves on the strength of the club. I think they have something like 40-50 players who are plus something. Club championships there are pretty competitive. Can't imagine Oakmont isn't similar. The more I think about this, the more likely it seems that this club is legit. Winning also breeds confidence and I'm sure the other clubs when they play this one are expecting to lose - that can easily become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...