Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1740 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Dear friends:

I have been searching for new ways and approaches to golf which will make golf game swing easier and consistent and forgiving.  Here goes #1.

- use two fingers and let the left hand more leading, and make a handle to be More of ONE unit. 

This new idea will make you think more and deeper.  Please let me know what you think. 

Thanks!

Thanks for sharing Golf tips!
danielS.


Posted
28 minutes ago, danielS said:

Dear friends:

I have been searching for new ways and approaches to golf which will make golf game swing easier and consistent and forgiving.  Here goes #1.

- use two fingers and let the left hand more leading, and make a handle to be More of ONE unit. 

This new idea will make you think more and deeper.  Please let me know what you think. 

Thanks!

I'm guessing English isn't your first language? That sentence doesn't really make any sense.

:callaway: Big Bertha Alpha 815 DBD  :bridgestone: TD-03 Putter   
:tmade: 300 Tour 3W                 :true_linkswear: Motion Shoes
:titleist: 585H Hybrid                       
:tmade: TP MC irons                 
:ping: Glide 54             
:ping: Glide 58
:cleveland: 588 RTX 62

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Hello, 

Thanks for comment. I must have created some confusion here.  I can clarify what I was going to say.  Two fingers mean index and middle finger of right hand, not including the ring finger of right hand assuming the golfer is right-handed. 

We know most golfers use three fingers of right hand.   My key point is that the handle (left hand and right together)  becomes more of ONE unit by using only two fingers of right hand.  I hope this makes clearer to you.  

Thanks. 

Thanks for sharing Golf tips!
danielS.


  • Moderator
Posted
9 hours ago, danielS said:

Hello, 

Thanks for comment. I must have created some confusion here.  I can clarify what I was going to say.  Two fingers mean index and middle finger of right hand, not including the ring finger of right hand assuming the golfer is right-handed. 

We know most golfers use three fingers of right hand.   My key point is that the handle (left hand and right together)  becomes more of ONE unit by using only two fingers of right hand.  I hope this makes clearer to you.  

Thanks. 

Is the grip below what you are describing? It is called a double overlap grip.

furyk.jpg

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Wow, 

This is great!  Jim Furyk does use this grip, double overlap grip.  Thanks for the right terminology.  I wonder how you found this picture, but I really appreciate it.

I mentioned one benefit earlier from my own perspective.  Can you share any other benefits or justifications you can think of? 

Regardless, I will continue to use this grip, and it really works well for me.

Thanks, boogielicious.

 

Thanks for sharing Golf tips!
danielS.


Posted

Hey daniel, whatever works for you, use it! Some folks use the ten finger grip, other the overlap, or the interlock, or the whatever. If it works, it works! Never mind what anyone else says!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
7 hours ago, danielS said:

Wow, 

This is great!  Jim Furyk does use this grip, double overlap grip.  Thanks for the right terminology.  I wonder how you found this picture, but I really appreciate it.

I mentioned one benefit earlier from my own perspective.  Can you share any other benefits or justifications you can think of? 

Regardless, I will continue to use this grip, and it really works well for me.

Thanks, boogielicious.

 

I just googled "Jim Furyk double overlap grip". I knew he used one from a previous discussion on different grips.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

While using the index and middle finger of the right hand might work for Jim Furyk I wouldn't recommend it.   When you swing properly, building swing speed using the kinematic sequence, it's much easier to be hold the club primarily with your middle and ring finger of your right hand.  Why - when you post up on your left and release your lag the club head 'snaps' forward through the ball.  Holding the club with the middle & ring allows your right hand to 'rotate' with the swing movement.  If you're holding on with your right index finger it's hard to keep the right arm tendons relaxed and out of the 'snap'.  This of course assumes your using good technique and using your body to drive relaxed arms to build tremendous club head speed.


Posted

Thanks, and the comment is quite thorough and analytic, and I will have to consider.  

My main point was that the handle (two hands together) will become more One unit by using double overlap grip, and it will let left the left hand be in more leading role and be a major source of power.  

Thanks for sharing Golf tips!
danielS.


  • 4 years later...
Posted
On 5/5/2016 at 10:49 PM, danielS said:

Wow, 

This is great!  Jim Furyk does use this grip, double overlap grip.  Thanks for the right terminology.  I wonder how you found this picture, but I really appreciate it.

I mentioned one benefit earlier from my own perspective.  Can you share any other benefits or justifications you can think of? 

Regardless, I will continue to use this grip, and it really works well for me.

Thanks, boogielicious.

 

I just went to this grip for my woods and went back to the standard interlock for my irons.  Was having arthritic pain in my right hand (trailing) ring finger and was searching for a way to alleviate it.  It worked.  Also discovered many benefits by making the hands more as one.  Also read it can help with chipping.  Will be trying that next.


Note: This thread is 1740 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.